Slashdot Mirror


Comprehensive Win2k/Linux Comparison

paxdiablo writes "Nice to see journalistic integrity in the never-ending Windows2000/Linux battle. Check out the article over at BBSpot for the final word." Heh - definitely one of the more amusing compare and contrasts. Mebbe Mindcraft should talk to them? *grin*

33 of 127 comments (clear)

  1. stupid bbspot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2
    Their articles are juvenile and brief. Not that length makes a good article, but most of the stories are self-evident and basic. Here's one formula:

    "Write the opposite of what people expect and present it as fact!" Ha ha! That's always funny! How about "Linux Developer Gets Laid"? Genious!

    Christ. I really worry about you Slashdot editors when you present this stuff as funny. It's not. BBSpot isn't as bad as www.themushroom.com, but they're close. One's about slashdot stuff, the other's about games. Both have stupid articles.

    So, to summarize: NOT FUNNY.

  2. Isn't it ironic? by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 2

    I find it both ironic and amusing that Slashdot has never posted a link to a BBSpot story before... but now, the day after a story entitled World's best tech humour site - and it still can't get on Slashdot appears in the news, Slashdot just happens to feature a BBSpot story.

    Journalistic irony? You decide.
    --

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  3. Re:Funny = good? by garcia · · Score: 2

    top reasons to get submitted:

    1. you have repeated an already posted post.
    2. you have posted something completely worthless
    3. you have posted something that is completely Anti-MS (yes, I am Anti-MS, but this article was ridiculous).

    honestly this post was not newsworthy.. I read this page to get directed to stories that I should be interested in. Reading about someone typing in "Linux sucks" and "Windows2000 sucks" into google.com and seeing which returns more for a comparison is just stupid. I won't even go into what I think of the Magic Eightball bit.

  4. Re:Just one day. I knew it. by Kyobu · · Score: 2

    But...but...BBSpot isn't funny! I mean, I guess it's mildly amusing, but it's shoddily-produced and sophomoric, whereas The Onion is sophisticatedly-produced and sophomoric. But the reason The Onion is great is that at the same time it is immature, it is also intelligent. And its writers have a fine ability to imitate the style of a newspaper article, and they know about current and past events. BBSpot, on the other hand, suffers from poor editing and uninspired humor.

    --
    Switch the . and the @ to email me.
  5. Re:Mascots by Lumpish+Scholar · · Score: 2

    ... why doesn't MS do mascots?

    All the good insects were already spoken for.

    --
    Stupid job ads, weird spam, occasional insight at
  6. At last! by lisle · · Score: 2

    BBspot makes it onto /. Now the guys @
    theregister will have to find another
    site to complain about...

  7. Re:That is so biased! by Xenex · · Score: 2

    But isn't Billy G's full name 'William Henry Gates the Third' (or something like that). It says so in Encarta, so it must be true.... ;)

  8. Lousy research by SClitheroe · · Score: 2

    Wow, what a realistic and impartial test of Windows 2000...Compiling your benchmark software with the Cygwin libraries adds an additional layer of overhead to the Windows 2000 benchmarks. Next time, why don't you run a Windows based benchmark program under WINE, and see how Linux fares...

    That's good, unbiased, and well planned research all right..sheesh!

  9. Re:Slashdot by wholesomegrits · · Score: 2

    I'll post logged in here, but it probably doesn't count cuz my UID shows I'm so green...we'd better get a ruling from User 1606 or whatever.

    Anyway, you make a few damn good points.

    --
    No sig is worth reading.
  10. hmmmmm.... by kill.process · · Score: 2

    did anyone notice the amazing coincidence,
    between this story, and the story posted
    on the Register.co.uk earlier?
    they said it was the funniest site
    that STILL can't get on slashdot.
    man, /. covered their asses
    QUICK!

    --
    }:kill.process:{
  11. windows2000sucks.com troubleshooter by Undocumented · · Score: 2
    From the my Windows 3.1 app won't run under win2k tree:

    Microsoft Windows 2000: Windows 3.x Programs Troubleshooter

    Does your program run under Windows 3.0 or 3.1? If your program doesn't run under Windows 3.0 or 3.1, it probably won't run under Windows 2000.

