Slashdot Mirror


Space Blimps

EccentricAnomaly writes: "JPL has a press release about an aerorover blimp for exploring Saturn's moon Titan. There's also a group that has been working on inflatable rovers for Mars and Titan. And there's a group working on flying robots, or aerobots for space exploration. With a 2.5 to 3 hour round-trip light time between Earth and Saturn, flying anything on Titan has got to be a little dicey."

31 of 77 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Not really important by Have+Blue · · Score: 2

    Do you have any URLs to support this? I find it hard to believe that a few million gallons of fuel is more expensive than the resources needed to keep humans alive indefinitely in a sealed environment and send them supplies from Earth as you propose.

    Perhaps wwe could plan some sort of self-returning mission: Take along equipment that can make fuel out of whatever you expect to find at the destination. Not an uncommon concept in sci-fi.

  2. Not really important by Have+Blue · · Score: 3

    It's all nice and geeky and all that, but it would be better to go for depth of exploration than breadth- Know all there is to know about a small subset of the possibilities than try to get a little of everything.

    Instead of trying to explore every planet in the solar system at once, we should be returning men to the moon, or heading out to Mars. The latter, while far more expensive and complex, would gain us far more knowledge than these probes ever would

    (I would propose establishing a permanent presence on the Moon or Mars, but I'm trying to be at least slightly realistic :) )

    1. Re:Not really important by BrianH · · Score: 2

      Ah, but you (and many people) make a mistake when assuming that Martian outposts must have a sealed environment. The Martian atmosphere contains carbon dioxide, and with a suitable energy source it's not even difficult to extract oxygen from it. If this extracted O2 is catalyzed with hydrogen, they can even make their own water (the hydrogen would have to be imported though...it exists in only trace amounts in the Martian atmosphere.)

      For every problem proposed, there is a solution. The truth of the matter is that we could have had men (and women) living on Mars over a decade ago, but governments apparently don't see the value in it. My only hope is that private industry will see the value in Mars and begin funding some private projects.

      --

      There is nothing so pathetic as seeing a beautiful young theory roughed up by a tough gang of facts.
    2. Re:Not really important by Teferi · · Score: 2

      The Clarke novel about Titan you're thinking of is Imperial Earth.
      There's also a rather good Baxter one, entitled Titan.

      --
      -- Veni, vidi, dormivi
    3. Re:Not really important by rde · · Score: 3

      but it would be better to go for depth of exploration than breaKnow all there is to know about a small subset of the possibilities than try to get a little of everything.
      Eventually, yes; but first you've got to know where the best place to look is.

      Consider mars: when Viking found nothing of profound interest, everyone said 'we looked in the wrong place'. Ditto pathfinder. Now that MGS has done a GS of M, we've a much better idea of good places to look. Sure the flood plain for pathfinder was a good idea, but we've much better data now about where water and/or life is/was likely to survive.

    4. Re:Not really important by isomeme · · Score: 2
      (I would propose establishing a permanent presence on the Moon or Mars, but I'm trying to be at least slightly realistic :) )

      Oddly enough, it would probably be cheaper to establish a permanent presence on Mars than to conduct a there-and-back mission. The logistics involved in returning to orbit from the Martian surface and boosting back to Earth get hairy. If you can find volunteers willing to go to Mars with virtually no hope of returning in their lifetimes, you can massively reduce the size (and hence cost) of the vehicle(s) required. What's more, using a scheme like Zubrin's Mars Direct, you can robotically land supplies, power and atmosphere generation gear, and the like before the colonists arrive, and supplementary supplies afterward on a continuing basis.

      I'm not sure the public is ready to support a one-way Mars colony project, but I'm sure there would be no shortage of volunteers.

      --

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    5. Re:Not really important by isomeme · · Score: 2
      Read the Mars Direct site I posted. You'll find that the bulk of the mission complexity and cost involves return-flight issues. It's not that fuel is expensive, it's that hauling it out to Mars or generating (some of) it in situ there, and making a lander that can also take off again and reach Mars orbit, are hard/expensive propositions.

      --

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    6. Re:Not really important by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but the all-your-eggs-in-one-basket issue is going to choke one of these days and we'll all sit by for a few weeks until they run out of air and die. Imagine the Nightlines every night for that, NASA.

