Slashdot Mirror


US Military Ramps Up Stinky VR Training

HarrisonSilp writes "CNN.com has a story regarding the U.S. Military's recent foray into using Virtual Reality as a training method. Being developed by Institute for Creative Technologies (ICT), they call it Mission Rehearsal Exercise or MRE for short, and it is a most impressive setup. 'The 5-minute scenario is projected onto a 150-degree movie screen, complete with 10.2-channel audio that creates floor-shaking sound effects. To enhance the sense of reality, smells including burned charcoal can be pumped into the room.' It almost makes me want to write off college and join the army..."

133 comments

  1. Wow, it's just like by astyanax · · Score: 1

    Metal Gear Solid 2, except for real...or is it? Where's those pesky Patriots to confirm or deny this!

  2. MRE? by thomkt · · Score: 1

    When I was in the Marine Corps, MRE stood for Meal Ready to Eat. These were the most horrible of things I was subjected to, other then the "Big Green Weenie" that is.

    1. Re:MRE? by wadetemp · · Score: 1

      Hah. You beat me to it. I was "skimming" the page and skipped the part where they told what that acronym stood for in this story's context... when I read that the "Institute for Creative Studies" created MRE, I got a little confused. MREs are not the most creative product. Then I was thinking, what, are the textures in these sims like the ones in Quake 1? Variations on pixelated brown? Sounds like a "realistic" sim.... OH.... Mission Rehersal Exercise.

    2. Re:MRE? by wadetemp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Shut up Anti-Wesley!

    3. Re:MRE? by Gary+Yngve · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the ICT hired Paul Debevec, one of the most prolific young researchers in using real-world data in graphics. Some of his work involves capturing the reflectance properties of skin and rendering the skin with novel geometry and novel lighting. That's a little better than a Quake skin. ;)

    4. Re:MRE? by EQ · · Score: 1

      Meals Rejected by Ethiopians is what we called them when they first came out. the worst was that freeze dried pork patty. ACCKK!

      --
      Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo! http://goo.gl/J9bkO
    5. Re:MRE? by intermodal · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the similar acronyms are a sign of the quality of the training that they'll be giving out...MRE's suck, but don't require training, whereas this training will smell more like real MRE's by having nasty smells pumped into the room, perhaps? Though I've had the fortune to avoid any burnt charcoal MRE's in my limited experience...

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    6. Re:MRE? by mizhi · · Score: 2

      I always thought the worst were the "Five Fingers of Death". That and the "Brick of White Rice".

      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
    7. Re:MRE? by mizhi · · Score: 1

      Surprisingly, MREs have gotten much better. The "food" I dread most now are the Jimmy Deans. Most soldiers I know are of the opinion that Jimmy Dean should be located, hogtied, and force fed the half-frozen pieces of crap the army bought off him.

      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
    8. Re:MRE? by flacco · · Score: 2
      When I was in the Marine Corps, MRE stood for Meal Ready to Eat. These were the most horrible of things I was subjected to

      No kidding. I gave my dog an MRE sausage once. He approached it excitedly, then stopped, froze, put his tail between his legs and backed slowly away. No kidding.

      And, back then at least, the MRE's were packaged in Cadillac MI, where, I believe, there are a lot of pet food processing plants...

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    9. Re:MRE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (1) They are "low residue" meals, and the joke was MRE stood for "Meals Rarely Excreted." I was told (as I was eating my first one) that the only way to, er, relieve oneself after consuming one was to tie one end of a rope to a tree, and the other end to, ah, er, ... and run away from the tree as fast as one could...

      (2) I have worked in this industry since the original SIMNET development for DARPA in the mid to late 1980s. Why they think a bunch of film-makers can improve computer-based training is inexplicable to me.

    10. Re:MRE? by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

      When I was in the Marine Corps, MRE stood for Meal Ready to Eat.

      Funny... I always thought MRE stood for Meals Rarely Edible. Of course, I understand you can do some cool things with the chemical-based food warmers that come in the new ones...

