Slashdot Mirror


Looking At Gobe

mneptok writes: "OSNews is running a review of a beta version of Gobe Productive, the office productivity suite initially developed for BeOS by the former producers of ClarisWorks. The beta tested by OSNews is for Windows, but a Linux GTK (and that's toolkit only) version is planned for release after the Win32 version ships. A public beta of the Win32 version is imminent. Looks like a nice, affordable 'army knife' office app for Windows users, and a serious contender in the Linux office space." We had some coverage of this a while back,

53 of 192 comments (clear)

  1. Personally... by Ravagin · · Score: 2

    StarOffice 6beta rocks my world (at least, those parts of it that deal with office productivity).

    I've been throwing off the Microsoft yoke in stages - my mail client is eudora lite, my office suite is staroffice, and my browser is k-meleon. Hooray, I guess.

    Don't tell anyone, but I actually save all my wordprocessing docs in RTF. So the program I use doesn't matter all that much, to some extent.

    --

    Karma: T-rexcellent.

    1. Re:Personally... by snarfer · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That seems to me to be conceding the don't-want-to-pay market

      Ah yes, the valuable "dont-want-to-pay market." They are, of course, the real prize market that most companies shoot for.

      Gobe's price is a THIRD of the Office UPGRADE price!

  2. Well.. by k98sven · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's always nice to see new linux software, even propritary..

    Still I don't quite see the market. Office people want what they know: MS Office,
    if your not using that, it really doesn't matter what you're using. So why not chose something that doesn't cost 120 bucks, like StarOffice or KOffice?

    Still, I haven't used the software, maybe it IS an OfficeXP killer. My point is: It'd have to be.

    1. Re:Well.. by Ubi_UK · · Score: 2

      One thing that sets M$ Office apart from the many others is that it comes with a database included. (Gobe does not have one).

      As much as I dislike M$ policies, Access is still a good low-end database product (does MySQL have an easy-to-use GUI build in??) that is definitely unmatched in any of its rivals.

    2. Re:Well.. by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 2

      Office XP will be bundled with new computers and soon will be the only MS Office suite available to small to medium businesses.

      Large businesses usually have premium Microsoft licenses which permit them among other things to buy an XP license and install 2000...

  3. Let's get real ... by vlad_petric · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Word .doc file format has not yet been mastered, no powerpoint compatibility, poor lettering on Glyphs, no sound or video.

    There's nothing more important in the Office world than compatibility M$ file formats. Which reminds me that the current antitrust settlement doesn't say anything about opening file formats.

    Back to StarOffice & powerpoint viewers (thanks god there's Wine!) ...

    The Raven

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:Let's get real ... by b-side.org · · Score: 2, Interesting

      actually, i was just about to post that whole paragraph..

      For BeOS and Linux this office suite is one of their killer applications that users should be proud of. For Windows users, it still has some features left to be desired when a 'monster' like OfficeXP is already out and about. The Word .doc file format has not yet been mastered, no powerpoint compatibility, poor lettering on Glyphs, no sound or video.

      Uhm.. And this is a serious contender in any market, how? And it's closed-source, so it doesn't do anyone any good as a learning tool, either?

      I'm sorry, but I just don't understand the front-page hype about it. It reminds me a lot of that vector-drawing program for linux that came out a little while and didn't do much other than coredump all over the place..

      --
      Indie rock lives! b-side!
    2. Re:Let's get real ... by Watts+Martin · · Score: 2

      While I won't gainsay Eugenia, I'll have to say that I haven't had any problems with Gobe Productive 2.0 (under BeOS) in its export/import capabilities for Microsoft Word. The RTF filter is rather dimwitted (logically, it should be capable of everything the Word filter is, but in practice it definitely isn't), and the HTML export is extremely barebones--although in some ways that's a blessing, since it means I have much less crap to remove when I want to turn it into a real web page.

      I used StarOffice 5.1 under Linux and Windows and it drove me absolutely batshit. I applaud the effort in OpenOffice to fix some of its predecessor's atrocities, but it's still an amazing resource pig.

