Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Veteran On the Record and Off the Leash

krow writes: "Mike Daisey, an X Amazon employees has put up some really humorous stuff about the company on his website. A trailer to a film, information about a play that is being done in Seattle and more is there. This is pretty funny to anyone who has worked in the web industry for the last few years. Serves them right, hiring all of those college grads, and then laying them off."

43 of 82 comments (clear)

  1. Amazon $9.99 glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

    Speaking of Amazon...

    two nights ago I saw Amazon selling 256 MB of PC133 Viking RAM at $9.99. Obviously this was a glitch, so I wasted no time and took advantage of it. I was ecstatic, but I didn't want to be too greedy -- so I only ordered two sticks (a friend bought three, another friend ordered two plus two 1GB modules (which, incidentally, were also selling for $9.99)). Placed the order. Got the confirmatory email. For kicks, I checked the web page again -- the price of the 256 MB modules had mysteriously risen to $329.99. Waited two days. Tonight I received an email from Amazon telling me that my order had been cancelled and that Amazon had not charged my credit card. But I would be getting a $15 gift certificate, good towards any purchase on Amazon (hurry, this incredible offer expires soon!) I understand that a *lot* of people tried to place orders during the glitch's transiprance. Perhaps that spoiled the broth. Anyhow, it was fun while it lasted.

    Now maybe if e-business would check *before* sending out confirmatory emails...

    useless rebates.

    RKatz

    1. Re:Amazon $9.99 glitch by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      IANAL, but I've read that if the company sends out a confirmation, they are legally obliged to fulfil the order. Which makes sense.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    2. Re:Amazon $9.99 glitch by cymen · · Score: 2
      The interesting part of the email was that Viking was apologising for the pricing mistake, not Amazon.com. Reread it again and see how it is an e-mail from Amazon.com with a quoted e-mail from Viking in the lower half of the body.

      Apparently Amazon.com has a system that allows non-Amazon parties to update pricing.

    3. Re:Amazon $9.99 glitch by Dredd13 · · Score: 3

      The answer to that is to make a big stink about it. Claim you never got the "oops" letter and demand to know when they're going to ship the memory you paid for. When they refuse, order it at the current price, then dispute it with your credit card company.

      That's what happened with UAL a month or so ago, and most of the credit card companies told their customers "pay the higher rate if you must, but call us immediately after you get the flight completed, and we'll chargeback the difference". UAL finally realized they were screwed, and "decided to honor the sales they made"... amazon will have to do the same thing.

    4. Re:Amazon $9.99 glitch by Monte · · Score: 3

      I have since been compensated with an incredibly lame $15 gift certificate, which just about guarantees me buying something for more than $15 because, hey what can you get with $15?

      Here's a book for only $12.00, that should leave enough for shipping.

      I'm not looking for a free lunch,

      You sure fooled me.

      I just want Amazon and Viking to be held accountable and not sweep us under the gift certificate rug.

      You want them to be held accountable to the tune of what, a hundred bucks, because of a typo? Do you really think that's reasonable?

      You found a mistake, and they're giving free stuff for your trouble. I think you got a pretty good deal. Maybe not as good as you wanted, but still...

    5. Re:Amazon $9.99 glitch by Elbereth · · Score: 4

      You tried to cheat someone out of something, and they figured it out? And then had the gall to offer you a gift certificate to keep your business? The assholes! BOYCOTT TIME!

    6. Re:Amazon $9.99 glitch by radja · · Score: 3

      here in europe too, although there is a provision that if the advertised price is ridiculous
      (brandnew pentium 3, 1GHz, 256MB mem. for only $9.99) the company is not held by it. if it would be a normal, but very very very low price, they're fucked.

      //rdj

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    7. Re:Amazon $9.99 glitch by cperciva · · Score: 3

      Don't you guys ever read the fine print? Amazon has a clear policy which states that they are not responsible for errors in pricing.

      In addition, while courts have upheld statutes which state that you cannot knowingly advertise incorrect prices, they have also stated that an advertisement is a solicitment and not an offer.

      In other words, you might get something out of Amazon through media blackmail, but that's all it is -- they have no obligation to give you anything.