      Only when that happens will NASA take the middle road, pre-launching everything they'll need for an extended stay (not to mention ongoing supply updates.) THEN you may launch someone there, and don't forget a machine shop to fabricate things that will end up busted or improperly designed.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    7. Re:Not really important by Zac+Thompson · · Score: 4
      Actually, Titan is one of the few places in the solar system that is a really good candidate for supporting life natively. It has a nitrogen and hydrocarbon atmosphere, with plenty of the required building blocks for amino acids. It's bigger than Mercury or Pluto; the atmosphere is only about 60% higher pressure than Earth's ... I think there's a Clarke novel about Titan. Anyone? http://www.to-scorpio.com/titanfacts.htm

      Unfortunately, it's damn cold, but a human presence should start creating some global lunar warming right away ;)

  3. Serious LAG by Sabalon · · Score: 4

    With a 2.5 to 3 hour round-trip light time between Earth and Saturn, flying anything on Titan has got to be a little dicey."

    And I thought lag on my cable modem was bad.

    I would assume some system would be incorporated to have it auto-navigate.
    if(mountain) turn left;

    1. Re:Serious LAG by seanmeister · · Score: 3

      I think it's safe to say that you could fly through the mountains, or just about any other surface feature, on Saturn.

      --

    2. Re:Serious LAG by Alien54 · · Score: 2
      And I thought lag on my cable modem was bad.
      I would assume some system would be incorporated to have it auto-navigate.
      if(mountain) turn left;

      You need some Artificial Intelligence stuff. Since Titan is one of the better candidates for native life in the solar system, it is always nice to have the "Run Away!" option.

      Check out the Vinny the Vampire comic strip

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  4. Re:Not going to work by Teferi · · Score: 2

    Thin?
    Titan's atmosphere is certainly not thin. It essentially consists of both short-chain and long-chain hydrocarbons - rather dense air!

    --
    -- Veni, vidi, dormivi
  5. is that the best they can do? by option8 · · Score: 2

    sure, the nasa budget's been cut back and all, but, if they can construct a 6.5 meter robotic inflatable sphere to invade.. er.. explore mars, don't you think they could do a little better than spraypainting a soccer ball black and photoshopping it into a martian landscape with a shuttle astronaut in front?

    http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/adv_tech/rovers/Rovr_art/t mbl_fot.jpg

    yeesh..

  6. Blimps contravein missle treaties! by vik · · Score: 2

    I have discovered through my work with TransOrbital Inc. on our lunar orbiter due for launch in December that putting an inflatable up is an administrative nightmare. You see, they get classed as deployabe, untethered ICBM decoys due to some short-sighted treaty wording. Daft, eh?

    Vik :v)

  7. What we need is by Scutter · · Score: 4

    What we need is a good inflatable technology scientist. Paging Dr. Schlock...

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    1. Re:What we need is by loki*J · · Score: 3

      For those who didn't get this, www.sluggy.com

  8. Already in the works for Buffy by KFury · · Score: 2

    Jos Whedon, Buffy:TVS creator, has already pioneered using Zepplin technology over Neptune for an upcoming episode.

    Kevin Fox
    --

  9. What massive pressure on the hull? by jcr · · Score: 2

    If I wanted to inflate something like a blimp in a vacuum, I'd only introduce enough gas to make it assume the shape I wanted (like the Echo satellites in the 1960's), and then add gas as necessary to maintain the shape when approaching the planet or moon in question.

    BTW, the larger the surface area/mass ratio, the less the space blimp has to heat up upon entering an atmosphere. Not everything has to heat up like a Mercury capsule or a Space Shuttle.

    Keith Henson[1] once figured out that a solar sail heading right for the center of the earth from an interplanetary trajectory would come to a very gentle stop, and actually float in the stratosphere on a warm-air bubble trapped under the sail.

    -jcr

    [1] Yes, *that* Keith Henson. www.freehenson.da.ru

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  10. funny by joq · · Score: 3


    Maybe NASA's JPL could team with DoubleClick or something to sell ad space, and raise money for NASA or even a charity. Sure it sounds stupid at first but wouldn't you like to think of yourself to have been the first to have your banner floating in space with the possibility of E.T.'s seeing it ;)

  11. Don't forget near-space blimps here on earth ... by taniwha · · Score: 3
    J P Aerospace are researching high altitude blimp platforms (20 miles up) for launch to LEO - basicly you blimp/balloon up to a floating launch platform, hop on a rocket and launch from there (thus avoiding the bulk of the atmosphere).

