Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

End Of reality For Silicon Graphics

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the end-of-an-era-you-didn't-know-we-were-in dept.

Zurk writes: "SGI is turning off its famous employee web server http://reality.sgi.com on August 15th. The machine has been running for nearly 10 YEARS and has resulted in a number of really kewl IRIX applications (and some linux ones as well) distributed from employee web pages at SGI. Games/source code/pictures/irix tips and examples of working life at this once great company will no longer be available." Seems like the sort of thing that every business ought to maintain, for employee sanity and general niceness -- too bad this one is about to go.

7 of 130 comments (clear)

  1. Hear, hear! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

    In terms of having good product but poor marketing, SGI reminds me a lot of DEC, another three-letter acronym company. Alpha was way ahead of its time. There can be no doubt that hardware "creep" is hurting SGI (i.e. the gulf between low-end, commodity, hardware and high end SGI stuff is becoming smaller).

    Indeed! All of the companies that have extensive and solid marketing (Sun, Apple, Intel, Microsoft) are the ones with the worst technology.

    Unfortunately, it's the innovative, engineering-focused companies like DEC and SGI that have the worst marketing, hoping that the merits of their products will market themselves...

    In the fickle consumer-space dominated by MBAs and technically-deficient CIO/CTOs, companies like DEC and SGI lose.

    Who will play the role with SGI that Compaq played with DEC? IBM?

    If what Compaq did with DEC Alpha is any indicator, then any acquisition of SGI by [Sun,IBM] would also probably infer that the buyer will kill any innovative SGI technology because it would:

    • Cost too much to support in the short-term. In the example of Compaq and Alpha, Compaq's bean-counters probably deduced that they could increase quarterly earnings without Alpha development. However, they are also killing any opportunity to differentiate their high-end Tru64/VMS/Non-Stop products from anyone else producing Intel Itanium boxes.
    • NIH syndrome. Compaq is a PC company first and foremost, so this would probably not apply. To Intel who will be the benefactor of Alpha development/fab/compiler technology, they will absorb only what will benefit Itanium but discard anything else. They should be thankful they have one less established competitor in the 64-bit space.

    For SGI, an acquisition by Sun/IBM would result in much the same. SGI was already transitioning off MIPS anyways but ccNUMA, MIPSpro compiler and XFS/LVM technology would either be one less competitive threat or a technological advantage.

    As you can surmise, I have very little confidence in the technical expertise of Sun, Apple or IBM compared to SGI or DEC :-/

    Likewise, I also have very little confidence in MBAs, bean counters and those idiots who believe that market forces create anything innovative or intelligent ;-)

    Slashdot readers may appreciate this excerpt of Ken Olsen, founder and former CEO of Digital Equipment:

    OLSEN SPEAKS OUT

    Short-sighted investors will do anything to have $1 more at the end of the quarter, the ousted founder of Digital, Ken Olsen, told a forum of about 300 entrepreneurs in March 1994.

    Olsen, now 67, reminisced about Digital's early days and debunked conventional wisdom. He noted that most great revolutions in technology, such as the hand-held calculator or the Sony Walkman, were not predicted. "The worst thing one can do is read the front page of the business section of The New York Times to figure out what they are. I guarantee every one of those is a failure," he declared.

    No loyalty

    Nor did the stock market escape unscathed. "I say never go public with your company. The only trouble is there's often no choice," Olsen told the entrepreneurs. Going public, he says, means putting the company's fate in the hands of often short-sighted investors. "Owners today have no loyalty to the company. They don't care about the company or the country. They would do anything to have $1 more at the end of the quarter," he said.

    Nonetheless, even a privately held company should be accountable to someone, Olsen suggested. "Boards of directors can be a pain in the neck," with directors often "overpaid" and "underworked," he said. But company managers should prepare reports for them, perhaps monthly. "You need that discipline. If they don't know enough to ask those things, make believe they do."

    As for his tenure at Digital, Olsen said "I was beat up unmercifully" in the press and by analysts "for not having mass layoffs."

    The Boston Globe, 6-Apr-94

  2. best answer yet... by cabbey · · Score: 5

    generated by http://lavarand.sgi.com/cgi-bin/corpspeak.cgi

    To: fans of reality.sgi.com
    From: bean counters
    Date: Sat Jul 7 13:09:57 PDT 2001
    Subject: immenent death/dismemberment

    An OEM scripting language negotiates the mergers, on a going-forward basis. For us to grow, we absolutely have to develop scripting languages. Due to the meta-services and paradigm shifts, what has changed is the pace of change.

    We absolutely have to develop a solution as well. Given current realities, communication empowers the Strategic Initiative. Having a plug-in that is fiscal, it follows that data disseminate a prominent suite of tools. As always, goals are the team.

  3. What SGI now stands for by sien · · Score: 5

    Soon Going Insolvent.

  4. classic lavarand site on reality is going away too by chongo · · Score: 5
    Not only are the employee home pages are going away, but so are the other services that are co-hosted on reality.

    The classic lavarand site (random numbers via Lava Lite Lamps), which is hosted on reality, is going away as well.

    We are planning to bring on-line a and improved version of LavaRnd (open sourced and patent-free) at www.LavaRnd.org hopefully before reality goes away.

    --
    chongo (was here) /\oo/\
  5. Why? by Jagasian · · Score: 5

    How about you tell us why its being taken down? I mean, is it because of budget problems, or is it due to a change in management?

  6. Re:Money Trouble ... by InsaneGeek · · Score: 5

    What exactly is the problem you are/were having. Using them for years I can say Irix is my favorite, as long as people are willing to *not* use the GUI for administration (elsewise you are really limiting yourself) it can't be beat (give me "inst" over any other rpm, aptget, pkgadd crap).

    Are you having a performance issue?? Memory, CPU, disk I/O? More than likely it's a simple thing that you don't know about, or has been fixed in the past 4 years.

    Irix must work properly/reliably for lots of people or else they wouldn't continue to sell their thousand proc plus single image configurations. You can't have downtime or not have it work exactly the way you want it when you are 30 days in to a 60 day calculation.

    The *REAL* reason SGI is floundering is because for years they could never market themselves out of a paper bag. You can have the best stuff in the world, but if your sales force doesn't quite get it...

  7. Good Customer Service = Bankruptcy by tenzig_112 · · Score: 5
    Yikes. I have so much of my career invested with these business school drop-outs it isn't even funny.

    It just goes to show you that full-service customer support will only get you in trouble. "Treat your customers like crap," I told them years ago. "They'll respect you more that way." But they wouldn't listen. You have a $15k graphics board go hinky on you? They'll drop ship it with a moment's notice.

    My hat is off to the beautiful people at sgi. They did the support thing right and are paying the price for it.

    When I die, I hope to go to the place most like sgi tech support.