    Hmmm.... Office 2000 and Visio just WILL NOT run under Windows 3.0 or 3.1, guess that means thay won't run under Windows 2000 either...

    How ludicrous!

  12. Re:Mascots by Cap'n+enigma · · Score: 2

    Microsoft's mascots are its users. They make such loyal little pets.

  13. Re:Just one day. I knew it. by Throw+Away+Account · · Score: 2

    Damn straight! While the comparison was mildly funny, the fact that /. linked to it only hours after the Register's article was hilarious...

    --
    There's no "we" in team, only "me"
  14. Re:Each OS has ups and downs by hammock · · Score: 2

    In case you didn't notice, Partition Magic, under win9x, reboots to a DOS environment, then repartitions. The idea of partitioning inside Windows and not having to reboot is bizarre. pqmagic.exe and its required files fit nicely on a single 1.44mb floppy. The CD that you may choose to buy even includes a tool that makes the floppy's for you, as this is how you repartition when you use Windows 2000.

    I bought Partition Magic 5 right before version 6 came out, but it cost me $0 after mail in rebates.

  15. it is own domain name? by dswensen · · Score: 2

    "I'm not sure I'd trust my mission critical apps to a company that can't even afford to give it's flagship OS its own domain name." And I'm not sure I'd trust my mission critical apps to someone who doesn't know the difference between "its" and "it's". Second grade grammar. Master it. Then let's talk about who's stupid and who isn't.

    1. Re:it is own domain name? by dswensen · · Score: 2
      Imagine you have a mathematician. Let's say he's got an IQ of 250 and demonstrates unbelievable genius in mathematics, except that he keeps calculating the sum of 2 and 2 as 5. Then, when people call him on this, he shrugs it off as "not a big deal" and refuses to have someone edit or correct this error, because anyone who notices it is just being "anal".

      If you're a writer, language is the medium in which you work, and you should have a basic grasp of it. The difference between "its" and "it's" is hardly rocket science, and no, I don't think it's too much to ask that a semi-professional writer know the difference.

  16. No OS is better ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

    Here we go again.

    No OS is better than another, it depends totally on what you use it for, and personal preference of course. I think Linux is a fine OS, but the advantages that it does have over Win2k are irrelevant to me. 80% of the software I use do NOT exist under Linux, and the alternatives are, in my opinion, inferior. Thus Win2k is the superior OS for the stuff I use my computer for. I will not go into detail, as any Win2k promotion in this forum is likely to mark me "-1, troll" or something similar.

    Suffice to say, in my opinon no OS can be generally considered to be better than another, it's ALWAYS different from person to person. Your taste in OSes, your occupation, your hobbies, your cashflow, all determine what OS you use.

    Take for example gamers. How many gamers use Linux? Not many. Look at the hardware enthusiasts .. 3dmark2000 on Linux? Don't get me started.

    Then the webmasters. How many webmasters run Apache on Windows 2000? Alright, so there might be a couple, but it is a commonly known fact I believe that Linux is a better OS for webservers than Windows.

    I could go on comparing the strengths of each OS, but it's pretty clear to me that different OSes will always have different strengths and this renders any debate about which OS is "better" useless.

    Just my two cents. Oh and don't come dragging with arguments like "Linux is more stable" because if you can't get Windows 2000 running without crashes, it's really your skills that are lacking. Nothing personal, anyone who knows Win2k will tell you the same - it's a great OS, but like Linux, it's not really suited for those who don't know how clear a few obstacles on their way to a perfect system.

    /w

  17. Real search engine test by slickwillie · · Score: 3

    Remember when a search for "more evil than satan" gave several hits for Bill Gates and M$FT in the top 10 (and even one for Disney)?