    JP are and interesting crowd - basicly a small-scale amateur space program

  12. Aberystwyth Uni doing same by illtud · · Score: 3
    Aberystwyth (Wales, UK) have a research project into 'aerobots' designed for planetary exploration. See introduction:

    http://users.aber.ac.uk/ajs99/Altairhtml/Altair.sh tml

    and photos:

    http://users.aber.ac.uk/ajs99/Altairhtml/presspics .shtml

    I'm not connected with them, I just work down the road.

  13. Re:Not going to work by iainl · · Score: 2

    Doh! Wrong gas giant. Serves me right for typing all that straight from five-year-old memory.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  14. No Hindenburg repeat by The+Gline · · Score: 2

    I once discussed something vaguely similar with a somewhat science-illiterate friend, and he expressed horror at the idea.

    "Blimps?! On a GAS GIANT?" he gagged. "One spark and the whole damn planet would turn into a supernova! This would make the Hindenburg look like a firecracker! It's dangerous! Mankind's arrogance is going to destroy the universe... blah, blah... "

    It took two hours to explaining to tell him why this would not happen (because of a lack of anything for the methane gas to combust WITH, like OXYGEN).

    Some people...

    --
    Honorary Member of Jackie Chan's Kung Fu Process Servers
  15. Warning : Go to Titan..but forget about Europa by cOdEgUru · · Score: 2

    All the worlds are yours
    Except Europa
    Dont attempt to land in Europa
    Explore them together, Explore them in peace..

    David Bowman

  16. Re:Balloons On Venus Can Inject Life There by Luminous · · Score: 2

    I agree. There are bacteria that live right next to underwater lava flows, there are bacteria that love to munch sulfur -- ship a few canisters to Venus and wait a couple million years. It'd be ripe for a colony right up until the Sun explodes. Of course, if it is too hot on Venus, they could always try this trick with it.

    --
    This is not the way to build a lasting empire.
  17. What's sad.... by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 5

    ...is that, depite going to these pages and seeing the technology, I really feel in my gut that much of this is decades away. These agencies (NASA, JPL) seem so slow-moving. It seems crazy, but more and more I find I am pinning my dreams of space onto civilians like "Rocketguy" and Dennis Tito. It is frustrating to look at the new technologies and be so jaded about them, but what normal people are doing to get into space soon excites me in ways that NASA can't match.

  18. This is just a NASA smokescreen by typical+geek · · Score: 5

    covering up their real interest in inflatables in space.

    I can't say much more (NDA, you know), but think about normal, red blooded American men in space for 3 1/2 years on the round trip to Mars, and the cost to get one of these into orbit (at $10,000 a pound) for each astronaut.

    Yes, inflatables are the answer.

  19. Oh no... by g0thm0g · · Score: 4

    Sir, we calculated the pressure in stones per square inch, not pounds! There goes another $4 million.

    --
    Elbereth Gilthoniel!
  20. Correction by sllort · · Score: 3

    This article is not about space blimps. It is about extra-planetary blimps. The distinction, of course, is that an extra-planetary blimp is inflated on a remote planet, and used for exploration. A true space blimp would be inflated in space. This would, of course, cause massive pressure on the hull, and provide no levitation since there is no gravity to push against and no differential air pressure to provide a lifting force.

    Space blimps do exist, however. The article just doesn't mention them.

    This is the part of the post where I would whine about how the /. editors don't read the stories, if I were that kind of guy.

  21. Not going to work by ShortedOut · · Score: 2

    We can't send a human being around the world in a balloon, what makes us think that we can send a helium filled balloon to Titan, and have it successfully circumnavigate that moon without any problems?
    We can't even use those remote controlled balloons around the house without ripping it on a ceiling fan!
    It won't work guys, do not waste time, and money on this thing. You won't be able to make it light enough, and strong enough for a foreign atmosphere. The propellers alone would have to be like 21 feet long to work in that thin of atmosphere!!!
    Peace!!!
    ShortedOut