Slashdot Mirror


11-Pound Model Plane Vs. The Atlantic

merrell writes: "Apparently some model plane builders are going to send some balsa wood loaded with some tiny computers and GPS receiver across the Atlantic, running on less than a gallon of gas. The Washington Post has an article on it. Just goes to show what some retired NASA engineers with lots of free time can do. :)" If this was a movie, it might sound too unlikely.

49 of 164 comments (clear)

  1. Private cruise missles now possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4

    Now it is possible for individuals or small groups to build private cruise missiles. Think of a high tech version of Black Sunday... or imagine what would happen to the United States if someone flew a 1000lb pilotless bomb into the 2002 Oscars!

  2. Re:Weight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

    or if it flies too high, it'll get burned by the sun!

  3. Hello cheap cruise missle! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

    "And then we added a few pounds of high explosive and changed the final co-ordinates to something more interesting." Wonder what the waypoint accuracy of this thing is? Dropping bombs down airshafts not just for the USAF anymore! Wheeeee!

    1. Re:Hello cheap cruise missle! by kfg · · Score: 4

      The Isreali army already uses R/C model airplanes for various missions. They are unsurpassed in effectiveness for short distance recon.

      KFG

    2. Re:Hello cheap cruise missle! by spoocr · · Score: 5
      "Dropping bombs down airshafts, not just for the USAF anymore!"

      Don't you mean the Rebel Alliance?

      "Great shot kid, that was one in a million!"

      -- Chris

      --

      -- Chris
      $email=~s/[^a-zA-Z0-9@.]//g;

    3. Re:Hello cheap cruise missle! by kcelery · · Score: 5

      Cruise missle? No, its unlikely. But watch out for the guided model planes flying from Columbia to California.

  4. Re:Can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5
    Of course that begs the question: aren't we lazy enough already?

    Ha, a good engineer will go to any amount of effort to avoid extra effort.

  5. Oh great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

    ...now the Chinese are going to get our balsa technology.

  6. Re:Weight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

    Balsa isn't strong...yeah right. You are right, it's not strong. Strength comes from engineering. In a high school Odyssey of the Mind competition, we build a struncture out of balsa, and super glue, that weighed 8 grams, and held in excess of 500Lbs. We used all the weights availabe, and it still did not break. We tried an experiment on our own, and found that it held 800lbs for 10 minutes. 10lbs/gram! Our play sucked balls, and we lost to a group who had some big chested girls. So much for Odyssey of the Mind!!!

  7. Re:Weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

    The mylar they are using is pretty impervious to weather. My son lost a R/C plane in a corn field, and we didnt get it back for almost 3 months. It had survive pretty well except for the radio equipment. They say they are using camp stove fuel, which means they are probably using a 4 cycle engine, and an ignition system. A 2 cycle engine does not have the fuel economy that is needed for this. Also with the ignition systme, they are getting telemetry for the engine RPM.

  8. Been done.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

    Check out this!

    http://www.insitugroup.com/LaimaFlight.html

    This plane was a little bigger, and made mostly out of carbon/epoxy composites, but it weighed 29 lbs and flew trans-atlantic on a gallon and a half of gas! The first unmanned trans-atlantic flight ever!
    The University of Washington Aero/Astro department is trying to build one to cross the pacific first too, but those guys at the air force beat us to it. Of course, their budget was MUCH bigger than ours.... Our airplane is only 50 lbs and 6 feet long!

  9. Re:Hello cheap cruise missile! by RayChuang · · Score: 4

    Given that the accuracy of satellite GPS is under 30 feet nowadays, the frightening thing is that anyone that knows how to make nerve gas (if you can make insecticide you can make nerve gas) could build a GPS guided model plane filled with 1 kg of Sarin, which when dropped would kill everyone within a 250-300 feet radius of the release point in open air. You could literally fly one and drop it off in front of the New York Stock Exchange. (shudder)

    --
    Raymond in Mountain View, CA
  10. More vrooom for your buck.. by MikeFM · · Score: 4

    Did you see that Junkyard Wars (TLC show where people build groovy gadgets from spare parts and compete the gadgets against each other) where they built the gas-effecient vehicles? Now that was impressive.

