Slashdot Mirror
More Domain Disputes Labeled 'Reverse-Hijacking'
merodach writes: "This article on technews.com actually has a rare piece of good news in it - two corporations whose attempts to take domains from others were rebuked as attempts at "reverse hijacking." We can only hope that maybe the arbitrators are finally beginning to see the light." Read the story and be amazed at the audacity of these companies.
(blatatantly americo-centric comment warning)
Had Nestle's reverse hijacking attempts been more sucsessfull I was going to suggest that we contract with them to protect our skies...
Huh? You mean people actually read the article before posting?
----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
Umm not true Dumb Fuck. That is your name right? It obviously has to be since you didn't read the article. IF you would have read it, you would realise that AspenGrove.com was registered by that family before Aspen Grove the company even existed.
I guess I am being a bit harsh on you, I'm assuming you can read.
I'm really amazed by how fucking stupid you are.
Damned form keys.
They're always invalid.
I don't know why they're invalid.
I don't even know what they are.
But they're invalid.
And it's preventing me from trolling.
I really don't like it.
I really wish they were valid.
It would help me troll more.
All my comments get blocked.
Because they have invalid formkeys.
Why do they have invalid formkeys?
I want to troll.
Dammit.
I want to post penis birds!
I want to post SUCK ONTO MY PENIS!
I want to post GOATSE.CX links!
I want -- I want to troll!!
Why won't you just let me troll!?!?
By the way, what's up with your horrible sentence structure? 'Looks like a new record.' -- No subject
The first sentence refers to the linked page as plural (because the site root is in parens). Please doublecheck your grammar next time and keep Slashdot a quality news site.
Keeping