Slashdot Mirror


Korean Brothers Arrested For File-Sharing Site

HarlanC writes: "This story discusses the arrest of two Korean brothers who run a website [warning, page requires Korean language support] that allows peer-to-peer file sharing. Note that the Recording Industry Association of Korea reports local companies lost $154 million in sales in 2000 due to use of the program, even though sales increased to $31.5 million in total sales in 2000 from $29.2 million in 1999."

30 of 350 comments (clear)

  1. Avast , ye swabbies! by JamesOfTheDesert · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...who believe that napster is lowering sails ...

    Is this because of the pirates?

    :)

    --

    Java is the blue pill
    Choose the red pill
  2. Re:Logical fallacy by dboyles · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just because sales went up does not mean that sales would not have gone up *more* without this "interference." Of course not a popular thing to say here.

    You're absolutely right, but just because 300 CDs worth of songs were downloaded doesn't mean that sales would have gone up by the total sales price of that 300 CDs.

    The record industry's absurd claims about how much money is being lost to piracy is just as ridiculous as /. posters who justify their theft with "Well I wouldn't have bought it anyway."

    --
    -- "Complacency is a far more dangerous attitude than outrage." -Naomi Littlebear
  3. Yes, they should by John+Miles · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I "steal" music to evaluate it. If you don't let me "steal" the music first, I will not buy it.

    Don't like it? Tough. I can live without your music WAY longer than you can live without my money.

    --
    Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    1. Re:Yes, they should by Pixies · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Pretty good tastes I must admit, you should check out Mouse On Mars, DJ Shadow and The Beta Band, you might likey. (Geez I feel like some amazon-generated mouthpiece)

      I think the point is though, it isn't your decision what business model the said copyright holders should be striving for, whether it is to their ultimate benefit or not. You are still breaking the rules and going against the will of a lot of people, without whom that music wouldn't exist. It's really about rights. Overriding them because it's convenient and seems reasonable to do so isn't exactly a defensible act.

      It is a fux0red up system, but the creators and distributors involved agreed to it all, so the best remedy is a) selective boycotting and b) lobbying the companies and performers who could forge a positive change.

      I agree it's best to sample before you buy, almost your right as a consumer, but one ought to try and do it legally whenever possible. Even if it's an inconvenience.

      /preach

    2. Re:Yes, they should by John+Miles · · Score: 5, Informative

      So, do you refuse to listen to music now, since nobody "lets" you steal it, or do you just go and say, "Well, if I couldn't steal it, then I wouldn't listen to it..."

      Fortunately, it's currently not difficult to "steal" the music I want to evaluate. The real problem is the threatened demise of private Internet streaming; that's where I usually become aware of new stuff.

      My usual pattern has been:

      1) Hear one song on MPEGRadio that sounds cool. Portishead's "Glory Box," to cite a real-life instance. That song was six years old when I heard it for the first time; I'm damned sure not going to stumble across it on eMpTyV or what passes for Top-40 radio ("All Britney, All The Time") these days.

      2) Go to Napster/BearShare/whatever. Download every track by (again, e.g.) Portishead I can find. Say to myself, "Self, this r0x0rs."

      3) Go to Amazon and start whaling on their Patented One-Click(tm) Button.

      4) Go back to Napster and search the drives of people who had the good Portishead stuff, looking for similar music to "steal."

      5) Discover Morcheeba, Lamb, Hooverphonic, Massive Attack, et al. Go back to step 3 above.

      The problem I have is, if the RIAA actually does manage to shut down the streaming servers and the many heirs to Napster's throne, I will have no way to find new cool stuff to buy. I don't hang out in smoke-filled clubs, and at any rate, the examples I mentioned above probably haven't been played in clubs for years. The RIAA will have inconvenienced me, but what will really have happened is they'll have shot themselves in their collective feet, along with the artists they represent. No "stealing," no revenue. It really is that simple.

      I can't speak for the "cheap" losers you refer to who make it a point of (dis)honor to use MP3 servers to avoid paying for music they enjoy. I'm not one of them; I don't know any of them; and frankly, I'm not sure they even exist in numbers large enough to warrant the RIAA's concern.

