Slashdot Mirror


Select or Lock Hard Drives... With a Key

robvasquez writes "Dr. Tom has done a review of a great $16.95 hard disk swapper. This could be a great tool for those of use who dual boot, without bootloaders, or danger to other drives/partitions. Flip the key and power the system up to the OS of your choice. Sure beats popping IDE cables on and off drives and boards." Some things are so simple its amazing they aren't more common. Totally clever idea.

53 of 144 comments (clear)

  1. HOW DID THIS STORY MAKE IT THROUGH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Gee. I submitted a story, only about it being System Administrator Appreciation Day. Rejected. About HackHU giving into the threat of legal action and going down. Rejected.

    And this piece of crap story makes it through?!?

  2. I've found it helps a lot by alewando · · Score: 4
    Harddrive swapping was a good idea three years ago, but the support hadn't really come through from the industry. Today's a different question entirely.

    Now that I've gotten a few nicklocks, I can
    • Keep a mirror drive handy when the one I do my development on dies.
    • Bring my code with me without having to juggle zipdisks or upload enormous files.
    • Use Linux on standard machine configurations without having to repartition the local harddisk or otherwise disturb my friends' computers much.


    I honestly can't speak highly enough about them. Of course it hasn't solve all the problems with IRQ conflicts I run into, but it is a step in the right direction and a welcome addition to my home computing environment.

    The only site on the Internet that gets it right.
  3. Re:Not a bad idea but... by sheldon · · Score: 2

    Well yes. I tried to explain VMWare to some of our technical people at work, and they were baffled. :(

    But even so, VMWare does have certain limitations because it emulates so many device drivers. Still VMWare is a pretty good solution for testing.

    There is also a new product from Connectix that claims to be similar. Unfortunately they don't have a trial, and it's by the same company that screwed me over back in 1995 with RAM Doubler.

  4. More Trouble than it is Worth! by Black+Art · · Score: 2

    Wow! You get to change between *two* hard drives!

    Removable hard drive trays are much better. (I use them for the few times I use Windows to isolate it from non-Windows data. MS does not play well with others.)

    One big warning on removable hard drive trays...

    When you buy them, buy twice as many as you think you will need. Make sure they are all the same brand and model. There are many places that make them and NO standard wiring for them. One brand may not work with the other or even fit in the tray slot. And worst of all, you may never find that brand again!

    Not fun when you have three (or more) boot drives and only two drive trays that work on the primary slot.

    --
    "Trademarks are the heraldry of the new feudalism."
  5. Re:So im buying one!!! by unitron · · Score: 2
    After reading the comments I've come to the conclusion that even out of the slashdot readers who read the article most don't know as much about IDE drives as they think that they do. Looks like Tom and the NickLock folks don't either.

    This thing might work if you just happen to have the right hard drives, but if you *don't*, you'll probably wind up ripping it out of the case with your bare hands, flinging it to the floor, and stomping it to powder.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  6. Actually, according to TFA, only one is active by rthille · · Score: 2

    http://www.tomshardware.com/storage/01q3/010727/ni cklock-02.html

    Quoted:
    Although it might have been useful to include a setting that lets you choose both drives, there is probably a good reason why NickLock only allows you to select between single drives or none. For one thing, only a few drives run as slave by default if no jumper mode is set. The majority of drives run in single or master mode by default, and if you use two of them, there is no way to assign the specific drives to master or slave, thus causing a conflict.

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  7. Re:how many newbies... by sharkey · · Score: 2

    this is just supposed to make it more brainless...

    How does this make Windows more brainless? I didn't think that was possible.

    --

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  8. Words of warning by fordp · · Score: 2
    Back around 1995 or so I worked for a hardware distributor one of our vendors sold these so we bought some to test them out.

    At the time they were ok for us, we kept multiple OSes on multiple drives, no bootloader, let us run NT, DOS, Linux, Novell without much hassle. They were most useful for file storage. Since the Max HD size was much smaller in 95, we found times when it was useful for us to swap out entire HDs. Overall however the drives were sensitve to shock, and if you weren't careful you could damage the drives quite easily.

