Slashdot Mirror


NEC Announces 61-inch Monitor

return 42 writes: "NEC will start selling 61-inch monitors next month. No pricing yet (if you have to ask, you can't afford it)." I'll promise to return it if NEC sends me one for review. Honest. Cross my heart. Update Chrisd sent us a related note, here's a 63" that got stolen. One of a kind of kind souvenir baby!

62 of 143 comments (clear)

  1. Watch out for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    ...that degause button...you may fry your knuts and cook the cat in one fell swoop!

  2. One big monitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

    If 7-11 can sell a 64-ounce big gulp, then it figures that things like this will follow. It's the Ford Excursion of monitors; a pixel-guzzling sport-utility-display.

    1. Re:One big monitor by garcia · · Score: 2

      I wonder if they are going to start the monitor at .69 :)

    2. Re:One big monitor by PopeAlien · · Score: 3

      Yeah great, Now I have to worry about RSI in my neck from looking back and forth across the expansive face of this monitor. But where can I get a four-foot wide keyboard?

  3. Build Your Own 120 Inch Monitor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3
    Directions:

    Get 1200 red light bulbs, 1200 green light bulbs, 1200 blue light bulbs, a DAC, 4000 feet of 12 guage wire, and a 220 volt three phase power source.

    Step one. Mount light bulbs in RGB clusters and wire them.
    Step two. Use DAC to convert analog VGA signal to digital light bulb switch.
    Step three. Connect to computer and power source.

    Max resolution: about 35 x 35 Min resolution: about 35 x 35

  4. What's the point? by Have+Blue · · Score: 2

    What is the advantage of this monstrosity over a tabletop projector that costs a fraction as much and can probably use a bigger screen?

    1. Re:What's the point? by blair1q · · Score: 2

      What is the advantage of this monstrosity over a tabletop projector that costs a fraction as much and can probably use a bigger screen?

      Daylight operation.

      You don't have to put your projector in the middle of the audience; especially if the audience is constantly moving, as in a conference hall.

      It's not cross-illuminating your presenter, making him look like Bozo the Cyberclown.

      No geometry/focus/vibration problems.

      90% of presentation selling is, "If you think my dick is big, you should see the one we couldn't bring along." Get their attention, hold it, and imply indirectly that you can exceed their expectations. Use every means to inflate their value estimates.

      --Blair

  5. Re:Still waiting... by CaseyB · · Score: 3
    I've been convinced for a while that this is the way to go in the long run. Find the sweet spot in production display size (maximize the size vs. yield tradeoff to get the cheapest price per cm^2) and let users buy as much as they need or want for a given application.

    I'd be willing to put up with a small margin for the benefit of an arbitrarily large, relatively inexpensive display.

  6. no, but ,. . . by hawk · · Score: 2
    >Like someone was gonna use a 5-foot plasma screen at their desk or
    >something. Nevermind.


    . . . If I put it at the other end of my office, I could work at my usual resolution without my glasses . . .


    hawk

  7. Re:Article Bug (isn't a bug) by jCaT · · Score: 2

    so, if you watch a regular movie converted (or even displayed?) in pal it will be 4 percent shorter? Jeez, if only I knew that earlier... anything that would have made "Sister Act II" 10 minutes shorter would be worth a LOT of money to me.

  8. Only one thing to say about this mini-Jumbotron... by glomph · · Score: 5

    Main Screen Turn On!

  9. We don't need no STEENKIN resoloution! by Chas · · Score: 5

    I want icons as big as my head!

    I want people to run away screaming as a rocket fills the entire screen in Quake3!

    I want to be able to sit back half-a county away and still be able to read the text on the screen!

    *Dances away to the tune of "Frank's 2000 Inch TV"*


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:We don't need no STEENKIN resoloution! by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 2
      Icons? I want pixels as big as my head.