      Speaking solely for myself, I'll be looking forward to gobeProductive for Windows, and I'll certainly see if I can run the Linux binary at work under FreeBSD. (Yes, bizarrely enough, I use FreeBSD at work and Windows at home these days, although I'm in the process of setting up a Slackware 8 partition on my PC.) I know some people have had good luck with AbiWord, but I'm not one of them; the only open source office application I've liked so far has been Gnumeric. The new Productive release fixes one major hole in previous incarnations (no sections). If they've added the ability to start numbering at pages other than 1, I'll be set. If they start taking advantage of their frames to move toward being a baby desktop publishing program, too, that'd rock. :)

  4. You guys... by ekrout · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You guys should check out Gobe's import/export filters. They actually developed an API that anyone can write to, so if they port the API and the filters over to Our Favorite OS(tm), which they are apparently going to do, then any application can choose to just write to that API and will immediately be able to save or write in any of the proprietary formats that Gobe supports.

    --

    If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538
  5. I want my MS-Office (no, really...) by coupland · · Score: 2

    What I was really hoping to see was Microsoft split up as per Penfield-Jackson's recommendation at which point we would have seen MS-Office for Linux. I've got no issue with Microsoft competing with good products, I just hate to see them use their operating system monopoly to reduce choices (bundling IE) or exclude competitors (not supporting Linux).

    1. Re:I want my MS-Office (no, really...) by coupland · · Score: 2

      Yeah you're probably right but at least it would have been a possibility. For all their faults they do make a nice OS and a nice Office package. The thing I fault them for is their cross-leveraging. (Use Office to spur Windows upgrades. Then use Windows to spur Office upgrades.) They're also getting quite arrogant with their licensing as well, although people should try not to forget how they permanently lowered the average cost of an office suite in the late 80's during their price war with WordPerfect, Lotus, and Borland. Sadly they achieved this price decrease by dumping product on the market and waiting for their competition to go tits-up...

    2. Re:I want my MS-Office (no, really...) by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 2

      For all their faults [Microsoft] do make a nice OS and a nice Office package.

      So could others. If we had a truly competitive marketplace.

      MS is not the only company who knows how to make good software. The problem is that there is a big lack of incentive to invest in a product that has to compete with MS, when they are a monopolist. Everyone knows better. All they have to do is give their product away, for awhile, until you die. Special!!!!!! Six month coupon for FREE!!! Office XP! included with Windows XP!!!! Be sure to get yours today!!!!!! Limited time offer!!!! (until our competition dies)

      --

      Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
  6. XP Lite, etc? by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    This is starting to look really good.

    there is definitely a market for a non MS suite in the hundred dollar range.

    I can remember Claris works, and a number of other similar and excellent products. Not every one wants to spend multiple hundreds of dollars just to write a basic letter.

    Heck I would be very happy with a Lite version of windows and office, half the features for half the price. I kan do witout a spel cheker. or all of the fancier features no one uses. Give me the 20% or 30% that 80% of the people use 90% of the time.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  7. Spelling/Grammer Nazis... by Teancom · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Disclaimer: I don't care if you don't find my grammar/spelling appropriate. Honestly, that's the best I can do. I bet you don't speak Greek at all. ;-)"

    For those of you who don't normally read osnews and Eugenia's reviews, she continually gets crap over her spelling and grammer. Specifically, she gets a lot more whenever they are linked by /. so I'm going to go out on a limb and say its generally /.'ers that are dishing the crap. Well, stop it. I hate to pull out the "you're representing all of us" routine, but its true. Everytime I read an article describing the slavering hordes of fanatical and rude linux users out there, I cringe, knowing that it is almost all directly traceable back to this website. And no, I'm not saying it is CmdrTaco's fault, if it wasn't /., it would be somewhere else. But come on, if you don't have anything nice to say.....

    *off soapbox*

    *ontopic*
    I really liked Gobe Productive when I used BeOS. I even bought a copy. However, I wish they had decided to use qt instead of gtk... It just mesh better with the rest of my desktop. Oh, well.

    1. Re:Spelling/Grammer Nazis... by nels_tomlinson · · Score: 3, Insightful
      ... she continually gets crap over her spelling and grammer.

      Don't you think that learning the basic, grade-school-levels skills like spelling and grammer would be a more appropriate reaction than this whining? If you don't like being accused of bad grammer, learn to use good grammer. If you don't like constructive criticism about your spelling, learn to spell. No, a spelling checker won't help ... did you really want to say affect or effect?

    2. Re:Spelling/Grammer Nazis... by namespan · · Score: 2

      Either there is some sarcasm at work here that is too subtle for me, or there's a supreme irony present....

      Say, anyone know much about Automated Transition Grammars? I've been looking into natural language translation that would understand an average slashdot post.

