One-Machine Linux Cluster
An AC wrote: Forget Beowulf ? clusters, Jacques Gelinas has made available a kernel patch to enable many virtual servers running on the same machine, even the same kernel. Read his original message posted to the Linux kernel list." Imagine what this will mean for hosting companies...
I always thought the point of a Cluster is desgined to add machines and combine into a "virtual" machine, that has much more porcessing power and disk capabilities than a single standalone box.
Thence, this may be a good idea for adding virtual machines, say for additional processes and purposes, but a cluster in the way I unsderstand it, ie putting two or more cheaper machines together to make one much, much more powerful "virtual" one.
BUT, combining this WITH a hardware cluster - now that is a good and worthwhile idea.
"Old Rallydrivers never die - they just fail to book in on time"
...one programmer scratches an itch and we all get a possibly incredibly useful utility. (And yes, I know Linux is actually Free [being GPL'd], rather than just Open Source - but Free is a subset of Open Source and Open Source lets this happen.) Try that in Windows - nyahh!
"that's not encryption - it's a new perl script that I'm working on..." - from some Matrix parody
I am displeased to see so many of you people replying and asking why this would be a good idea.
:)
The point is that this is *l337*. *That* is the point.
If there happens to be a practical application, that is completely secondary.
Slashdot 's editors are dickheads
Unless this is highly optimized, why not just use VMWare?
Jump onto a FBSD system and "man jail"
Imagine a cluster of beowulf clusters - each system running multiple instances of linux!
In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
Imagine a Beowolf cluster of these!
(Goodbye Karma)
Yes, this is a good thing.
Yeah, just imagine if you had a BEOWULF CLUSTER of these things!!!!
C'mon, someone had to say it!!!
My journal has hot