    I've been looking at the Honda Insights because they get around 70mpg which I think is impressive but yeh 3000mpg just blows that away! To bad I'm to big to sit on a model plane. :)

    At a recent LUG meeting we had a guy from our Universities solar car team give a talk and he mentioned that some people have built motorcycles that are entirely solar powered. To me that would be the best. I'm seriously considering trying to build one for myself. Has anyone experience in such things? My biggest question is the legality of driving such a thing on the highway. It'd be awesome to take roadtrips and never have to buy gas though. :)

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  11. Re:Weight by HeghmoH · · Score: 5

    Things that weigh less are less likely to be torn apart in the wind. They have less inertia, and so will simply move with it instead of breaking. Being slammed into the ocean isn't a problem if they don't fly really low. The main problem would be prevailing winds opposite the direction they're going, forcing more fuel use or something like that. Since the winds are usually west-to-east, this shouldn't be a problem.

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  12. Re:There goes the drug war by ethereal · · Score: 4
    ...monitor electrical bills watching for people growing pot hydroponically...

    "Honest, officer, I was just adding another 4000 nodes to my Google cluster! Why won't you believe me??"

    Caution: contents may be quarrelsome and meticulous!

    --

    Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  13. Retired engineers vs. "productive" ones by Brento · · Score: 5

    This is what you get when you let brilliant minds do whatever they feel like doing. Somehow, it feels more valuable than what a lot of my working friends are doing at dot-com flameouts.

    There's a lot to be said for letting brilliant people do whatever they want, without giving them much money. It's this sort of spirit that used to drive dot-coms, back before incubators, before the stock boom took off and everything was about stock valuations. Suddenly, millions of dollars were flying around, and everybody was under pressure to turn it into profits.

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
  14. eBay Use by SEWilco · · Score: 4

    Return of the successful plane will be by placing the high bid on eBay.

  15. Re:There goes the drug war by harmonica · · Score: 4

    ..., some special Texan circuit closes in their brain, and the next thing you know is they are shooting away.

    Thank God none of them is in a real position of power... D'oh!

  16. So much for drug interdiction. by jcr · · Score: 4

    Well, I guess this is the solution to the problem of Peruvian fighters shooting down unarmed civilians at the CIA's behest.

    I'm sure it's worth $500 in materials for a drug runner to send a kilogram of cocaine across a border in a package too small for airborne radar to target it. Shoot, with a bit of clever software, they could even do it with a sailplane. (No engine, even smaller radar cross-section.)

    A few years back, the company I worked for was across the hall from a US Customs office in Reston Virgina, and I had a conversation with a customs officer about smuggling technology. I was very surprised to learn that radio-control boats were first used for smuggling liquor across the great lakes and the Niagra river in the 1920's.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  17. Ahhh by eric17 · · Score: 5

    Now this is great to see. We need more projects like this to keep bored retirees off the street and away from the temptations that are offered there. Why just the other day in the neighorhood Denny's, I was accosted by a grim little man whose bravado was no doubt enhanced by the support of his fellow grandslammers. He yelled in his reedy voice, "Hey buddy! I got my social security! And you're paying for it!!!" which was followed by the raucous laughter of his comrades...

  18. The plane's name by moeller · · Score: 4

    Last weekend, most of the team gathered at the horse pasture in northern Montgomery County lent by veteran aviator Beecher Butts, 88, whose charity has prompted the modelers to name their plane "The Spirit of Butts Farm."

    Hope the wind's aroma isn't too frightening!

  19. There goes the drug war by mesocyclone · · Score: 5
    This technology, inherently stealthy, will no doubt be of great use to folks wanting to move high-value substances across our borders.

    Today, there are dirigible-carried radars along our southern borders watching for smuggling planes. Will they see a plane like this, flying at a few hundred feet AGL? Not likely!

    --

    The only good weather is bad weather.

    1. Re:There goes the drug war by RGRistroph · · Score: 5

      I used to live near Spring, Texas, which in those days had a Goodyear blimp hangar right next to I-45 and near the high school. ( That facility has since been closed, and the Goodyear blimps operate out of Akron, Ohio, as far as I know. )

      I knew lots of "rednecks" ( a lot of them were not real rednecks, just crazy Texans ) that had taken potshots at the blimp at various times. It always seemed stupid to me because those bullets have to come down somewhere, but it didn't occur to me that they were actually hitting their target until my Civil Air Patrol unit took a tour of the blimp facility. The folks there showed us numerous bullet holes and patches on the covering, including one on the edge of the gondola where it attaches to the bag. Some of them described the experience of flying slowly along and just watching while a tiny figure down below blazed away with a deer rifle.

      They had a little collection of hunting arrows, squashed bullets, crossbow bolts, etc that had been removed from the skin.

