Slashdot Mirror


80 Gig MP3 Player

An Anonymous Coward writes: "I don't know who has anywhere near enough MP3 music to need an 80G drive, but for those who want one Reality Media has just released the GIDI Digital Jukebox. The company is based out of Belgium and offers the unit in three different box styles including one for the dash ($715) and one for a systems rack ($795). The company will also sell you the guts alone to build your own player. The key is the company's Single Board Audio Computer (SBAC), which is a pre-programmed for digital music."

8 of 238 comments (clear)

  1. Why? by PopeAlien · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is it so hard to believe that someone would want 80 gigs of music storage? Is it difficult to believe that someone would have several hundred CD's collected over the years and want to archive them at a decent quality in a jukebox? I know I've run out of space on my 40 gig drive and am going to adding another just for music..

    1. Re:Why? by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Insightful
      > I gauren-damn-tee that you don't, and won't, listen to *all* the the files on that 40 gigs. I would wager that 20% you actually will ever play, and the rest are taking up space.

      Over several years of collecting MP3z and/or ripping/encoding your own CDs, yeah, you will listen to everything in your collection, at least once.

      If you're ripping your own CDs, you won't know the rip/encode was "good" until you've listened to the MP3.

      If you're l33ching MP3z, you won't know you "got" the song (that is, you won't know that the idjit posting the file did his job of previewing the MP3 before he uploaded it) until you've listened to the MP3.

      Thus, any serious MP3 collector will probably have listened to every piece in his or her collection at least once, and arguably multiple times.

    2. Re:Why? by mixmasta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > I gauren-damn-tee that you don't, and won't, listen to *all* the the files on that 40 gigs. I would wager that 20% you actually will ever play, and the rest are taking up space.
      ---

      Just like the %80 of my CD's I dont listen to. CD's collect take up REAL space AND collect dust. I rip them and then sell 'em back to the warehouse when I'm done. =)

      But .... Forget MP3!

      Dont waste your time ripping 80G of mp3 just to have to do it again when hardrive space quintuples in 2 years.... like I did.

      Forget mp3 and all the other lossy compression types. They are/will be a complete waste of time when 1-200GB hard disks are selling for $200 sometime next summer.

      I'm saving all my files with lossless compression with the flac format: http://flac.sourceforge.net

      A cheap 80G drive should hold quite a bit, and I'll never have to rip the files again since they will expand to perfect digital copies when played.

      Trying to save the world time....

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
  2. 80GB is not more than enough (it is nice though) by Nathdot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know who has anywhere near enough MP3 music to need an 80G drive

    While this undoubtably has the capacity to fit a moderate (300 - 500) CD collection a few times over I'm sure the extra capacity would easily be put to good use.

    I imagine you'd even fill it with MP3's of CD's you didn't particularly like just to accomodate things like parties/entertaining etc. (afterall that is the point of a jukebox)

    Then there's the possibilty of burning at much higher bit rates etc.

    80GB is definitely not a problem

  3. Re:problem with large storage mp3 players by AaronStJ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is how do you navigate through 80gb of content?

    Very easily. Ok, I've only got 8 gigs of mp3s, but navigating through my collection is still not a problem in the least. I just have a directory structure that goes something like C:\music\Band Name\Album Name\mp3s. Compilation albums go into C:\music\Various Artists. It's just like any large physical album collection I might have, only it alphebetizes itself. Navigating through my mp3 collection has never given me any difficulty. And if I ever get a lot more bands' mp3s, I can just categorize the Band Name directories in Genre directories.

    As far as I've seen, most portable mp3s players haven't been able to catch onto the value on a directory structure. With the tiniest bit of discipline and a directory structure, organizing a very large mp3 collection is not difficult at all.

    --
    Stupid like a fox!
  4. Enough for several radio stations... by srvivn21 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    From the article:

    A commercial rack unit, this player is targeted for radio stations and the like. When you realize that 80GB can probably hold the entire active libraries of most stations...


    Let's be greedy, and assume that the stations encode their music in such a way that each song takes 10MB. There is still room for 8,000 songs. That (from my very subjective viewpoint) seems like a lot more variety than any radio station I have heard in a really long time.
  5. Interfaces? by jpellino · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Looks like it's serial or USB. Anyone know for sure?
    If so, Yikes. What can we know:
    10 min to transfer 5 GB over FireWire;
    x 16 to fill 80 GB - 160 min
    x 33.3 if you move from 400 FW to 12 USB
    Sooo... something like 88 hours to fill via USB? That's half a week.

    Bet that iPod's looking pretty practical right about now?

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  6. Re:Audio Quality? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    when it comes to common sense than that would be true. But today EVERYBODY uses the same basic hardware. Home Theatre Magazine reviewed 30 DVD players and 30 CD players. The highest marks on DVD players was to the latest APEX dvd player... best video best sound, it beat out the B&O , $1500.00 DVD player hands down, the apex unit is $229.95.

    In Cd players the mentioned that if it doesnt have digital out, dont buy it. otherwise there was no perceptable difference from the $199.00 unit to the $3200.00 cd player they tested. (They also mentioned that audiophiles that use Scopes to check for better specs are either stupid or rich as only a dummie would pay huge dollars for something that you cant hear.)

    It's sctually very interesting to research Audio and so-called audiophiles... several audio masters, the great men that designed the awesome audio of today remark that a great majority of "high-end-audiophiles" are just spoiled rich kids that really dont know anything, and are coloring their hearing because they spent $50,000 on their stereo... A human cannot hear the differnce between Silver no-ox cables or 12gague lamp cord in a home stereo or commercial audio install. and many of the perceptions that people swear by are either artifical coloring of the audio (Ala Tube Amps, they sound different) or reflections.

    research the audiophile world, it's pretty funny and will give you new insight on how to snicker when a salesman trys to say that that $2700.00 Nakamitchi is the only choice in high end audio.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.