Windows 2000 Source Code Gets (A Few) More Eyes
hansley writes: "Microsoft has extended its source code licensing program. Is it for distributed debugging purposes ? hmm ..." As the article points out, this limited and NDA-ridden disclosure is an expansion, rather than a wholly new idea. And remember, it has "nothing to do" with Linux or other Open Source software.
"We estimate this to be about 1,000 firms in the U.S., and not all of them will want the code," ...In fact some people would prefer it was just incinerated.
While the number of developers lost to both comercial and free/open operating systems should be low, we might never know the real loss.
If the NDA covers a whole company -- as the last one I had with MS for Win95 did ^ -- simply being an employee might stifle ... well ... inovation.
If so, this is a real 'win-win' for Microsoft in the long run.
How often do we discuss employment contracts and non-competes? The lack of talk on this issue here seems to show that NDAs aren't taken very seriously.
^. Not source.
A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
This will be a great opportunity for someone to examine their code looking for GPL'ed code.
Wouldn't it be great to find some GPL'ed code in there.... What a can of worms that would be for MS.
Linux - Because Mommy taught me to Share.
Would that be the source of all evil then?
I'm just full of questions. Anyone care to try and answer?
The most important question (IMHO) is:
Support a few technologists in Washington.