Slashdot Mirror


Council of Europe Pushes Net Hate-Speech Ban

omnirealm writes: "The N.Y. Times is reporting that the 43-nation Council of Europe is trying to ban racist and hate speech from the Internet by adding a protocol, or side agreement, to its cybercrime convention, which was stamped for ratification on Thursday."

4 of 642 comments (clear)

  1. Its about time. by Anton+Anatopopov · · Score: 1, Troll
    Since the population of Europe at around 310 million is greater than that of the USA, its about time we got a more European feel to the Internet.

    I have never been able to understand why Americans feel that they can use racial slurs and hate speech freely. What purpose does it serve ? All civilised countries have laws about what can and cannot be said, to protect the minorities, and ensure stability.

    Anyway, I hope Slashdot gets a censorship policy up and running soon, since all the racist crap that I have to put up with when I read at -1 will surely contravene this law...

  2. Hate speech by thelenm · · Score: 2, Troll

    Obviously the Council of Europe hates racists and are being given a public platform for their hateful beliefs! The N.Y. Times should be forced to remove this hate speech from their web site!

    --
    Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
  3. What a stupid law.. by defile · · Score: 1, Troll

    But I wouldn't expect anything less from the inferior life forms passing for human that Europe spawned. Man are those people stupid. And they smell awful. Don't they believe in baths?

  4. Re:Going too far. by gilroy · · Score: 1, Troll
    Blockquoth the poster:

    to put free speech into the law proper


    I'm not sure what you mean by this. Isn't "shall make no law ... abridging freedom of speech" something in the law "proper"?



    To quote Aristotle, "The habit of changing the laws lightly is an evil." I think it's good that no one's willing to modify the Bill of Rights. Let them retain a little bit of their sanctity, rather than be whittled away with each new fad.