Slashdot Mirror


The PayPal Phenomenon

An Anonymous Coward writes: "Pretty interesting and thorough history of PayPal." Not really the usual fare on Slashdot, but this is a very readable account of one of the few dot-com successes. I find PayPal pretty annoying today - a lot of the anti-fraud, privacy-invasive measures which this article applauds make Paypal much less enticing to me than it used to be. And they've been accused of squatting on people's funds at the slightest excuse. But maybe that's the way to success: start off with a very appealing product, then slowly tighten the screws.

17 of 184 comments (clear)

  1. eBay was crucial here by Zach` · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It seems to me that the problem with previous micropayment schemes was not the scheme itself, but that there was never a situation in which the convenience of using the system outweighed the risks associated with trusting an outside party with your money and transactions.

    eBay provided the fluid marketplace that created the situation where that convenience overrode the inherent mistrust of a newcomer like PayPal.

    eBay brought the idea of the auction as a sales model to the forefront of the net, they also pioneered community based trust mechanisms that let their model survive even though they don't back transactions directly (something that would have quickly invalidated their business model).

    What was supposed to be a concept that allowed high-brow concepts like online media micropayments seems to have come about largely because of the requirements of some people to sell $5 pens and beany babies.

    Probably important not to forget that no matter how large the venture capital some firm gets to change the internet, most likely it won't succeed unless we decide it will.

  2. I dunno... by trilucid · · Score: 4, Interesting


    I've never really had anything but a good experience with PayPal (and I've used it *heavily* for two years now). Maybe it's just my good fortune.

    Well, okay, I do have one small gripe. Apparently, their site cannot be convinced that a certain customer of ours is browsing from the U.K., and as a result he's having to send us a check (brits read: cheque ;) ) in lieu of PayPal funds transfers.

    Hopefully their money market fund will see a bit of a recovery soon (1.9% == blegh), but hey, there's a whole slew of investment vehicles that aren't doing so well at the moment. Such is the state of the economy.

    As for "overly tight fraud prevention measures", I'd like to hear from people who've simultaneously run a company basing his/her online transactions on "true" merchant account methods. Most e-based merchant account providers/processors don't place nearly the emphasis on security that PayPal does, and chargebacks are a real bitch (not to mention quite bad for P.R. if the customer who got ripped off is particularly angry about it).

    Just my brief experience in these matters. Replies are very welcome!

    1. Re:I dunno... by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's nice to hear you had a good experience with PayPal. I've only rarely used it, but I was recently pointed to Paypal Warning.

      The page lists all sorts of articles with negative comments about Paypal. Apparently it has gotten a 3 out of 7 on Reseller Ratings (where everything is scored by customers). They also have a Paypal Wall of Shame with "unedited horror stories".

      The thing that grabbed my attention the most, however, was the following on the front page:

      WARNING:

      Your Paypal account can be frozen at any time, without advance notice leaving you without your money for weeks (if not forever), and there isn't much you can do about it.

      Any thoughts, folks?

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:I dunno... by trilucid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thank you for the reply! I definitely see where you're coming from on this topic, and think that all cases of abuse at the hands of a financial institution (or pseudo-institution, as the case may sometimes be) deserves close scrutiny.

      However, the situation is always more complex than that. For example, a couple of quick minutes on Google yielded the following unto mine Konqueror:


      Basically, pick any financial institution or payment processing company "X" and search for a hate site associated with it. You're almost certain to "win" each time. Now, I'm not saying that these companies are blameless by any stretch of the imagination. Case in point, I actually got messed over by Bank of America while I was working on the development team that wrote their telephone banking system software. Needless to say, I got the errors corrected rather quickly.

      The problem is simple: any company doing business of any sort will come up against opposition, disgruntled customers, angry stockholders, etc. It's oftentimes difficult to weed out the "fact from fiction" in a lot of cases involving complex issues. I don't think there's a major national bank in existence that hasn't dealt with a major class-action lawsuit over policy issues.

      That's where the trick comes in. These days, almost all institutions, from banks to brokerage houses, have strict and specific verbiage allowing them to "hang on to your cash" in the case of a perceived conflict. PayPal isn't even close to the worst I've seen of that sort of practice.