  3. Not that new by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Simulations have been a large part of Military development for a LONG time; almost since we had computers. I used to go to a school which was next to a longstanding military research post for virtual reality installations. When I left, they where working on a way to make a compact way to distribute the tank simulation data to multiple systems for networking.
    Mostly they focus on the visual data in all of the simulations because it helps the most. This is an interesting new thing, but its really only an incremental improvement, considering how advanced the military simulations already are.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:Not that new by WowTIP · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I heard rumors that the US Army used a modified version of Doom(!) as a combat simulator. Don't know if they actually used it or if it was just a test, but this surely looks like some further development of that stuff.

      Like, "technology has reached the needed level of realism", or something...

      Yeah, I found this old link... Seems like the old memory is still functional.

      --

      --

      "I'm surfin the dead zone
      In the twilight, unknown"
  4. 5 minutes? by wadetemp · · Score: 1

    So, usually, when things are measured in a fixed number of minutes, they aren't really simulations. They are movies. Maybe they're really good movies, with the IMAX-style screen, and Smellovision, but they aren't "VR."

    What if you don't "secure the assembly area" within your alotted five minutes? Do you have to pay for another ticket? Sorry, your five minutes are up. Please put all trash in the designated recepticles on the way to the exits.

  5. Marketing... by PRickard · · Score: 5, Funny
    The US Army announced today that it will begin training new recruits with modern techniques designed for today's younger and less educated soldier. The new methods include training on the PlayStation 2, Microsoft XBox, Nintendo Game Cube, an enhanced multimedia experience involving cheap pornographic movies and a 38-foot-wide screen, and free liquor Fridays. The Army is reportedly adopting these new training techniques to attract youth who would not otherwise be interested in military service.

    'Army of One' is referring more and more to the average IQ of new recruits, not the sense of fellowship. (This isn't an attack at the military, just an observation about the people I know who have signed up in the last 2 years.)

    --

    == Paul Rickard, Editor of The Microsoft Boycott Campaign ====

    1. Re:Marketing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially now that they've discarded the minimum of high school graduation. Nowadays JoeBobGreen can enlist dispite completely dropping out of school after junior high, blaming the teachers for "holding a grudge against him". Remember kids, joining the armed services used to be an honor, not an opportunity to add to your resume. That, and the fact that giving responsibility to a delinquent is only asking for trouble. Not to discriminate against those who truely improved themselves (learned to take responsibility, learned the meaning of respect and honor, et cetera) while serving their country ...

    2. Re:Marketing... by stoopidguy · · Score: 1

      Off-Topic, but..

      This reminds me so much of my brother... sort of. He graduated in the top 10% of his class; in the clubs NHS, APE, SADD, etc, etc. He went on to admit to everyone his cocaine addiction, went to rehab, 6 months later enlisted.
      He went to college after 4 years while staying reserved and is now JAG, funny stuff if you ask me.

  6. You want VR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Try some psilocybin mushrooms. Yummy!

    They go great with weed too.

  7. What a waste of money! by Digital_Fiend · · Score: 2, Funny

    Those idiots can just download a DOOM wad that turns all the monsters into Barney the Purple Dinosaur! They'll be killing machines in no time!

  8. Virtual reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is actually much cheaper than all this equipment.

    It costs about $5 a hit, and comes on blotter paper.

    So why bother with all these fancy electronics when LSD, one of the wonders of chemistry, works better?

  9. Doh! Missed the last line... by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "It can't replace any real training," says Omer. "But what it does do is allow the military to prepare and rehearse before they get into any situation."

    And boot camp is for...?

    Combat training is for...?

    SEAL, Munitions, Howitzer, Tank and Sharpshooter training is for...?

    This dude deserves a "DUH!" award, if there was one.

    Remember those lines from G.I. Jane:
    Nurse: "Why are you doing this?"
    Jane: "Do you ask that of all the men?"
    N: "Yes"
    J: "And what do they answer?"
    N: "I get to blow shit up."

    Hell, Rogue Spear and Q3 mods provide enough realism...just add it to the VR and several "pressure cuffs" and "shock suits" to simulate damage.

    Oh, well, I suppose every little bit helps.

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
    1. Re:Doh! Missed the last line... by Ozx · · Score: 0

      Einstien, it's cheaper and safe to offload as many simulations as possible into a virtual environment...

      It won't replace any of these, but it will augment them... Sort of like flight training using simulators...

    2. Re:Doh! Missed the last line... by Gary+Yngve · · Score: 1

      There's a lot more to the army now than just shooting things up. Peacekeeping missions involve communications, logistics,etc. See here for a sample script (peace-keeping in the Balkans) that they used.

