Slashdot Mirror


Beyond Contact: a Guide to SETI

Beyond Contact is the definitive guide to human efforts at contacting alien civilizations. Sure, there have been various works that suggest the best way to make contact is to stand out in a cornfield on a dark night, but if you believe hard work and science (and maybe a *cough* data-crunching PCI card) is the way to go, this book will tell you everything you need to know. The author has been interviewed before; that will give you a starting point. Beyond Contact: A Guide to SETI and Communicating with Alien Civilizations author Brian McConnell pages 417 publisher O'Reilly rating 9/10 reviewer michael ISBN 0-596-00037-5 summary the definitive guide to SETI

Some readers may recall what Stephen Hawking said about his book, A Brief History of Time:

"Someone told me that each equation I included in the book would halve the sales. I therefore resolved not to have any equations at all. In the end, however, I did put in one famous equation, E=mc2. I hope that this will not scare off half my potential readers."

Hawking was facing the same challenge as Brian McConnell faces in this book. Both are trying to turn advanced knowledge of their field of endeavour (which requires heavy math, heavy astronomy, heavy physics, heavy programming, and so forth) into a work which can be comprehended by lesser beings. McConnell has taken a different path than Hawking - his book has plenty of advanced equations, diagrams, and concepts. McConnell does a reasonable (and often very good) job at trying to bring readers up to speed when he thinks he's going to go over their heads, but it is still not a book for the faint of heart or mathematically-challenged. There are enough equations in the book to bring its readership down to (.5)n -- oh, roughly zero, give or take.

In any case, it's a good book, but technical. You were warned.

The first couple of chapters cover the history of searching for extraterrestrial life, "are we alone?", the nature of intelligence, and similar areas. Drake's Equation is the famous set of fudge-factors that would tell us whether we were likely to find other life forms, if only we knew what the values of the variables were:

N = R * fs * fp * ne * fl * fi * fc * L

Fill in values for all of those and you'll be famous forever. But what it means, as our knowledge stands now, is that we have no clue at all whether there is likely to be life out there or not. Comforting, isn't it?

The next several chapters cover the technical aspects of communicating over interstellar distances. The electrical engineers in the audience will have a leg up here; everyone else has the opportunity to learn the basics of signal processing and the peculiarities specific to communication across galaxies. Pretty thorough and informative, without being overwhelming.

Finally, the latter half of the book covers the 64,000 lightyear question: what to say? How to communicate with an intelligence where you can't assume even the most basic things in common? Yes, yes, you've probably heard of the idea of starting with the periodic table or basic mathematics and working up. But that's sort of like a dot-com business plan:

  1. Establish Contact
  2. Send Periodic Chart
  3. ....
  4. Communicate!

McConnell fills in the "...." part, and it's obvious that a great amount of thought has been put into it. Pretty quickly McConnell is describing how to send entire self-executing programs (see Vernor Vinge's A Fire Upon the Deep).

This book is a bit of an oddity. If we're just talking about entertainment reading, it falls short - too technical. If I was grading it as a scientific work, again it would fall short - not technical enough. :) But as far as I know, this is the only work which tries to explain what SETI really is in terms that educated, reasonably bright laymen can understand, and as such, it does a fine job.

You can purchase this book at Fatbrain. Want to see your review here? Check out the book review submisison guidelines! :)

26 of 176 comments (clear)

  1. Step 3 by imrdkl · · Score: 5, Funny
    2. Send Periodic Chart

    3. Wait 40 more years

  2. SETI@Home by jeriqo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't forget to join the Slashdot SETI@Home Team!
    Here is a link with the stats and stuff:

    http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cgi?cmd =team_lookup&name=slashdot

    -J

    --
    Alexis 'jeriqo' BRET
    1. Re:SETI@Home by quannump · · Score: 3, Informative

      The real slashdot team has over 2,000 members. The one in your link only has about 550. This is the real team link.

      --

  3. What are they calculating? by raffe · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Do we actually know what numbers we are
    crunching? Missile ranges? Nuclear calculation?

    A few sys admins at The Swedish Radio
    where fired some time ago because they had seti@home running on some machines.
    The management said that didn't know what seti@home acutely did.....and of course that it was a security threat....

    Just my 0.02

  4. Challenges facing SETI by Chocky2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Probably the single greatest challenge facing SETI-like projects is not the daunting task of acquiring and analysing the vaast ammounts of data, but the criticisms levelled at it by many politicians and scientists.

