Senator Backs Down On Crypto Backdoors
evenprime writes: " Sen. Judd Gregg (Republican, New Hampshire)
was advocating mandatory backdoors in crypto on Sept. 13. Wired
is now reporting that Sen. Gregg has changed his mind. They say that Gregg's spokesman, Brian Hart, has said: 'We are not working on an encryption bill and have no intention to.'" As Rob Carlson is quoted at the article's close, though: "(Gregg) said he was definitely supporting it. Now he says he's definitely not. Maybe he'll say he's definitely supporting it again."
"(Gregg) said he was definitely supporting it. Now he says he's definitely not. Maybe he'll say he's definitely supporting it again."
Our beloved solons are sometimes wrong, but never in doubt.
probably he was surprised that his IT department staff suddely smiled at him knowingly when passing by since he started an email flirt.
Looks like those jpg's of Senator Gregg and his mistress that I intercepted and then attached to my recommendations that secure email encryption is a Good Thing seemed to have done the job.
Sometimes you've gotta relate to them on the lowest common denomenator.
just like those "packet sniffers", which are just miniaturized hound dogs...
Hail to thee, oh gracious spork!
Maybe he finally checked his email. Somehow I don't think he's going to be looking at hand written letters for a while.
IN THE THIRD MILLENNIUM, THE WORLD CHANGED. CLIMATE, NATIONS, ALL WERE IN UPHEAVAL...THE INTERNET TRANSFORMED INTO A POISONOUS SCORCHED DESERT, KNOWN AS "THE CURSED EARTH"
MILLIONS OF SLASHDOTTERS CROWDED INTO A FEW MEGA ISPS. ISPS WHERE ROVING BANDS OF HACKERS CREATED VIOLENCE THE JUSTICE SYSTEM COULD NOT CONTROL. LAW AS WE KNOW IT COLLAPSED. FROM THE DECAY ROSE A NEW ORDER. A SOCIETY RULED BY A NEW 31337 FORCE.....A FORCE WITH THE POWER TO DISPENSE BOTH JUSTICE AND PUNISHMENT.... THEY WERE THE POLICE. JURY AND EXECUTIONER ALL IN ONE.
THEY WERE THE JUDDS.
"A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
Then:
Two days after the Sept. 11 attacks, Gregg strode onto the Senate floor and called for a global prohibition on data-scrambling products without backdoors for government surveillance.
Now:
"We are not working on an encryption bill and have no intention to," spokesman Brian Hart said in an interview.
It's obvious what happened. Somebody from the CIA phoned the senator and said "hey dumbass, we already can descramble all the encrypted messages, shut up about it already." At least that's my take on things.
~ now you know
Seriously. For a laugh it's always fun to look at the RIAA's "Free Speech" website, where they talk about how explicit lyrics labels are okay but regulation is bad.
Our entire system of government is designed to slow things down so that rash and unwise decisions don't get made too quickly.
You're right, it is much better if the rash and unwise decisions are made after a few weeks of deliberation.
Edith Keeler Must Die
Is it just me or did anyone else misread "Judd Gregg" as "Judge Dredd?" I wondered what in the hell Sylvester Stallone would know about software backdoors...
Hmm... "shifty, closed-minded weasel without principles" does describe at least some of our Honorable Representatives... and, of course, Hilary Rosen, Jackie "The Fish" Valenti, and Ted Turner.
Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.