      --

    2. Re:We don't need no STEENKIN resoloution! by suwain_2 · · Score: 2

      He he, I don't see what's with the tiny resolution... Eizo has a 50" Plasma that can do 1600x1200. Why this 60" monitor doesnt' seem to do better than what looks like 800x600 or so completely baffles me...
      ________________________________________________

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    3. Re:We don't need no STEENKIN resoloution! by suwain_2 · · Score: 2

      Heh, thanks for the correction... I should read more carefully before I start fantasizing about things. :-D
      ________________________________________________

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  10. Big? by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 5

    Pioneer has been selling a professional model 60" display with d-sub and bnc rgbhv inputs for at least 18 months. This display is only 1" bigger.

  11. This is for customer briefings by gelfling · · Score: 2

    To your execu-weenie 'nerve center' where you take future customers so they can ooooh and aaaaahhhh over your help desk process. Hang them on the wall so the customers can see them while they walk down the hall.

  12. 61" monitor (21" viewable) by tuffy · · Score: 5

    But at least it'll look good in the ads...

    --

    Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  13. Big but not sharp by Outland+Traveller · · Score: 2

    Reading the spec of this beast, it looks like the resolution and pitch really stink. You'd be better off using a traditional projector if you didn't need such a rectangular format.

  14. not impressive by novarese · · Score: 3
    size doesn't matter, resolution matters:

    The new model which features a 1.05 million pixel monitor (1,365 by 768 pixels) with pixel pitch of 0.99mm

    Life begins at 1600x1200.

    1. Re:not impressive by rkent · · Score: 3
      Life begins at 1600x1200. Amen. And the dot pitch is .99 mm as well. Which means this thing is really just a glorified projector, useful only for presentations in meetings and such.

      LOL! Oh yeah, just occurred to me, that's all you'd want it for. Like someone was gonna use a 5-foot plasma screen at their desk or something. Nevermind.

      Still, seems like a souped-up 1024x768 LCD to me.

      ---

    2. Re:not impressive by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 5

      size doesn't matter, resolution matters:
      Hmm, I might be able to use that one tonight.
      --------

    3. Re:not impressive by GeckoX · · Score: 3

      Ever heard of the right tool for the job?

      This is obviously not the monitor for you, but it is for many many uses.

      Bigger means more people can view it at the same time from greater distances.

      Better resolution meanst that you get more detail out of it.

      Quite often these don't go hand in hand, since one doesn't necessarily require the other.

      These will be great in classrooms and the like in which case, what would be the point to doubling, tripling or greater the resolution? Little bobby at the back isn't going to care, he's still just happy that he can se it at all. Also, the only reason the school could afford one is because the price didn't go up exponentially because of the higher resolution which requires _much_ higher processing power etc etc etc.

      Your's will be coming some day, but this just isn't it.

      --
      No Comment.
  15. Oh come on! by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 2

    To support the PX-61XM1's monitor, NEC teamed up with nVIDIA Corporation
    to develop a new chip, which makes full display of the wide XGA (1,360
    by 768 pixels) and VGA (848 by 480 pixels) possible and enables CAD/CAM
    detailed material to be displayed accurately without image stretch


    oh puh-leeze, what about just using X and creating a custom mode line? Since when one needs a new chip to drive a non-standard resolution...

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
  16. The stolen 63" by macdaddy · · Score: 2
    You know, it would be hilarious if the theives of that stolen 63"monitor called Samsung tech support to ask about drivers for their newly acquired monitor. ;-)

    --

  17. Stolen 63" by wiredog · · Score: 2

    How the hell did they sneak it out of the hall? They certainly didn't stuff it under their jacket! It'd take two hands to carry the thing!

  18. heh by British · · Score: 2

    Now would be a good time for someone to start selling computer desks that this monitor could fit in.

    Seriously, I'd like to get a better resolution than that spec so I could use today's apps and just push all the toolbars/palettes around AND have a great canvas size.

    Of course I could just go multi-mon, but that's not as cool as this TekWar-like monitor.

