Monitor One-Upmanship From IBM
openSoar writes: "So here is a solution for your lounge or media room setup and a nice display for your office. 61 inches of plasma sounds sweet but a $28K price tag doesn't. The IBM LCD will do 3840x2400 which would make me SO much more productive ;-)" Who says 200dpi is only for the labs? I'd rather have two of these than one 61" display anyhow. 3840 x 2400 would mate nicely with the Nikon D1x I also don't have.
it only costs 18K
when you think about it, it's cheaper than a wife and kids...
Do you think they'll get many impulse buy sales?
Heh, maybe everybody who submits a story should make it confusing like this one. That way, more /.ers would have to actually follow the links and read the stories before commenting ;^)
A sphincter says what?
Why don't manufacturers use a simple naming convention [...] 3840x2400
Using screen resolution would be a good idea in principle, but marketing people haven't found a way to cheat with those numbers yet, so they don't like it. Remember, these guys are used to measuring the size of a screen diagonally, counting the black border, rounding up to the next integer inch, and adding one for luck.
They have a cool monthly plan where you pay only 566 dollars a month, 288 required hours of slave work from your children and your soul. I figure I can get this baby easy.
18k isn't too bad.
didnt someone say that 640k would be enough for everyone?
--donabal
Safety First Day?
Uh... not a bad idea, I hope writing Christmas lists online hasn't been patented yet.
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
Why don't manufacturers use a simple naming convention instead of these hideously long acronyms
Hey, they could use the japanese convention: Graphics Alpha 3 EX Perfect!!.
(yes, the exclamation points are part of the name)Reboot macht Frei.