    3. Re:Doh! Missed the last line... by The_Messenger · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The problem is that most of these "simulations" are crap. Simulating a ground war, especially in an urban environment with a civilian population, is impossible given today's technology. The results merely test whether you've memorized protocol.

      Flight simulation is successful because the cockpit is a limited environment anyway; you have a set of controls, a restricted viewing area, and a relatively low number of possible situational variables. The stress of real conflict will still be missing, but you don't have to worry about the enemy ducking into a building, or having to carry a wounded squad member, or having your overtaxed weapon seize. But even flight simulation often degenerates into a protocol exam, because pilots are so highly-trained to begin with that much of what they practice in simulation has already been learned in the classroom and in the cockpit.

      But I digress. My point is that if simulation cannot accurately simulate, it doesn't matter if it's less costly. Real excercises, while not perfect, are always more realistic, and if your soldiers are 1% more prepared for The Real Thing than the investment is justified.

      --

      --
      I like to watch.

    4. Re:Doh! Missed the last line... by mizhi · · Score: 4, Informative
      And boot camp is for...?

      Instilling discipline, basic tactics, and getting recruits to understand just how much punishment their bodies can take.

      SEAL, Munitions, Howitzer, Tank and Sharpshooter training is for...?

      Small unit tactics, basic skills.

      This dude deserves a "DUH!" award, if there was one.

      What "this dude" is talking about when he refers to rehearsals is mission specific rehearsals. A unit rehearses a mission as much as possible so that people know their jobs and everyone else's and the mission as well as possible. The examples YOU cited are more general tactics and skills training.

      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
    5. Re:Doh! Missed the last line... by Ozx · · Score: 0

      Limited number of variables? You've been playing too much Flight Simulator...

      Flight simulators do not "accurately simulate" air missions, they simply provide experience in managing the plane... That's it...
      You'll never "accurately" simulate anything unless you actively seek to do so... "Don't do that, you can't suffer from hunger in the simulator!" leads to no future when you can, because there research isn't there.
      You also rob people of the experience they can gain from them, and don't reduce the safety concerns for your expensively trained men...

      Whoever modded you up is an idiot with absolutely no military experience... I hope they feel highly enlightened when they've never even approached a combat sim, or even know what occurs during 'real' training...
      Stop getting your authority from something you watch on Discovery channel, people...

  10. Cool...but now what? by milkmandan9 · · Score: 1

    Yet another example of "we built this cool toy but have no idea about what to do with it."

  11. Official Announcement & Extra Reading by GNU+Zealot · · Score: 4, Informative

    The annoucement at http://www.isi.edu/uarc.html lists a couple dozen news sites that have covered this announcement.

    If you're interested in the AI type stuff behind virtual/synthetic elements that would go along with this sort of thing, check out some SOAR/ASTT documents.

  12. VR EH! by Technosteve! · · Score: 2, Funny

    just get the soliders play metal gear solid one and two a couple thoudand times till they think they are snake. then we will have a army of super soliders able to take on 50 feet nuclear armed dinosaur looking things. think the future. think snake.

    --
    Me and lunchbox here are going to kick your ass.
    1. Re:VR EH! by kruczkowski · · Score: 2

      Didn't Microsoft buy - or at leaset resell that game?

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
  13. This is Nothing New by The+Raven · · Score: 1

    The military has been using virtual reality in some form or another since the late 80's... This is nothing more than yet another graphical upgrade. It should surprise nobody.

    --
    "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    1. Re:This is Nothing New by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      yeah, didn't matthew broderick train monkeys in the 80s to fly combat simulators?

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    2. Re:This is Nothing New by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      WHAT? how the FUCK did you find out about Project X? are you a spy?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  14. In response to lagging enrollment by Scouras · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now that the hype from the World Trade Center "lets go kill some terrorists" hype is dying down, the military returns to researching new recruitment techniques. We find our greatest influx comming from gamers, and we intend to demonstrate that the military is the ultimate experience. In other news, the Air Force is assisting in the development of Microsoft Flight Simulator 2005 to include some of the newest aircraft in order to give, "product placement and early training," to future recruits.

