Slashdot Mirror
Analysis of Passport Flaws
An anonymous reader sent us an excellent (and technical) paper describing problems with Passport its not lame anti ms rhetoric, its actually a well written technical assesment of security problems with the unified login that passport aims to achieve. This is a good read.
Remember, AMD and Linux are good, Intel and Microsoft are bad. Why think when the collective can do it for you?
Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
I don't get this, they don't force us.
I don't know if you have read anything about Windows/Office XP. In order to get them to work for more than 30 days, you have to get a passport account. This is so that MS can get the info of what machine (not Processor ID #) but what type of processor, how much ram, type and size of HD's, etc. I will give MS one good statement, they can make an awesome licence agreement, just too bad that they can't make a decent OS.
You can be replaced by a very small shell script.
I hate you, spork_testicle. Fuck you. f u c k y o u ff uu cc kk yy oo uu fff uuu ccc kkk yyy ooo uuu ffff uuuu cccc kkkk yyyy oooo uuuu fffff uuuuu ccccc kkkkk yyyyy ooooo uuuuu
"The bulk of Passport's flaws arise directly from its reliance on systems
that are either not trustworthy (such as HTTP referrals and the DNS) or assume
too much about user awareness (such as SSL). Another flaw arises out of
interactions with a particular browser (Netscape). Passport's attempt to
retrofit the complex process of single sign-on to fit the limitations of
existing browser technology leads to compromises that create real risks."
Do we really *need* Passport?
yeah, I hate it when I'm right too. Why are you in pain, my son? Is it your lack of money, skills, or ethics? Did your assets get seized, sweetie? P.S. If I were you I would look into a career change, maybe a violent prison guard, or a drug property seizure expert. "Guilty! Guilty! Guilty!" - the three lizard priests from Anachronox
Take this personaility test.