      I suppose it really does come down to individual experience (and group communication of experience, very valuable). As for the sites that report on the misdeeds of these organizations, I say rock on. But, we've got to balance everything out. Frankly, PayPal has taken a heck of a lot less heat than is typical of a "newcomer" in the field, especially given the unsteady ground they started out to build their revenue stream on initially.

      I attribute their success to good management. That doesn't mean they'll always have the benefit of intelligent people at the top, but as long as that's reasonably enough the case, I'm okay with them.

      On the other hand, if they burned me badly I'd probably be first in line to register "GodIHateThoseScrewyBastards.com" too. It's just human nature to attempt to right wrongs, and I could even be in the wrong in that case without knowing it... almost makes my brain hurt trying to wrap the grey matter around that part.

      Thank you again for the thoughtful reply!

  3. How they succeed... by Zach` · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not surprisingly, a lot of Slashdoters doubt PayPal...which is understandable, since it's so difficult to believe that any pure-play dot com can survive these days.
    However, I've had the pleasure of working closely with many of PayPal's senior management over the past two years, back since they merged with X.com. I can tell you three very important things:

    1. The P2P space is actually a loss leader. Most of their profit is made in the B2B and B2C space - not pure P2P as most people believe. They do very well in these spaces and recent analysts predict that their revenue was between $80 and $100mil last year. That's a heck of a lot better than most of the not-coms we've seen over the past several years.

    2. They have an incredibly intelligent, dedicated and savvy staff that understands their market and industry.

    3. They have a business model that works.

    In my opinion, these three items equal success.

    I love their service and I enjoy working with the company. If I didn't enjoy my current job so much, I'd probably apply for a job with them.

  4. Gosh, you think? by seldolivaw · · Score: 4, Funny
    But maybe that's the way to success: start off with a very appealing product, then slowly tighten the screws

    Wow, have you thought about writing an e-commerce strategy book? No-one's ever come to that conclusion before. Incidentally, how much are those /. subscriptions going to cost?

  5. PayPal. Nice idea, but it has it's problems. by Chas · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a nice outline of why PayPal's implementation is NOT very conducive to regular transactions.

    http://www.gamers-union.com/paypal.html

    I personally have had many transactions thru PAYPAL as both a buyer & seller.

    I have had 1 bad transaction.

    The situation was resolved to their satisfaction but not to mine. I still accept PAYPAL payments but I would not recommend it.

    On March 22 I sent a person in Canada $190 payment for battletech items. This is someone I had dealt with a few times previously & had no problems with. Payment was never sent via PAYPAL before tho.

    Well he received the payment & tried to withdraw it from his paypal account. He was charged a $20 currency transfer fee (by PAYPAL). & the money never made it to his canadian bank account & was bounced back to his PAYPAL account 7 days later less the transfer fee. $170 remain.

    Paypal was contacted & all the necessary info was verified. He then tried to withdraw the money again to his bank account. He was again charged a $20 currency transfer fee & again it bounced back to his PAYPAL account less the $20.

    $150 remained So now quite upset he contacted PAYPAL a 3rd time. All the information necessary to withdraw the money was verified with PAYPAL a 3rd time. He then tried to withdraw the money again to his bank account. He was again charged a $20 currency transfer fee & again it bounced back to his PAYPAL account less the $20. $130 remained.

    After the 2nd attempt I was also contacting PAYPAL to find out what was going on. The standard reply via email was given. Or the "he needs to contact us to straighten this out" via phone. We were both trying to get the situation resolved via phone & emails. It was our conclusion that nothing had changed since day 1.

    He still was unable to get the money out of PAYPAL. We also found out he was unable to do anything else with the funds. He could not transfer them or return them to me. He was not about to try & withdraw them again. So after more than 1 months time I filed a claim to try & recover the funds. Which again took more than a month. In short on May 30th I received the email below.