    8. Re:Amazon $9.99 glitch by clare-ents · · Score: 3

      "

      In addition, while courts have upheld statutes which state that you cannot knowingly advertise incorrect prices, they have also stated that an advertisement is a solicitment and not an offer.
      "

      But a confirmation seals the agreement.

      The confirmation email says

      Amazon.com agree to sell to you one memory stick for $9.99 + shipping. We have accepted the order and will be delivering as soon as possible.

      You can also go for misleading advertising - this is only likely to work if it is displayed as a special offer though - I once did this in a supermarket with beer - it had a misprinted special offer notice above it, £1.99 for 24 cans - not £11.99, and I quibbled at the till over the price. I think they would have chucked me out were it not for every other customer in the shop refusing to pay for anything until they honoured it [really].

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. (Einstein)
    9. Re:Amazon $9.99 glitch by RedWizzard · · Score: 2
      Here in australia theres a law that says if an item is incorrectly marked they must give you one of that item for free and the rest for the marked price. I think thats it anyway, maybe u just get the first one at the marked price and the rest at normal, either way it'd still be a bargain.
      That only applies to barcode scanner systems where the price the scanner produces doesn't match the price on the shelf. It doesn't apply to incorrect prices on the shelf.
  2. Ha ha, real funny guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

    No, this can't be true! Everyone knows that if you go to college, you graduate and then get a job automatically (well except those who go on for more school or are philosophy majors). Then you work at that company (while getting in Nerf fights every day, and causing mischief and mayhem between them) until another one sees what fine work you do, and hires you for more money with more stock options and perks (and better-looking co-workers). The cycle continues until you retire early at 40, then decide to invest your millions into "side projects" that you've been meaning to do all along. So a few startups later and the federal government is asking you for loans. You tell them you will loan them money if you can drive their top-secret 'mechs (because when I get that old, they better have mechs dammit!) and they say yes, so you invite a bunch of your old college buddies over (who are all rich like you except that guy in philosophy who still thinks computers are for geeks) and you compare the real thing to Mechwarrior 46, and then decide they need a little bit more work, but that the government is making good progress. So you loan them the money afterall and then pause to reflect on all the goodness you've done in your life.

    So what's this I hear about work sucking? I don't believe it. (And I've got another two months of covering my eyes and ears before I get bitchy, decide my employer sucks, and then wait until my NDA is up so that I can publicly trash my ex-employer in a desperate attempt at attention because I'm so distraught that everything didn't turn out like it was supposed to) I hope somebody will notice me and reach out to me, perhaps employ my sorry ass before I am forced to jump from the top of my two-story low-rent apartment complex in a weak attempt at suicide because I wasn't noticed by my bitching and moaning about the real world.

    Moderators, I leave it up to you.

    1. Re:Ha ha, real funny guys... by squidfood · · Score: 2

      I went to see the show with some Amazon friends (I'm not one). It was pretty funny, even some of the "higher up" Amazonians thought. But the guy himself? Well-remembered! "Yeah, he joined Customer Service when I did. Always hung around and never did anything. We were all being promoted beyond him when he left...never did a bit of work..." This opinion was shared by both his colleagues and his higher-ups.

  3. This guy is the one doing the play. by Tim · · Score: 4

    This has been in the Seattle Weekly a coupla times now. The website is for a play of the same name, which may or may not still be running in downtown Seattle. It was supposed to be a mediocre play, but a good commentary on dot-bomb life.

    --
    Let's try not to let fact interfere with our speculation here, OK?
  4. The agreement also says.... by TBone · · Score: 2

    That regarless of what confirmations we have, Amazon reserve the right to cancel the order at any time before charging your card. You aren't going to win this one...

    --

    This space for rent. Call 1-800-STEAK4U

  5. This guy is retarded by ig88 · · Score: 3

    This guy's "humor" is incredibly uninsightful and unfunny. His "wacky" views on the amazon and dot com culture may have been insightful FOUR YEARS AGO, but they're tired, stupid, and redundant now.

    And as if that wasn't enough, his pining over his lost love for Jeff Bezos is equally pitiful and speaks to his intelligence (or lack thereof).

    Basically, his whole shtick can be summed up as: "I joined what I thought was this wonderful cult called Amazon.com, but then it turned out to be not so great!"