    Later I was working at a small university who used these in one of their labs, I can't quite say I understand why. They thought it a good idea. Here is where we found the biggest problems. The locks are of the $1.95 Hardware Store variety, and they are mounted in plastic. They may to a reasonable job holding a metal desk droor shut but student regularly would rip them right out the machine.

    Worse yet, they are not hot swappable. Which is fine if you remember never to yank them out while the machine is running. It is not fine the one time you yank one out while the machine is running.

    Before you buy one of these devices think about rather you really need it and remember:
    Bootloaders will allow you to boot most any operating system these days so it is unlikley this is really a good use of such a device.
    HDD's are getting bigger all the time, is a 16.95 drive caddy really worth it when you can buy a new HDD for only a few dollars a gigabyte.
    What OS do you run? How does it deal with drives and partitions? Sure bioses can autodetect different harddrive types, but will your OS like it? This isn't a problem ofcourse if its your boot drive.

    From my experience with these I would say they are a mixed blessing. Certainly bad for a non-controlled or production enviroment. On a personal machine they will work just fine (if you use care.) But I can't see myself buying anything like this in future. As I said, HDDs are far to cheap to make them all that useful, I can usually buy my current HD size+twice whatever I think I might need for under $200.

    Just my $0.02

  9. sheesh by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 2

    People, RTFA. Turning the key doesn't make one hard drive available and the other not available -- it just selects which is bootable. So you don't need three drives (i.e. Linux, Windows, Common Files), just two -- both drives are accessible at all times.

    1. Re:sheesh by Hershmire · · Score: 2

      Assuming the non-booting drive defaults to "slave" if there are no jumpers set on that drive. Of course, you knew that since the article stated it (it's in the back).

      --
      if(!toilet_paper) roll.replace(new roll); //Stupid roommates.
    2. Re:sheesh by hearingaid · · Score: 3

      huh. pot-kettle. from the article:

      Although it might have been useful to include a setting that lets you choose both drives, there is probably a good reason why NickLock only allows you to select between single drives or none. For one thing, only a few drives run as slave by default if no jumper mode is set. The majority of drives run in single or master mode by default, and if you use two of them, there is no way to assign the specific drives to master or slave, thus causing a conflict.

      twerp.

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  10. This is more general by gregbaker · · Score: 2

    Reading the article (and looking at the pictures), it seems like this thing is really just a jumper switch. In one key position, neither jumper is closed, in the other two positions one of the two is closed.

    There has to be more interresting things to do with this. Hmmm... It could switch processor speed if your mobo has jumpers to select such things. It could switch IRQs for old ISA cards that conflict differently in Linux and Windows (hey, it could happen).

    Any other ideas? Maybe you could short it across two processor pins to provide a "self destruct" switch. :-)

    Greg

  11. See also by novarese · · Score: 2

    Check out the romtec Trios. It switches between three drives at the push of a button, and has a saftey feature that prevents you from accidentily switching after boot-up. The only downside is you can't access the data on one drive if you boot from another.

  12. Sounds great to my TiVo by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 2

    Something like this was discussed in the AVS TiVo Forum not to long ago. The idea was that you could have your normal TiVo set of disk(s), and then you could have a second instance of TiVo that you use for programs you want to store long term.

  13. No access to both drives? by einTier · · Score: 2
    I'm very disappointed that there's no way to access both drives. Perhaps I'm mistaken, but it seems to me that it would be fairly simply to wire this device up to switch pin configurations, particularly if you set jumpers on all pins. With some simple wiring, you could flip a switch to get the drives to align in any of the four possible IDE configurations. Perhaps this is a project for myself, as the overall idea is a good one.

    For those that say Lilo isn't that hard to set up, it isn't, but sometimes it's nice to have OS's on their own hard drives, with their own MBR. That way, you can completely blow away the drive and know you're only loosing the OS (and shared data) on that drive.