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    3. Re:Spelling/Grammer Nazis... by reverius · · Score: 2

      Anybody who writes a web site in Word has serious issues... ;)

      The sad thing is, because of Microsoft's popularity, people are bound to do just that (and while their spelling and grammar will be fine, they will have much larger problems).

      I won't go into why writing web pages in a word processor is a bad thing. :)

    4. Re:Spelling/Grammer Nazis... by StandardDeviant · · Score: 2, Insightful
      <flame> Maybe if she used full featured word processors that have spelling and grammar correction in many languages, she wouldn't have that problem. </flame>
      The problem is that a non-native speaker of language X wouldn't neccessarily know whether or not Word's grammer/spell checker was fucking up or not when editing language X. And yes, I've seen it fuck up a lot. Case in point, I've typed "e.g." before and had it complain that e and g should be capitalized as being the first words in a sentence, and that is a simple special case to check for.
      Really though, doesn't that in-and-of-itself show why MS is still ahead with consumers for product popularity?
      "They don't drink sand becuase they're thirsty. They drink sand becuase they don't know the difference." ~ Michael Douglas's character in _The American President_

      But seriously, flaming someone for poor grammar in a language that's not their native one is really, really, really lame... English is my native language, and I'm sure my grammar and spelling leave somthing to be desired, but that's becuase I don't care enough to check everything. The reviewer is trying above and beyond the call of duty (ever tried to speak a foreign language? if you haven't, don't bother sharing your opinion) to be intelligible, and a such deserves to be applauded, not flamed.

    5. Re:Spelling/Grammer Nazis... by Kiwi · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Slashdot is really going downhill.


      When a spelling flame, using hate-filled language like "basic grammer skills", gets modded up, you know it's time to find some other site which isn't such an asshole magnet.

      --

      The secret to enjoying Slashdot is to realize that it should not be taken too seriously.

  8. Re:Save as .PDF??? by Teancom · · Score: 3, Informative

    Search for ps2pdf, espitopdf, db2pdf, dvi2pdf, html2pdf, a2pdf, even pdf2pdf (for different versions). All free software, or it wouldn't be on my debian box :-)

  9. Re:Save as .PDF??? by reynaert · · Score: 2

    Err... GhostScript will happily write PDF's. Try, for example, the ps2pdf command.

  10. Re:Save as .PDF??? by reynaert · · Score: 2

    I sure as hell don't see it under Word2000's Save As ;)

    But you can get an 'Print to PDF' thingie. You just have to install the Windows version of GhostScript, and some little program they offer on the same site allows you to install it as a printer driver. (it's been a while since used Windows, so I don't remember the details :)

  11. Re:Save as .PDF??? by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
    All KDE applications can write to PDF, as that is one of the virtual printers that comes with the KDE print system.

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  12. My Linux Productivity Suite by scorcherer · · Score: 2, Funny
    User Friendly

    CircusLinux

    Koules


    And the one site we all love dearly.

    --

    --
    The Cap is nigh. Time to get a fresh new account.

  13. Wow...a sane commercial license... by Hal-9001 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Gobe Productive will be $124.95, with the "Gobe Family License" which allows you to install on every computer in your home plus one installation where you work
    If Microsoft and most other software companies weren't so greedy, this would be a far better way than Windows Product Activation to combat piracy (real, not "casual").
    --
    "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    1. Re:Wow...a sane commercial license... by SubtleNuance · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This will also mean that people can use the suite at home and bring there work with them to the office. The local OA geek wont be up in arms (as much) if they have a license for a local machine... this will help Gobe put a wedge into business machines - they will be able to have their suite seen by IT types and managment...this is an EXCELLENT idea.

  14. License by tykeal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know for a commercial product to be releasing with such a broad license is just plain cool. I don't care if I don't plan on using it, but the "Family License" giving you the ability / right to install on _all_ your home machines plus one machine at work is awesome. I wish more companies did this.

  15. Gobe's liscensing terms actually get it by alewando · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For $125, you get a "family liscense" which permits you to install their software on all the computers in your home plus one computer elsewhere (presumably one at work). This demonstrates a surprising amount of prescience on their part.

    The real money for liscensing is in corporate liscensing. The really financially damaging software "piracy" is among corporate (or government agency...) clients. There's not terribly much to gain from having draconian liscensing schemes that prevent multiple parties in a household from having the software installed; one might even argue that there are no economically justifiable reasons from curtailing any installations, but that's another argument.

