Slashdot Mirror


DMCA Forces Cox To Censor Changelog?

Ross Vandegrift writes: "Alan Cox released 2.2.20pre10 today, which includes security fixes. He is refusing to indicate what security holes have been fixed, as Unix-style permissions could be used as an anti-circumvention device. The thread starts here. " It'd be great if people could read the threads here and try to figure out what is going on. I'm a little lost, but it looks like he's being overzealous.

17 of 573 comments (clear)

  1. Anal Cox? by anal-johnson · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Dildo Manipulation in Cum-filled Assholes

    fa!

    1. Re:Anal Cox? by anal-johnson · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      thank you, kind fellow!

  2. Predicted life of this post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    i see this post getting modded up, people replying with flames, modded as overrated, modded up again, then modded into the ground as "troll".

  3. What a jackass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    He's only going to hurt Linux users wanting to see the changelog, the rest of the world couldn't care less. Maybe he should spend more time thinking about a little exercise, a shower, and some grooming tips rather than this bullshit.

  4. Re:Force this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Fuck up a page?
    Why
    Would
    I
    Do such a thing?
    MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MM ?





    - The AnoMymous Coward

  5. Re:Force this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    9239dafb87f3002d5b7fb9719c4598af 6423318b6461fb9f2401e8594b3759d1 33c9126f3731f3a9776594ab47d9802f 08e5e37957fd468d0be728a5ac63b21d117b&n bsp;b79db6e1a8ef348f583556176cd596d56f f979834ee5662d91ed923dfd7f12897c d7b80fb4e1dc571005eb271a25636f3e a15a3908c75e6f8963152d1ab922ad06ed&nbs p;144132df2499828dfbb3d21d18abb97d83eb 7ed9dcc53eb7ee21070fd21f0d356d83 e4cdcfad50bbece78d3f55056d2318e1 f23b25cdcc1d167ffe41f59d797dce61 530b4c6d1605346b12914b7528a373e7fa8f&n bsp;7a9d564768339a93465f881b49e3ec7d56 35885bf86b179363771d91c847a5f7b8 d12c653da7f4c5021fe7dd9b93268594 db982faf8f6045d903fffdc1c99915fa83&nbs p;e82b11c5c4198b17da19c77b9d033cbd9073 c101df2b5c95267b24b92f0d364b8dcb 1ff77e510801529dba25325baeb3369b 246dd547b327aa1b6de1997ddf47abf5 042777b1041717bde89b2f6d1819ea9501fb&n bsp;f21b562f867172890089850d7bdd5abf02 f90f13e24df069639d12c7c6d7525573 a713adb98d007da2d573b7013560a991 6b5d2f7d9b379544cb4517c0517ea74671&nbs p;ae1764037e07f57f53e32a2f934dd2cb6725 e77b8cad0f5b01e3c677009b25777c67 e8e389efc42dcaa7ef7b5097d5598a2f 703fc6b9e62fe887e3370257ba3d0a19 0dbf9b8150ff199f744d76f325d9a807dab9&n bsp;6543f2a784db5b07fe89bcc5b7251aaba2 857497bee526570547ef89c6e77c3b30 5584a5ef39ccd7605b13915807fa39a7 49be151513ddc9baff1c2fb1895c97d87b&nbs p;328f6c7b52192375f3a3d5b959776a91931f

  6. Microsoft by JohnHegarty · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Can you imagine microsoft getting this sort of attitude with updates to windows? ... i think not...