    1. Re:In response to lagging enrollment by kruczkowski · · Score: 2

      I was talking to a Army recruter and he said that on the 12, 13 and 14th on Sept. the Army had NO NEW SIGNUPS. For three days after the atack no single person entered the Army.

      Also Navy ROTC and Civil Air Patrol is using MS Flight Sim 2000 for traning.

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    2. Re:In response to lagging enrollment by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      The ENTIRE Army had no signups? Or just his station?

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  15. As a US Army Veteran by Chas · · Score: 1

    I say, stay in school.

    You're about as likely to see this system in your time in, as you are to get struck by lightning AND win the lottery.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  16. Silly Army.... by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 5, Funny

    While this may be an interesting new technology, or cool new advances on older technology, I have to wonder why we need this so badly. I mean, really... The Army is always getting fancy new toys like this which cost millions of dollars, yet the Marine Corp still manages to do better with the leftovers they inherited from the Army after Vietnam. Can someone explain why we really need to waste "more than $45 million... between 2000 and 2005." on these new toys?

    1. Re:Silly Army.... by nathanm · · Score: 2
      The Army is always getting fancy new toys like this which cost millions of dollars, yet the Marine Corp still manages to do better with the leftovers they inherited from the Army after Vietnam. Can someone explain why we really need to waste "more than $45 million... between 2000 and 2005." on these new toys?
      Can you explain why the USMC wastes 1% of its annual budget on its birthday celebration? It was ~$27 million for FY 2001.
    2. Re:Silly Army.... by Kenneth · · Score: 2

      Can someone explain why we really need to waste "more than $45 million... between 2000 and 2005." on these new toys?

      I really hate to break this to you, but $45 million (are you sure you didn't meanb $45 billion?) isn't all that much. It's a fairly large powerball jackpot (but by no means huge), and a rounding error for Microsoft and several other large companies.

      The military is willing to dump $45 million into things like this because a) one of them might pay off, and b) even if there is no direct payoff, things are learned that may be used later.

      One only needs to look at the history of scientific development to realize that sometimes things that don't make sense need to be funded. How many technological advances of today are dependant upon scientific discoveries made years before they were considered useful? A lot. A simple example is anything that works on electricity. It took nearly 40 years from the first experiments by Michael Faraday in the generation of electricity before anyone found any real method of production, and over a century from Franklin's first investigation to real use.

      Just because something doesn't have a use now, doesn't mean that knowledge gained isn't valuable. And since the military has the budget to fund things that no one else can, they tend to do so.

      As to the reason the Marines do so much better than the Army with so much less has a lot to do with the training, and 'winnowing' process done on recruits. Say what you want about methods, the most severe of the branches of the service also seems to produce the most effective soldiers.

      --
      There is a civil war coming in the United States. Remember which side has most of the guns
  17. another thought by Technosteve! · · Score: 1

    i know millions of game fans out there. Are playing counter strike or tacops religiously online everyday. could playing a fps like cs or tacops be like vr training?

    --
    Me and lunchbox here are going to kick your ass.
  18. flight sims by Eil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The military has been using virtual reality for years now, just not exactly in this form...

    I'm talking about flight simulators. They perfectly model the inside of a cockpit, hook the thing up to hydraulics and have an entire room full of minicomputers to drive the simulation with SGI Onyx machines for modeling the landscape and entities. The scenery is provided by 8 projectors which display the surroundings on a curved reflective screen just outside cockpit windows.

    These multi-million dollar machines are quite impressive definitely a lot more fun than X-Plane. Machines at separate military bases can even be linked up together for the ultimate multiplayer flight sim.

    Getting to check one of these out has definitely been one of the highlights of my life as a geek. I decided that being a systems programmer / maintainer or developer for flight simulator could be a very entertaining use of my future career. I already have the avionics background, I would just need the CS degree and maybe a class or two at Embry-Riddle...

    1. Re:flight sims by kruczkowski · · Score: 4, Funny

      I remeber my dad took me to the Navy post grad school in Monterey CA back in '95. They were developing sims that had helecopters, tanks and personel in one scenerio. I am still amazed by the graphics. It was funny, at one point the machines crashed and started playing clasical music. One of the guys with a pony tail and glasses says, "Uh, it crashed again"

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    2. Re:flight sims by Fesh · · Score: 2

      That's definitely my vote for dream job... I have no idea how to break into that field though... Been an aviation nut for as long as I can remember.