      About a year after that a bunch of the CAP folks and friends (I wasn't present) were launching model rockets near there and someone got the blimp with that big five foot long Estes "Black Cat" model -- it didn't pierce the skin, it hit a glancing blow and bounced off, and everyone dove into their cars and fled, abandoning some nice rockets.

      Anyway, since we're talking about model airplanes -- the blimp folks told a long story about a powerful model airplane ripping a long gash in the bag, while they were landing somewhere in California. It nearly caused the thing to collapse, it couldn't take off at all until they got a cherry picker and patched it with a massive amount of duct tape, put all they helium they had on hand in the bag and tossed all extra weight, and managed to limp it over to a place where they could work on it better.

    2. Re:There goes the drug war by RGRistroph · · Score: 5

      A "real redneck" is usually pretty ignorant and uneducated. They are not racist as often as the stereotypes on TV and film would have you believe -- often they are surprisingly willing to take anyone they meet at face value. Rednecks occur in every US state, inspite of the stereotype of there being more of them in the South -- some of the most extreme rednecks I've ever met lived in Massachusetts and New Hampshire. Rednecks are more likely to decide to shoot at a blimp than other people, but most of them are pretty peaceful and friendly, and like most people, not really instinctively aggressive enough for it to even occur to them to start shooting at some random blimp in the sky.

      On the other hand, the "Crazy Texan" personality can be educated and quite sophisticated, but they are still Crazy Texans. There is a substantial overlap between the groups, of course. But an example of a crazy Texan would be Ross Perot, a quite educated person, who still thought nothing out of the ordinary in hiring a bunch of mercenaries to go get his people out of Iran. He understood that there were experts in the State Department and the CIA working on all those things, and that by being a loose cannon he could possibly screw up important national matters -- but the conclusion that all those people were screwing everything up and that by hiring some insane vietnam veterans he could do a better job, is a natural one for the Crazy Texan mentality. But Ross Perot is not a redneck.

      For examples of Crazy Texans, think of the outfits that specialize in putting out oil well fires. Snuffing those with explosives, or plugging them while they are burning, is pretty sophisticated; rednecks can't do it, but it is a job well suited to Crazy Texans.

      So what I was trying to say when I said that the people who were shooting at the Goodyear blimp were often Crazy Texans instead of rednecks, is that these people were smart, college bound, computer literate, New York Times reading people; but if they are sitting at the computer and hear that odd engine sound of the blimp, and go out and look at it, some special Texan circuit closes in their brain, and the next thing you know is they are shooting away.

      Rednecks go fishing. Crazy Texans tie a meat hook with a dead rabbit on it to the trailer hitch of their truck with rope, in an attempt to catch a six foot catfish that was observed in a lake near Houston (true story). When a number of animals from an emu farm wandered into a neighboring subdivision, various rednecks attempted to rope them or shoo them into a fenced enclosure; Crazy Texans were observed chasing them on dirt bikes with roman candles pvc pipe bottle rocket bazookas.

      HTH.

    3. Re:There goes the drug war by number+one+duck · · Score: 5

      On the other hand, you wouldn't be able to fly these things over my neck of the woods... the rednecks shoot at *everything* that there isn't a law against...

  20. Area 51 by Chairboy · · Score: 4

    The obvious project this inspires is equipping a model airplane with a digital camera, gps, nav computer, and sending it to Area 51 to get some recon shots. Using sonar, you could have the plane fly right on the deck, maybe less then 10 feet high for the final approach and during the evasion afterwards. If your model plane makes a lot of turns and stays at low altitude, there's no way Area 51 security could follow it reliably, and they probably couldn't scramble a helicopter fast enough. Plus, if it's not transmitting, they can't track that either.

    You could launch this baby from Vegas or out in the desert a couple hundred miles away from anything interesting so there would be no way for them to track you...

  21. *conspiracy theory* by crashnbur · · Score: 5

    Wow, what an interesting new device for drug trafficking. Strap the dope in the pilot's seat, fly that sucker at just above tree-top level, send it to Cousin Vinny... Hell, I don't know anything about it, but if this model plane can make it across the Atlantic, then it can certainly carry drugs across a border.

  22. The strength of Balsa by kfg · · Score: 4

    In point of fact wood is stronger than steel * per pound.*

    It is strength per unit of weight that is critical in this particular undertaking.