    Subject: Resolution of Buyer Complaint Case #53104 (KMM10989963C0KM)
    Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 14:24:04 -0700
    From: "complaint-response@paypal.com"
    To: Ed Karl

    Dear PayPal User, PayPal has concluded the investigation of your Buyer Complaint. As our policy states, we conducted this investigation on a best effort basis and made no guarantee of funds recovery.

    Case ID: 53104
    Transaction Amount: $190.00
    Transaction Date: 03/22/01
    Seller's Email: achillies_10_2001@yahoo.ca

    Our investigation has revealed that the seller is at fault. We are pleased to inform you that we were able to recover funds from the sellers account. Your account has been credited $128.35. Please allow up to 5 days to see the adjustment on your account. This amount is the maximum we were able to recover. We value your business and regret that you have had this experience. To avoid similar experiences in the future, we recommend that you read our Security Tips on our website located at:

    http://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=p/gen/f ra ud-prevention-outside

    Sincerely, Craig
    Complaint Resolution Department

    So out of $190 sent I received $128.15 back. The problem? The person I sent it to did not get the other $61.85. PAYPAL has it & is refusing to part with it.

    Basically they are telling me someone who could not do anything with the money is resposible for the remaining amount. The only funds not recovered are for Currency transfres Fees where the currency transfers never occurred.

    Why I can't get the rest of the funds back? Because the funds were not in the account of the person I sent them to. But they were withdrawn for services that were never performed. & not only that but PAYPAL was contacted to verify the necessary info on the 2nd & 3rd try. PAYPAL funds were sent to a PAYPAL account which means the funds are subject to PAYPAL restrictions.

    Read the first paragraph of the copied email.

    What should I have done differently?

    If I had sent the funds I sent to be withdrawn from a credit card (or check card) I would have had the recourse to have the CC co reverse the charge in full.

    Other info I have learned. NEVER LEAVE ANY MONEY IN YOUR PAYPAL ACCOUNT! Just 1 complaint locks up the account & you do not get to do anything until they decide you can. In the meantime any funds sent to your account will be returned with a notice that the account is frozen. This may take MONTHS!

    Why have I decided on PROPAY?

    http://www.propay.com

    PROPAY is a credit card processing company, not a money transfer company like PAYPAL. Only the seller needs to be a PROPAY member. PROPAY can be used to for face to face personal transactions. (garage sales, conventions, etc) PROPAY can be used with PALM & other forms of PDAs PROPAY will very shortly have a setup similar to PAYPAL's Web accept feature.

    In summary; PAYPAL has $61.85 for services that were not performed. PAYPAL refuses resposibility for the $61.85 PAYPAL acknowledges that he was not signed up properly to withdraw or do anything with the funds in his account but he was signed up enough for them to Charge him 3 times & deduct $20 each time. PAYPAL refuses to do anything further to recover the funds

    Other info. PAYPAL is unable to get a BBB seal of approval do to the amount of complaints against them.

    My story is minor compaired to some. Do a web search under "PAYPAL COMPLAINTS" You will be surprised at how much you find. I used http://www.dogpile.com for this search. (dogpile searches thru 40 search engines including all the big ones.)

    Also interesting to note, a few days after this page went up, PayPal yanked service on the W3 storefront they'd been providing for this individual.

    And now he will no longer accept PayPal transactions.

    Unfortunate, but very necessary to protect himself and his customers.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  6. God in Heaven... by Accipiter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I find PayPal pretty annoying today - a lot of the anti-fraud, privacy-invasive measures which this article applauds make Paypal much less enticing to me than it used to be.

    Michael. Do you look for reasons to bitch? I swear to God, wannabe privacy advocates piss me off. How do you expect PayPal to do business such as it does (WITH ACCESS TO YOUR CREDIT CARD) without a modicum of personal information, hm? Do you think it would make good business sense for PayPal to say "You know, we don't need any of your personal information. Just give us your credit card number, and we'll base our business on the honor system."

    Yeah. Right.

    I strongly recommend you have a look at Paypal's Privacy Policy. Since you're obviously doing some blind, ignorant whining about subject matter with which you have absolutely no clue, I guarantee you've never even clicked on the privacy policy. PayPal does their best to explain what information is gathered, why it's gathered, and how it's used. If you don't like it, don't use the service. But don't complain.