    --
    -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
    1. Re:No access to both drives? by omega9 · · Score: 2

      Ummm... Did you do any follow up to this or do you usually get 'very disappointed' with little effort? I read the review and noticed it didn't mention being able to access both at the same time, so on a whim I tried The Nicklock homepage for more info. At the bottom of one of the pages it says that accessing both drives is possible.

      The information is out there. Don't get disappointed because you have to look for it.

      Omega9
      chown us base

      --
      I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
  14. You're right, I only read the review of the item by einTier · · Score: 2
    I thought that would be enough. I wasn't interested enough in the item to really do some fact checking on the manufacturer's website. Now that I've seen how it's done, I'll make one myself that doesn't take up a full sized bay, and doesn't cost me $16 USD.

    In the article I read I found the following quotes:

    After installing NickLock, you can access a key switch at the front of your PC, which lets you choose between the two drives or make both drives inaccessible to the system.

    The key switch has three different positions: Left, right and middle. This picture shows the key at middle position, which causes neither of the drives to be accessible to the system, effectively creating a lock. If you switch the key to left position, it selects the drive on the left by having its cable close its master jumper.

    Although it might have been useful to include a setting that lets you choose both drives, there is probably a good reason why NickLock only allows you to select between single drives or none.

    Sure sounds to me like you can't have both drives operational at the same time.

    --
    -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
  15. Re:porn and more by coyote-san · · Score: 2

    While this is one use (*cough*), anyone storing confidential records on clients/customers should consider storing all of that information on a tray-mounted drive which is locked in a safe overnight.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  16. Re:Hmm.. by thogard · · Score: 4

    I've been hot swapping ide drives for quite some time with the cheap (US$10) drive caddies. So far I've only had one drive die and I suspect that was due to other abuse like being dropped.

    On a box with a 2.2.* kernel, I've got a small c program that reloads the ide hd info and then I can mount a drive. I use the drives for backup since they are much cheaper than any tape/tape drive combo I could find.

    The problem is the hotswap program won't work on 2.4.

    If anyone wants the program, email me but its basicly:
    exit(ioctl(fopen("/dev/hda", O_RDONLY),HDIO_SCAN_HWIF,atoi(argv[1])));
    with error checks.

  17. Re:Hmm.. by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
    Last time I checked, CS (cable select) was still a valid option. Put both racks on the same IDE controller and just set your enclosed HDDs to CS. Then label the outer racks as master and slave.

    How many computers support cable select? I've worked with Compaqs and HPs that use it, but will your run-of-the-mill clone assembled from parts support cable select?

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  18. Military uses these all the time by devphil · · Score: 2
    One guy I knew used it to enforce discipline on himself. [...] one was work and one was play/

    Yup. It's the exact same setup used in research labs, except one is unclassified and one is secret. At the end of the day, you power down, pop out the classified drive, and lock it in a safe.

    Nothing new here, move along, move along... :-)

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  19. bay by British · · Score: 2

    I had a removable hard drive bay, with out the mentioned switch, and needless to say, I took it out.

    I could hear the hard drive power up and down over and over again for some strange reason. I had all the cables on nice and snug, but it just didn't seem to like being in a bay.

  20. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  21. Not quite what I want by El · · Score: 2

    Cute, but I'd rather have four jumpers, two to each drive, so I can just swap master and slave for dual boot...

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  22. XP does not have an MBR wipe by steveha · · Score: 3
    Word is that WinXP will rewrite the MBR

    My wife signed up to test WinXP. We installed it on an expendable computer. This computer was set up to dual-boot between Win98 and Linux, with the GRUB bootloader. WinXP is not re-writing the MBR. Ever since the install GRUB comes up unchanged, Linux still boots, but choosing "windows" in GRUB now boots into XP instead of 98. This is the RC1 version of WinXP (build 2505).

    Microsoft is possibly insane enough to put in an MBR wiping "feature" but they are definitely not insane enough to put one in at the very last minute. Therefore I state with some confidence that the release version of XP won't have an MBR wipe either.