  18. dont worry... by gimpboy · · Score: 3

    its defined on everything2, so it must exsist.
    hey rob. you could probably include a spell checker in slashcode...

    use LaTeX? want an online reference manager that

    --
    -- john
  19. Domain names by innit · · Score: 3

    Domain Names - Windows2000.com redirects you to a Windows 2000 product page on the Microsoft site. I'm not sure I'd trust my mission critical apps to a company that can't even afford to give it's flagship OS its own domain name

    That really bloody annoys me that does. The author of this article clearly has no idea how domain names should be used by companies. Microsoft are actually doing this right.

    It should be http://www.company.com/products/product1/ and not http://www.companyproduct1.com/ that companies like HP often use. It's a stupid waste of domain names, admittedly domain names that the companies would claim they have a right to anyway, but even so.

    When will clueless journalists stop trying to make the Internet into something that they want it to be, and not accept it for what it is and has been for a long time.

    Stuii!

  20. Mascots by MicroBerto · · Score: 3

    Funny article! The idea of mascots arose a great question though -- why doesn't MS do mascots?

    Mike Roberto
    - GAIM: MicroBerto

    --
    Berto
    1. Re:Mascots by drinkypoo · · Score: 3
      Funny article! The idea of mascots arose a great question though -- why doesn't MS do mascots?

      Are you kidding? Bob was a great mascot! And that paper clip... Hmm. Maybe that's why M$ doesn't do mascots.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  21. Re:That is so biased! by Richy_T · · Score: 3
    But isn't Billy G's full name 'William Henry Gates the Third'

    No, that was last year under the old version numbering system. Now it's "William Henry Gates 1955"

    Rich

  22. Re:No offence... by cfreeze · · Score: 3

    I actually did my master's research on a comparison of multi-user operating systems. http://www.cs.clemson.edu/~cfreeze/research.html . I had fun doing it, and was suprised.

  23. Funny = good? by Fervent · · Score: 3

    So if I write a funny comparison that says Windows is better, it will make it's way to Slashdot?

    --

    - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

  24. Re:We can LEARN from this!! by ckedge · · Score: 3

    You're methodology is all wrong and quite inapropriate.

    A search for Hate Linux reveals 174,000 hits, while a search for Hate Windows reveals around a half million hits. Hate Microsoft gets a third of a million. Hate Sun Microsystems gets 10,000, while Hate AOL gets a half million. Hate Canada and Hate USE also get around a half million each. Hate France gets 350,000.

    Of course my initial methodology is poor too. I should only be counting those that are highly correlated, for example using only complete quote delimited phrases:

    Hate Microsoft.....7,775
    Hate AOL...........3,290
    Hate Unix............347
    Hate Linux...........393
    Hate Sun Microsystems..5
    Hate America.......2,090
    Hate Canada..........260
    Hate USA.............213
    Hate France..........185
    Hate Quebec...........42
    Hate Saskatchewan......1
    Hate You.........121,000
    Hate Me...........95,200
    Hate God...........5,510
    Hate Satan...........236
    Love Satan.........1,760
    Hate Nobody..........323
    Hate No One..........758
    Hate Everybody.....2,930
    Hate Everyone......6,910
    Hate Everything....8,690
    Love Her.........283,000
    Love Him.........335,000
    Love Me..........471,000
    Love You.......1,060,000

    Feel better now?

  25. Repeat of a comment by comcn · · Score: 3

    OK, so did anyone realise that this was actually submitted as a comment the other day?

  26. Re:Each OS has ups and downs by dietcrack · · Score: 3

    Holy shit, did *any* of you read the article?

    It's a comparison of the OSes on the basis of name, mascot, and the opinion of a Magic 8-Ball.

    Sometimes I think some Slashdotters value a low comment number over comment coherency/relevance.

