Slashdot Mirror


Putting The Fiber Glut In Historical Perspective

securitas writes: "This editorial over at the New York Times makes a good case for the optical network buildout being an essential infrastructure project like the railroads, telegraph lines and interstate highways were of previous generations. These projects stimulated new inventions and applications and helped build a great nation. So if you lost a ton on JDS Uniphase, Ciena, Corning, Nortel and the rest, rest easy that you have helped build the future and inspire innovation."

3 of 95 comments (clear)

  1. Broadband infrastucture will run TV by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Late last month Digital TV was launched in Finland. Billions of Finnish Marks had been spent on building a next-generation TV network for digital TV.

    Now it seems this standard is already on it's way out, and to top it all off, the consumer products needed to actually watch digital TV aren't really available yet...

    Just imagine how much better off we could have been if all that money had been spent on a broadband infrastructure for transporting any data, including TV. ARGH.

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
  2. Fiber Glut by DavidBerg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The glut of fiber tends to be more in the metro space. I really don't see the middle of Iowa with a ton of fiber. What this does is give the opportunity for metro buildouts. It's going to be the battle of the cities verus the towns all over again.

    Personally, I can't wait to have my own 100mb connection to the net.

    dave

    1. Re:Fiber Glut by GreyPoopon · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The glut of fiber tends to be more in the metro space. I really don't see the middle of Iowa with a ton of fiber.


      This is true, but my guess is that one the places where this dark fiber is going to be used eventually is in subscription-based streaming audio and video. And if you think where the most likely place for something like "Online Blockbuster" to set itself up, you'll see that a big city (with lots of customers close by) is the most logical starting point.


      Connectivity, bandwidth and service almost always find their way to the rural areas last. It's a trade off when choosing a place to live: In the middle of the city with honking cars and lots of people and a choice between DSL, Cable and Sat; or a nice house with some land in the quiet country and nothing but 56K dialup that might give you 41K if you're lucky. It was a hard choice, but I opted for the quiet country and 56K dialup. But I hear that someday we might actually have cable modem!! :)

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?