    The one thing this guy is good at, is self-promotion. His site makes that abundantly clear.

  6. Re:Move on, nothing to see by The+Original+Bobski · · Score: 2

    rather funny Indeed! I laughed all the way through. Definitely deserved a posting to the front page.

    I didn't even bother to check out the videos on the site attached to this story because every page looked the same. I guess its the video thats supposed to be funny, the site is nothing but marketing hype.
    ---

    --
    satire, n: 1) witty language used to convey insults or scorn; 2) a form of humor lost on most slashdot moderators.
  7. Re:What to post. by Elbereth · · Score: 2

    We could always use them to power the computers in the beowulf cluster. Hey, it worked in The Matrix...

  8. Re:ok... by Elbereth · · Score: 3

    Nope, not really... just some stupid guy with a bone in his mouth talking about how he and some other people worked for 12 hours a day and thought they weren't being taken advantage of.

    Huh?

    I wish I could find people like that. I'd build up an army of them, then take over the world.

  9. Re:Look--it's the author. by mwalker · · Score: 2

    mike -
    just watched your whole webcast. i hate realplayer, but it was worth the effort to see your show.

    i know that horrible, sinking feeling that comes from being in the midst of a whole company that can't possibly be producing anything, doing nothing, pissing money, surrounded by that horrible duo:
    -impending doom
    -clueless people who don't know you're doomed

    your show is great. i think your talents are real, and they don't involve computers.

    best of luck to you. hope you beat #5 at rogue someday.

  10. MODERATORS, +2 - Possibly Insightful Hearsay. by smirkleton · · Score: 2

    This claim would be inadmissable in a court of law. - Thank goodness the court of public opinion has a lot lower standards.

    Moderate this one up someone! I'd do it myself but I squandered all my last points moderating Jon Katz down on his dribbling New Jerusalem Open Source heresy.

    Fight the power! Fight the powers that be!

  11. I had to read your reply 5 times to get it... by smirkleton · · Score: 2

    How sad is that?

    I'm assuming I'm not only illiterate dork here with a disdain for articles, right?

  12. Bezos Sumo Wrestle Challenge... by smirkleton · · Score: 4

    If Bezos steps up to the plate for a rassling match with you, Sumo-suited or no, tape it. I would pay money to see a Bezos bodyslam. (I don't have anything against the man personally, but it isn't every day you get a chance to see a billionaire get squashed by a disgruntled ex-employee of his own company.)

    On a side note:

    Depressing and unfortunate to see so many /. people making comments about weight/appearance. I guess that's the downside of /. having a readership that so closely resembles the denizens of the J. Crew Catalog.

    I'm assuming I'm not only supermodel here, right?

    1. Re:Bezos Sumo Wrestle Challenge... by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      I'm assuming I'm not only supermodel here, right?

      You can assuming you're not only English major, right, too?

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
  13. the dot-bomb culture by neowintermute · · Score: 4

    I can't imagine the size and power of all the web professionals who've been layed off in the last few months and now can't find a job.

    It'll be really interesing to see all the startups and ideas that bubble up from the froth in the next 6-12 months. I know I'm cooking up mine. Getting layed off was the best thing that's ever happened to me.

    http://www.hyperpoem.net

  14. The web site isn't the point by Argy · · Score: 3

    Some people have commented that the site is lame, just a couple pics and comments. I'd agree, it's nothing special, and I'm surprised at the Slashdot description of it. But the site is about a play, how to get to it, when it runs, viewer comments. The play it's referring to is well done. Maybe not earth-shattering, but it's an interesting first-hand perspective on some of the dot com hysteria, with some amusing diatribes (if they amuse you) as well as personal insights and self reflection. For people who dismiss the site because "it's got a fat guy with a bone," I don't think you'll get much from the play, but if you're dismissive only because of the lack of content on the site, that's not really reflective of what its author has to say.

    You can view the entire play in Real or Quicktime formats at different speeds from http://206.253.218.29/21dogyears/index.htm. The web page seems intermittently slashdotted at the moment, though I just watched the 100kbps feed for forty minutes or so, and performance was fine.