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
    3. Re:flight sims by Eil · · Score: 2


      I would imagine you have to have a strong background or degree in some aerospace field or two or three first. (Avionics, flight theory, possibly even simulation itself is a degree.) Then, you need to know how to program, probably in a few different languages and quite possibly on several platforms applicable to flight sims.

      Then, you need to get in with a company that actually designs, builds, and maintains the flight sims themselves. If memory serves correct, that would be Lockheed/Martin on this base, but it wouldn't surprise me much to hear that Boeing and TRW also get in on it.

      Very occasionally, the programmers for the flight sims here stop by our shop to use one of our test benches to have an accurate benchmark of what our avionics test station does vs. what their program is doing. Next time they stop in, (and it's possible they might not) I plan on asking them what I would need to do to be a flight sim programmer. If you give me your email address, I can write it down and give you the scoop.

      Come to think it it, there might be some information regarding this on the web. I'll submit this comment and check it out.

    4. Re:flight sims by Frijoles · · Score: 2

      http://www.es.com/about_eands/careers/career+oppor tunities/index.asp

      Evans and Sutherland has been in the flight business for years. Granted, they aren't doing so hot right now.. *shrug* They are heavily in to internships and have great college recruiting. Harmony is the lead product (http://www.es.com/products/image+generators/harmo ny/index.asp). If you can see it all decked out, it is quite amazing.

      Frij
      *lowly IT worker for E&S

      --
      -Frijoles-
  19. Smells by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Insightful
    '...To enhance the sense of reality, smells including burned charcoal can be pumped into the room.' It almost makes me want to write off college and join the army...

    That's lame. I experienced the smell of burned charcoal yesterday; it was the savory aroma of my Thanksgiving turkey cooking on the Weber grill. It gave me a nice warm fuzzy feeling.

    If they really want to do combat simulation, they need to pump in the smell of cordite and napalm; the smell of rotting flesh on week-old corpses; the smell of truckfulls of men who haven't changed their clothes in five weeks; the smell of raw sewage and mud at the bottoms of trenches; the smell of mustard gas and burning tires; the smell of fear.

    If they had this kind of realism, you'd stay safely in college.

    1. Re:Smells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they really want to do combat simulation, they need to pump in the smell of cordite and napalm; the smell of rotting flesh on week-old corpses

      Go watch the video. Rotting flesh is one of aromas they use.

    2. Re:Smells by Iamthefallen · · Score: 1

      If they really want to do combat simulation, they need to pump in the smell of cordite and napalm; the smell of rotting flesh on week-old corpses; They have that, saw a story yesterday where they let a reporter smell what rotting body smells like, he didn't like it much...

      --
      Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
    3. Re:Smells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..."If they had this kind of realism, you'd stay safely in college." This message has been brought to you by yet another 18 year old computer nerd who has never even THOUGHT of combat, other than after watching Saving Private Ryan on DVD.

    4. Re:Smells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Least-fond memory: burning shit.

  20. Join the Army? by x136 · · Score: 1

    It almost makes me want to write off college and join the army...

    Only if I get to keep the 150 degree screen and 10.2 system...

    --
    SIGFEH
    1. Re:Join the army? by ZPO · · Score: 1

      Just as likely to be NCO's. The scenario they describe is one anyone leading a couple of vehicles could face.

      This isn't going to help train anyone for hot contact. It can do a good job of training for more policelike things. This sounds like an upgraded and overpriced version of the police shoot/don't-shoot trainers.

  21. This seems like a waste of time by HanzoSan · · Score: 3, Insightful



    It would be better to give the military guys paintball guns and let them reherse marine tactics on each other

    Then give them a REAL virtual reality combat sim, not some fancy looking movie

    I'm sorry but i looked at the picture and it looked like virtual cop 2 with a special movie screen

    Ok maybe the screen is nice and its a decent similator, but tell me how do a group of soldiers actualy interact with it if its just a screen? At least if you wear a body suit and goggles you interact with it with your body so its actually realistic.