  19. Bummer. by jcr · · Score: 2

    Besides the resolution, i'm a little bummed that a plasma display should have such a low contrast rato. 60:1 isn't all that impressive.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  20. Still waiting... by lildogie · · Score: 3

    What I would like to see is a tileable display module (zero-width margins), with hardware to distribute the video to various combinations of tiles.

    Then you could construct a custom display of whatever size and shape you like.

    You could also maintain the display by replacing individual tiles (instead of replacing the whole display).

    Anyone heard of such a scheme in industry?

    1. Re:Still waiting... by Jart · · Score: 3

      If you like red (or whatever. I like red) on black you can get big fat LED arrays in panels. Tile your wall. Play something vector-graphixy like Battlezone. Slammin!

    2. Re:Still waiting... by petard · · Score: 3

      This is probably what you want. At a mere $22k, it's probably cheaper than the plasma display too. :-)

      --
      .sig: file not found
  21. Agreed, plus... by LinuxParanoid · · Score: 3

    ...for the price you're paying, a screen resolution of 1365x768 which is 61", you could make do with a *lot* cheaper LCD projector shining output on a wall or whiteboard. At least for CAD/CAM work, that's what I'd do (assuming walking in front of the projector is an avoidable issue.)

    --LP

  22. Weird Al.... by Chris+Brewer · · Score: 2

    Risin' above the city, blocking out the noonday sun
    It dwarfs the mighty redwoods and it towers over everyone
    I still remember when that delivery truck came down our block
    What a lucky guy, I hear he got the last one in stock
    And the neighbors are just green
    They say, "That's the biggest screen we've ever seen!"
    It's Frank's 2000" TV
    Everybody come and see
    Frank's 2000" TV

    There's Frank's remote control, you can look at it but don't touch it, please
    'Cause Frank's the one in charge and he decides what everybody sees
    The picture's crystal clear and everything is magnified
    Robert DeNiro's mole has got to be ten feet wide
    Everybody in the town
    Can hear those 90,000 watts of Dolby Sound
    And I'm mighty proud to say
    Now I can watch "The Simpsons" from 30 blocks away

    On Frank's 2000" TV
    Everybody come and see
    Frank's 2000" TV
    Everybody come and see

    I'm gonna get one of my own real soon
    It's like having a drive-in movie in your own living room
    Whoa, hey now, hey no na na na now
    Hey now, Hey now na na now

    Frank's 2000" TV
    Everybody come and see
    You won't believe it
    Frank's 2000" TV
    Everybody come and see
    Frank's 2000" TV
    Get a 2-year warranty on parts and labor
    Frank's 2000" TV
    Frank's 2000" TV
    --

    --
    Consultancy: If you're not part of the solution, there's money to be made in prolonging the problem
  23. Re:California by Emil+Brink · · Score: 2

    True. The spec sheet linked to in the press release puts it a nice 660 W. Whoa. I also find the resolution, 1365x768 as mentioned everywhere, a bit odd...

    --
    main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
  24. Sadly only 1,365 by 768 ... by taniwha · · Score: 2

    but for those of us that are long sighted putting one on the wall across the room could be very comfortable ...

    1. Re:Sadly only 1,365 by 768 ... by ackthpt · · Score: 2
      Everytime I see INFOCOMM, I think of the Infocom text games. Yeah, this is just what you need to play Zork.

      Also, since it's a light source, you'll probably want to use it in a room with subdued light. The next step in boardroom slide shows.

      --
      All your .sig are belong to us!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  25. It may not have high resolution but... by decipher_saint · · Score: 2
    It'd still be better than the projector unit the company I work for owns. We could have a meeting with the lights on for a change.

    Nice...

    -----

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  26. The 63" monitor thieves will be discovered... by Spunk · · Score: 4

    very easily when it's noticed that someone is trying to download the drivers.

    --

  27. Resale... by supabeast! · · Score: 2

    Wonder what the black market value of a 63", hand built, one of three in the world, display is?

    I bet the mafia stole the display and gave it to a hacker who they pay to encrypt their email!

  28. Words.. by supabeast! · · Score: 3

    I feel like an eskimo talking about snow, because I can come up with thousands of ways to say "I want one of those!!!"

