Slashdot Mirror


The America Online Protocol Revealed

Gods Misfit writes "The America Online protocol(Connecting, Logging In, Joining Chats, etc..) has remained a mystery for most of its life. The only way one could log into their AOL account was via the AOL software. A few months ago, some people set out to break down the AOL protocol and open the door for alternative America Online software. This document is the result: The AOL Protocol. A sign on example for Visual Basic programmers has been written and is available here." I suspect a fair number of people never try Linux or one of the BSDs because they're moderately happy with AOL as an ISP, and switching OSes would mean switching ISPs at the same time. A shame that AOL doesn't make this kind of information more easily available.

7 of 468 comments (clear)

  1. A Text File woudl be nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Not everyone can read .wri, a .txt and/or .pdf would be nice.

  2. Re:This is stupid. by AaronStJ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    AIM isn't just a "protocol", kids. It's a bunch of servers owned, run and paid for by AOL. AOL spends millions of dollars on Sybase licenses and support contracts alone to run AIM

    Umm, the artile talking about AOL itself, not AIM. And anyone using an alternate AOL client would still have to pay for AOL, so I don't see why it's a problem at all.

    --
    Stupid like a fox!
  3. Closed source video chat by wiremind · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Something I recall reading a while back was that AOL's Instant Messanger program did NOT have video chat abilitys because if aol added that they would have to open up there protocol. and they did NOT want that. now that the protocol maybe there is a chance that Aol Instant Messanger will add the video chat feature, which would in effect challenge MSN's messanger.
    That or AOL will just go and change everything now...

    Microsoft, AOL, Borg, whats the diff.....

  4. Re:This is stupid. by SlamMan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I so wish I had some mod points left...

    --
    Mod point free since 2001
  5. Re:Making it available means lost revenue by billnapier · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Essentially it's THERE style of html distributed through a browser.
    Oy Vey!!! Please learn about possesive pronouns! Try this instead:
    Essentially it's THIER style of html distributed through a browser.
    Nothing like a spelling/grammar flame war to get things going...
  6. Universal communications? by raam4122 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Pardon my ignorance, but does this mean we are a little closer to having a universal Instant Messaging program? I'm sick of needing to open so many programs (AIM, ICQ, Yahoo Messenger, MSN Messenger) to talk to different people. A single universal program would be awesome. I think the big companies should come together to create one standard (preferably open-source) for instant messaging, although I doubt it will happen. I know there are a bunch of people out there already attempting to do this (jabber.org).

  7. Re:Making it available means lost revenue by RobNich · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    They're == They Are (apostrophe means letters are missing)
    There == a place (has the word "here" in it, which is the opposite)
    Their == Belongs to them

    We're == We are (apostrophe!)
    Where == a place (again, has the word "here" in it, also a location)
    also, (pronounce("we're") != pronounce("where"))

    I understand that people might get these confused, but certainly they could remember after seeing the above! I dropped out of high school after ninth grade! (Though it was to pursue programming...)

    --
    Hello little man. I will destroy you!