    Michael's comment absolutely reeks of "I'm with Stupid", "follow everyone else's opinion" mentality. "Wow. The community is really for individual privacy! It's time for me to attempt to gain acceptance with my (cough) peers by complaining about privacy-invading goons!"

    Yes. Privacy is important. However, when you choose to conduct business over the internet with a credit card, bitching about a company doing its best to protect yours and their asses only serves to make you look like (more of) an idiot.

    Personally, I've had nothing but excellent service with PayPal. It's nice to be able to accept credit cards, or use credit cards to pay for something without a whole shitload of messy paperwork. I've got to give PayPal a lot of credit. They've become a very successful online transaction service, and pretty much the standard auction payment system on eBay. (Ah, no need to worry about sending checks or money orders through the mail. Instant payment rocks.)

    --

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
    (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    1. Re:God in Heaven... by danb35 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It's nice to be able to accept credit cards

      Unfortunately, as of 11/13, you won't be able to receive credit card payments any more with a personal account. Copied from their Policy Updates page:

      Notice Date: October 11, 2001
      Effective Date: November 13, 2001

      To reduce the costs associated with credit card processing, the ability to receive credit card funded payments will become a feature reserved for Premier and Business accounts. Personal Accounts that receive credit card funded payments after 11/13/2001 may accept the payment by upgrading to a Premier or Business account, or they will have to deny the payment. Personal accounts will continue to be able to receive non-credit card funded payments for free. Once upgraded, Premier and Business Accounts may receive unlimited credit card funded payments.

  7. Re:"Fraud Prevention" by rewter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You give your account number to everyone you pay with personal check, it's printed on it. Do you consider that as a security breach too?

    Other than that, you're not allowed to have two personal Paypal accounts. Once they find you doing that (and they seem to have some krad-sophisticated-systems for that) you'll end having both accounts suspended and banned from using their service.

    Tom

  8. Re:PayPal. Nice idea, but it has it's problems. by mindstrm · · Score: 4

    Well.. does paypal have it? That's between you and paypal.

    I would say the person you sent the money to should be sending you the remainder of the cash, or delivering the items.
    The fact that he couldn't get his money out of paypal is between himself and paypal.

    Paypal is *very* clear that bank transfer fees will not be refunded if you do them wrong (because it costs paypal money if you do it wrong). This includes transfering to a bank that doesn't exist, or won't accept transfers, etc (I believe). It costs paypal money to attempt a wire transfer, and to sort it out later. There's a reason they charge money for this.

    Also.. why did this guy try again adn again? after it failed the first, time, he should have been on the phone to paypal to sort it out properly.

    This is not a failure on paypal's part. Paypal is not a credit card. Paypal is not there to 100% protect you. They are there to factilitate transfering money.

    Also... this guy needs to contact paypal to sort things you. It's HIS account that's having the troubles.

  9. Fraud Sucks by pjrc · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Together with Robin, I run a small e-commerce site. We have a conventional visa merchant account with our bank. I can say from experience that fraud really sucks. When a fraudlent transaction occurs, somebody is going to lose money. With a conventional merchant account, most of the time the merchant is the one who will end up bearing all the loss.

    It's easy for guys like our infamous slashdot editor to comment:

    I find PayPal pretty annoying today - a lot of the anti-fraud, privacy-invasive measures which this article applauds make Paypal much less enticing to me than it used to be.

    Well, that's an armchair critic opinion if I've ever heard one. PayPal is now less enticing to "michael of slashdot".

    The cold reality of the world is that there's a small number of crooks out there who will commit fraud, given the opportunity. Any party in the transaction who may be exposed to the potential for a loss would be acting irresponsibly by not taking reasonable measures to detect fraud before making the transaction.

    In the conventional visa merchant world, the consumer is protectedby the fact that their bank will handle their dispute with the merchant and issue a chargeback to the merchant to recover the funds.