    And contrary to what most think softwood is stronger than hardwood * per pound.*

    ALSO contrary to what most people think Balsa is a hardwood, not a softwood. The terms hard and soft wood are biological classifications, not an actual discription of the wood.

    KFG

    1. Re:The strength of Balsa by kfg · · Score: 5

      I'm sorry, I meant to make a quick and interesting post, not write a monograph on the various mechanical properties of wood.

      I rather thought that what I meant could be at least roughly deduced by the reader by refering to the subject at hand.

      I meant in overall properties, given the certain structural shapes and assembleges germain to stick built objects such as houses, cars, and . . . model airplanes.

      As you intimate structural materials have many different properties. Wood, unlike steel, is not isotropic and so its properties are greatly effected by its orientation to load, at least in its natural state. Bear in mind that there are many high tech composite wood products these days with rather remarkable properties. But since the subject is balsa I'll confine myself to wood as she comes from the tree.

      Wood has a tensile strenth of about 5 ton f/in.^2, mild steel is about 28.

      Mild steel has an elongation percent at failure of about 20. Wood is close enough to zero to count. In a situation where dimensional stability is of higher importance than unltimate failure strength wood is often the superior choice.

      Mild steel's Young's Modulus is about 30 lbf/in.^2 * 10^6, wood only about 1.5. Wood is less stiff than steel, however its elastic limit is very, very high. Wood will bend and return to its original shape in ways that make it in many cases a more desirable structurual material than steel.

      But things get REALLY interesting when we start to look at beam strength. Beam strength goes up by
      * the square of the cross section.*

      Given the need for a particular beam length, ohhh, say the main spar of an airplane wing just to pick a hypothetical example at random, and the need to keep weight down, a wood beam of * the same weight* will be of markedly greater cross section, and again, * strength goes up by the square of the cross section,* The wooden spar will be stronger than the steel spar. Or we could, as an alternative, make the wooden spar of somewhat smaller cross section, giving up strength but * saving weight*.

      It would be perfectly possible to build model airplanes out of steel. It isn't done not because of cost,(steel is cheaper than balsa), not because of constructiion difficulties, ( balsa plane construction is no piece of cake and working with steel isn't significantly harder), it is done because it results in a structurally superior product * per pound* than using steel would. ( And please note that when the cross section gets sufficeintly large it is perfectly possible to gain all the benfits of tubing with wood. Sailboat spars are constructed this way as well as wing spars for airplanes)

      Using stressed skin construction makes up for wood's low Young's modulus yielding remarkably stiff structures.

      That, in a nutshell without writing a formal monograph, which I refuse to do, is what I meant by 'strength.'

      When we get into the more modern composite materials wood looses some overall 'strength' but gains isotropicness.

      In the field of military aircraft two planes in particular, from two different world wars, stand out as having such a reputation for sturdiness and ablility to take fire that they are legends to this day. From WWI there is the Roland C-2 "Walfisch", and from WWII there is the Mosquito. Both of these planes were molded wooden composite. The Roland was so sturdy that by the end of the war the tailgunners were in the habit of shooting at enemy plane * directly through their own fusilage!*

      Now THAT is strong, but you won't find that kind of 'strong' in any engineering reference or ANSI standard.

      By the way, what are YOU smoking. You havn't a clue what the terms softwood and hardwood mean. The gentleman in the post below you got it right. Go look it up.

      Oh, and you COULD have correctly criticized me for one thing, I should have said "botanical" classification, rather than " biological", but you missed my ACTUAL error. Go figure.

      KFG

  23. As a point of interest. . . by kfg · · Score: 4

    A kite has already made the trip across the Atlantic unattended.

    The kite was tied to a bucket which was filled with water and dropped into the sea. The bucket held the string of the kite and the kite dragged the bucket with the prevailing winds.

    Cape Cod to Ireland.

    KFG

  24. handicap by snyrt · · Score: 4

    i read the article yesterday in the post. One of the most amazing parts of this whole project is that the main man is legally blind and mostly deaf. he put the plane together in his basement using lots of really thick pairs of glasses and he dyed the glue pink so that he could see it. i think that's pretty cool.

    --
    -"Hey, Baby. It's not a rash, it's textured love."
  25. Global Hawk by mikeboone · · Score: 4

    Let's see a cost comparison with the USAF's Global Hawk (which flew to Australia a week ago).

    :)

  26. True hackers by TeknoHog · · Score: 5
    "We could sit around and vegetate," Hill said. "But why do that when there's something interesting and fun and challenging to do?"

