Slashdot Mirror


Red Hat Proposes Alternative Settlement To MSFT

cwsulliv writes "Red Hat, Inc. has proposed an alternative settlement to the Microsoft class-action lawsuit in Maryland. Microsoft originally proposed supplying a limited number of poorer school districts in the US with PC hardware and limited-license Microsoft software. The alternative proposal submitted by Red Hat would have Microsoft supply NO software but dramatically increase the number of school districts receiving hardware. Red Hat in turn would supply ALL the software (Open Source) and unlimited support via their Red hat Network. "

6 of 532 comments (clear)

  1. Deja vu by FTL · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sorry Hemos, Michael beat you to it in the update to this story.

    --
    Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
  2. Well played. by EndersGame · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is a styme on Microsoft as they are probably depending on accounting for the full cost of the licencing on the software that they will provide to come up with a huge number for the settlement.

    Each machine is probably around $1000, but they will get them for significantly cheaper, but they can install $1000 worth of software on those systems for almost free.

    I like RedHat's point. I'd really like to see the actual numbers on this, e.g. the percentage of the settlement that results from hardware versus software expenses. Also, the limited licences are a scam.

  3. Wow... by jonfromspace · · Score: 3, Informative

    Fantastic Idea, but with the amount of Windows boxen out there... is it ok to be teaching kids to use Linux? I mean really... how many of them are going to run into that platform in the workplace...

    I am sure to be modded down for trolling, but I think this is a valid point.

    --
    I am become Troll, destroyer of threads
  4. Re:Touche by jmv · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, that's because MS proposes to install not only Windows, but expensive versions of Office and lots of stuff like that. I think the hardware ended up as less than 20% of the total cost (including software, "support", ...).

  5. you don't get it by varkatope · · Score: 3, Informative

    Under Red Hat's plan, all of these schools would get a massive amount of hardware. Some of these schools may not even have computers in the first place or have decrepit 486s. Who cares what OS they're running? It's all about the hardware.

    - the schools might already have licenses to windows software, what's stopping them from installing windows on the newly donated hardware? Also, if they at some point in time scrounge up enough loot for the MS software, what's stopping them from installing it then? Hardware would just be one less thing to buy.

    -the schools might not have hardware in the first place (we're talking poorer areas here) and maybe, just maybe a hard to use by the layperson (but ultimately rewarding) computer is better than no computer at all. Am I right or am I right?

    There are a few things I can think of right off the bat that schools could use under linux.

    Star Office/Open Office, GIMP, the INTERNET for crying out loud, various programming languages (high school mostly). Shit, they could even get MAYA if they had the cash. I'm sure there's plenty more. The only thing lacking would be the kiddie "educational" and "edutainment" software.

    These would be very usable computers no matter what OS they end up running.

    I don't think this is going to happen but it would be really, really nice.

    --
    I got a fever...and the only cure is more cowbell!
  6. Re:Touche by m0nkyman · · Score: 3, Informative

    Microsoft is a monopoly. Legally speaking they are not only a monopoly, they are abusing that status. Schools are funded by the government. Punishing Microsoft by extending their monopoly further is a bad idea.

    Pushing a government funded institution into helping break that monopoly is a good idea.

    As far as whether the schools would install it themselves if they wanted to, that option doesn't even show up on their radar 99.99% of the time. That is the power of a monopoly.

    I've also seen a lot of comments about how there isn't any educational software fo linux. To that I call bullshit. Given any subject there is something out there that some geek has whipped together, and it may not be produced by Mattel or Disney, but Linux is a much better tool for actually instilling the ability to learn than Windows.

    I think this is a great publicity stunt by RedHat, and it won't go anywhere, but I'd love to see Linux in more schools. Yes I said more. There are quite a few schools that are already using it. do a google search for 'Linux education schools'

    some useful(Karma Whoring) links:
    http://www.seul.org/edu/
    http://www.riverdale.k12.or.us/linux/
    http://scnc.holt.k12.mi.us/techplan/index.html

    --
    ~ a low user id is no indication I have a clue what I'm talking about.