  27. TRSDOS by Anomie-ous+Cow-ard · · Score: 4
    Although i always ended up using NEWDOS, since i only had one floppy with TRSDOS while i had about 10 with NEWDOS (all 11 of which had random bit rot, hence "use this one to boot, then switch to this when it complains about errors, then this to..."). One copy of MSDOS 3.0, which wouldn't boot at all.

    www.trsdos.com is a pretty crappy site, all it says is "get internet explorer 5.5". No possibility to try the site with any other browser. Configuring junkbuster to return an IE user agent gives a page about some class completely unrelated to TRSDOS. However, i award negative points to Microsoft products because the site was created by and is served off of those products. Also, negative points to the Harvard Extension school for whoever there created the page. There is no www.trsdossucks.com.

    No mascot that i can recall... maybe some BUAF spelling "TRSDOS"?

    The search engine test returns 0 results for both phrases. Does that beat 66,700 for W2K?

    The Magic 8-Ball test was inconclusive... it answered "Yes" no matter how i phrased it (although it did have some trouble deciding, it told me to try again 5 times in a row)

    "Fuck TRSDOS"... ummm, yeah. Takes too long to say.

    There we have it! A post about an ancient OS that few know anything about. Now excuse me as i go peruse my crate of TRS-80 related magazines for cool BASIC programs. Old-style BASIC, with required line numbers and all that goodness, not this new "Visual Basic" Microsoft pushes. And no fancy GUI, not even lower-case letters on my old Model I without that special chip someone hacked in!

    -----

    --

    --
    perl -e'$_=shift;die eval' '"$^X $0\047\$_=shift;die eval\047 \047$_\047"' at -e line 1.

  28. BBspot by update() · · Score: 4

    I like BBspot, but this isn't one of their better efforts. (A nice bit of Slashdot-link-whoring, though.) My picks are Hour Lost Explaining Computer Terms To Mom and Linux Developer Gets Laid.

  29. Comprehensive Slashdot/ZDNet Comparison by BRock97 · · Score: 5

    Well, since these sorts of comparisons seem to be in, lets take it to the news media:

    Comparison of ZDNet and Slashdot

    Names:

    Well, this one is a no brainer. With a name like Slashdot, it has to be good. Besides sounding like something you would hear in a 1st grade class ("Now to finish the letter, just slashdot."), it also make a cool sword sound effect. Just saying ZDNet out loud, one must cringe. It sounds like something that should be served in a Italian restaurant. "Come to the Olive Garden to sample our new ZDNet." See?

    Advantage: Slashdot

    Content:

    Hmmm, this one is a tough one. On the one side, you have Slashdot, where you can't go twenty four hours without hearing either a Linux story, anti-Windows story, a technology story that will not be affordable by mere mortals for another ten years, or some lame attempt to be funny article like my post wants to be. Then, you have ZDNet. Just have one word, Berst. Need I say more? Okay, how about Dvorak? Oh yeah, that's the sugar.

    Advantage: ZDNet

    Mascot:

    This one is tough, but we will try and break it down. To start off Slashdot, you have one of the founder's name CmdrTaco. You think taco, you think south of the border. You think south of the border, you think Taco Bell. You think Taco Bell, you think little chuaua. That's right, the once fired Taco Bell mascot. How can you go wrong? "Yo geuro Slashdot." Sorry to butch that word, but the exact spelling escapes me. ZDNet, you think C|Net, you think big red sign with the C|Net logo, which makes you think stop, don't cross, or any other liberty robbing rule. Sorry, that makes me cry just thinking about it.

    Advantage: Slashdot

    There you have it. An indepth look at these two media power houses. To save you the money, definately check out Slashdot, where in our scientific research one 2 to 1!

    Bryan R.

    --

    Bryan R.
    The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, or $12.50 as seen on eBay.....
  30. We can LEARN from this!! by Chester+K · · Score: 5

    A search for "Linux Sucks" yields 114,000 results, and a search for "Windows 2000 Sucks" gets 66,700.

    And thanks to the power of Open Source propaganda, where you can rely on everyone to be an advocate, as opposed to the old style Closed Source propaganda, where the majority of suckage has to come from the vendor, this problem will be fixed by Linux 2.4!

    --

    NO CARRIER
  31. Just one day. I knew it. by kinnunen · · Score: 5