    Now go and ask yourself that question.

    --

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  27. Can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of these? by KurdtX · · Score: 5

    Sorry, but honestly, I can't wait to see a commercial app out of these. Newspaper companies could use fleets of them to deliver papers (particularly to remote houses). Fast Food companies could one-up drive throughs. It could even solve some of the US Postal Service's troubles

    Of course that begs the question: aren't we lazy enough already?

    Kurdt

    --

    Kurdt
    I'm not anti-social. Just pro-technology.
  28. Re:radio contact? by Spinality · · Score: 4

    Plus batteries. -- krokodil

    Remember they have a little 1Hp internal combustion engine. It could generate electricity pretty cheaply and efficiently. Or a little cellphone lithium-ion battery should give plenty of juice. I doubt they're maintaining continuous contact in either direction. Some of the earlier posts suggest the plane is being operated by remote control, like those lame battling robots on TV. But I'm sure the computers are there to make this thing semi-autonomous, checking GPS fixes and sending return telemetry at relatively infrequent intervals (i.e. not constantly) to keep radio use down. The thing is steering from waypoint to waypoint, like commercial autopilots, maintaining a predefined flight profile without somebody steering the thing.

    This project is so cool, I'm sure these guys are having the time of their lives.

    --
    -- We all have enough strength to endure the misfortunes of other people. La Rochefoucauld
  29. Weather by Murphy+Bitter · · Score: 5

    The real question is whether the weather will work in their favour. Assuming that they have a model that will fly the distance. If it's too sunny the wings may warp (twist) causing an increase in drag and more problems for the autopilot. IIRC rain doesn't mix well with mylar, although I'd guess it's been sealed because of engine output (fluid etc.). They didn't say what king of engine they are using, if it's a glow engine they may get more problem with rain.

    I'm not quite sure why they didn't build a glass fiber model. It isn't that difficult to do. They usually run well in the rain, if slower.

    It should be interesting to see how well they do.

    --
    Murphy Bitter

  30. PAN H(AM)STER 101. by Murphy+Bitter · · Score: 5

    "Opening at an airport near you Hamster Airlines. A low cost solution to moving you pets."

    --
    Murphy Bitter

    P.S. I have heard of people putting hamsters in models, they usually don't survive. The G's are usually way too high.

  31. Re:Weight by khendron · · Score: 5
    Wind is not the issue. The difficulty is turbulence. However, if all the wind around a body is moving in the same direction and at the same velocity, then from the body's point of view there is no turbulence. If the body is light and not fixed to anything (like, say, a model airplane) then the body is unlikely to notice the effects of the wind.

    We humans tend to notice wind as very turbulent because

    • We are usually fixed to the ground and do not move with the wind.
    • We are usually deep inside the boundry layer of the earth, where ground effects and obstacles (trees, building, etc) cause all sort of turbulent eddies.
    --
    Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
  32. You really don't know anything about models by Erioll · · Score: 4

    Ask ANYBODY who has flown a model airplane about your "10 feet off the ground" maneuver. Any little gust of wind will have it crashing. Whenever I do any maneuvers THAT close to the ground, it is the hardest, and most stressful part of flying. I can see small, light computers being able to fly a plane across the ocean using waypoints at a few thousand feet. Lots of time for compensation for gusts, etc. But terrain-following? Get real.

    This isn't to say someone SHOULDN'T try flying a plane over Area 51. I think that'd be cool. Since you aren't going trans-ocean (maybie only from the next state, or somewhere similarly annonymous) a good high-resolution camera wouldn't be that difficult to mount. Flying at 300-400 feet AGL, you would still get awesome pictures. And with a transimitter, even if your plane gets shot down (by rifles, etc. Wouldn't be that difficult to hit, even at night. The heat of the engine would be easy to spot) you will still have the images. :)

  33. Weight by spoocr · · Score: 5
    At 11 pounds, won't it be incredibly susceptible to winds, especially over the open ocean? Towards the end of the journey when its gas is almost gone, it's going to weigh probably something near 5 pounds - it seems like it would be too easy for it to get caught in a gust of wind and slammed into the ocean, or torn apart.

    -- Chris

    --

    -- Chris
    $email=~s/[^a-zA-Z0-9@.]//g;

    1. Re:Weight by MadCow42 · · Score: 5
      >> If the wind was to, say, force the nose down

      GPS systems not only give you your location in latitude/longitude, but also provide elevation. I'm sure they're not stupid enough to let this thing fly without checking it's own elevation to make sure it stays at 2000'.