    I dont know about this

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:This seems like a waste of time by voiceofthewhirlwind · · Score: 1

      Paintball training for the military is kind of like teaching BASIC to people who need to learn C/C++... Developing a reflex of aiming higher at even close range target because you have to account for the arc of the paintball will probably get you killed in a real firefight. Maybe close-quarters-combat training could use them but I think they train with real guns with blank adapters and lasers on the barrels (and presumably laser detectors on the vest and helmet).

    2. Re:This seems like a waste of time by SpcJWH · · Score: 1

      real guns with blank adapters and lasers on the barrels (and presumably laser detectors on the vest and helmet). they have them, I've used them, although seems to me it was IR rather than laser
      and as for interaction, FAADS was using an interactive missile simulator at least as far back as '91 when I was in training... 35lb. fake Stinger sitting on my shoulder, wired to track the images on the screen... no smells, but I don't think we were missing much there

    3. Re:This seems like a waste of time by Pyrosz · · Score: 1

      While paintball always seems like a good idea and is brought up every time something like this article is posted, it is not that usefull. Paintballs tend to not work like real bullets in that small trees and leaves tend to stop the paintballs. They also tend to have a very limited range, unlike real bullets that can and do go for miles. What they can and do use is something called Simunition. This is a non lethal bullet that is fired from the very same guns that they will be using in real combat. The only thing needed is some sort of face protection. Its like advanced paintball. They even have shotguns outfitted with this stuff.

      --

      An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
  22. Doom sure taught the columbine kids right? by HanzoSan · · Score: 1

    If the media says the Columbine kids learned from doom, Why cant our military? Afterall Doom isnt just a game, Its training for teenage psycho murderers!

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  23. In other news... by reaper20 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Soldiers continue to live in shitty housing, with hardly any benefits, and get paid like crap while counted on to sacrifice their lives.

    Yet another Army idea due for the scrapper after countless $$$ is spent. Remember how much they spent on Land Warrior before they canceled that?

    1. Re:In other news... by shaunbaker · · Score: 1

      i hate to break this news to you but they have not canceled the land warrior system, it is fully functional and in use in some of the ranger units. having worked with this system on a limited ammount i can say that the millions have paid off. the tactical advantage it provides will undoubtably save countless american lives

    2. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude,

      I'm sorry to tell you this, but there is noone using the land warrior system right now, at all. If you think Army Rangers are going into combat wearing 100+ pounds of extra crap, then you're wrong.

  24. MRE Acronym by Bastian227 · · Score: 1

    MRE? The military already has that acronym for Meals Ready to Eat. Kinda the similar though... MREs are virtual food.

    1. Re:MRE Acronym by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The military is drowning in its own bullshit.

      I mean, take "JAMPS". Means "JINTACCS Automated Message Processing System." "JINTACCS"? Joint Interoperability of TActical Command and Control Systems." So, acronym contains acronym.

      "MPC"? "Message Processing Center" for the C2 types, "Military Personnel Center" to everyone else.

      Etc., etc., etc.

      The MRE confusion is nothing new, believe me.

  25. the Rest of Them by Snover · · Score: 1

    Sure, this may SOUND good, but if you've ever seen a show that had a military airplane or tank simulator in it (or if you've been to one) you'd notice the lack of any kind of decent graphics. While this new simulator sounds incredible, I'm wondering just how much it's lacking in that concern. I mean, they shell out billions of dollars on these things and they can't even install a copy of *shudder* Microsoft Flight Simulator (or some reasonably modified facimile)?

    --

    [insert witty comment here]
  26. Wow. Dream Park at last by mughi · · Score: 1

    I had given up on seeing this happen, as technology seemed to pass it by. But now it looks like Niven's work still holds water. And he pinpointed the military application.

    Too bad Dream Park is out of print and hard to find. It's not on par with True Names, but is interesting from a 'how they saw it' viewpoint.

    1. Re:Wow. Dream Park at last by spinwards · · Score: 1

      True Names.. ah, there is a truely great novella. I don't think that the link is accurate though, that edition has not (or should not have been) printed yet. I have a standing order with Tor for it, i have had the order for the last two years, the publication date has always been a few months in the future. I am fairly sure that it has not been recently published because i have just bought a compleat collection of Vinge's short stories, the only omisions being true names (because of the pending publication), and Grim's world (it being the core of Tajta Grim's World). The distributer, i think it was Baker and taylor, but i could be wrong, said that the publication date for True Names (i check every time i order something) has been pushed back yet again. This all makes me wonder why Barnesand Noble say it is instock and ready to ship.... i dunno...

      online text of True Names (not sure how long this wil be up... so get it while its fresh)

      True Names
      A fan supported Vernor Vinge web site
      Vinge's site at SDSU (the miscelanious link at the bottom has the good stuff)
      Some of his other books
      Bibliography

      ok, thats enough for now... check google for more.
      I recomend reading some of his stuff if you havn't already, some reminds you of all of the science foction you have read before, and some is just astounding. True Names is/was truely prophetic (check out when it was written, then compare to neuromancer).