  29. Question: Why 1365x768? by Spire · · Score: 2

    At first glance, the 1365x768 pixel dimensions might seem a little arbitrary or strange. (When was the last time you saw a display with an odd horizontal pixel count?)

    Things get clearer when you realize that 1365x768 works out to a 16:9 aspect ratio, which is the standard for widescreen TV (and fairly close to the aspect ratio of most widescreen movies). It seems likely that the designers chose a nice "round" vertical pixel count (768), and simply multiplied it by 16/9 to get the 1365 that we now have.

    Thing is, how "round" is 768, really? I mean, sure it's a nice multiple of 2^8, but consider:

    High definition TV (US standard) has a vertical pixel count of 480, 720, or 1080. DVD has a vertical pixel count of 480. None of these will scale cleanly to 768. To get decent (but not great) picture quality, you'll have to do some fairly sophisticated bilinear or bicubic resampling, or -- in the case of a 720p signal -- be willing to tolerate a small black border in order to get as sharp a picture as possible.

    I'm wondering why the designers didn't choose, say, 720, 960, or 1080 as the vertical pixel count instead. Any of these choices would have made for optimal image quality in at least one format. But as it stands, the display is a "jack of all trades, master of none" -- and needlessly so, at that.

    Anyone care to enlighten me on this design decision?
    --

    --
    begin 644 .sig22&%I;"P@9F5L;&]W(&=E96 LA`end
  30. finally! by egomaniac · · Score: 2

    My dream of life-size pr0n can now be fulfilled...

    Seriously, though, if you need a 61" display just get a projector. This will only find use in places where projectors aren't practical (kiosks and the like).

    "...makes it ideal for mid-sized conference room...", yeah right. All of my company's conference rooms have projectors, and I'm damn sure they were a lot cheaper.

    Pretty monitor, of course, but the price is going to be otherworldly.

    --
    ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
  31. Speaking of... by RoninM · · Score: 2
    I'm planning on designing and producing a sports car for the very same market that are enviously eyeing this 61-incher. How does the Compensator XL sound?

    A monitor is perhaps one of the few areas in life where it's not the size that matters (well, so long as it's not tiny), but what you can do with it. In this case, you have a huge monitor, but can't do jack for resolution with it. And that's what I really need: a pixel as big as a frickin' beachball.

    --
    If a corporation is a personhood, is owning stock slavery?
    1. Re:Speaking of... by Animats · · Score: 2

      Larry Ellison, the ego behind Oracle, has a daylight-viewable projection TV , using a projector sized for a movie theater aimed at a smaller screen. So there.

  32. Does anyone know... by JesseL · · Score: 2

    what kind of refresh rates plasma displays are capable of?

    --
    "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
  33. Think bigger... by Contact · · Score: 2

    That's easily fixed. Just buy four of them and arrange them in a square... ;)

  34. Re:Canyonero! by Fesh · · Score: 2
    "...sixty-five tons of American pride..."

    I know it's satire, but that describes the M1A2 pretty accurately as well...


    --Fesh

    --
    --Fesh
    Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
  35. Life size porn? by 13013dobbs · · Score: 3

    Ok, I have to admit, seeing pr0n stars in almost life size would be kinda cool. However, it would suck to see the goatsecx image on that.

    --

    No replies made to AC posts. Please log in.

  36. Hallelujah! No access controls! by yerricde · · Score: 3
    From the data sheet:
    4. Not designed with copy protection
    Hallelujah!
    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  37. I have informed my CIO of this innovation by ellem · · Score: 3

    I told him I need one to live.

    He said I could have two but I have to put UT back on the server and unblock all porn sites.

    ---

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
    1. Re:I have informed my CIO of this innovation by ryanvm · · Score: 2
      He said I could have two but I have to put UT back on the server and unblock all porn sites.

      Sweet! Win - win.

  38. California by YKnot · · Score: 2

    This ain't for Californians. Plasma displays' power consumption...

