Cringely On Gates' Free Software Connection

Posted by ryuzaki0 on Tuesday November 20, 2001 @03:20PM from the getting-on-bob's-bad-side dept.

cworley writes: "Slashdot recently reported on Gates' paternity claims over Open Source at a recent shareholders meeting. Although Gates' actual statement didn't make a great deal of sense, it looked as an attempt to revise history to portray himself as the creator of Open Source by initiating the PC's open architecture (or reverse engineering the BIOS to wrestle exclusive control of PC system sales from IBM). In Cringely's weekly article, he attempts to find the truth in Gates' statement. IBM's Jack Sams provides an historical perspective of Gates' role in the genesis of the PC's open architecture. "

2 of 303 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Re:Gates' Comment by Score+Whore · 2001-11-20 17:28 · Score: 0, Flamebait

The parent isn't interesting. Just pointless, uninformed, and argumentative.
Re:Paternity? by GeorgeH · 2001-11-20 17:45 · Score: 1, Flamebait

Quiet you! No one likes the facts to interfere with a good joke. Now repeat after me "Al Gore is a spoilsport. The Supreme Court didn't choose our president, the mandate of the masses did. George W. Bush understands concepts more complex than 'The badguys are evil, mmmmmkay?'"

--
Why can't I moderate something "Wrong" or at least "Grossly Misinformed"?