    To date, most books on bioastronomy in general and seti in particular have been rather daunting and require a good grasp of not just physics and biology, but even philosophical issues such as anthropomorphsim and technical matters such as DSP; a popular book on the subject, such as this one, could go a long way to raising public knowledge of the subject past the "looking through telescopes for aliens" level.

  5. It should have been titled by wiredog · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Alien Civilizations in a Nutshell" Then they could have put a cool animal on the cover. Now, what animal goes with SETI?

    1. Re:It should have been titled by hyoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      A Yeti, of course.

  6. Solution to the Drake equation by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Drake's Equation is the famous set of fudge-factors that would tell us whether we were likely to find other life forms, if only we knew what the values of the variables were: N = R * fs * fp * ne * fl * fi * fc * L

    fc is the fraction of intelligent species that develop the ability and desire to communicate with other civilizations : after the aliens realize the voice of the UN secretary general of the time on the Voyager probe recording was a fucking Nazi, probably 0.

    Therefore, N=0.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  7. Not right now by cascino · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's little chance the current SETI program will find ET. The problem is that SETI has no dedicated, high-sensitivity telescopes. They simply can't afford it. The best they've been able to do is "piggyback" with other radio astronomy projects and listen in.
    And although this may be unpopular on /., we can thank Microsoft's Paul Allen for donating the $26 million to fund the Allen Telescope Array, to be built in California in the next five years (I think), which should alleviate this problem. It'll be a network of smaller telescope arrays programmed to act as a single, massive radio telescope.

  8. Me Human, You Alien by jonathanpost · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Me Human, You Alien: How to Talk to an Extraterrestrial" by Jonathan Vos Post (c) 1996 by Emerald City Publishing an excerpt from a book entitled MAKING CONTACT: A SERIOUS HANDBOOK FOR LOCATING AND COMMUNICATING WITH EXTRATERRESTRIALS, edited by Bill Fawcett, July 1997, New York: William Morrow & Co. http://www.magicdragon.com/EmeraldCity/extraterres trials/alien.html This has original ideas on how you, personally, should best prepare to communicate with ETs, including what to carry in your pockets. It also has the best review of Science Fiction approaches to the concept, as well as anthropology and linguistics.

  9. What the Variables Mean by qualera · · Score: 5, Informative

    N = R * fs * fp * ne * fl * fi * fc * L

    R = the rate of formation of stars in the galaxy

    fs = the fraction of stars that are suitable suns for planetary systems

    fp = the fraction of those stars with planets (thought to be around 1/2)

    ne = the number of "earths" per planetary system i.e., planets suitable for liquid water

    fl = the fraction of those planets where life develops

    fi = the fraction of planets with life where intelligence develops

    fc = the fraction of those planets that achieve technology which releases detectable signals into space

    L = the lifetime of such communicative civilizations

  10. Let's do some math.... by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 5, Insightful
    1. 400 billion stars in the galaxy.

    2. Let's be generous and say there is a one in a thousand shot of a star having planet capable of supporting life (right distance from the star so that it's between 250-350 K at the surface, enough atmospheric pressuse so that water can exist as a liquid, protected by massive outer planets against constant meteor bombardment, far above-average abundance of Oxygen, Sulphur, Nitrogen, and Phosphorous, etc, etc.) That puts the number of *potential* life supporting planets in the galaxy at 400 million.

    3. Let's be very, very generous and estimate that life actually *does* form on one in every thousand potential life-supporting planets. Most molecular biologists will tell you that even the most basic life is so complex that the odds of it forming from inanimate matter are staggeringly small, and we should count ourselves lucky that it managed to happen once in the entire history of the Universe. But we'll be liberal and say one in a thousand. That puts the number of planets in the galaxy with any sort of life at 400 thousand.

    4. There is no reason to assume that just because life exists, it will become intelligent and start using EM communications that we can receive. I don't know how you could put odds on something like that. Let's just go nuts and say that ALL planets with life eventually give rise to intelligent life. So 400 thousand planets out there in our own galaxy will have intelligent life at some point in their history.

