Slashdot Mirror
IBM To Make CPU For Sony's PS3
SmasKenS writes "So, not only did they get to make the CPU for Nintendo's GameCube, now they work for Sony too. Saw this on voodooextreme first, they also got a link to BBC News." Now, granted, this is several years away from actually happening, (projected date of 2004) but the costs (and profits) that are involved are staggering.
Now we're gonna get "Peace, Love, and PS3" on our sidewalks.
I read through the posts that showed up here quickly and the posts over at voodooextreme and I think people are a bit confused.
The fact that IBM and sony announced their partnership here doesnt mean that they're switching gears already for the ps3. All it means is that they are announcing the beginning of development for the platform. How long did the ps2 take to develop? the x-box? a few years. This is nothing new in the way of business relations.
What I am excited to hear about though is the kinds of technologies that IBM is planning on using or hoping to use in their new chips... They have a few years to develop it so I assume they have some high goals!
I also wonder what platform squaresoft is going to contract to next. will they stick with sony? renew their relationship with nintendo? join the evil empire (scary thought)?
--onyx--
Seriously, though, it isn't the hardware that makes a console. What matters is who the companies that make games develop for. You could have the best system in the world, but if you don't get the Squaresofts of the world writing games for you, it won't amount to anything. While I pine for the days when writing your own 3d engine that beat all of the others was the mark of excelence, nowadays it is the artfulness and resourcefulness of the game design that matters. The key, now, will be attracting the developers to one side or the other. Part of that will be done by market forces, but part of it will also be done by how friendly the company is to developers. During the PS1/N64 competition, Sony showed they were superior in this aspect, as many of Nintendo's long-time supporters switched over to sony, even though their platforms were comparable (sony's had a little better overall performance for the cost, but not too much...). Anyways, we'll see what happens now, when the mists clear.
- Rei
You know when it's okay to shout fire in a crowded theatre? When it's on fire.
" "The result will be consumer devices that are more powerful than IBM's Deep Blue super-computer, operate at low power and access the broadband internet at ultra-high speeds," the statement added."
It's really great to see that all of IBM's investments in basic research in naoscale technologies will find their apotheosis in making Lara Crofts boobs jiggle EXACTLY like Angelina Jolie's. God I can't wait for the future to be here.
It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries
Instead of IBM developing 2 chips, why couldn't they develop just one and send it to both Nintendo and Sony. Think they would notice? ;-)
;-)
It *would* lower the hardware production costs if Nintendo and Sony ever "standardized" on commodity hardware. Nahh, they'll never go for it, it would make too much sen$e.
Although IBM is a big bad company, they have retained "cool" status because of the following (in no particular order):
Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
This isn't a new role for IBM at all. IBM was contracted to make and assemble Atari Jaguars. As most /.er know, they fab Transmeta's chips too.
IBM one of the best fabribation capacities in the industry, so it should be no surprise they would built PS3's.
Why does this take three years?
Allow me to read from the History of Video Games poster on my wall (USA release dates):
Atari: 2600 = 1977; 5200 = 1982; 7800 = 1987.
Nintendo: NES = 1985; SNES = 1991; N64 = 1996.
Sony: Playstation = 1995; PS2 = 2000.
Do you notice anything?
I'd be *greatly* surprised if a console didn't take 3-5 years between generations. The legions of Sony fans who cried "it (the PS2) better be backwards-compatible!" just left me shaking my head in disbelief.
It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
from the article:
The three companies aim to design a "super-computer on a chip" with a wide variety of consumer applications, they said in a joint statement.
"The result will be consumer devices that are more powerful than IBM's Deep Blue super-computer, operate at low power and access the broadband internet at ultra-high speeds," the statement added.
me:
Must resist urge...must...resist...must...res...
WOW CAN YOU IMAGINE A BEOWULF CLUSTER OF THOSE?!
please shoot me. for the love of god, shoot me...
If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
Too bad it's not Intel. I was actually looking forward to a combination of the two commercials' sounds at the end... Imagine if you will:
"Bling bling bling BLING - Play-sta-tion"
It's got a certain rhythm
psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo