Slashdot Mirror


Korean Brothers Arrested For File-Sharing Site

HarlanC writes: "This story discusses the arrest of two Korean brothers who run a website [warning, page requires Korean language support] that allows peer-to-peer file sharing. Note that the Recording Industry Association of Korea reports local companies lost $154 million in sales in 2000 due to use of the program, even though sales increased to $31.5 million in total sales in 2000 from $29.2 million in 1999."

16 of 350 comments (clear)

  1. Avast , ye swabbies! by JamesOfTheDesert · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...who believe that napster is lowering sails ...

    Is this because of the pirates?

    :)

    --

    Java is the blue pill
    Choose the red pill
  2. Re:Those are some pretty impressive figures... by Traxton1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, at least it's good that Free Korea is trying to learn something from the US right?

  3. blah by geomcbay · · Score: 5, Funny

    God damn it. Yet another Korea-centric article. When are the Slashdot editors going to realize there's more to the world than just Korea?

  4. Re:No, there's definitely more... by dboyles · · Score: 4, Funny

    One time while portscanning for port 80 (out of boredom, not for any malicious purpose) on my former dorm's subnet I came across a directory that the individual probably didn't want to have shared: the one containing the history file for his browser.

    His webpage portrayed him as a nice, churchgoing young man. But some of those URLs would suggest otherwise...

    "But I was sure www.girlongirl was a scripture quote site!"

    --
    -- "Complacency is a far more dangerous attitude than outrage." -Naomi Littlebear
  5. Stop this by roxytheman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Stop this already! File sharing should not be illegal! At least not the technology allowing it! File sharing is SO MUCH MORE than just porn and copyrighted mp3s!

    --

    Find nice cocktail recipes @ www.spitzy.net
    1. Re:Stop this by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know what file sharing you're doing but mine involves nothing but copyrighted mp3s and porn.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    2. Re:Stop this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh please. Once Freenet hits prime time, it will be nothing but MP3s and porn.

      (That's a good thing)

  6. no concrete evidence by bigbadbuccidaddy · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Soribada is probably affecting our business, but there is no concrete evidence," said Cho Jin-bae, who handles online marketing at the Seoul office of the EMI record label. For an industry that claims to be losing to piracy 5 times more money than it takes in, all from one source, the lack of concrete evidence suprises me. Or maybe the South Korean RIAA wannabees are even more mathematically challenged than their American counterparts. Frankly, I'm suprised they can crank in $30 million or so a year, what with 2 college kids in their way.

  7. Re:which korea? by Nerftoe · · Score: 2, Funny

    South Korea. Read the article, numbnuts.

  8. SK's own napster? by whiteranger99x · · Score: 1, Funny

    Quoted from the article:
    "We wanted South Korea to have its own Napster."

    Sorry buddy, You need a sexy logo like Napster's first :)

    --
    Join the TWIT army now!
  9. Re:Those are some pretty impressive figures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    A drunk walks into a bar and says to the bartender (with a drunken slur), "bartender, buy everyone in the house a drink, pour yourself one, and give me the bill."
    So, the bartender does just that and hands the man a bill for $37.00.

    The drunk says, "I haven't got it."

    The bartender slaps the guy around a few times then threw him out into the street.

    The very next day the same drunk walks into the bar and once again says (with a drunken slur), "Bartender, buy everyone in the house a drink, pour yourself one, and give me the bill."

    The bartender looks at the guy and figures to himself that he can't possibly be stupid enough to pull the same trick twice, so he gives him the benefit of the doubt, pours a round of drinks for the house, has a drink himself and hands the drunk a bill for $37.00.

    The drunk says, "I haven't got it." The bartender can't believe it, so he picks the guy up, beats the living day lights out of him, then thows him out into the street.

    The next day the same drunk walks back into the same bar and says (with a drunken slur), "bartender, buy every one in the house a drink, give me the bill." In disgust the bartender says, "what, no drink for me this time?"

    The drunk replies, "No, you get violent when you drink."

  10. No, there's definitely more... by whatnotever · · Score: 3, Funny

    You're forgetting the movies.

    And the occasional app or game.

    And sometimes people's cookies.txt. (I found one with Amazon one-click shopping once! ;)

    Hey, I think we might be able to make a case for the legality of downloading someone else's cookies.txt! Score one for p2p!

  11. Re:yeah well... by unitron · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Its like saying if Slashdot did not exist our IQ would be higher."

    But if our IQs were higher, would Slashdot exist?

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  12. Re:Those are some pretty impressive figures... by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny
    I plan to make $500 million dollars next year. If I don't, does this mean I can have people thrown in jail?

    Good thing it's the Free Korea, as opposed to that evil stalinist state up to the north where they trump up charges and haul people off to the gulag.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  13. irony by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    today is korean liberation day

    cognitivedissonance = on

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  14. Re: Criminials, eh? by Zergwyn · · Score: 2, Funny
    The record industry is going after these people that open up new channels of information. The problem with this is that there is plenty of legal material being transferred as well. One of my good friends writes and plays music in his own band, and if it weren't for mp3s there would be little chance of their work being distributed. Simply opening new channels shouldn't be illegal(though look at the DMCA...).

    Can you imagine if the DMCA was around or the RIAA was around a decade ago?

    News FLASH
    AP Wire
    Today, the RIAA and MPAA sued the Defense Department for violating the DMCA, charging that this new "Internet" constitutes an illegal circumvention device. Said a head lawyer for the RIAA "This internet will be a haven for criminals and piracy, causing the US economy to plumit. It must be stopped now."

    How many future possibilities do we kill with every shutdown of a new information sharing system?