    (By the way, so far I just hate XP. Most of the changes to the user interface annoy me, and the spare computer--a 450 MHz box with a GeForce 2 and 128MB of RAM--isn't quite fast enough to run XP well.)

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  23. my team uses this at work by egomaniac · · Score: 3

    We use swappable drive bays at work. We have a single computer with a dozen hard drives -- each one contains a different test environment (Win95, Win98, WinNT, Win2000, WinME, Chinese, Korean, etc.)

    This is (to me) a lot better than using System Commander, as it's much easier to be 100% that your system is completely plain-vanilla and any weirdness can be directly attributed to your software. It's also a lot smaller form-factor than a room full of systems...

    --- egomaniac

    --
    ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
  24. OK, this is cool by aozilla · · Score: 2

    After reading all the comments, and then finally reading the article, I finally see what it is this thing actually does, switches your jumpers between master and "not master". Now, what would be cool is if they could build these things into the already very cool removable drive bays. Basically have a switch on the front of the caddy itself to switch between master and slave.

    Remember, I said it here first, so don't try to get a patent or anything. There is a patent on the NickLock, but this probably wouldn't infringe.

    --
    ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
  25. Re:Hmm.. by omega9 · · Score: 2

    Then, if you want to swap the hard drive, you can turn off the computer and take the drives you want to swap, then don't forget to switch the master/slave jumpers too.

    Last time I checked, CS (cable select) was still a valid option. Put both racks on the same IDE controller and just set your enclosed HDDs to CS. Then label the outer racks as master and slave.

    Omega9
    chown us base

    --
    I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
  26. Turbo Switch by 10.0.0.1 · · Score: 5

    I did a similar thing years ago with 2 525MB drives. I used the (useless) turbo switch to select master/slave on both drives, allowing me to access data on both drives in either configuration. Problem then was that the BOIS didn't auto-detect geometry information, so both drives had to be identical. Worked great, though.

    --
    forth ?love if honk then
  27. How? by green+pizza · · Score: 2

    What was your wiring configuration? All of my cases with Turbo switches just used a dinky single pole, single throw push button for Turbo.

  28. Just use a hotswap tray, it's NES-like! by green+pizza · · Score: 2

    Go down to Fry's and buy a couple IDE hotswap trays and install it in a spare 5.25" bay. Get some spare drives. Pretend your PC is a Nintendo and insert your cartridge (drive) of choice... BeOS, NT, Linux, FreeBSD, DOS 6.22, Darwin, QNX, WinXP, OS/2, Solaris x86, etc...

  29. Hmm.. by PopeAlien · · Score: 5

    I dunno, I use Removable Hard Drive Trays, which make more sense for me.. I not only want to be able to switch drives, but move the drives between home/office etc.. I picked up several removable trays for $20 each (canadian even!) and am quite happy with them.

    This lock switch seems overpriced at $16.95. Parts would cost you about $6 or less I imagine..

  30. Not a bad idea but... by QwkHyenA · · Score: 4
    ...you're limited to two hard drives. At work and at home I use removable hard drives all the time.

    At home I use it to simplify my computer needs by having:

    A gaming system

    A linux box

    And Win2K box for days when I work at home

    At work we use them for developmental testing. All we do is slap a new clean HD into the computer. Boot it up. Run our software installation and try to crash it. Rinse and Repeat as needed.

    One problem! The removable kits AREN'T STANDARDIZED! So, if you are going to jump into removable hard drive kits, make sure you buy what you need and then some! I've run into some that won't give the HD power til it's locked, others that give power upon being inserted and worse yet....Ones that are poorly ventilated!

    All and all...Saves tons of money by not having to shell out da clams for tons of new computers (and upgrading them all once a week...)