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
  4. Re:total sales are what again? by Vuarnet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, technically, I think it would go something like this:

    Let's say they sell 2 million CDs, at $15 a piece.
    Now let's say there's 10 million copies of the CDs floating around in Korean cyberspace.
    Ergo, to the marketdroids, those 10 million copies at $15 each equal $150 million in CDs they should've sold.

    Not that they would ever sell that quantity of CDs in the first place, but then marketing and logic don't always go hand in hand these days.

    --
    Tongue-tied and twisted, just an earth-bound misfit, I
    Learning to fly, Pink Floyd.
  5. Gandhi? by Kasreyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What possible connection could there be between the Mahatma and a bunch of kids downloading free music?

    One was willing to fight, suffer, starve, and die for his beliefs. The others are just opportunists.

    Find a better metaphor, eh?

    -Kasreyn

    --
    Kasreyn: Cheerfully playing the part of Devil's Advocate to hairtrigger /. flamers since 1999.
  6. Perjury is still illegal, even against criminals by David+Jao · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I fully agree with you that trading mp3s en masse is illegal, the web site operators are in the wrong, and they should be busted.

    Even so, the Recording Industry Association of Korea has no right to publish patently false damage claims. I don't think any person in their right mind can possibly believe that national record sales would have been 535% higher without this web site.

    Media and software companies have been publishing ridiculously implausible damage figures for years, and it's time they put a stop to it. The reality of copyright infringement is bad enough; there is no need to falsely inflate the damage.

    Two wrongs don't make a right.

  7. Even USENET may not be sustainable in the long run by John+Miles · · Score: 3, Informative

    My provider, http://www.giganews.com, already has a "Click here to submit DMCA removal requests" button.

    (Besides, I hate the thought of using Usenet to distribute large binary files. Physically copying huge blocks of data all over the planet is just not the right way to do it. Sure, it works, but it's still a ridiculous waste of bandwidth and storage.)

    --
    Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
  8. blah by geomcbay · · Score: 5, Funny

    God damn it. Yet another Korea-centric article. When are the Slashdot editors going to realize there's more to the world than just Korea?

  9. Re:No, there's definitely more... by dboyles · · Score: 4, Funny

    One time while portscanning for port 80 (out of boredom, not for any malicious purpose) on my former dorm's subnet I came across a directory that the individual probably didn't want to have shared: the one containing the history file for his browser.

    His webpage portrayed him as a nice, churchgoing young man. But some of those URLs would suggest otherwise...

    "But I was sure www.girlongirl was a scripture quote site!"

    --
    -- "Complacency is a far more dangerous attitude than outrage." -Naomi Littlebear
  10. No. Not my definition. by nyet · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Theft is depriving me of the thing YOU stole, not the *potential* loss of value of something I already own.

    And people HAVE been arguing that one is less morally offensive than the other for as long as copyright laws have existed in this country. You clearly read /. regularly, so I am somewhat taken aback that this suprises you. People have already pointed out that "losses" due to *potential* sales not happening are completely bogus. You know this, I know this. Just because somebody got something for less than *you* sell it for does not mean they would have paid for it had they not had the opportunity to get if for less. And it doesn't mean they "STOLE" the price difference from your pocket. If price competition is "theft", why bother with a capitalist economy at all?

    Information has the unique property that you *can* copy it without "destroying" the original. Why not harness this property, rather than make it look like a limited good?

    The purpose of an economy is to distribute a limited good fairly and equitably as possible. Information is NOT a limited material resource. At worst, it is a common good (in the economic infrastructure sense), and at best it is a completely unlimited resource. In both cases, it has zero mariginal cost.

    In short, the following is a valid *opinion*: "Copying information is not as morally offensive than stealing my physical property, or depriving me of my freedoms."

    You may argue that this opinion is false, but you certainly can't tell me it is NOT a topic for debate.

    Are you unaware that our founding fathers debated this topic as well?