    1. Re:California by ackthpt · · Score: 2
      These are hardly new, and this smells more like publicity than anything new, as these displays have been out for 2 years.

      As to the power consumption, the last time I looked at was 385 watts, which is about 4 times what your typical monitor draws. Quite the power hogs and they produce a large amount of heat. Bummer if you already have a warm workspace, bonus if it (like mine) is often cooler than you'd like.

      --
      All your .sig are belong to us!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:California by Arthur+Dent+75 · · Score: 2
      I also find the resolution, 1365x768 as mentioned everywhere, a bit odd...

      On first look, yes. But a bit of work with a calculator:
      768*16/9 = 1365,33

      It seems to me that the vertical size of 768 was chosen and the other value is just what you need for a nice modern 16:9 display.
      --

      --
      michael at slashdot.org: The real answer is that a couple of the slashdot authors are sick.
  39. Re:Bigger organs by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2
    Can anyone see any use to this beast that a projector couldn't fulfill?

    • You can't burn your fingers on a halogen bulb.
    • Bugs that fly in front of it don't have their shadows magnified 100x.
    • On the same note, kids fingerprints are easily dismissed.
    • You can walk in front of it without looking like a dweeb with a Powerpoint presentation on your chest.
    • You can stare straight at it's display source without blinding yourself
    • You don't need a darkened room to view it comfortably as with most projectors
    • It has a much higher 'COOL' factor (for now)
  40. I've got a beta version.. by wardomon · · Score: 4

    The main problem is that I had to get a license from the Atomic Energy Commision to switch it on...

    --

    - - - If the sun is a star, why can't I see it at night?
  41. Speculation on the first californian to get one... by jmpresto_78 · · Score: 2

    As I unpack my spanky new 61" with a fork lift and lovingly set it upon the concrete foundation I had to have installed, I wonder... Can the world be an more wonderful? No.
    I make my connections and give the monitor a once over to relish in this historical moment.
    I depress the power button, my heart is beating fast....
    ...
    ...
    The lights dim and go out.
    The breaker box blows.
    I am in the dark.

    The world could not be more wonderful... I love this.

    The phone rings.
    I answer.
    Not only have I blown my power, but half the grid is down.
    Life is good.

  42. About 12 inches by freeweed · · Score: 2
    Okay it may be great for corporate presentations but how far away do you have to sit to work at it!

    At 12 inches away, all the pr0n stars seem to be life-sized, and it feels like you're finally getting that lesbian orgy you've always wanted.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  43. If you really want a large LED dsiplay by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3

    You need some of these. Get a large array of true RGB LEDs and you're set. Of course the cost would probably be super expensive since I think they are still around $8/each in large volumes and you'd also have to build all the hadrware to control them.

  44. Re:Not for the desktop though! by glenkim · · Score: 4

    for god's sake, will somebody talk about the pr0n possibilities?

  45. monitor alleviates feelings of inferiority by Magumbo · · Score: 2

    Tokyo electronics company, NEC, released a huge 61-inch plasma monitor today. NEC spokesman, Keiichiro "Ketchup" Fujiwara, says it will alleviate much tension and feelings of inferiority among the workers at NEC. "We have long felt our NASDAQ symbol, NIPNY, is a racial slur and it has caused many employees to feel unmotivated," said Fujiwara. Then, while destroying an intricate model of New York City, he added, "This new monitor will force people to look at us differently, like Gojira rising from the deep to destroy Mosura." [ed: "Gojira" and "Mosura" are known in the western hemisphere as "Godzilla" and "Mothra", respectively]

    --

  46. I have a projector... by sketerpot · · Score: 2
    I can hook up a projector to a computer with a higher screen resolution than that. The only problems would be lighting (the room would have to be dark, so keep this away from the cube farm) and focus.

    Projectors are a much cheaper way to run Quake. Now if they could get the same kind of resolution in dots per inch with that thing that normal CRTs do, and computers get so fast that you can run quake at a great frame rate, that would be cool.