Slashdot Mirror
Code Redux
I don't understand why Symantec classifies a "remote root" exploit as only "medium" damage. Code Red [?] is hitting cable modem networks especially hard, as the new variants scan "nearby" IP's in preference to random ones, which has apparently caused enough damage and network congestion that AT&T's residential broadband division (MediaOne) has cut off port 80 across their network to try and halt the spread of the worm, or so several submitters reported. Newsforge has a story about various reactions to the worm, and reader nettdata sent in an interesting story about the worm becoming the main course at a dinner of security specialists.
I wish that RoadRunner San Diego would do that! All they've done so far is to send two "Virus Alert" e-mails out to people, imploring them to install the patch if they run Win2k or WinNT.
I really think that it's the responsibility of a machine's owner to lock down his/her system from attack. Ignorance of the rule is no excuse. If you put a machine on the net, and it's not secure, it becomes a danger for everyone.
The easiest thing to do is to shut down the access to machines that are infected. That way, you have their undivided attention when they call you up and say, "My cable's not working!" You simply respond... "Yes, we shut it off, because you wouldn't take care of business."
You're not lame for running IIS if you've patched it. You're lame if you aren't paying attention to the patches out there.
While out and about looking for the latest Code Red statistics, I found this link to a Code Red Self Test which is supposed to tell you if you are vulnerable, and if you have been infected.
I don't know if it works, I don't have a Win boxen to test it on...
What they should do is scan for people running IIS webservers and cut them off. Leave the Apache users alone!
You can block incoming and outgoing http connections separately. eg. if a SYN packet is going from an outside address to an inside address, and the port number is 80, block it. But don't block anything else.
Here in Fairfax, our cable modem dropped out around 6pm Sunday night; it came back up after about an hour, but ever since then, I've had faster speeds on dial-up.
The phone system reports that SirCam has taken out their email servers, and that Code Red [I|II] is causing serious performance problems. They expect to have it done by tomorrow - except that today, when I called, they no longer are saying that, merely begging users to patch their systems.
Phone tech support is turned off, at least in my wanderings in the phone system.
Anyone else having these problems?
ZOMG I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS ON MACINTOSH VERSUS WINDOWS, VI VERSUS EMACS, AND HOW YOU'RE NOT A DORK
Well, given the choice between having j00r box r00ted and having something like WinCIH blank out your BIOS and wipe out your FAT...
For security, it's critical. But the amount of data loss is minimal until after someone telnets to the open port and blows away your drive.
Finally, consider Symantec's core market -- not the guy running a brokerage firm on a farm of IIS boxen, but home and office users of PCs worried about the virus that'll wipe out their pr0n collection. Joe Win95er really isn't at risk from Code Red II, apart from wondering why "the Internet is slow" if he's on RoadRunner.
Considering Symantec's core audience, and what this worm could be doing to compromised systems, and yeah, I'll buy "medium".
grep ida access_log | cut -d" " -f1 | sort | uniq | wc -l
139
Looking over the infected hosts, it seems that half are broadband clients (RR, Bellsouth, Verizon, @Home, etc.), a third are overseas (with
I see Code Red as a big boon to jobhunters, especially those looking for SA work. Right there in your logs is a list of companies that are hiring, whether they know it or not.
I guess the big question is this: do you root their box before the first interview or after?
k.
"In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
It's been already shown that Code Red will not bring the Internet down. And it was never very much of a mortal threat to the majority of the users out there, because those are not running IIS (or any http server, for that matter). And until the more recent versions, the worm was not even a menace the files in the infected system (the recent versions, by installing a backdoor, would allow for a malicious invader to do a lot more damage).
The kind editor should also remember his math and Netcraft nice figures. IIS installations represent some 25% of the servers out there. Most of those are already patched by now. Even when they were not patched Code Red got only 6-7% of them (considering 4 million servers/250 thounsand infected).
Code Red is certainly a local problem in networks where it finds a nice ecologival niche. Cable modem networks are likey to suffer due to their archtecture and their own flaws. Other networks will suffer down the road.
But the main point is that this particular the worm is out of the way for nmost of us (if it ever was in the way) and will only affect the bandwidth locally.
It is almost time to reduce its risk rating to low.
We might be in for another growth spurt...when the hundreds of thousands of college students return to campus and plug in their computers. A good portion of them have probably been unattatched to the network, or will be brand new machines just for school. Working at a University, we aren't looking forward to this potential new stream of *fun*.
One possible saving grace is that most of our students come back after the worm is supposed to sleep (20th of the month). However, it might wake again come Sept. 1st. Not to mention any server out there with bad dates ready to spew it around.
On another note, I've notified several people in other departments that they've been hit with the CR II version. They say "well, I'll just apply the patch". Wrong, that will stop your computer from trying to broadcast the worm. Unfortunately, the patch doesn't clean up the trojan explorer.exe and registry settings. I tell them "you'll need to reformat the whole computer, and they laugh". Well, at least I can be first in line to berate their IT department for not taking that suggestion when their whole networked gets compromised from another backdoor installed during the computers 'open' state.
-A non-productive mind is with absolutely zero balance.
- AC
Remote Linux install, anyone?
If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
I know I'm askin' for it, but I couldn't resist:
/home/httpd/html
/dev/zero default.ida
:-) (And people say PPPoE has no value.)
cd
ln -s
I'm only a 128k ISDN, but with compression, I can push over a T1 worth of zeros
6 of our machines at work got infected over the weekend. I was under the impression that our web guy had been keeping them up-to-date, but 5 were inside our NAT (infected by the 1 that was outside). I was under the impression that the ones inside the NAT would be ok. Bad assumption.
The bandwidth it used was so bad that it completely wiped out our ability to get out via HTTP. We could ping, get and send mail, but we couldn't browse at all. I had innoculated my home machine, and it wasn't until this morning, when we received a notice from our ISP accusing of massive port scanning of port 80 that I made the connection. I went around the office and, even after 5 of the 6 machines were innoculated, we still couldn't get out via HTTP. It wasn't until the 6th was innoculated that we could get out.
Our line is a 768/512 DSL (I believe those are the numbers), and it amazes me that a single machine infected could cause so much trouble. This is pretty disturbing.
I ran a test on the 1597 unique hosts that have attempted to infect my web server recently.
321- 20.1% - "Under Construction" default blank page
0- 00.0% - "too busy"
1093- 69.4% - cannot connect
183- 11.4% - some web page
Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.