Re:well... not exactly
by
rubicelli
·
· Score: 5, Informative
Please.
"Parrot" is the development name for the internals of Perl 6, notably the interpreter. See, e.g., this explanation. Any similarity to a certain April Fools joke is probably intentional, but isn't to be taken literally.
I wasn't expecting Parrot
by
Ukab+the+Great
·
· Score: 4, Funny
Guido:I wasn't expecting Parrot...
Larry: Nobody expects Parrot! Our chief trait is laziness...laziness and impatience...impatience and laziness...Our two traits are laziness and impatience...and hubris...Our *three* main traits are laziness, impatience, and hubris...and a ridiculous habit of quoting JR Tolkien...Our *four*..no... *Amongst* our traits...are such elements as laziness, impatience...I'll come in again.
Someone didn't get the joke
by
digital_freedom
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Parrot was an April Fools' gag.
This is what happens when jokes go bad. I hope the/. editors consider this carefully next April. Otherwise we might have a story about Bill Gates & Bill Joy collaborating to produce a new proprietary rock-solid server GUI.
Windows + Sun = Greenhouse
Sheesh... Then someone will implement it...
April fools becoming real?
by
Ed+Avis
·
· Score: 5, Informative
I believe there was an April Fool's joke many years ago about a 16-bit version of the ARM processor called THUMB. But then only a relatively short time later ARM Ltd announced they were indeed working on a 16-bit frontend to the ARM (basically a new instruction decoder), and now the 'Thumb instruction decoder' is a standard part of many ARM family CPUs.
How many other things started out as an April Fool's day joke and then actually got implemented?
In a related development, Microsoft has announced the immediate availability, in Q2 2002, of their new.Net hybrid of Visual C++ and Visual Basic, to be known as Visual Seasick.
Visual Seasick will offer all the elegance and ease-of-use of C++, fused with the raw power and scalability of Visual Basic.
Analyst Larry Bribewell of the respected IT Research firm Rentrag Group, predicts big things for this de facto industry-standard language: "the first release, version 3.1, looks rock solid. We predict [0.8] it will overtake Parrot in quarterly revenue by Q1 2002."
(c) 2001, ZDnot.
Unlike the joke, it is not a combined language !!! It started as an idea as a 'shared bytecode/runtime environment that could be used by both Perl 6 and a future version of Python'
Right now it is a interpreter that does assembly to bytecode only for now as far as I can tell...
Guido:I wasn't expecting Parrot...
Larry: Nobody expects Parrot! Our chief trait is laziness...laziness and impatience...impatience and laziness...Our two traits are laziness and impatience...and hubris...Our *three* main traits are laziness, impatience, and hubris...and a ridiculous habit of quoting JR Tolkien...Our *four*..no... *Amongst* our traits...are such elements as laziness, impatience...I'll come in again.
ESR on encouraging the bytecode merge ( http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-J uly/016406.html )
use.perl.org links ( http://use.perl.org/search.pl?topic=parrot )
Parrot was an April Fools' gag.
/. editors consider this carefully next April. Otherwise we might have a story about Bill Gates & Bill Joy collaborating to produce a new proprietary rock-solid server GUI.
This is what happens when jokes go bad. I hope the
Windows + Sun = Greenhouse
Sheesh... Then someone will implement it...
I believe there was an April Fool's joke many years ago about a 16-bit version of the ARM processor called THUMB. But then only a relatively short time later ARM Ltd announced they were indeed working on a 16-bit frontend to the ARM (basically a new instruction decoder), and now the 'Thumb instruction decoder' is a standard part of many ARM family CPUs.
How many other things started out as an April Fool's day joke and then actually got implemented?
-- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
Visual Seasick will offer all the elegance and ease-of-use of C++, fused with the raw power and scalability of Visual Basic.
Analyst Larry Bribewell of the respected IT Research firm Rentrag Group, predicts big things for this de facto industry-standard language: "the first release, version 3.1, looks rock solid. We predict [0.8] it will overtake Parrot in quarterly revenue by Q1 2002."
(c) 2001, ZDnot.