    2. Re:Wow. Dream Park at last by mughi · · Score: 1
      True Names.. ah, there is a truely great novella. I don't think that the link is accurate though, that edition has not (or should not have been) printed yet.


      I know the story. Over the past few years Amazon.com has kept it for pre-sale, while Barnes & Nobel yanked it after the first or second publisher delay. They put it back up recently, and have stuck with the Dec 1 ship

  27. "VR" in the army by Sabot7723 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Any type of VR the army has was built by the lowest bidder, made with the least expensive parts and is sure to be 100% crap. When I was in, we had some motion platforms designed to teach you to drive the M1A1 tank. They were too floaty, geometrically incorrect, didn't have enough cool animations for falling off of cliffs and they wouldn't let you run over any trees. (in the simulation, you'd "die". In real life, you go through 3 foot thick trees like buttah) There is no substitution for actual live training. The army will never get VR right, they even screwed up applesauce.

    1. Re:"VR" in the army by shaunbaker · · Score: 1

      actually the simulators will let you roll over trees, when you where in training you were there for the training portion and thus they turned on the options so that if you hit anything you die. this is very good for inital training because you can't very well be rolling over the trees on the "drivers ed" course and when you are deployed for peacekepping, the local populace isn't to forgiving of friendly when you accidentally run over their barn, you can turn the realisim on the simulators up and you can roll over all the 3 foot thick trees you want

    2. Re:"VR" in the army by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At Langley AFB we had a simulator to train for things like air-to-air refuelling. One guy who got airman of the quarter got a trip in it and managed to stall the aircraft. The stall was portrayed realistically enough that he blew chunks.

  28. Only Stupid Idiots join any military service ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Military := commanded murder Military := commanded killings Military := commanded destruction Military := waste of money Military := suppresion of the weak Do yourself a favour and buy the best gaming machine around with e.g. one or more Projectors. Setup yourself a multimedia gaming-room. There you can kill, destroy and murder as many people as you want in virtual reality and you won't harm any (mostly) innocent folks, destroy their property and oppress them for personal interests of some rich american assholes. As a swiss guy i'm forced myself to train every second year in military. It's just the uttermost plain stupid union possible. The higher the rank of these folks the more ruthless and egoistic they get. Just a dumb waste of money ! Your's Beeblebrox

  29. Acronym conflict? by dimator · · Score: 2

    MRE also stands for "meal ready to eat", ie, field rations. Now they want to call this training Mission Rehearsal Exercise...

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    1. Re:Acronym conflict? by The_Messenger · · Score: 0, Troll
      Years ago, I used to work as a geek lackey at a well-known [civilian] military news service. Our buddies at Naval command hooked us up with a big, thick book filled with hundreds of thousands of miliary acronyms. If you think that the technolgy industry overuses acronyms, you'd get a kick out of this book -- deciphering acronyms made of acronyms made of acronyms will often leave you doubting the sanity of the government. (Of course, if you weren't doubting it already, I doubt your sanity.)

      The military and the defense industry also have some wonderful jargon. My favorite example, often seen in sales brochures, is "ruggedized." A "ruggedized" object is an object which has been made rugged.

      Anyway, I can guarantee that MRE already stands for at least ten other things, probably only half of which are common among all four major branches. The public is only most aware of the "Meal Ready to Eat" definition because of the publicity that that particular crap received during Desert Storm.

      --

      --
      I like to watch.

    2. Re:Acronym conflict? by nathanm · · Score: 2

      Or: Meals Rejected by Ethiopians

  30. Buzzwordish by somneo · · Score: 1

    "Virtually Identical"

    I thought reality was something with which you could interact. Even a virtual reality must have some sort of I/O or it's just a movie, no matter how many gimmicks are thrown in. Smoke and mirrors may prepare soldiers for some of the confusion of being in combat, but the ability to think on one's feet and react to a rapidly changing scenario won't come from looking at a movie screen.

