Slashdot Mirror


French Government Online-Why Isn't the U.S.?

DullTrev asks: "Looks like the French are pushing forward once again with their online government plans. The BBC News site has this article about the new portal about to be launched. The article says the portal 'will give every citizen a personal internet portal allowing them to pay taxes online, register a child for a state school, or be reminded that their regulatory car inspection is due in a month's time'. The UK government has had this portal up for a while, and are steadily expanding their services. This is all within the EU government systems that are (not surprisingly) encouraging online government all over the place. How does this kind of thing compare to the US?"

13 of 401 comments (clear)

  1. Why not U.S.? by InfinityWpi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Simple answer: Because we're an order of magnitude bigger. More population. More beaurocracy (yes, I know it's mis-spelled). More variables. Instead of having 30 million personal pages listing the same information, we need well over a hundred million pages, with different senators, different information, more extensive tax data... not to mention, someone has to decide who's in charge of all this. Does the IRS have to run the site? Who else would?

    1. Re:Why not U.S.? by sql*kitten · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Simple answer: Because we're an order of magnitude bigger. More population. More beaurocracy

      That's simply not true. The US has a smaller population than the EU (285M and 376M) and a proportionally smaller public sector (the EU tax burden is 41.5%, US 29%).

      The real root of the matter is that the EU has far too many politicians, bureaucrats and civil servants, too much money, and too little idea or inclination to do anything other than expand their role.

    2. Re:Why not U.S.? by Thomas+Miconi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Simple answer: Because we're an order of magnitude bigger.

      About 4.5 times bigger, more precisely (60 million inhbts).

      BTW, isn't this a reason why you kept the federal model instead of becoming a big nation-state ?

      What I mean is this: this e-government stuff should really happen at the state level. France is famous for being an embodiment of the good old nation-state, but the federal nature of the United States of America seems to lend itself pretty well to e-government, state by state.

      Think about it: of all the bureaucratic stuff you must deal with as an American, how much has to do with local institutions (state, county or city), and how much is related to the federal government ?

      Actually this would make it much more manageable in the US than in France. The population of South Dakota is two full orders of magnitude lower than that of France, isn't it ? (It is; I checked)

      Thomas Miconi,
      French.

      PS: BTW, this has nothing to do with a gigantic web-database. The French are extremely sensitive when it comes to data privacy. The idea is more about replacing the counter than the data storage itself.

  2. population and federalism by kaisyain · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Population of US: 250 million
    Population of France: 50 million

    And France has nothing like states' rights that the US has to cope with that makes us a patchwork of sometimes conflicting laws.

  3. Why we're not online by sealawyer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The biggest reason why there isn't a national portal for most of this stuff is that many of the functions are a matter of state law.

    Car inspections, school registrations etc are not federal government functions.

    Also I think civil liberties minded folks would be a little concerned about a centralized data base that had all this information in it. Besides the potential for official and unofficial abuse, you just know someone would come up with the idea to raise money by selling the database.

  4. Security ... and the lack of experts at government by Wizard+of+OS · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I am in the process of writing a paper about why it is a Bad Idea(tm) for governments to do more on the internet than just providing information. The dutch government is busy with plans that would enable one to do the things mentioned here (pay tax, applying for funding, etc.). They have huge plans with lots of buzzwords like 'iris scan' and 'smartcard', but they forget that the johndoe behind the screen doesn't know what a computer does.

    He doesn't know that clicking on an e-mail attachment (that seems to come from secretary@dutchgovernment.nl) could let a trojan loose on his system, one that becomes active AFTER authentication with smartcard/iris scan, one that changes keystrokes but doesn't show that to the user.

    Doing things like this is acceptable for companies, because they are profit based and take risks all the time. For governments, it is totally unacceptable that this is possible, but unfortunately they have spent literally millions of euro's on pilots and can't reverse the process. Somebody has to make clear to them that the internet + computers == not a secure infrastructure, but well ... is there anybody who will listen?


    My apologies for my bad english, I'm Dutch.

    --

    --
    If code was hard to write, it should be hard to read
  5. Re:Internet Aceptance by easter1916 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I suspect that France has a much higher percentage of citizens with real ISPs than the United States, so naturally this idea would fly beter over there.
    The reverse is actually true. France has one of the lowest levels of Internet penetration in the EU, much lower than in the US.
  6. Re:US Population: 285 million; France: 58 million by vscjoe · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It's not the 285 million people that are the problem (once you have solved the problem for 58 million people, the rest is probably mostly a lot of extra hardware), it's the 50 states, zillions of counties, and dozens of federal agencies that would rather die than talk to each other.

    And that profusion of governmental entities in the US seems deliberate. In the US, limiting the power of government through disorder, confusion, and lack of integration is a way of life. The French believe in bureaucracy and at least superficial order and rationality. I can't really say which is "better", but it does explain some of the differences.

  7. Because Voters Don't Care by vtechpilot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know its too late for anyone to read this but I guess I'll point it out. While all of your say size and complexity of the US government is the issue, I must disagree.