      With that data, and some cool programming, they wouldn't even need to know the orientation of the plane (even if it were upside down). (However, I have a feeling that they also have instruments to measure orientation).

      At 66'/sec, the GPS data would change at a fast enough rate that they could make fairly quick analysis of what direction they're going, and what effect control surface changes have. If they decide to pull the elevator "up" and the plane starts going the wrong direction, they can assume that they're upside-down and make opposite corrections. Heck, they could have programmed it with no knowledge of how to "turn left", but rely on the GPS data to tell the plane if it's doing the correct thing (random control movements, feedback analysis of results).

      I'm sure it's simpler than that though. q:]

      MadCow.

      --
      I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    2. Re:Weight by capt.Hij · · Score: 4

      It is not uncommon to find Monarch butterflies in the UK that narrrowly missed their normal migration route to Mexico. Once in the air the prevailing winds can pull the craft across. If a butterfly can survive the shear forces then a model plane should have no troubles.

    3. Re:Weight by dtmos · · Score: 5

      Ah, but that's the advantage of a small model, with a length on the order of six feet. Getting torque from the wind requires a wind vector differential over a distance equal to the size of the model, and unless one is in a tornado one is unlikely to be in winds that differ significantly (from a structural survivability standpoint) over a distance of six feet. Maintaining proper attitude and directional control, of course, is a separate issue, but not an insurmountable one.

      It's no exageration to say that Maynard Hill is the world's greatest living R/C aircraft modeller, so I'd have to say that betting on him is the smart play. He's been doing this type of thing better than anyone else for a long, long time ... since the 1950's.

  34. Re: Import / Export by dhowells · · Score: 5

    Now all we need is for someone to write the three-line-perl-RSA-implementation on the side of it for the most stylish arms-trafiking stunt in history.

    Seriously tho' doesnt it occur to anyone that if this does succeed, it could have very serious implications for smuggling (Like thinks how much crack this thing could carry with it per-flight with a little modification),

    Of course the simple internet minded solution would be to legally threaten the balsa-growers, the plane-sellers, and the gasoline-vendors while letting the crack whores continue unmolested.

    ------------ Dom Howells

    --
    use Blunt::Instrument;
  35. Brings back memories. by DysonSphere · · Score: 5

    As a kid I used to build "stick and tissue" CO2 powered models with a simple pendulum "guidance" system. Trickiest part was getting the right amount of friction at the pendulum pivots to keep the model from over-compensating, and to design around the center of gravity shift for the pitch control. Once the rig was setup properly though, you could "program" it to do all sorts of neat stuff, by offsetting the pendulums. Balsa kits were around $5.00, and pendulums were made from fishing weights and paper clips.

    --
    Mommy. What's a karma whore?
  36. Re: Import / Export by number+one+duck · · Score: 5

    Smuggling isn't a problem. I work in a secret government lab, we are already training genetically modified seagulls to bring these babies down (at least during mating season).

  37. Re:Balsa wood? by sllort · · Score: 4

    No disrespect intended, but I'm not sure you know what you're dealing with. As an R/C modeler, I can tell you that the incredibe tensile strength of stretched, bonded mylar that we coat our planes in combines very well with the compressive and torsional strength of balsa to create some really sturdy aircraft. I've flown balsa gliders into precision landings in winds gusting up to 50mph.

    Lindbergh's plane was cloth over wood!

    As far as mounting telemetry in these suckers... yawn? Yes, they make a perfect delivery system for a terrorist. Zero cross section on radar, silent, incredibly hard to see, and they can carry a decent payload.

    The big holdup has always been the telemetry, which is quite different than a robotic aircraft. Robotic R/C planes, if perfected and made cheap, would be... a law enforcement nightmare.

    My guess is that they (law encforcement) have already thought about this for a while.

  38. And people are saying... by Francis+Frisina · · Score: 4

    that the practical applications of this are phenomenal! :) Just kidding. It is actually pretty neat. Three thousand (give or take) miles per gallon - now if only my CAR would be that efficient!
    ---

    --
    "The universe is a womb for the genesis of gods."
  39. Let's just hope... by Francis+Frisina · · Score: 4
    1) They don't lose contact with it
    2) They converted all their metric units correctly
    3) It does not burn up in the atmosphere on approach

    Sorry, couldn't resist! :)
    ---

    --
    "The universe is a womb for the genesis of gods."