Slashdot Mirror
The Mozilla 1.0 Definition
The Evil Beaver writes: "Here we go. Mozillazine is reporting that Brenden Eich, mozilla.org's Technical Bigshot, has released the criteria to what is to be the 1.0 milestone. The 'manifesto' also explains why 1.0 is so important to reach, and why it isn't just another milestone, either. The Mozillazine article is here and the definition document here.
Where's the "World Domination" item?
Score:-1, Funny
Could it be, that what we're seeing isn't the infamous slashdot-effect, but in fact a conspiracy preventing anyone not using the latest build of Mozilla on the latest build of the linux-kernel from entering the page?
We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
"Unable to connect to SQL server"
Is this some new HTSQL standard being reffered to here? WOw, I didn't know they were working on making a XUL Query tool, thoug it wouldn't surprise me...
:o)
... but will the workers control the means of production?
(The question is more important than it might initially seem.)
I love Poland but is it really essential to fix the Polish language bugs for a 1.0 release? Aren't there more important priorities? Isn't 1.0 about a stable API (and product!) and such, and if so, couldn't fixing spelling mistakes in the Polish language pack wait until 1.0.1 or something?
The document outlines some really good principles for managing software, but this entry confuses it for me. Any Polish people here to explain why it is critical? :-)
Hi!
Hey, all the team needs to do is ask.
Novel theory: Modern Man evolved from psychopath
At the bottom of the buglist we see Bug #100309
Description:
Opened: 2001-09-18 08:55
we need preparation as well as a good place to have the biggest & coolest party
ever!
that's a good bug to have
~z
sig?
(Our scene opens in a conference room at the W3C standards meetings. Reps from Microsoft (Ms) and Netscape (NS) are in attendance.)
Ms Guy: We ned colored scrollbars in the standard.
NS Guy: But we need themes... We don't force folks to use our boring scrollbars.
Ms Guy: Yeah, but we force 90% of the world to use boring scrollbars, it should be in the standard.
NS Guy: Jerk.
Ms Guy: Hey, like it or not, IE 5.5 will support colored scrollbars, and you'll implement them eventually because you have to, standard or not.
NS Guy: Like hell.... We still haven't implemented the marquee tag. Or page transitions.
Ms Guy: Wow, people actually use your piece of crap???
NS Guy: Look here Monopoly boy, if you've ever read Slashdot you know these people want to be reading ASCII in Lynx. You can tempt them with your "eye-candy" and "formatting", but if it ain't Courier New, it just plain blew.
Ms Guy: Yeah, whatever, Nutscrape. Aren't you glad we don't make IE for Linux?
_END_
The sad fact of it is that Microsoft can and will set the standards for a while now. It didn't occur to me until 2 days ago that colored scrollbars are not supported. Not that it makes that big of a deal, but it can help the look of your pages if you use alot of inline frames.
Microsoft already sets the font standards. (Because it's what you can expect to be on the client machine)
Netscape has to go out and do everything MS can do, and then some. Linux has to do everything Windows can do and then some.
When MSIE 1.0 came out.... But they caught up. Then they did everything Netscape could do, then they did more.
P.S. Mozilla still takes too damn long to load up.
~Hammy
http://www.nothing4sale.org
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
/. is so "powerful"?
Is this why
We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.