Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Pronouns, Acronyms, Abbreviations

Slashback tonight brings you updates on: that silly plastic barcode scanner by that company, what's-it-called ... oh yeah, "Digital Convergence;" how to spread your genetic code the polite way; and why you won't be voting on an MS-Dell-Unisys machine unless things change from vapor to reality, soon.

Aren't you ever gonna get that thing declawed? AnonymousCowhand pointed to this NYTimes story on the CueCat. The article is a nice overview of the way the little-bar-code-reader-that-could (that could track users by serial number, that is) came to be mailed out to hundreds of thousands of people, and how successful it's been. A hint: " After partners like Forbes, Wired and other publishers distributed the CueCat device to several million subscribers, the technology was criticized by reviewers and consumers for being impractical and of limited benefit."

I'd be nearly as willing to vote with a fake machine ... Anonymous Coward writes "Forbes reports that the Microsoft, Unisys, & Dell plan to build a new voting solution is 'phony'. A Microsoft spokesman denies that the company is part of such a partnership."

My favorite line in a long time is this one: "When Unisys says it's "offering a fully integrated approach to election management," it does not mean it has something specific to offer." Well, then, just so that's clear.

Like, OMG! Chuck Borromeo wrote in response to the story that hemos posted the other day about XML, bioinformatics, and markup languages for genetic information.

He says: "I noticed your posting on Slashdot. You're right, XML will be very helpful in the Bioinformatics field. However, there is another gene expression XML DTD in the works. It's being proposed by an OMG group called MGED (www.mged.org). GEML is proprietary and is being supported by its creator Rosetta Pharmaceuticals. MGED is going to become an OMG standard and already enjoys support and contributions from a wide variety of academic and industrial leaders."

Another installment in the reprint of Jon Katz' series of columns, emails and comments is online for your perusal.

11 of 132 comments (clear)

  1. ::c:u:e:c:a:t:: voting by micahjd · · Score: 4
    We could make everybody happy and just use cuecats for electronic voting!

    --
    -- 2 + 2 = 5, for very large values of 2
  2. Wired has stop using CueCat by Fervent · · Score: 3
    If anyone read Wired's last Rants and Raves (letter) section, they have stopped using CueCat and will no longer publish barcodes next to any advertiser's print. Apparently the sheer volume of subscribers mail (some of which was published in the magazine -- nice job guys), got the CueCat axed.

    First time in a long time: Capitalism wins.

    -
    -Be a man. Insult me without using an AC.

    --

    - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

  3. Re:Pencil and paper by AndrewD · · Score: 3

    That's not really so big an issue. In the UK we manage hand-counts of 20-30 million votes at general elections, and the first results are in in two hours after the polls close (usually Chris Mullen's constituency, up Geordie way, who make it a point of pride to be fast, and since Mullen's had a majority to die for for twenty years, inaccuracies don't matter much).

    Vote-counters aren't hired at a salary anyway: elections are too infrequent an event for anyone to make a living at it. Usually it's local government civil servants getting a spot of overtime payment here in the UK, and a dozen or so vote-counters can easily handle the votes of a constituency in which 30-40,000 votes are cast.

    Election fraud is actually less of an issue with human counting: you've got to bribe or threaten every single counter in a voting district to make a difference, whereas with a machine count you only have to nobble the guy who oerhauls the machine on the night.

    Single points of failure are a Bad Thing.

    --

    -- AndrewD

    A Maze of Twisty Little Laws, All Different.

  4. Voting solution. by Lover's+Arrival,+The · · Score: 5
    The problem with the voting system at the last election was that it was too technical already. Why does America have a penchant for complicating the simple? All that is needed is a simple pencil, piece of paper and a bunch of people to count the votes.

    I am so glad the the rumours of Microsoft and Dell developing a new voting machine are false. It would doubtless have been even more of a disaster than the present one.

    Voting procedures should be as simple as possible, like the UKian model, in order to make it as resistant to fraud as possible.

    Complexity breeds error and fraud. Technical types tend to forget that.

    --

    --Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The

  5. :Cuecat just hasn't found its market yet by Chuck+Flynn · · Score: 5

    Just give them some time. They spent two years researching and designing one of the more innovative products out there, and so they've run into a few snags. Nothing big, really. They'll bounce back, sooner than you can say ":Cuecat". Why have they failed so far? Not enough punctuation.