    The bank is protected by their ability to issue a chargeback to the merchant. If the bank believes the merchant may not have the funds to cover chargebacks, they will hold a "reserve", which basically means they won't give the merchant some portion of their money for many months, sometimes even a year or two! (we had this shitty situation when we got started and consquently had to carry quite a bit more debt than we expected as we weren't getting the money for most of the products we sold!)

    The merchant isn't really protected by much of anything in the conventional visa transaction, other than their own efforts to verify that the buyer really is the legitimate cardholder and that the goods are shipped to the correct destination. Actually, a card swipe and signature are more-or-less proof that the buyer received the goods, but with internet and mail order sales, it's a risky business for the merchant.

    PayPal is in a tough situation, being in the middle of a transaction. It's really amazing that they can make this work at all, built on top of the conventional infrastructure which puts most of the risk onto the seller's side. They really need to do everything they can to detect and prevent fraud... even if it doesn't appeal to michael's tastes.

    PS: I will agree that it's very un-cool to take personal customer information and use it for any purpose other than the reason it was provided. We don't do this, partly based on ethical grounds, partly because we're so small that there's no incentive, but mostly because nothing is more important than satisfied customers.

  10. Some useful sites, and tips to stay safe. by Gendou · · Score: 4, Informative

    I personally have had nothing but good experiences with Paypal, but I was shocked to learn that there was a dark side to it that many, many people have been burned by. It seems the fact that I've had no problems with Paypal is the exception rather than the rule -- many people haven't been so fortunate.

    Some of the problems can just be attributed to "shit happens," but in many cases, Paypal is guilty of out-and-out theft: when they receive a complaint about a single transaction, they often freeze the accounts of everyone involved, and then do everything possible to make themselves inaccessible by phone or e-mail so that the accounts can never be unfrozen. They've just walked away with someone's money. Good job.

    Anyway, here are some useful links that have many, many testimonials of bad experiences:

    Paypal Warning

    Testimonials from above site.

    PaypalSucks.com

    Based on the testimonials I've read, here are a few ways I can think of to make the Paypal experience as safe as possible.

    1. NEVER leave money sitting in your Paypal account. Withdraw it IMMEDIATELY. They will freeze it, or steal it, if they get an excuse to do so -- any excuse will do. Don't be tempted by their "Paypal Money Market Fund". That 1.2% APR isn't going to make you rich. You'd be better transfering your money to your bank where it can't be stolen. They can't steal what isn't there.

    2. Try to avoid setting up a bank account on Paypal or giving them your checking account number for any reason. They do everything in their power to convince/force you to set up a bank account, which should give you cause for suspicion. If you give them your checking account number, they can (and will) withdraw the money from your bank account at any time without permissions.

    3. If you must set up a bank account with Paypal, contact your bank and tell them NOT to allow Electronic Funds Transfers from Paypal without your approval. Unlike with a credit card, there's no way to dispute EFT charges. Get this in writing from your bank.

    4. Check your credit card statement carefully each month, and chargeback any mysterious charges immediately -- but not if you have money sitting in your Paypal account or they have your bank account number, because they will take your money away from you if you do a chargeback. Get your money safe first, then call the credit card company to do a chargeback.

    5. Try to avoid using a debit card -- you have no fraud protection, and if the debit card draws from the same account as the bank account you have set up in Paypal, you might run into some problems because of the way Paypal does things. If you have $600 in your bank account, and you try to make a $500 Paypal payment from your bank account, it'll bounce! Why? Since bank transfers take 3 days, Paypal wants to avoid finding out 3 days later that there's no money in the account, so they use your credit/debit card to "secure" the transaction by "locking" $500 on the card and then releasing it after the bank transfer clears. So now, when you've tried to pay $500 from your bank account, Paypal has locked $500 of the $600 in the account, leaving only $100 in the account which will make the $500 bank transfer bounce. The bank will charge you a bounced transfer fee, Paypal will charge you a fee, and you'll be unhappy with the whole situation. Sometimes even when the transaction DOES complete, they still don't release the "hold" on the card for days, weeks, months, or ever.

    6. Do not use Paypal for large transactions. Use some sort of escrow service. With the incredible fees Paypal is charging now, it wouldn't be much more expensive.