  15. Coming Soon by zpengo · · Score: 4
    From Pen-Gwynn Productions:
    • Portrait of the Artist as a 1337 h@x0r
    • My Life With the One-Click Cult
    • They Call Me Mister Romero
    • Distro Fever
    • Carrie 2: No Carrier
    • Twelve Angry Geeks
    • Cobol Jungle
    --


    Got Rhinos?
    1. Re:Coming Soon by StandardDeviant · · Score: 2
      • Enemy at the Flow Gate Array
      • The Determinant
      • Men In Pocket Protectors
      • One Flew Over The Coder's Nest
      • Titanic: The Story Of Amazon.com (too big to fail!)
      • Bridges and Routers of Madison County
      • The Dirty 0x0C

      --
      News for geeks in Austin: www.geekaustin.org
  16. Move on, nothing to see by MrBlack · · Score: 5

    Perhaps I have a low tolerance for stupidity but seeing a few pictures of a fat(ish) guy with a dog buiscuit in his mouth doesn't constitute fun stuff to me. Obviously I'm not 1337 enought to have stuff that I've submitted like this rather funny parody of /. that ddj is running posted. (not even in "ask slashdot" which will put up pretty much any crap). Granted, I didn't look at any of the videos etc for this one but it seemd a bit lame to me.

    1. Re:Move on, nothing to see by lemox · · Score: 2

      Perhaps you have a low tolerance for concentration. The entire *point* of the linkage was the videos.

      Oh BTW, poor you. Everyone should get every submission posted so people like you can bitch about how stupid it is.

      --

      "We obviously need a new moderation category: (-1, Woo-fucking-hoo)" --Mr. AC

  17. Somehow... by gvonk · · Score: 4

    This guy looks like someone I would never hire in a thousand years in any capacity for an e-com. Hmmmm...why could that be? Maybe it's because there's a GIANT PICTURE OF HIM WITH A BONE IN HIS MOUTH on his page.

    --


    El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
  18. Re:/.s have no sense of humour by susano_otter · · Score: 2

    What do you expect? The "first impression" rule is as old as salesmanship. If he's got quality content, but hides it behind a particularly lame and off-putting homepage, then whose fault is it when visitors are immediately put off and promptly leave?

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  19. Re:ok... by jgodfrey · · Score: 2

    And if anyone reading these threads is in the Puget Sound area, you can catch Mike's live performance on the weekend's for only ten bucks. I can't imagine he's really making much off that. I've only seen the online video; thought it was hilarious. I hear there's always an empty seat set aside for Jeff B, but he hasn't shown up yet ;) Sure he flames Amazon a bit, but overall it sets a pretty funny image about how all these dot-coms thought things were gonna happen.

  20. Actually, yes by Earthling · · Score: 2

    While its easy to dismiss the whole site based on the front page, you'd really be missing something: the films. "Rear Entry: An Unauthorized Expedition into Amazon.com" was produced and realised by John Tynes (the famed game designer and author of the recent Salon article on Wizards of the Coast linked Monday on /.) is well worth seeing and received quite considerable media attention. The soon-to-be released "Barely Legal: Amazon.com Employees On the Record & Off the Leash" seems off to a good start too. You can grab the trailers for both here. (.mov only, sorry).

    -Earthling

    --

    -Earthling
    "I'm sorry, I had to; the irony was just too thick."
  21. ok... by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 5

    Someone can feel free to clue me in if there really was anything interesting on that site. Three pictures of some weirdo with a dog biscuit in his mouth are about enough for me. Someone might walk by and get the wrong idea...

    --
    -- dR.fuZZo
  22. But what about ... by xmutex · · Score: 2

    I keep hearing about the dot-com culure, but want I really want to see is a one-man act about the dotorg culture.

    And please, no fat people.

    --

    jack's bicycle is music to my ears
  23. Re:What to post. by O.F.+Fascist · · Score: 4

    yeah if we only had a whole bunch of unemployed .com people lying around. Hey wait we do, maybe we can make a beowulf cluster of them.

  24. "Just Jack" with a web presence. by jpellino · · Score: 2
    I heard this guy on NPR, and thought it was a gag - it wasn't. This seems to fall somewhere between terminal whining and public masturbation.

    OK - you didn't mesh with Amazon.

