Slashdot Mirror
The PayPal Phenomenon
An Anonymous Coward writes: "Pretty interesting and thorough history of PayPal." Not really the usual fare on Slashdot, but this is a very readable account of one of the few dot-com successes. I find PayPal pretty annoying today - a lot of the anti-fraud, privacy-invasive measures which this article applauds make Paypal much less enticing to me than it used to be. And they've been accused of squatting on people's funds at the slightest excuse. But maybe that's the way to success: start off with a very appealing product, then slowly tighten the screws.
It seems to me that the problem with previous micropayment schemes was not the scheme itself, but that there was never a situation in which the convenience of using the system outweighed the risks associated with trusting an outside party with your money and transactions.
eBay provided the fluid marketplace that created the situation where that convenience overrode the inherent mistrust of a newcomer like PayPal.
eBay brought the idea of the auction as a sales model to the forefront of the net, they also pioneered community based trust mechanisms that let their model survive even though they don't back transactions directly (something that would have quickly invalidated their business model).
What was supposed to be a concept that allowed high-brow concepts like online media micropayments seems to have come about largely because of the requirements of some people to sell $5 pens and beany babies.
Probably important not to forget that no matter how large the venture capital some firm gets to change the internet, most likely it won't succeed unless we decide it will.
Not surprisingly, a lot of Slashdoters doubt PayPal...which is understandable, since it's so difficult to believe that any pure-play dot com can survive these days.
However, I've had the pleasure of working closely with many of PayPal's senior management over the past two years, back since they merged with X.com. I can tell you three very important things:
1. The P2P space is actually a loss leader. Most of their profit is made in the B2B and B2C space - not pure P2P as most people believe. They do very well in these spaces and recent analysts predict that their revenue was between $80 and $100mil last year. That's a heck of a lot better than most of the not-coms we've seen over the past several years.
2. They have an incredibly intelligent, dedicated and savvy staff that understands their market and industry.
3. They have a business model that works.
In my opinion, these three items equal success.
I love their service and I enjoy working with the company. If I didn't enjoy my current job so much, I'd probably apply for a job with them.
Here's a nice outline of why PayPal's implementation is NOT very conducive to regular transactions.
http://www.gamers-union.com/paypal.html
Also interesting to note, a few days after this page went up, PayPal yanked service on the W3 storefront they'd been providing for this individual.
And now he will no longer accept PayPal transactions.
Unfortunate, but very necessary to protect himself and his customers.
Chas - The one, the only.
THANK GOD!!!
I find PayPal pretty annoying today - a lot of the anti-fraud, privacy-invasive measures which this article applauds make Paypal much less enticing to me than it used to be.
Michael. Do you look for reasons to bitch? I swear to God, wannabe privacy advocates piss me off. How do you expect PayPal to do business such as it does (WITH ACCESS TO YOUR CREDIT CARD) without a modicum of personal information, hm? Do you think it would make good business sense for PayPal to say "You know, we don't need any of your personal information. Just give us your credit card number, and we'll base our business on the honor system."
Yeah. Right.
I strongly recommend you have a look at Paypal's Privacy Policy. Since you're obviously doing some blind, ignorant whining about subject matter with which you have absolutely no clue, I guarantee you've never even clicked on the privacy policy. PayPal does their best to explain what information is gathered, why it's gathered, and how it's used. If you don't like it, don't use the service. But don't complain.
Michael's comment absolutely reeks of "I'm with Stupid", "follow everyone else's opinion" mentality. "Wow. The community is really for individual privacy! It's time for me to attempt to gain acceptance with my (cough) peers by complaining about privacy-invading goons!"
Yes. Privacy is important. However, when you choose to conduct business over the internet with a credit card, bitching about a company doing its best to protect yours and their asses only serves to make you look like (more of) an idiot.
Personally, I've had nothing but excellent service with PayPal. It's nice to be able to accept credit cards, or use credit cards to pay for something without a whole shitload of messy paperwork. I've got to give PayPal a lot of credit. They've become a very successful online transaction service, and pretty much the standard auction payment system on eBay. (Ah, no need to worry about sending checks or money orders through the mail. Instant payment rocks.)
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon? :P)
(If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't.
It's easy for guys like our infamous slashdot editor to comment:
Well, that's an armchair critic opinion if I've ever heard one. PayPal is now less enticing to "michael of slashdot".
The cold reality of the world is that there's a small number of crooks out there who will commit fraud, given the opportunity. Any party in the transaction who may be exposed to the potential for a loss would be acting irresponsibly by not taking reasonable measures to detect fraud before making the transaction.
In the conventional visa merchant world, the consumer is protectedby the fact that their bank will handle their dispute with the merchant and issue a chargeback to the merchant to recover the funds.
The bank is protected by their ability to issue a chargeback to the merchant. If the bank believes the merchant may not have the funds to cover chargebacks, they will hold a "reserve", which basically means they won't give the merchant some portion of their money for many months, sometimes even a year or two! (we had this shitty situation when we got started and consquently had to carry quite a bit more debt than we expected as we weren't getting the money for most of the products we sold!)
The merchant isn't really protected by much of anything in the conventional visa transaction, other than their own efforts to verify that the buyer really is the legitimate cardholder and that the goods are shipped to the correct destination. Actually, a card swipe and signature are more-or-less proof that the buyer received the goods, but with internet and mail order sales, it's a risky business for the merchant.
PayPal is in a tough situation, being in the middle of a transaction. It's really amazing that they can make this work at all, built on top of the conventional infrastructure which puts most of the risk onto the seller's side. They really need to do everything they can to detect and prevent fraud... even if it doesn't appeal to michael's tastes.
PS: I will agree that it's very un-cool to take personal customer information and use it for any purpose other than the reason it was provided. We don't do this, partly based on ethical grounds, partly because we're so small that there's no incentive, but mostly because nothing is more important than satisfied customers.
PJRC: Electronic Projects, 8051 Microcontroller Tools
It's nice to hear you had a good experience with PayPal. I've only rarely used it, but I was recently pointed to Paypal Warning.
The page lists all sorts of articles with negative comments about Paypal. Apparently it has gotten a 3 out of 7 on Reseller Ratings (where everything is scored by customers). They also have a Paypal Wall of Shame with "unedited horror stories".
The thing that grabbed my attention the most, however, was the following on the front page:
WARNING:
Your Paypal account can be frozen at any time, without advance notice leaving you without your money for weeks (if not forever), and there isn't much you can do about it.
Any thoughts, folks?
XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.