    My advice to :cue:cat is to increase the number of colons (":"). One thing you learn in business school is that when you're going for an angle with a marketing campaign, you can't hammer home your main point enough. You have to try harder. Most people don't even notice the colons when they first look at ":CueCat", and far fewer remember to include them when discussing the product among friends. It's a losing proposition, I'm afraid.

    That's why they need to have more colons. They shouldn't stop until their name at least looks like ":::c:u:e:c:a:t::". They should also get a trademark on "cuecat" without the colons and start harassing people who misuse it instead of ":CueCat". They also have to dump cuecat.com as their homepage, because it unfortunately reinforces the "no colon" mistake. Problems like these aren't often solved so easily. :CRQ should consider themselves lucky.

  6. Cuerat by Nidhogg · · Score: 3
    During the height of the whole DC/:Cue:cat controversy I explained it and discussed it with our company president. Who, admittedly, is not a bad businessman IMHO.

    He said afterwards and I quote: "That has got to be the most DUMBASS idea I've ever heard." He went and searched all his business journals, found all the related articles and gave them six months before they folded.

    They've got 2 months left. :)

  7. Pencil and paper by perdida · · Score: 3


    The problem with the pencil and paper is that it is expensive. You can only hire so many people to count, and if you hire them at too low of a salary they could conceivably be susceptible to election fraud.

    Furthermore, a simple vote procedure should be backed up by a strong computerized system, in order to ensure the rapid tabulation of results. Or would you have us go back to the time when it took weeks to figure out the election, every election?

    Furthermore, electronic voting, if it can be perfected, is a good way to extend the direct initiative and referendum on more issues to citizens. Technologies like the internet enable us to expand the realm of direct democracy and shrink the role of government.

    1. Re:Pencil and paper by furiousgeorge · · Score: 3

      >Or would you have us go back to the time when
      >it took weeks to figure out the election, every
      >election?

      BAH! That shows how screwed up the US system is. How long did it take them do to a recount in florida for 2-3million ballots? The canadians count ALL their ballots BY HAND within about 4 hours of the polls closing (if memory servers it was 13+ million votes cast).

      >Furthermore, electronic voting, if it can be
      >perfected, is a good way to extend the direct
      >initiative and referendum on more issues to
      >citizens.

      Bollocks. If something is contested, what do you do? You can't do anything but have a total revote. If you have all those pieces of paper in a box u just count them again.

      >and referendum on more issues to
      >citizens.

      ugh. That is the LAST thing that we need. We need politicians with backbones that can actually do the right thing, even if it is unpopular. Instead of the current bunch that are swayed by the whim of polls. Just having a referendum on every damn issue makes it worse - nobody thinks of the BIG picture, every little minutia is debated on it's own merits ONLY. Issues don't exist in vacuums.

  8. Re:If it were the "old" Wired... by rw2 · · Score: 3
    I would be holding my breath for an article on how to hack the CueCat scanner and make it more useful.

    Sure, but you wouldn't be able to read it because they would have used lime green ink on a yellow background to show how 1337 they are!

    --

  9. XML is not an acronym. by jelwell · · Score: 5

    XML is an initialism.

    An acronym is a word formed from the initial letter or letters of each of the successive parts or major parts of a compound term.

    An initialism is not a word at all, but the intial letter or letters of a compound term.

    The easiest way to remember this is:
    radar is an acronym, you say "ray-dar" you don't prounounce out the letters "r-ay-dee-ay-r".

    If you pronounce out all the letters, it's an initialism, not a acronym. like IBM is an initialism - although I don't think IBM stands for International Business Machine anymore...

    OK - is both!! Check your OED. :)
    Joseph Elwell.

  10. XML - Slashdot.xml, that is :( by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 3
    Funny how you should mention XML, Timothy. Alright, anyone with IE5, just try to open slashdot.xml. Notice the error? Its on this very story.

    Now Timothy, I know you are fond of using(apparently Linux/Unix only) umlauts, but this is at least the 2nd time a story of yours has make the slashdot.xml page not work with an industry-standard XML parser.

    What's the deal here? Anyone? Are you doing this on purpose to fuck with people using MS software?

    --

    No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?