    OK - Amazon is version 0.9 of how to do anything remotely like this.

    OK Jeff Bezos puts his pants on one leg at a time...

    But you intend to make an industry of your response to your experience? Then start a biz and show us how to do it without all the alleged tragedies - unconstructive criticism is at best obvious noise. If it was funny, I could see - but this is strained at best. His NPR spot sounded like he was waiting for the laugh track to kick in - sort of "Just Jack" with a cloying, pseudo-hip web presence.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  25. Re:/.s have no sense of humour by juju2112 · · Score: 4


    I agree. It seems most everyone just spent one second of their life to view the front page of the site, made a split-second judgement of everything this guy was about, and then posted some dumb comment here. But then, the /. story doesn't really make it clear that you can actually watch the entire one-and-a-half hour show.


    -- juju

  26. Legal issues by kupekhaize · · Score: 2

    I would be extremely wary of posting a page like this. Especially the introduction. Considering whats happening to the guy that posted something resembling CNN's CNNFN, he could have a whole pack of lawyers after his pack of dog biscuits lickety split.

    Anyone know about the legal ramifications of using some of Amazon's actual logos and pages on a page directing a lot of negative direction at Amazon? It seems to me they would be likely to throw everything in the book at this guy for doing this site..

    --
    One of these days i'm going to find this 'peer' guy and reset HIS connection!
  27. So amusing by OpCode42 · · Score: 2
    If dog biscuits don't tickle your funny bone, try this from the guys at Modern Humorist. Now that's funny.

    -----

  28. Celebrity gossip rag material by eXtro · · Score: 4
    These kind of things have always seemed pretty lame to me. Somebody gets canned or they get fed up, part ways with the company then go and lambaste them in public... for profit. I don't see that this is any more humorous, informing or worthwhile than the typical unauthorized celebrity biography. If he expected to make millions off his time at Amazon and didn't and is upset over this, well, to fucking bad. Grow up, get a job at a 7-11 and start over. Unless you were a grade-A moron you knew there was a lot of risk in these overly valued and underly financially sound companies.

    It doesn't sound like this is completely what he does from his press releases, but it still reminds me of the Seinfeld episode where this female stand-up comedian based her entire show around "Jerry is the Devil".

    I do support his right to do it, I just think he's a slimy troll for doing it.

  29. Oh... by mikedaisey · · Score: 2

    Clarification: I left the corporate world, under my own power, a year ago. I have no steady job, which is my own choice, but it should be noted that I QUIT Amazon, in February of 2000, when the stock was still high. Also, I really loved working at Amazon--I believed in our mission to be Earth's most customer-centric company, and I still miss the frenetic pace and dedicated people. I just don't believe that what Jeff has built is on a supportable foundation--this doesn't mean I'm embittered or angry. I'm a little surprised that Slashdotters aren't more supportive: I live on $800 a month and voluntarily put all my content on the web for free. There was a time when that may have been admired in the /. community. Course, if you think I suck, it won't matter much, eh? ;)

  30. Look--it's the author. by mikedaisey · · Score: 4

    Hello--I'm the author, creator and performer of the website in question. Thanks to everyone that has watched the movie and enjoyed it, and thanks for all the valuable commentary on my weight--since I was unaware I was fat, it'll be very helpful to my future endeavors. I'm in a rush, but to answer a few questions: No, I don't need or want anyone to feel 'sorry' for me or other dot com people. I'm interested in the phenomenon from a social perspective, not as a pity party. If this is unclear and you have the time/bandwidth, the one-man show makes this abundantly obvious. The bone was a sanitary chew toy bought at a drugstore, though it did taste faintly of chicken boullion. Amazon has no official comment on any of this, but people who work under Jeff and senior management have told me they talk about the show all the time. There are standing orders to forward all press and emails people receieve or see to Jeff, so he's probably reading this thread now. I have challenged him to a sumo wrestling battle in those sumo suits...he's quite adept with them, and despite my obvious weight advantage I believe it could be quite a battle. I'll post to the site if they decide to accept, and what follows from that. Anyway, that's all I can think of now. Feel free to email me at mdaisey@mac.com if you like, or post here to make commentary. I'm happy to answer questions.