Slashdot Mirror


Looking At Gobe

mneptok writes: "OSNews is running a review of a beta version of Gobe Productive, the office productivity suite initially developed for BeOS by the former producers of ClarisWorks. The beta tested by OSNews is for Windows, but a Linux GTK (and that's toolkit only) version is planned for release after the Win32 version ships. A public beta of the Win32 version is imminent. Looks like a nice, affordable 'army knife' office app for Windows users, and a serious contender in the Linux office space." We had some coverage of this a while back,

7 of 192 comments (clear)

  1. Well.. by k98sven · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's always nice to see new linux software, even propritary..

    Still I don't quite see the market. Office people want what they know: MS Office,
    if your not using that, it really doesn't matter what you're using. So why not chose something that doesn't cost 120 bucks, like StarOffice or KOffice?

    Still, I haven't used the software, maybe it IS an OfficeXP killer. My point is: It'd have to be.

  2. Let's get real ... by vlad_petric · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Word .doc file format has not yet been mastered, no powerpoint compatibility, poor lettering on Glyphs, no sound or video.

    There's nothing more important in the Office world than compatibility M$ file formats. Which reminds me that the current antitrust settlement doesn't say anything about opening file formats.

    Back to StarOffice & powerpoint viewers (thanks god there's Wine!) ...

    The Raven

    --

    The Raven

  3. Spelling/Grammer Nazis... by Teancom · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Disclaimer: I don't care if you don't find my grammar/spelling appropriate. Honestly, that's the best I can do. I bet you don't speak Greek at all. ;-)"

    For those of you who don't normally read osnews and Eugenia's reviews, she continually gets crap over her spelling and grammer. Specifically, she gets a lot more whenever they are linked by /. so I'm going to go out on a limb and say its generally /.'ers that are dishing the crap. Well, stop it. I hate to pull out the "you're representing all of us" routine, but its true. Everytime I read an article describing the slavering hordes of fanatical and rude linux users out there, I cringe, knowing that it is almost all directly traceable back to this website. And no, I'm not saying it is CmdrTaco's fault, if it wasn't /., it would be somewhere else. But come on, if you don't have anything nice to say.....

    *off soapbox*

    *ontopic*
    I really liked Gobe Productive when I used BeOS. I even bought a copy. However, I wish they had decided to use qt instead of gtk... It just mesh better with the rest of my desktop. Oh, well.

  4. Gobe's liscensing terms actually get it by alewando · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For $125, you get a "family liscense" which permits you to install their software on all the computers in your home plus one computer elsewhere (presumably one at work). This demonstrates a surprising amount of prescience on their part.

    The real money for liscensing is in corporate liscensing. The really financially damaging software "piracy" is among corporate (or government agency...) clients. There's not terribly much to gain from having draconian liscensing schemes that prevent multiple parties in a household from having the software installed; one might even argue that there are no economically justifiable reasons from curtailing any installations, but that's another argument.

    Historically, office-suite penetration has occurred from the corporate level down to the private level; that is, people are forced to use software at work and therefore find themselves having to use it at home as well. The corporate market is fairly well saturated by microsoft Office so it'd be suicide for Gobe to fight there first. Far better would be to worm into the home office market, and try to get employees familiar with it so they can demand their employers reconsider.

    By making it almost pleasant to use their product (and for a reasonable price), they get my vote.

  5. BeOS by MisterPo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gobe is seriously beautiful. I had the last version on BeOS and I found it tricky at first having come from a predominantly MS Office background. But when you get used to it then you realise how well designed the UI is, and how bad MS stuff is :)

    It is also shocking to be reminded off how bad the Linux office productivity stuff is in comparison. Staroffice (5.2 at least) is shockingly bad, and Abiword just looks like MS Wordpad, though I do like GNUmeric. K-Office is nice but still feels unfinished.

    But the most impressive thing about Gobe was its size. Or rather the lack of it. This program is just *so* slick and I will be getting a copy when its finished :)

    Po

  6. What's most interesting.. by Ogerman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To me, the most interesting thing about Gobe is that apparently a group of at most 10 seasoned programmers (see picture on their site and some of those guys are the executive team) came up with a high quality MS Office replacement from scratch in a relatively short amount of time. And they did it without any help from the Open Source community. But alas, this post is not another cowardly retreat call to proprietary software. Quite the contrary. The difference is that these guys were paid to work on Gobe full-time until it was production quality. If similar talent could be focused on say.. KOffice or OpenOffice, imagine how fast those projects would move along. Who would pay them? Quite simply, any smart company that is tired of throwing hundreds of thousands of dollars into a black hole every time MS decides to put out a new version Office. All that's needed is a company or non-profit to organize this effort. A non-profit, of course, may be of greater value to businesses because it'd be a tax write-off.

    1. Re:What's most interesting.. by Klaruz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I always wondered why the people who want to use opensource don't just support the founding of a non-profit orginization that hires and pays programers to write software for them. Instead of each of 30 companys paying $500,000 on microsoft licenses, and not getting exactly what they want, they each spend $50,000 (3 million can write alot of software if spent wisely) each and gets a tax writeoff.

      you'd have the problem of software designed by committee, but I don't have the exact ideal solution for that right now. perhaps if the org doesn't do exactly what each wants they can hire an in house programer to add a feature of choice.

      this of course needs to be thought about alot, it's just a quick offhand idea floating in my head.