    Historically, office-suite penetration has occurred from the corporate level down to the private level; that is, people are forced to use software at work and therefore find themselves having to use it at home as well. The corporate market is fairly well saturated by microsoft Office so it'd be suicide for Gobe to fight there first. Far better would be to worm into the home office market, and try to get employees familiar with it so they can demand their employers reconsider.

    By making it almost pleasant to use their product (and for a reasonable price), they get my vote.

    1. Re:Gobe's liscensing terms actually get it by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 2

      ClarisWorks (now AppleWorks) also gets it. Read the AppleWorks (or older ClarisWorks) license. If your employer buys it for you, they also let you install it at home or on your laptop.

      They really seem to get the reality of the way people want to use the licensed product.

      I paid real money for ClarisWorks, many years ago, for my Mac. It was a fantastic investment. Inexpensive upgrades. Reasonable licensing. NO SERIALIZATION nonsense, or copy protection, no mandatory registration, etc. Just try it. When AppleWorks or ClarisWorks is launched for the first time and asks for your name and serial number, just leave it blank and click OK. Yes, really. Try it. It's worked this way for years.

      AppleWorks (and older ClarisWorks) runs on both Mac and Windows -- and serial number is not needed with either. I can say from personal experience.

      They get it with the licensing. Most reasonable people don't mind paying a reasonable price in real money for an outstanding product.

      On a similar note, I think The Kompany also gets it. A long time ago, so did Borland. Ever read Borland's "no nonsense license agreement"? It was in plain english, and readable.

      By contrast MS makes their licensing programs vague. You never can be sure if you're in compliance. Suppose hypothetically, I have 5 workstations that are used by 8 people. Do I need 5 licenses or 8? Well, the only way I've found to correctly interpret MS's licenses is to interpret them in whatever way is most favorable to MS in terms of $$. What if the 5 workstations run the software from a central server. Do I need 5 licenses or 8? And don't even dream about a license that allows you to take your work home with you to your personal computer when using MS. Or to take your personal copy in to the office. What if I have 10 workstations shared by 5 people? Need 5 licenses or 10? What if every engineer has 3 computers in his workspace, why can't I install Product-X on each workstation for convenience? It still only benefits one person. But nooooooooo. You must get 3 seperate MS licenses.

      --

      Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
  16. Sounds like a good deal. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 2

    When the Linux version is released, it's gonna be great for FreeBSD users like myself. I like to run simple, quick programs. (For example, IceWM as opposed to a desktop environment like GNOME or KDE.) As I recall, Gobe was lean and quick on BeOS. I hope the Linux version is like that too.

    Oh well.

  17. BeOS by MisterPo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gobe is seriously beautiful. I had the last version on BeOS and I found it tricky at first having come from a predominantly MS Office background. But when you get used to it then you realise how well designed the UI is, and how bad MS stuff is :)

    It is also shocking to be reminded off how bad the Linux office productivity stuff is in comparison. Staroffice (5.2 at least) is shockingly bad, and Abiword just looks like MS Wordpad, though I do like GNUmeric. K-Office is nice but still feels unfinished.

    But the most impressive thing about Gobe was its size. Or rather the lack of it. This program is just *so* slick and I will be getting a copy when its finished :)

    Po

  18. Watever appened to the Win. version of ClarisWorks by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    I quite like its simplicity.

    I liked the way all the selection entries in the dropdown font menu appeared in their own fonts.

    About 2 years ago I built a computer for someone & he wanted ClarisWorks for Windows installed, but I couldn't find a downlaod anywhere of it.

    Even old versions or demo versions that you use to get on magazine CDs.

  19. Re:Save as .PDF??? by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 2

    What? KDE has PRINT to PDF, so any KDE program that can print can also produce PDFs. It doesn't require a license from Adobe, and its really cool.

    --
    main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
  20. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  21. But is there a cross platform license by DABANSHEE · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So buying Gobe means you can use it one your W32, BeOS & Linux partitions.

    Then they can have the 3 versions all on one CD in a crossplatform box. Retailers love that - it makes stocking easy.

    Bit like if you buy the boxed version of BeOS you get both X86 & PPC versions inside it.

    Actually I think the boxed version of ClarisWorks itself came with both Mac & Windows versions in it. You know, like it had compatible with both Macintosh & Windows markings on the box.