    5. Now, here's the depressing part. Our planet has been around for 4 billion years. We've been using EM waves to communicate for roughly 100 years. So, in the whole history of our planet, civilization has only been detectable for 0.0000025 *percent* of the time. Let's say your typical advanced civilization (using radio waves) can last 1000 years before nuking itself into oblivion, and your typical planet exists for 5 billion years. That would mean that out of the 400 thousand planets with life, chances are only 0.00002 percent of them, or 0.08 total, are broadcasting at the same time we are receiving.

    Thus, even with the most wildly optimistic estimates, there is only an 8% chance that there is even one civilization out there that we can listen to, in the entire galaxy. Forget about there being one within 100, or even 1000 light years.

    Of course, you could simply throw those numbers out, and believe in a God who likes to put intelligent life on planets all over the place. But that wouldn't be very scientific.

    --
    dinner: it's what's for beer
    1. Re:Let's do some math.... by LMCBoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "1. 400 billion stars in the galaxy"

      Unfortunately, this is the only number in your post that means anything. The rest are pure speculation on your part.

      "Most molecular biologists will tell you that even the most basic life is so complex that the odds of it forming from inanimate matter are staggeringly small, and we should count ourselves lucky that it managed to happen once in the entire history of the Universe"

      This is simply untrue. In fact, any molecular biologists think it's possible that life may have formed from inanimate matter more than once on the Earth.

      "Of course, you could simply throw those numbers out...but that wouldn't be very scientific."

      Why would someone else's equally speculative take on the Drake Equation be any less "scientific" than yours?

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    2. Re:Let's do some math.... by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Drake equation worksheet sets the lowest bound of planets per star capable of sustaining life at .33. That's absurd. Given what we know about what a planet needs to support life, it's ridiculous. Here's a small sampling of parameters needed for a planet to support life, and odds that they will be satisfied (from renound astronomer Hugh Ross):

      - planetary distance from star: 0.001
      - rate of change of axial tilt: 0.01
      - rate of change in planetary rotation period: 0.05
      - mass and distance of moon: 0.01
      - surface gravity (escape velocity): 0.001
      - magnetic field: 0.01
      - thickness of crust: 0.01
      - mass of body colliding with primordial earth: 0.002
      - number & distribution of planets in solar system: 0.01
      - atmospheric transparency: 0.01
      - atmospheric pressure: 0.01
      - carbon dioxide level in atmosphere: 0.01
      - oxygen quantity in atmosphere: 0.01
      - cobalt quantity in crust 0.1
      - arsenic quantity in crust 0.1
      - copper quantity in crust 0.1
      - boron quantity in crust 0.1
      - flourine quantity in crust 0.1
      - iodine quantity in crust 0.1
      - manganese quantity in crust 0.1
      - nickel quantity in crust 0.1
      - phosphorus quantity in crust 0.1
      - potassium quantity in crust 0.1
      - tin quantity in crust 0.1
      - zinc quantity in crust 0.1
      - molybdenum quantity in crust 0.05
      - vanadium quantity in crust 0.1
      - chromium quantity in crust 0.1
      - selenium quantity in crust 0.1
      - iron quantity in oceans 0.1

      Multiply all of those probabilities, and you get a number that's *slightly* smaller than .33.

      --
      dinner: it's what's for beer
  11. Fermi's objection by s20451 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Fermi's objection to the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations goes something like this: It should take a spacefaring civilization about 1-10 million years to colonize a space the size of the galaxy, even without faster than light travel (the idea is exponential growth -- we send two colonies, then they send two colonies each, and so on). Since 10 million years is short with respect to the amount of time the galaxy has existed (10 billion years) and the amount of time that life has existed on Earth (4 billion years), there should be evidence of colonization everywhere, even if there is as few as one advanced civilization. So, where is everybody?

    I'd like to know if the book discusses this. Many SETI researchers are approaching the conclusion that humanity is the most advanced form of life in our own galaxy, at least.

    --
    Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    1. Re:Fermi's objection by egomaniac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While I tend to agree with this -- I believe humans are likely alone in the galaxy -- it does rely on some very specious assumptions.

      Other species may have no interest in space travel. They may well be shocked that at this point in our technological development, we *still* haven't developed the Microstatic Dweebelizer, while we would be shocked at how primitive their transportation technology is.

      Other species may have no interest in colonization. Wanting to spread your seed among the stars may be a purely human affair.

      Other species may not be as suitable for space travel as we are (not that we're particular suitable). If they are less able to survive a wide range of conditions, for instance if slight (to us) temperature variations are fatal to them, space travel might not appeal to them very much. Further, if they could only live within a narrow range of conditions then other planets wouldn't be particularly appealing. Maybe humans are particularly able to adapt to the physical and psychological rigors of space travel.

