Trident Micro Changes Policy Toward XFree86
Alex writes: "According to Egbert on the Xpert Xfree86 mailing list, Trident Microsystems, who makes video chipsets for low end PC's and notebooks, has changed its policy towards open source developers. Get the details here."
If you want to email Trident Micro Public Relations, please be polite! Flaming will only hurt the chances that Trident will reverse this decision.
Man, the last trident video card I saw was PCI... With all the major brands going under, I wouldn't have expected Trident to last.
What do they expect to get from keeping their specs private?? It's not like they are the leading chipset maker, and other companies are attempting to steal some secrets.
Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com
Looks like some of the replies on the mailing list are also worried about the response Trident may get from Slashdot....
My hypotheses are:
If these companies really believe that their competitors can't do the same thing a 12 year old kid did to get the info, then they deserve whatever they get. I wish they could just see how stupid they are being and save the rest of us some time!
I thought to check the Yahoo stock message boards and hit them in the wallet (the only place a big company really listens), and it looks like someone beat me to the punch. You may want to mention the economic side of things if you write to Investor Relations as well as the PR people. The addresses are there in the referenced post:
Yahoo TRID stock message board
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo! http://goo.gl/J9bkO
Get a Mac / OS X
You know, on the one hand you are right. Linux doesn't yet have much of a maket share. That's right.
But on the other hand - neither does Mac, and much less the new OS X. What's its market share? 2%? Yep, something in that direction.
No flame - but I always wondered: Why in the world do the companies support such a tiny market as Mac so "good"? I mean, Linux has a stronger market share (~5 %?), but it's not as good supported by the major players.
Why are Macs supported so strongly?
Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.iso-top.de iso-top.de - Die
I just sent them this:
Dear Sirs:
How can it possibly benefit your company to require an NDA for the documentation on how to use your graphics chipsets?
Several years ago, when I was consulting for Hewlett-Packard, I was informed that HP considered the data on instruction latencies in the PA/RISC architecture to be highly proprietary, and access to it was strictly controlled by their in-house compiler development group. Indeed, even other parts of H-P were unable to get it.
The upshot was that GCC was unable to include a decent optimizer for PA/RISC, and consequently designers chose PPC, SPARC, MIPS, and the products of other, more cooperative vendors for their designs. Heard anything about PA/RISC lately?
Frankly, I'm as astounded by your stupidity as I was at theirs.
-jcr
"These kids today don't know the simple joy of saving four bytes of page-0 memory on a 6502" - unknown
The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
Actually, from what I've seen lately, SiS chipsets are being used quite frequently in low-end systems. They are cheap, relativly decent (though I have not tried dual-head support with it), and very plentiful. The "no frills" machines my place of employment uses a mobo that has video/lan/sound/modem built in (though we put it into a 'standard' ATX case so it can quickly be changed down the road). All said built in items are SiS integrated items. They even all have Linux drivers! =] Right on the CD even! =]
Come to think of it.. I can't remember the last time I saw a 'low end' system with a Trident video card in it.. =]
bork bork bork!
On behalf of Trident Microsystems, I would like to state on the record that Trident has not changed our policy of providing chipset documentation to open source projects. Trident however continues to require an NDA to be signed in order to gain access to such confidential technical information.
He posted it at 10PM.