  22. Re:Watever appened to the Win. version of ClarisWo by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    Thankyou very much

    cosmus@tpg.com.au

    Mick's the name

    I'm still in contact with that bloke - I'll be able to ring him up & say that I managed to find ClarisWorks for Windows, for him.

    He'll then think I've been spending the past 2 years deligently looking for it for him :)

  23. Re:Watever appened to the Win. version of ClarisWo by j-beda · · Score: 2
    If my memory is correct: ClarisWorks was renamed AppleWorks when Claris Inc. turned into FileMaker Inc. and dropped pretty much all of their non-database software back onto Apple Inc.

    I think that there has been talk of doing a new release for Windows, but the Apple online store only seems to have AppleWorks 6.2 for Mac OS 9 and Mac OS X.

  24. What's most interesting.. by Ogerman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To me, the most interesting thing about Gobe is that apparently a group of at most 10 seasoned programmers (see picture on their site and some of those guys are the executive team) came up with a high quality MS Office replacement from scratch in a relatively short amount of time. And they did it without any help from the Open Source community. But alas, this post is not another cowardly retreat call to proprietary software. Quite the contrary. The difference is that these guys were paid to work on Gobe full-time until it was production quality. If similar talent could be focused on say.. KOffice or OpenOffice, imagine how fast those projects would move along. Who would pay them? Quite simply, any smart company that is tired of throwing hundreds of thousands of dollars into a black hole every time MS decides to put out a new version Office. All that's needed is a company or non-profit to organize this effort. A non-profit, of course, may be of greater value to businesses because it'd be a tax write-off.

    1. Re:What's most interesting.. by be-fan · · Score: 2

      Actually, I'm rather unimpressed by both the GNOME and OpenOffice projects (no not a troll, just a statement of facts ;) but dude, have you seen how fast the KDE guys are going? KDE 2.2.1 finally got me to dump Windows, and KWord is a great Word replacement for almost anything I care to do. Given that KOffice didn't even exist a while ago (it came out with KDE-2!) that's damn impressive.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    2. Re:What's most interesting.. by Klaruz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I always wondered why the people who want to use opensource don't just support the founding of a non-profit orginization that hires and pays programers to write software for them. Instead of each of 30 companys paying $500,000 on microsoft licenses, and not getting exactly what they want, they each spend $50,000 (3 million can write alot of software if spent wisely) each and gets a tax writeoff.

      you'd have the problem of software designed by committee, but I don't have the exact ideal solution for that right now. perhaps if the org doesn't do exactly what each wants they can hire an in house programer to add a feature of choice.

      this of course needs to be thought about alot, it's just a quick offhand idea floating in my head.

    3. Re:What's most interesting.. by raph · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > And they did it without any help from the Open Source community.

      Guess again. Gobe Productive actually uses Libart for the cool vector rendering. Not only that, but they've contributed some nice patches back, and they've paid for bug-fixing and enhancement work. So I think they do get the Open Source thing.

      --

      LILO boot: linux init=/usr/bin/emacs

  25. Counterpoint (or "requisite MS bashing)... by srvivn21 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The real money for liscensing is in corporate liscensing. The really financially damaging software "piracy" is among corporate (or government agency...) clients. There's not terribly much to gain from having draconian liscensing schemes that prevent multiple parties in a household from having the software installed;


    Others might not agree with this statement...

    According to Wired, regarding Windows XP:

    Nieman said Product Activation is required for individual users only; corporate and site licenses will be handled separately. Microsoft wants to reduce a form of piracy it calls "casual copying," which is sharing among individual users, claiming the practice is responsible for up to 50 percent of its sales losses.

    Corporate users will get a site license with a unique key required to activate the software, so no registration is required, and if a corporate copy of Windows XP or Office XP is pirated, the source will be traceable via the key, said Nieman.

    I'm with you in that I think that the money is in corporate liscencing. Then again, I don't have any software that anyone would want to buy.
  26. Re:Interesting Idea - Hard To Sell by snarfer · · Score: 2, Informative

    I noticed on the website that you can pre-order Gobe Productive for only $39.95.

  27. Re:Save as .PDF??? by iso · · Score: 3, Informative

    No, PDF does not require a license from Adobe. It's a remarkably open file format actually; I'm surprised that it isn't used by open source advocates more often.

    - j

  28. Re:more office suites? by HiThere · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The problem is that they aren't good office suites. (Don't know about Gobe.)