    --
    LFS. Have you built your system today?
  31. Re:how many newbies... by graveyhead · · Score: 2
    I cannot count the number of newbies that kill their windows partition by installing linux!
    Blame Windows for this, not linux. There is a fairly easy fix, but it is not very well documented:
    fdisk /mbr
    This restores the master boot record to the way Windows likes it. So what you need to do is have a dos boot disk ready with fdisk on it, in case of emergency. It sucks that newbies can lose data this way, but it doesn't "kill their windows partition," they do it themselves when they use that OEM restore disk.
    --
    std::disclaimer<std::legalese> sig=new std::disclaimer; sig->dump(); delete sig;
  32. Defense against WinXP's MBR wipe by blab · · Score: 3
    Word is that WinXP will rewrite the MBR (Mater Boot Record) eachtime it is booted into. That means byebye Linux partition for those who dualboot! This might make a great defense.

    But will you go to jail if you use one as a circumvention device???

  33. sheesh is right! by DreamingReal · · Score: 2
    huh. kettle-pot. from the Install page at the website:
    Setup
    Enter Setup
    Normal use, no connection between harddisks
    In the setup chose automatic detect on your first IDE unit.
    If you like to boot from either one HDD and be able to reach the other Set also the slave to automatic.


    -------

    --
    We want some answers and all that we get
    Some kind of shit about a terrorist threat

    - Ministry
  34. Speaking of sheesh by update() · · Score: 2
    And look how many people are under the impression that this is one of those removable hard drive gadgets! I mean, the article begins:

    The NickLock is meant to simplify the rather annoying process of changing the main hard drive. Usually, to change the hard drive you have to first open the case and change the IDE jumper settings and probably the cabling as well. The typical way around this inconvenience is to use a removable frame system, in which each hard drive that you plan to use is installed into its own frame. After shutting down the computer, the drives can be exchanged freely. However, this solution is not ideal if you have to do this frequently, since hard drives are sensitive to physical movement. In the worst-case scenario, you could cause a head crash if you remove the drive before the read/write heads have been securely parked. In a more harmless scenario, the bearings could get out of whack, resulting in a noisier drive in the idle state.

    With the NickLock, you can avoid these kinds of hazards and inconveniences.

    Unsettling MOTD at my ISP.

  35. Re:Defense against WinXP's MBR wipe -- Fix by BrynM · · Score: 2
    Go check out the HowTo on setting up linux in the Win2K/NT OS Loader menu. I've used this several times without fail.

    Links:
    http://www.littlewhitedog.com/reviews_other_00011. asp
    http://lists.linux-india.org/lists/linux-delhi/200 105/msg00179.html
    or the handy mini-howto
    http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/mini/Linux+NT-Loader .html

    bm :)-~

    --
    US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
  36. What a moron. by MWoody · · Score: 2
    Did the author of that article even test the product? It seems he understands the whole concept of "master pin closed on one drive means master, open on other means slave," and he even gives diagrams of how the cables connect to the jumpers, but he still thinks the lock disables one drive!? How, by switching which HDD is master and which is slave, does one become inactive? As long as both have power and are on the same IDE chain (neither of which is affected by this device) both will be seen by any reasonably competent BIOS.

    Maybe the author is trying to indicate that the device may not work in a single-drive system, which may indeed be the case on older drives (those that won't allow a single HDD to be set to "Master" instead of "single). Maybe he knows some intricate secret of HDD setups that I've missed in many a year of buidling and fixing computers. Maybe he's just a moron, and folks should check out the NickLock website instead of reading this POS review. Guess which one I choose?

    Note: Having read the Nicklock website, it appears that it is not much better than Tom's Hardware for explanations. Yeesh.
    ---

    1. Re:What a moron. by MWoody · · Score: 2

      But, this is exactly what I was saying. Most BIOS are set to AutoDetectHDD, so a master/slave switch will almost always end up in both hard drives being accessible. The article talks like that's impossible, and laments over the restriction. The NickLock website I didn't examine too closely, so it may have been more correct.
      ---

  37. Some additional points by MWoody · · Score: 2

    Some folks are claiming that the article is correct, since the drive doesn't allow you to set the "slave" jumper. But 99% of drives out there assume that an open master jumper means slave. If a slave jumper is even present, it's just a holding place. Why use two jumpers, and thereby create a four-state system, when you only need to know on or off?

