Slashdot Mirror


User: exi7

exi7's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
21
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 21

  1. Good luck Mr. Clarke... on Arthur C. Clarke Is Dead At 90 · · Score: 1

    ...on your journey to Jupiter and Beyond the Infinite.

  2. Re:Yeah, or.... on MPAA Touts Record Year For Hollywood · · Score: 1

    "I Am Legend" is a remake of a movie made from a book....

  3. Re:...anyone ever hear of a chargeback? on Consumer Strikes Back at Crooked Online Retailer · · Score: 1

    After the product arrived, did you give the company their money back?

  4. Re:Making an impression on Hackers, Spelling, and Grammar? · · Score: 1

    the attidute here

    Score: 5, Ironic

  5. Re:Who did use encyclopedias? on How The Web Ruined The Encyclopedia Business · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I always wondered where my mandibula was!"

  6. Re:Another problem this causes: on Anti-Virus Companies: Tenacious Spammers · · Score: 2

    What kind of virus scanner doesn't strip the virus out of the bounceback message? If it didn't remove the virus and instead sent the virus on, it wouldn't be very anti-virus, would it?

  7. Early versions... on Microsoft Raises Security Game, Notes Shortcomings Elsewhere · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't cream in your pants just yet... Gates actually "described early versions of the Word text-processing program as "clunky."

  8. Re:Can we sue? on Verisign Typosquatter Explorer · · Score: 1

    I also had two customers get .ws websites rather than AVAILABLE .com sites because they use the method of putting the name in the browser and seeing if a site comes up. They figured verisign was squatting on the domain, and thought they would have to pay verisign for the use of the domain.

    Perhaps you should educate your customers on proper methods instead. Just because a domain is not resolved does not mean it is available. Many situations in which this would be the case, as in a domain not being propagated or improper/missing pointing of the domain to the IP.

    Maybe you should let them know of a tool that will allow them do do their research properly. It's called WHOIS.

  9. Rez on Videogames Attract More Women Than Boys? · · Score: 0
    Women are only playing games more since this game (and attachment) came out: http://www.gamegirladvance.com/archives/2002/10/26 /sex_in_games_rezvibrator.html

    At least I hope so.

  10. Heaven's Gate on Ikeya-Zhang Now Visible · · Score: 0, Funny

    Since I missed my salvation the first time around with Hale-Bopp, I can now be saved! Where should I get in line?

  11. PCMCIA on What's the Worst Acronym You've Ever Heard? · · Score: 1

    People Can't Memorize Computer Industry Acronyms

  12. This post is copyrighted. on Aussie ISP Scans Downloads For Copyright Violation · · Score: 3, Funny
    Therefore, by reading it, you will be arrested. Expect your service to be terminated any second now.



    (c) exi7, 2001. All rights reserved.

  13. Well, duh... on Right to Post Anonymously Protected · · Score: 1
    How hard is it to supply fake information when you sign up on a message board?

    I use fake names for everything, including message boards, product registration, whatever....

    The only way to track me would be to get my IP address, but most message boards don't show that information, even if it is in the server logs. (And rightly so.... sysadmins should still be able to keep your IP on record, even if your post is supposed to be "anonymous". It's just like calling the police from a payphone. If you want to be truly anonymous, use a PC at a library in addition to using fake information.)

    Dave

  14. Re:I've just had a weird idea. on images.google.com · · Score: 1
    Altavista actually used to do this on their own image search engine. It was sometimes accurate, most often not.

    I just did a search for an image in altavista and that feature no longer appears. It was very interesting while it lasted.

  15. Re:Rich kids on "sucks".com Sites Win Legal Victory · · Score: 1
    Rich KIDS? Hell, I'm 22 and I've already done this:

    www.mandiwatersisapunkassbitch.com

    I'm so classy.

  16. My Definition of "Cyborg" on Testing The First Cyborgs · · Score: 1

    I'd have to say that a cyborg is someone who:

    A) Has electronic body parts, like an arm, foot, heart, whatever

    B) (Most importantly) Can control their electonic parts with their brain and no other means. That means you can move your robotic fingers just like you would move your real fingers, by thinking about it.

  17. Re:A Matter Of Definitions on Creation: Life And How to Make It · · Score: 1

    ...if you agree that the fundemental definition of life is an object that both consumes and produces energy, responds to its environment..The ability to reproduce isn't necessarrilly required...

    What about fire? It consumes energy (oxygen), produces energy (heat), responds to its environment (too little oxygen, no fire... too much oxygen, BIG fire). AND it reproduces by spreading.

    But sorry, NO. Neither thermostats nor fire are alive.

    Thermostats don't think, fire doesn't think, robots don't think. Robots and characters that exist in virtual worlds don't think, they merely respond or act as they are programmed. Let's see a virtual character learn another language merely by interacting with other virtual characters that speak that language. If a real person went to France and lived there for several years, you'd eventually learn the language from just being around French speaking peoples and using cognitive thinking to reason that certain words pertain to certain objects, after seeing so many people use those words and objects at the same time.

    Programs may seem real, but they aren't alive until they think: Cognito Ergo Sum

    Dave

  18. The Six Million Dollar Man on Robot Fish That Swims Using Frog Muscles · · Score: 2

    "The military's interest could revolve around "exoskeletons" - prosthetic suits that will one day let soldiers run faster, jump higher or carry more weapons. Such systems might employ real muscle."

    Now this is exciting! All of us /.'ers will finally be able to kick sand in other jerks faces now.

  19. Lack of creativity and challenge = MONEY on A "Vow of Chastity" For Game Designers · · Score: 2

    Corporate game companies have one ultimate goal for each game: You master/beat the game, get bored and go buy another one. Then the cycle repeats

    So, there's currently 2 types of games out now: 1) Those you can beat right away (and thus forcing you to buy a new one) and 2) Those in which people play together, therefore guaranteeing that it will be different everytime and you will keep paying your monthly fee.

    Why should game designers create something so innovative that you keep going back to the same game and playing over and over? Then there's no turnaround for them. But wait! Then they can sell you a cheat book to make your gameplay even better. Chalk up another $15 for them

    The online gaming model is the best way to introduce innovation, because there IS NO TURNAROUND. There's the potential to keep playing and playing and playing.

    If there's no turnaround time and no inevitable point when SumGuy will shelve the game for good, then you can work on innovation. Why work to innovate a game that is only worth $60 retail, when you can work on something that's $20 every month?

    So now we just need a non-StarWars/Tolkien/Cyberpunk/Vampire adventure/action/strategy game and we'll be set for life.

    Dave
  20. Pillows! Inflatable pillows! on Cool Packaging Ideas? · · Score: 1

    As an SA for a call center, I once received a large box containing FOUR fully inflated packing pillows to protect my order.

    The actual contents of my order?

    ...One 3Com Dongle.

  21. I agree with that on Legal Recources Against Above-Board Spamming? · · Score: 1

    I used to get tons of spam, about 20+ messages a day. I use Outlook Express and have setup some filters to block out subject lines like "porn, xxx, $$$, make money, financ, mortgage, loan, sex, etc..." Obviously, there's many more words than that. That's just off the top of my head. But now, I'm too lazy, so I just hit "Block Sender" whenever I get a spam. Then it just dumps all future messages from that sender in the Trash folder. But, like cr0sh, have noticed a drastic decrease in total incoming Spam. My guess is that those who reply to Spams or send removal requests (haha) are moved to the top of the list, and no-reply addresses get pushed to the bottom and eventually drop off. This is a good way to eventually get off lists, but you'll still get spam from companies that send email to all possible addresses, like a@domain.com, aa@domain.com, etc...