    I need indexes, tables of contents, style sheets, ...
    StarOffice is getting close. But it's not there yet. KOffice doesn't have any sort of index. AbiWord didn't impress the last time I looked. Applixware hasn't been updated in a few years. Word Perfect doesn't work with recent Linux distributions. KLyx has disappeared from KDE. Etc.

    KOffice and AbiWord have seemed the major hopes, but haven't been very impressive yet. (This weekend I ended up borrowing my wife's computer so I could use MS Word to organize a small collection of poems (with table of contents and index ... I USE!! those features!).

    To be absolutely truthful, at the moment the best word processor on Linux seems to be a combination of a browser and a text editor (write it in html, and then look, to make sure you got it right), but this isn't very appropriate for printed output.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  29. what I really need by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2
    What I really, really need is a fully featured MS Access replacement that is cross platform(windows and Linux). It doesn't need to be compatible with Access files, but it needs to be able to connect to MySQL databases.

    Does such a beast exist? If it did we could totally ditch MS completely at my office.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  30. Re:Gotta change the name! by reverius · · Score: 2

    Yeah... that's how I always have thought of it. Except, when saying it out loud, it sounds wierd to make it into two words... so I just say "gobe" like "globe" but without the l sound. ;)

    In case you haven't figured that out, it rhymes with these words:

    - globe
    - robe
    - Moby (but without the "ee" sound)
    - etc.

  31. Re:Interesting Idea - Hard To Sell by firewort · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They did more than a few betas of Gobe Productive- the last of the Be line was Gobe Productive 2.0, which handled .doc more smoothly than any other non-MS product I've ever seen.

    Worked magificently on BeOS 5 Pro and PE.
    Buy the thing now, and you can get the windows and linux version for the same money. use it on win at work (if you suffer like the rest of us) and linux at home.

    --

  32. ClarisWorks was availiable for Windows too by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    The boxed product contained both

  33. ClarisWorks was great by bacchusrx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Personally? I'd pay $120 for Productive--even if it's only half as good as it sounds. I was a big fan of ClarisWorks for the Macintosh--I preferred it greatly to MS Word due to its simple, elegant design. If Gobe succeeds in bringing a ClarisWorks-like product to the Linux environment, I'd jump at the chance to use it.

    How do the other office suites stack up? StarOffice is a positively huge application (especially for those who need only "light word processing.") KOffice seemed buggy and unimpressive. WordPerfect for Linux has one of the most rauciously flawed font renderers I've ever come across. So... I've had my eye on Gobe for some time--I hope they come through.

    BRx.

    --
    Life after capitalism? The participatory economics project
  34. Re:ClarisWorks was awesome by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 2

    Yes, it was awesome. I've used ClarisWorks for 10 years. Prior to that, other Claris products for Mac. i.e. MacDraw, MacWrite.

    I remember a friend saying many years ago "In ClarisWorks you can do anything!" And he's right.

    The drawing surface is really a poor man's page layout program. You can set up multiple text boxes where the text will overflow from one box to the next. Set up complex multiple column layouts, and when you edit text in an earlier box, the text "flows" throughout the "linked" text boxes. Setup multiple "chains" of linked textboxes if you wish. Each text box has full word processing features. Wrap text around odd shaped pictures. Draw complex pictures. Paint pictures. (Paint is pixmap based, Draw is vector-object based.) Make slideshows.

    Put spreadsheets into wordprocessing, to form tables. Directly draw or paint inside word processing documents. Even play a QuickTime movie inside of a word processing document. (It prints as a still image.) Spinning logos in letterhead or slideshows.

    In fact, the biggest thing that I thought ClarisWorks lacked was that its pixel manipulation (i.e. Paint) is not more Photoshop like.

    --

    Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
  35. Re:Gotta change the name! by be-fan · · Score: 2

    It was originally on BeOS, so Gobe is Go Be Productive. Its a pun.

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  36. Re: PDF not that open by iso · · Score: 2

    Older PDF files have the nasty habit of being compressed with LZW (think GIF).

    True, but all new PDFs are compressed with ZIP so this isn't a concern anymore.
    I also remember reading somewhere (maybe /.) about problems reading some of the newer PDF files on *nix systems if they used fonts that weren't on the system.

    Well if the fonts in a PDF aren't on your system then you can't view them, obviously. But how is this any different from any other word processor file? The nice part is that fonts can (and in most cases, should) be embedded into the PDF so if anything, this is another reason to use PDF over something like RTF.

    - j