    Another thing that had been bugging me was why there were four connectors. I should have read the nicklock site closer, so that I would have found this picture. Each drive connection has two different size jumpers to accomodate different drive styles. Duh on my part.

    All in all, a cool little device. Might pick on up, even if that IS too much for those parts, since I've neither the time nor the inclination to build one myself.
    ---

  38. Re:how many newbies... by 3-State+Bit · · Score: 2

    Well, your fingers weave quick minarets; Speak in secret alphabets;
    I light another cigarette; Learn to forget

    Well, your fingers weave some quick applets; ROTs their secret alphabets;
    DMCA gets on your ass; Wish you'd not never taught that class.



    I could do better, but it's late.

    --

  39. What I always thought would be cool.... by 3-State+Bit · · Score: 2
    (and the title had my hopes up)...A hard-drive controller that reads a PGP (or GPG) key into super-volatile onboard cache (maybe with enough juice in it to automatically wipe a few passes of 1's and 0's over it whenever the hard-drive loses power?) and isn't willing to read or write a byte until it gets it, but reports all geometry stuff correctly. Then, which hard-drives are on are a matter of which keys you manually load and type pass-phrases for. And, best of all, all the partitions still see each other, so you don't need to worry about windows stuff suddenly popping up on drive D: and breaking 3,000,000 registry entries that point at C:. Don't want to accidentally format a hard-drive? Simply send it a low-level command to lock. Then, take out the floppy that had your private key, and put it into a locked drawer. You're 100% safe from damaging your hard-drive, your hard-drive doesn't have to be moved around physically, and you don't need to power down to add or remove partitions. Hell, you could even have the controllers have a proprietary set of LEDs that fit into to a normal bay (y'know, so they have a visible face-plate like your cd-rom drive has, like certain SBLIVE!s, I think) and have blinkers for exactly which hard-drive is curently on and which is not. You can even have buttons below each of the available LEDs which, when pressed, drop the key as soon as the hard-drive hasn't been read or written to for 3 seconds. Most software copes just fine with having secondary storage (hard-drives) suddenly disappear, even your /swap partition, I think...certainly usually what happens when you take out a floppy while it's not writing is nothing catastrophic. Rather, you get a read error, which you can choose to fail on.
    The best parts of this are:
    1. Your controller is the one responsible for all this. All your hard-drive EVER holds is strongly encrypted bits. Way secure.
    2. Because you have your private key on several diskettes, when the LED is off indicating that you have a hard-drive "off", if you put your disk away then your hard-drive automatically cannot be accessed at all. For "secure" things this is great because you can trust that even if unsecure people use your computer, at best they can only delete the info on your hard-drive, not change it or read it. (Well, they can install keyboard sniffers and so forth, but you know what I mean).
    3. Get this: how about if the controller automagically starts backing up a hard-drive bit-for-bit whenever it's in the off mode. This just isn't possible while software has access to a hard-drive, and is possibly reading or modifying it. The most awesome backup you can have is a bit-by-bit image of each of your hard-drives. Sure it'll need a little massaging if you need to restore to a hard-drive with different geometry, but you get my point.
      The best thing is,
      any decent kernel can stay entirely in memory. If the controller has decent programmability, you can ask it to start making a backup every night at 12:00, as soon as every hard-drive has stopped being written or modified.
      If you do your scripting right, you don't even need to unmount any of your partitions! (Just make sure your system is COMPLETELY idle at the time).
    Isn't life grand?
    Of course, we are talking SCSI here. Do you call yourselves Geeks?
    "Yeah, I have a dual 1.2 gigahertz athlon".
    Oh? What's your hard-drive subsystem on that?
    "72 gigger!"
    IDE?
    "That's E-IDE to you! 5400 RPM too!"
    Sigh.