    If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it. Its peculiar character, too, is that no one possesses the less, because every other possesses the whole of it. He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me. That ideas should freely spread from one to another over the globe, for the moral and mutual instruction of man, and improvement of his condition, seems to have been peculiarly and benevolently designed by nature, when she made them, like fire, expansible over all space, without lessening their density in any point, and like the air in which we breathe, move, and have our physical being, incapable of confinement or exclusive appropriation. Inventions then cannot, in nature, be a subject of property. Society may give an exclusive right to the profits arising from them, as an encouragement to men to pursue ideas which may produce utility, but this may or may not be done, according to the will and convenience of the society, without claim or complaint from any body. Accordingly, it is a fact, as far as I am informed, that England was, until we copied her, the only country on earth which ever, by a general law, gave a legal right to the exclusive use of an idea. In some other countries it is sometimes done, in a great case, and by a special and personal act, but, generally speaking, other nations have thought that these monopolies produce more embarrassment than advantage to society; and it may be observed that the nations which refuse monopolies of invention, are as fruitful as England in new and useful devices.

    - Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Isaac McPherson, August 13, 1813

  11. Re:Those are some pretty impressive figures... by Trinition · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "...even though sales increased to $31.5 million in total sales in 2000 from $29.2 million in 1999."

    I still have a problem when people try to cite facts like these as being evidence that pirated music improves sales. Now, throw out of your mmind all of teh number fudging and erroneously reported numerical values. The fact is that their sales increased from 1999-2000. But did this happen despite the piracy, or in spite of? In other words, who here can say how much their sals should have changed without the piracy? Would the lack of piracy have meant more sales jthus increasing their improvement? Or would the lack of piracy have meant less exposure so people would buy less new music thus having a neagtive impact on their potential sales growth.

    You can't simply look at one tiny piece of data and say "uh yup, folks, lookie thar... that thar proves I should steal music."

    Don't get me wrong, I'm in favor of sharing music (especially from the standpoint that current copyright terms are unconstitutional and harming the public domain). But if you're going to complain about it, don't use fuzzy math. Leave that to the politicians.

  12. Re:Where does it end? by reverius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I sometimes wonder why moderators like comments like this one.

    This is not a matter of opinion; it is a simple fact that the injustices the parent comment is referring to is not

    "making copied cd's illegal"

    it's "arresting people for writing software".

    The fact is that these guys were not arrested for copying cd's illegally. They were arrested for writing a program that people CAN use to pirate music. I can use FTP, IRC, or even Apache and a web browser to do this.

    The exploding point for the issue is when people who write web servers and ftp servers are legally responsible for what people use them for - and the authors of Apache are arrested for "sharing illegal content".

  13. Wrong link by brunes69 · · Score: 3, Informative


    Try http://www.soribada.com if you want to see the site mentioned int he article.

  14. Re:Logical fallacy by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "Just because sales went up does not mean that sales would not have gone up *more* without this "interference.""

    I'm not disagreeing that there's a chance this program hurt record sales to some degree. However, I see no reason to believe that sales would have been quintupled without the presence of this program. At the very least, this would likely have been accompanied with a corresponding increase in CD player sales, for instance...

  15. Those are some pretty impressive figures... by achurch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Note that the Recording Industry Association of Korea reports local companies lost $154 million in sales in 2000 due to use of the program, even though sales increased to $31.5 million in total sales in 2000 from $29.2 million in 1999.

    So they're claiming that they were expecting $185.5 million in sales in 2000? A 535% increase over the previous year? And I thought the RIAA was stupid...

    1. Re:Those are some pretty impressive figures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The article doesn't cite any sources. It seems there was a failure to communicate. This page is apparently based on the same sources, but has slightly different figures:

      Alleged lost sales: 200 billion won ($152 M)
      2000 sales: 410 billion won ($312 M)
      1999 sales: 380 billion won ($289 M)

      Presumably you can find this information on their official website, but it seems to be in Korean. In any case, it seems that in the article a decimal point has been slipped in by mistake, makeing a ridiculous claim into an apparently outrageous one.

    2. Re:Those are some pretty impressive figures... by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny
      I plan to make $500 million dollars next year. If I don't, does this mean I can have people thrown in jail?

      Good thing it's the Free Korea, as opposed to that evil stalinist state up to the north where they trump up charges and haul people off to the gulag.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  16. Stop this by roxytheman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Stop this already! File sharing should not be illegal! At least not the technology allowing it! File sharing is SO MUCH MORE than just porn and copyrighted mp3s!