  7. Re:Force this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      • We667We7cbW2d7bWf3c1Wfc41Weca1W2a45W3ff9W2265We25f W7717W9be5We1f5W5a39W5a6bWc5bdWcb69Wc16bWb0b3W3bd1 Wa8f3W69f9Wf1fdWcb8dWf16dWd1fdW7c23W5307Wa3b9Wb167 W896fW7cffW32b3Wd64dWbbc5Wbf71Wa991W57abWa447W648f Wb0c9W26b7W2f7fWe65dW9b87W8699W5e09W64a1W2583W72c3 W31bbW7d83W0975W7babW374bW5081W17f9W221dW9473Wf405 Wf6f7W3901W02a3W2565W318fW559fW9e21W7b6bWc079Wd667 Wf1b3We365Wb2f1W8843W26cbWb0a5W2027W7251Wc225W0689 W0915Wd033Wd4fdWe50bW52f7Wc2d5W0aabW9fbdW8231Wbfb9 W7acfW075dW5dadW46b9Wa7fdW0dd3W22cbWe64fW92ddW2cc3 W71cbW1665W49dbW5689W9aafWf193Wdd4bWb9cdW72a3W54ed W2011W1f83W59edW6e49W1cc9W2b77W9a4dW4109Wa76fW474f Wc5e5W2961Wf389W801bW3ea7We61fW96cdW1e5dW8e37W30f1 We04bW4087Wb657W6d35Wec0fW400dW21cfW7537W5b51W28e7 W5dcfW0dffW191bW0ba1W43dfW0999W136dW71d7Wbc45W9fd7 W50e5Wbd47Wc0e5W05a5W4af1Wb953Wc8b7Wcac1Wf465W2711 W43a3W0611W54b9W8bc7W4eefWd865W1f9dW09fdW4a23W4dbd W312dW8d03W7479W2517W5695W0ef1W3abbW86afW4b3bW413b W5dafW30cfW525fW5fb5W9903W2313W5555W7615Wf2afW5031 Wee15We001W5adfW5e43W4679W4b95Wc45fWfd87W33d7W066d W5d7dWddb9W772fWdd2dW1171Wc9c5W89cfW5583Wfa4dWf21d Wde81W8ab5Web5bWed81Wff2dW74abWbc0bW783fW6f05We16d W7b5bW79ffWb92bWe939W33bbW5a13W93dbW24ffW677bW2a2b W800bW6f6dWeda9Wafb7Wcda3W7879W5787Wd397W6c17Wf367 W8667W8073W6f91Wa753W9a19W777bWb29dW2a37WdfcfW23b5 W7c53W8e6fWe98fWf3bbW92f9WcacdW7607W4211Wa32dW2515 W510fW53e1W638bW6709Wd47bW7649W5cdfW25f5W318bWc21f WbebdWe4afW2ad9W8e41W28b9W5827W66b9W1851Wd001W9669 W0221W6c07We98fW782bW8c17W10f5Wc0cdWf4cdW1195W86d1 W62bfWc0e9W61efW1839W45a7Wf755W33bfW0bffWd52fW14b1
  8. keesh's perl script strikes again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Just had a thought... This might be even better...

    • Wc37bW27dbW0c97W892bWf1f1W7f77Wd533W5779W4b13W725f W2211W9ea1W10dfWe1b5Wda67W8915Wa39bW8dc7W99edW2dd7 W7fd9W3bf7Wdf17W25a5W1f05W3525W2fe7W3c9dW826bWc497 W3d31W2863Wb0b7Wdf5dW8c61WaacdWee09W9c3dWafc9W0909 Wf675Wa415W9565W3f45W030fW42cfWf421Wd8ddWe171W40bb W5fa5Wd4f3We5c3W2c81W0a9bW7fabWff43W3d87Wbf7bWa7c5 Wb74fW76d1W17c9W18cbW62ebW3277W79e9Wc1b5W4ec9Wbd81 We55fW7019W2dd3W2c55W159bW87c5W922dW0f9bW033dW9ef9 Wb8c9W31adW4be1W66fdW6f5fW0475W8867Wc959W5d05We7d9 W19b7Wa171W752bWf0a7W740dWfaafWdd29W57f7W70bfW3b35 W0c45W3b17Wae85W22f9W6e3dWd3efW8843W0771W504bWd1ed Waa4dW33bbW60b1Wfb6fWce33Wd547W88bfWbf9fWa50bW5d01 W695dWe0efW782dWbcefW420dWdfe9W888dW6a63W8a7fW4ead Wb471W8c9dW068dWb4cbW6bc9W3ffbW9cc5W2bb3W7aebW5595 Wb777W5b93Wb3dfW7771W7839W00cdWfe2bW1921W85f1Wa1d3 Wd515W1cf1Wbd57W9d95Wbc6dW958fW8c07W3a67Wb3d7W8c31 W3dffWdd69W3093W333dW05adW1271Wa5bfW6d6fW0677W8c71 W2325W1187W29c1Wc65dW1287Wd26dW0673W6c9bW9b59W33d9 Wa305W36dfWb517W737bW5a07W5a9fW7007Wcea5Wa927W3df1 W7c7fW0c6dW32b7W92fbW78b1Wb461Wb9b9W83d7W0cf3Wd9a3 W6069W16f9W5e83We293Wf139W741bWe0d1W34ffW7a6dW31a5 W0d4dW2ec1W040dW5293W09a1W52edWa87bW1cd9Wc48bW137b Wd77dW7057W9111W1f67W0bb7Wc633Wc85dW9d5fWbabfW80cd
    1. Re:keesh's perl script strikes again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      lol, most /.ers do that anyway :) FWIW, here's the basic crap generating thing:

      perl -e "foreach(1..100){printf qq[
      • %4.4xW%4.4xW%4.4x
      • %4.4xW%4.4xW%4.4x
      • ],rand 0xffff,rand 0xffff,rand 0xffff,rand 0xffff,rand 0xffff,rand 0xffff;}"
  9. Windoze Sux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    What you're proposing could never be carried out on a windows machine, and even if it could, what NT SysAdmin would have the brains to keep up with all of the patches?

    I think that what Allan Cox needs to keep in mind -- what we all have to keep in mind -- is how to make sure Linux can compete with Windows. If that means wild speculation about the rants of some "IANAL's" interpretations of the law.... well, then, that's what we've got to do. As long as it helps ensure corporate acceptance of our software.

    As for the BSD users... I won't even bother dignifying /them/ with a comment.

    Oh, and I'm sure I'll get modded down... because the moderators are just glorified script kiddies who wouldn't understand my radical insight. Well, too bad!

  10. Re:Using the Linux community as pawns by niall111 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In Marshalltown, Iowa, horses are forbidden to eat fire hydrants.

  11. Re:Keeping America safe for copyright holders by renehollan · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    An interesting development regarding the WTC collapse...

    It seams that the building design specs called for asbestos insulation on the support structure to avoid the catastrophic collapse that a fire could cause. This was used up to the 64th floor, when the use of asbestos insulation was banned in NY. At the time, one designer pointed out that if a fire broke out above the 64th floor, the building would collapse.

    Now, asbestos is dangerous when inhaled, but with proper handling is no more dangerous than, say, gas mains.

    One friend is of the opinion that of the 6000 dead (pick your number), 1000 were the result of a terrorist attack, and 5000 were the result of government irrationality. Had asbestos insulation been used, it is estimated that the buildings would have stood for at least four hours, if not indefinitely, allowing many of those 5000 to escape.

    --
    You could've hired me.
  12. help my company is switching to XP!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I am worried about about a script kiddie with a dictionary and a basic script to crack everyone's passward and I am worried about licesning costs. Anyone here have an idea on how I should approach the issue with my boss?

  13. Am I doing this right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    * 7d2fW255fWf973
    * 7006W7c2cW889c
    * 3644Wec86Wbff8
    * 31f3We5e6W6322
    * dfffWc032Wbbb0
    * a18aW782cW1e0b
    * 2cf9W50cbW646d
    * 7d2fWa057W943c
    * abd6W89faWebb1
    * 4567Wbe17W31b1
    * 414fWcd17Wc7e6
    * 2281W2e47We11c
    * 2716W73b5W90d5
    * 1dd4Wfa57W4ade
    * e2f6W6891W8cb8
    * 7fdaW0007Wc666
    * e686W222dWc2a8
    * 407bW2652Wc611
    * c5acW1575Wc9ba
    * db7aWf6dcWc5c6
    * b0aaW3ceeWf855
    * 100dW2b10W1c56
    * eba9W2a56Wa2e4
    * 7846Wcd29W06d8
    * 9f47W19b7W0be4
    * 3c91Wb2feW8858
    * 5012We113Wfe27
    * 7782W1cafWc657
    * e93cW76a1W152f
    * d006Wa47fW830e

  14. Too late to make a stand... by thogard · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Alan Cox knows he's going to get busted if he ever goes to the US again so maybe its best he just doens't go there.

    The real problem is what happens when the US goes to him. With the way Blair seems to be tring hard to be the 51st governer it may not be long till hiding in the UK won't save Cox either.

    So what happens with Oz when the UK becomes a state? Will the Queen still be the head of state or will the chain of command be much different? I wonder how King George the 3rd feels about all of the this and if there is much rolling in his grave.

    (as I quickly try to find my asbestos undies)

  15. Mod this UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    up up and away, yay!
    not.