Aussie ISP Scans Downloads For Copyright Violation
Steve Nakhla writes: "According to this article, Excite@Home has begun snooping users' downloads in order to find copyrighted or pirated material. Violators have their access cut off. As an Excite@home user, this alarms me. What exactly is their definition of copyrighted? Doesn't the New York Times copyright their online articles? Can I not view them any more for fear of violating Excite's policies?"
(c) exi7, 2001. All rights reserved.
to watch the porn we download.
I want one of these jobs.
Je t'aime Stéphanie
This post is copyrighted by the_other_one.
You must purchase the right to read my posts or be cut off by your ISP.
My current rate is $200.00 CDN per character. Please email me the cash prior to reading.
134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
I love the smell of Karma in the morning
Hear that? Thats the sound of a giant toilet flushing your privacy down the drain (counter-clockwise).
http://windows.scares.us
Oh yeah, and how can I capitalize on this?
And then you can prosecute them under the DMCA for "circumventing a protection device" if they manage to decode it anyways.
Laugh... it's funny. q:]
MadCow.
I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
If you're paying monthly, isn't that like renigging on a business contract...
I think the word you're looking for there is "reneging," from the same root as the word "renegade" and the verb "renege." "Renigging" isn't a word, and could potentially offend members of certain demographics.
That may be something you would want to keep in mind for the future... the word you used could get you into trouble (and with a little less justification than the teacher who used the actual legitimate word "niggardly" and got canned. Anyone know what happened to that teacher?)
Just thought I'd help you avoid any future legal trouble.
InigoMontoya(tm)
This signature is self-referential.
I hope you used a spill chuker.