    The Fact is that the majority of voters in the US don't care about the government being online. Congress doesn't push for online government because %90 of the voters don't care. Corporations on the other hand with their lobbyists, have pushed the IRS online. If you paid taxes like the corporations do, you would want it to be as efficient as possible so you wouldn't have to pay as many accountants.

    Again its not size or complexity, its an issue of who wants it to be done. Remember American Slashdotters, you are a minority if you do everything online. Just because you do it online doesn't mean the rest of America does.

    --
    Slashdot is an anagram for Has Dolts, and I am Dolt number 468543
  8. State e-gov't already exists by SnakeEyes8311 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I can pay my personal property taxes, renew my drivers license, and pay my state income taxes all online. In fact, they encourage residents to do it online by charging less. Good enough for me.

    You can also pay your federal income taxes online and that's really the only time US citizens deal with the federal gov't (at least that's all I've ever done with the federal gov't). Maybe you need to open your eyes and ears a bit before asking why the US gov't isn't "online."

  9. You want to know why not the US? by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The Tenth Amendment:
    The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

    Some of the things mentioned that this French government site can do are either things shared between the state and the feds, or just aren't mentioned in the Constitution and rest solely with the state. For example:

    "pay taxes online"

    If I recall correctly, you can pretty much do that already with your federal income taxes already through the IRS website, but it isn't the job of the IRS to collect state income taxes, or any other taxes levied by the state. Talk to your comptroller, or at the very least go to the website of your state government. For me, I'd have to find the Louisiana website for information on paying Louisiana income and property taxes.

    "register a child for a state school"

    Beyond those offered by the military for their dependants and the five federal academies, I don't think there is such a thing as a federal school. Elementary and high schools are usually the responsibility of the local government (county or city), while they only have to answer to state guidelines and standards. If you want to register your kid to attend local schools, talk to the local school board. They're at your county seat, not at Washington D.C.

    "reminded that their regulatory car inspection is due in a month's time"

    For commercial vehicles, while there are federal rules and regulations for your vehicle, it is up to the state to enforce them. As for personal vehicles, my title, registration and license plate are from the State of Louisiana, and the brake tag I got from St. Charles Parish. Frankly, I wouldn't want to have to deal with a city almost a thousand miles away for something as simple as my car. And if neither of those two governments provide what you're looking for, the only think you might be justified in complaining to the US Congress about is that they haven't set aside any money for state and local governments to set up such services.

    So why can't we interact with the US federal government in the same way? At least 90% of the interactions your average citizen has with the federal government are with either the IRS or the USPS. Both of these organizations have very well-done, informative and useful websites. For anything else I suggest you check with your state website and/or see if your local government maintains a website.
  10. I don't want government to be easy to use... by bbaskin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't really want people to perceive the government as "easy to use". I'd rather have people see it as it is, a burden. Similarly, I'd rather have income taxes not withheld from each paycheck so that people have to pay the IRS each month and realize where their 20,000 dollars a year goes. Then, perhaps, people will want to reduce their tax burden and save us from an ever expansive state.

  11. Re:A few reasons... by manonthemoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1- Minitel is actually a long-term drag on France. As another poster in this thread noted the backward condition of the telephone network worked to France's advantage when it did upgrade during the "digital age". Conversely Minitel is a drag on adoption of the internet and use of the French language on it.

    2- There seems to be a consistent thread of anti-religious bias coming from French posts. It appears there is an active antagonism being taught by the French school system equating religion to ignorance. I would urge those who have been indoctrinated in this way to throw their own blinders off. Religious belief is not necessarily an impediment to rational thought, education, or enlightenment. The comment that "Republican ideals naturally spurns religion as something which enslaves humanity" smacks more of a Communist tract or the Reign of Terror than anything truly Republican.

    3- The American university system rewards individual achivement as much as any in the world. Scholarships are available from every institution and the cream of the crop are recruited heavily to the top schools- which aren't generally state sponsored schools by the way. If you're good enough you'll not pay a dime and likely have a stipend as well. Yes, being a capitalistic society a space is made for big donors- but those big donors make available thousands of scholarships available to the best and the brightest.

    4- Considering the constraints placed upon us by our relatively light population density, I would say that America gets more bang for the taxpayer dollar for government services than any country excepting Australia (which is largely funded by taxing its natural resources). Our infrastructure is highly dependend upon the policies of the local state and municipalities. Many American cities have services that can favorably compare with any European city.

    Many non-americans are as myopic about us as we are about them. Those of us from either group who have lived in both America and internationally tend to have a balanced view of the whole thing. America *as a whole* and *considering its unique geography and demographic challenges* has created an unmatched and dynamic society that is the most technologically advanced, economically powerful, and politically responsive in the world. Many other countries can match or pass us in individual categories, especially those with monocultures. I really, really wish that many Europeans would be happy with their own successes and strengths and not need to demean America to make themselves feel superior, it gets old, quick. Yes many American yahoos get their jollies by baiting internationals, but please don't make it so easy on them.