      Again, while I do tend to agree with Fermi and assume that we are the only intelligent life in the galaxy, there are a lot of unknowns about the way an extraterrestrial species would behave. We're *probably* an 'average' species, in the sense of intelligence, capabilities, and so forth, simply because being in the middle is a lot more likely than being one of the extremes, but for all we know we're exceptional in every way (for better or worse). Maybe we're the only species that wants to conquer space, or maybe we're the only species that has gotten this far and not even tried yet.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    2. Re:Fermi's objection by TheSync · · Score: 3, Informative

      Since 10 million years is short with respect to the amount of time the galaxy has existed (10 billion years) and the amount of time that life has existed on Earth (4 billion years), there should be evidence of colonization everywhere, even if there is as few as one advanced civilization. So, where is everybody?

      I think we also need to keep in mind that the majority of metal-rich star formation was 7 billion years ago, so other life forms only have about a 3 billion year head-start on earth, not a 6 billion year head-start.

  12. Re:Ugh by egomaniac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I confess to not having read the book, but I've never seen any decimal used in proposed SETI communications (nor, I suspect, have you).

    Most "number" transmissions I have seen have been unary (in other words, three pulses equals three). I know binary was used on the plaque in (ummm) Voyager, was it? but that wasn't a serious attempt to communicate with other species.

    Mathematicians aren't stupid, and I promise you that they know perfectly well that aliens aren't likely to use base 10.

    --
    ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
  13. Arms on a clock by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you happen to be talking with someone via radio who has never seen a clock, try to explain to him what "clockwise" works. Maybe you would turn to the rising and falling of the sun and moon as a reference point, but if this person has never been outside or lives in a different solar system? Where is the common reference point?

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:Arms on a clock by Xzzy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > Where is the common reference point?

      Binary. :)

      If you can convery on and off somehow, up or down, in or out, there is a basis for communication. Sure it's not easy, but look at your desktop.. it's created with nothing but ons and off. If we can do that, certainly with enough patience two intelligent beings could develop a method of communication.

      For a real world example suggesting that two intelligent beings will always find some way to communicate, consider Helen Keller's story.

  14. Re:I've always found it pointless. . . by s20451 · · Score: 3, Informative

    If there are other lifeforms out there, what are the chances that they would be on the same technological level as us?

    Even if they had something more advanced than radio waves (whatever that might be), certainly they would realize that RF is a cheap, simple, robust solution to certain problems -- such as, say, navigational beacons. Even on Earth, with GPS and other hi-tech navigational aids governing the waterways, we still use lighthouses to say "stay away" in the clearest possible language.

    --
    Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
  15. my review (I wasn't that impressed) by danny · · Score: 3, Interesting
    You might like to check out my review of Beyond Contact . I wasn't that impressed - I thought it was rather awkwardly put together.

    Danny.

    --
    I have written over 900 book reviews
  16. Re:talking with spacemen by LMCBoy · · Score: 3, Funny

    I remember a stand-up comedy routine where the guy said that in order to ensure that First Contact goes smoothly, all Earth citizens should carry chewing gum at all times, in case they are the first to meet ET. That way a friendly encounter is assured:

    Alien: beep. beep.
    Human: Want...some.....gum?

    --
    Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
  17. hahah by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just realized that hardcore seti geeks are so mad that if they personally actually met some aliens they would get really excited...

    alien: how are you gentlemen! We are aliens!
    seti geek: omg! fuck! real aliens!
    alien: take us to your leader!
    seti geek: do you have alien computers?
    alien: indeed
    seti geek: are they really advanced compared to ours ?
    alien: indeed
    seti geek: Do you mind if I run seti@home on them ?

    graspee

  18. Drake calculation by rde · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Calculate your own values for the drake equation here

  19. Seti Message Recieved! by msheppard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scientists Decode the First Message From an Alien Civilization...

    Simply send 6 x 10^50 atoms of hydrogen to the star system at the top of the list, cross off that star system, then put your star system at the bottom of the list and send it to 100 other star systems. Within one-tenth of a galactic rotation you will receive enough hydrogen to power your civilization until entropy reaches its maximum! IT REALLY WORKS!

    M@

    --
    Krispy Cream is people