    --

    Find nice cocktail recipes @ www.spitzy.net
    1. Re:Stop this by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know what file sharing you're doing but mine involves nothing but copyrighted mp3s and porn.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  17. no concrete evidence by bigbadbuccidaddy · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Soribada is probably affecting our business, but there is no concrete evidence," said Cho Jin-bae, who handles online marketing at the Seoul office of the EMI record label. For an industry that claims to be losing to piracy 5 times more money than it takes in, all from one source, the lack of concrete evidence suprises me. Or maybe the South Korean RIAA wannabees are even more mathematically challenged than their American counterparts. Frankly, I'm suprised they can crank in $30 million or so a year, what with 2 college kids in their way.

  18. Fuzzy Math and Confirmed Kills by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Quoting from reply:

    i had 183 confirmed kills in korea and i'm proud of every one of them

    Oh, you're running the script which shuts down Code Red / IIS-infected machines, huh? Sounds like fun. Judging from my log files, the Koreans don't seem to be really keen on patching their servers.

    Quoting from article:

    Note that the Recording Industry Association of Korea reports local companies lost $154 million in sales in 2000 due to use of the program, even though sales increased to $31.5 million in total sales in 2000 from $29.2 million in 1999.

    To paraphrase the ever-illustrious American National Drinkin' Buddy, George Dubya Bush, that sounds like some fuzzy math.

    Ever have someone give you a CD that you'd have never bought, and you threw out or gave away because you didn't want it occupying the real estate on your CD rack?

    Then, there's music that you keep for the sole purpose of mockery. Emimem. Madonna singing American Pie. Name your boy-band or rap "artist" du jour.

    Why can't the RIAA, etc. understand that the MP3 simply liberates music that they'd have *never* sold anyway? Of course, they'll count every file transferred as another dollar/yen/peso/lira/mark/franc/whatever lost, even when it probably falls into either one of the above categories or is a duplicate download to find a specific version of a song.

    I've boycotted all forms of purchased music until the recording industries start to recognize that this isn't the end, it's the beginning. And that Napster was only the first.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  19. No, there's definitely more... by whatnotever · · Score: 3, Funny

    You're forgetting the movies.

    And the occasional app or game.

    And sometimes people's cookies.txt. (I found one with Amazon one-click shopping once! ;)

    Hey, I think we might be able to make a case for the legality of downloading someone else's cookies.txt! Score one for p2p!

  20. Where does it end? by Sarcasmooo! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    War? Is that what capitalists that behave this way want? I mean, goddamnit. I'm a pacifist, but I'm also a realist. How many people can you harrass, deceive, and imprison before someone blows their fucking lid and torches a corporate office? In some countries, there are already riots inspired by this sort of abuse. I remember reading about a McDonald's being vandalized, and the golden arches becoming a hood ornament on someone's car. THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR WAS STARTED OVER LESS. Jesus Christ. This bulllshit is never going to end. The only solution is to make money obsolete.

  21. Re:Sad... by quartz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I fail to understand what is it that they are guilty of. They just wrote and hosted a file sharing service. Like, you know, millions of FTP sites out there, and newsgroups and whatnot. How are they guilty if people using their service decide to use it for some illegal purpose? Is Smith & Wesson guilty because I decided to kill someone using a weapon manufactured by them?

  22. Re:yeah well... by unitron · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Its like saying if Slashdot did not exist our IQ would be higher."

    But if our IQs were higher, would Slashdot exist?

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  23. irony by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    today is korean liberation day

    cognitivedissonance = on

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  24. Story with more reasonable numbers by back@slash · · Score: 5, Informative

    I suggest reading the article located here which contains the more believable numbers

    the industry says album sales in South Korea totaled $315 million in 2000, up from $292 million the previous year. .

    --
    This comment was generated by a Squadron of Ultra Ninjas
  25. Re:Translation: Criminals got busted. by guygee · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There is another way to change the law: Mass Disobedience. Gandhi led India to freedom from British rule using this tactic. Marijuana use was decriminalized in many states in the 1970s because of mass disobedience to the laws. When the legal system is corrupt, using legal means to change the system may not be sufficient. We need to call on all of our resources, the whole repertoire from lobbying to political organizing to protesting to encouraging mass disobedience. Any other response is self-crippling.