    7. As an alternative to Paypal, consider using E-Gold instead. Instead of dealing in a national currency like Dollars or Pounds, it uses actual physical gold as currency: you actually own a stake in the vault of gold that the company owns, and you can send/receive electronic gold from others as payment. It's very expensive to get involved, though: getting money into an E-Gold account requires you to go through a currency exchange service (E-Gold does not offer this service directly) which generally charge a 15% conversion fee, and 1% of your balance is deducted per year.

    The cool thing about E-Gold, though, is that if you buy 5 ounces of gold, you'll always have that 5 ounces of gold in your account no matter what happens to the value of gold or to your national currency. If you spend (for example) $200 on 2 ounces of gold, but six months later the price of gold has risen from $100/ounce to $300/ounce, you'll still have that 2 ounces of gold -- but it'll now be worth $600. Pretty nice, eh? A lot nicer than Paypal's 1.2% APR mutal fund.

    Anyway, use Paypal if you have to, but be safe. Minimize the opportunities for them to steal your money. Don't use them as a bank. They're not a bank; they're not regulated as a bank, but they want you to use them as a bank so that they'll have more chances to take your money.

    Play it safe, and you should be okay.

    1. Re:Some useful sites, and tips to stay safe. by kindbud · · Score: 4, Informative

      Try to avoid setting up a bank account on Paypal or giving them your checking account number for any reason.

      You can also setup a new checking account just for use with PayPal. If you do it at the same bank as your main checking account, it should be a piece of cake to transfer money between the two as needed.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
  11. X.com by GodWasAnAlien · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They didn't mention that paypal bought their competition, x.com, which included banking, mutual funds and stocks, then discontinued all of its operations.

  12. Re:PayPal. Nice idea, but it has it's problems. by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

    on the phone to paypal? that phone number is a closely guarded secret and noone at paypay will give it out.

    you cant call them or email a live person. you only get their automated responses..

    Sorry, but any bank that ignores all it's customers is a scam, and Paypal is a scam, plain and simple... If they want to prove to me they aren't then have a live human respond to my email instead of the canned computer responses.

    I reccomend to everyone I know to avoid paypal like the pleague and expect to get money stolen from them by paypal with no way of ever getting it back.

    Paypal can fix that, Hire people to answer email and publish a phone number.hn

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  13. It's All About... Trust! by omnirealm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As I take a careful look at this new community being formed, what I see forming is a globalized, fluid, largely anonymous culture. Then I look at my local neighborhood and my city. I see people who know each other by their faces and their first names. There is a feeling of trust among everyone here. Joe, who runs an electronics shop down the street, knows that Renee is not going to try to take advantage of him or steal from him. First of all, she has a sense of responsibility toward Joe as one of her neighbors. Second, there are several rings of authority around her that keep her from wanting to do something wrong. If she gets caught shoplifting, what the government will do to her is the last thing on her mind. She will first feel responsible toward her parents and her close friends and relatives. She will then worry about what the people she goes to church with every Sunday will think of her. She would be concerned about her employer finding out "through the grapevine" that she shoplifted.

    This sense of community helps foster individual restraint in the face of self-interest. While everyone would like to take everything they can get their hands on, they have a sharp sense of responsibility toward those around them ... and many feel such a responsibility towards God. In economic terms, this keep the "transaction cost" down.

    On the Internet, this community is virtually nonexistent. People can distance themselves from the world around them and become immersed in a sea of IP addresses. For some, a sense of responsibility leaves also, and they take the opportunity to take advantage of nameless, faceless people around the world. They don't know these people, and so their natural human inclination to deal virtuously with these people declines. And for many, the only potential repurcusion of their actions would be from the law (the government is a weak authority figure in the minds of the people ... and I think that the government should be the *last* entity we should be worried about when we do something wrong!)

    The result? Again, in economic terms, transaction costs go up. Without trust in the virtue of those around us, we need to hire middlemen to keep us all in line. PayPal finds itself in such a situation ... so don't be surprised when you find PayPal's service substandard (and more costly) to that of your local community bank.

    --
    An unjust law is no law at all. - St. Augustine