    --
  40. Re:Silly idea by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2
    Ever see what windoze 95/98 does to 'alien' partitions when it is installed after another OS?

    This solution keeps that crap from happening.

  41. Computer Science Lab by ian_po · · Score: 4

    Just thought I would say that the Computer Science Dept here at CU is installing some computers with these type of hard drives in them. The setup is for the operating systems class.

    Each monitor/keybord is hooked up to two computers using a switch to choose which computer you are looking at. Then you can check out a couple hard drives and schedule time on one of the computers. The idea is you can setup each of your 2 computers however you want and explore things like making your own server/client programs and so on.

    The whole thing is behind a firewall to protect from people messing with the rest of the lab. Its really weird to see a computer where you can just pull its disk right out. The bios is setup so it'll just boot of that drive. They are also thinking about putting linux on a CD-ROM so people without a hard drive can still use it to surf.

    I wish I had these when I took OS but we learned on BSD not Win2k like next semester

  42. Another Interesting Way to swap OSes by serial+frame · · Score: 2

    As for me, I use CompactFlash cards to quickly swap OSes. Using a simple CF->IDE socket (http://www.pcengines.com/cflash.htm for the goatse.cx weary), and a 3.5" drive bay cover plate, I fashioned somewhat of a CompactFlash card slot. A 64MB CompactFlash card holds QNX, and an 8MB holds a small Linux distribution I hacked together long ago (http://www.phatboydesigns.net/mu2-embedded-2.3.4. tar.bz2). Too bad the IDE spec does not allow you to hot-swap (not that I would with a running box).
    Sure, not as flexible, but it has plenty of coolness factor. I've also used the same Linux CompactFlash card in an mp3 player project I messed with last summer.

    --

    -
    And the Angel said unto me, "These are the cries of the carrots! The cries of the carrots!"
  43. Re:Dual-booting by Bonker · · Score: 2

    Well, you're already buying two drives for booting off of if you're using this device.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  44. Silly idea by kilgore_47 · · Score: 2

    This seems sort of pointless to me. If your going to use two drive bays, why not have access to both drives? Lilo isn't that hard to setup!

    ___

    --
    ___
    The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
  45. duh, this misses the point by fleabag · · Score: 2
    The whole point about "switchable" hard drives is that you KNOW that bootable drive X is untouchable because it is sitting on your desk:

    "COMPUTER: format /dev/hdc -are you sure?"

    "USER: duh, was that turn the key left or right?"

    Even when I am as drunk as I am now, I know that the drive with all my work on it is OK, because it is unplugged and in a drawer.....

  46. Been using one for years by Ulwarth · · Score: 3

    I've been using one of these for a few years. They are also very nice for taking your disks on the road; you can carry a drive between home and work, or whatever.

    One guy I knew used it to enforce discipline on himself. Two drives, the same OS, but one was "work" and one was "play." Play contained chat clients, games, bookmarks to recreation sites, etc. Work contained purely down-to-business stuff. One interesting side effect to this approach (I thought) was the fact that he could have a very insecure install with lots of games and buggy flash plugins and things on the "play" drive, and if it gets compromised or the drive gets munged or whatever he looses nothing important.

  47. Re:Why don't You RTFA by dohcvtec · · Score: 2

    Both drives are NOT available at all times. The switch has 3 modes: 1.) Drive "1" set to master (jumper circuit closed,) drive "2" no jumper; 2.) Both drives open jumpers (i.e. no drives;) 3.) Drive "2" set to master, drive "1" no jumper. Last time I checked, and according to the article, a drive with no jumper just sits there. This is what Tom was saying in the FA when he mentioned that old drives may cause strange behavior if they are not jumpered. Sheesh!

    --
    -- Never hit a man with glasses. Hit him with a baseball bat.
  48. porn by yellowjacket03 · · Score: 3

    Now i can let others use my machine with my porn locked up safe.

  49. other competing products by cwliao · · Score: 2

    There're other competing products out there... more souped up verions...

    www.sentrytech.com.sg