  31. MREs? by Scooby+Snacks · · Score: 1
    they call it Mission Rehearsal Exercise or MRE for short
    Not to be confused with Meals Ready to Eat, the decades-old expansion for the MRE acronym. (Incidentally, they have the dubious distinction by some who have eaten them as one of the few existing in-the-wild examples of a contradiction in three words.)

    Although I could see where people might get confused, especially with the smell of charcoal being pumped into the room.

    (Incidentally, I've had MREs (the "edible" variety), and I actually don't think they're that bad, although that might be because I only had mess hall food for comparison at that point. ;) )

    --

    --
    Runnin' around, robbin' banks all whacked on the Scooby Snacks...
    1. Re:MREs? by mizhi · · Score: 1
      (Incidentally, I've had MREs (the "edible" variety), and I actually don't think they're that bad, although that might be because I only had mess hall food for comparison at that point. ;) )

      They're not that bad until you have to eat them 24/7. You spend the next month clearing them out of your system. :-/

      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
    2. Re:MREs? by Scooby+Snacks · · Score: 1

      Ah, well, that could be it. I only had 2 or 3 in a row. When you put it that way, I see how they could get really old, really fast.

      --

      --
      Runnin' around, robbin' banks all whacked on the Scooby Snacks...
    3. Re:MREs? by Quila · · Score: 2

      You're lucky you didn't get them back in the pork patty days. There was almost no attempt then at anything resembling taste.

  32. US DECLARES WAR!!!! by posmon · · Score: 1

    koopa castle was nuked by the us air force last night. says george bush "we must take bowser, dead or alive".

    --

    update comments set karma=-1, reason='offtopic' where sid=26315

  33. [OT] 'Army of One' by mizhi · · Score: 2
    'Army of One' is referring more and more to the average IQ of new recruits, not the sense of fellowship. (This isn't an attack at the military, just an observation about the people I know who have signed up in the last 2 years.)

    Unfortunately, the Army is still of the mindset that quantity is better than quality and has repeatedly lowered standards to pump up the numbers. Intelligence/Education is just one of the many victims of this mindset. This, at a time when the tasks of the average soldier are becoming increasingly more complex, both technologically and politically. Soldiers can no longer just be considered automotons that mindlessly follow orders... they have to be aware of the ramifications their actions can have. IE: How does a soldier fix the wireless networks of a group of tanks when his MOS is for radio communications? How does a soldier respond when confronted by the media? I hope the Army learns quickly, but history indicates otherwise.

    --
    Humorless sig goes here.
    1. Re:[OT] 'Army of One' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intelligence/Education is just one of the many victims of this mindset
      >

      You're not kidding. I did better than 97% of the people on the ASVAB, and didn't get accepted because of my physical. *sigh*

  34. Patriots join the military, cowards don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    i'm forced myself to train every second year in military.

    So you don't think your country should be able to protect itself from invasion?!

    I don't know why societies bother with cowards and slackers like you.

    In Finland the "conscientious" objectors aren't jailed like they should (preferably until they agree to go and serve their country). Instead they get to do light civil service for 13 months and still they whine about how unfairly they're being treated. You see, the obligatory military service can be as short as six months...

    Now, if someone won't give a measly six months (or 12 in your case) of their lives to pay back the debt of honor to their fatherland (which gave them everything!) then in my opinion they don't deserve the citizenship.

    1. Re:Patriots join the military, cowards don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about your "fatherland," but our fatherland here in the US spends most of its time taking money and resources away from people under the guise of "helping redistribute resources fairly".. yes when done correctly all is great.. but it's such a farce these days that the federal government wastes more on deciding what to do with it then doing anything with it.

  35. Join the army? Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the average slashdotter's waist size? Fat camp is more likely.

  36. 10.2 sound?? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    WTF the fuck is that supposed to be? 5.1 is 5 channels plus 100Hz right? So, is 10.2 10 channels plus 200HZ or is someone just escalating numbers to impress teenagers again? This is the dumbest crap I've ever heard of.

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
    1. Re:10.2 sound?? by tom.allender · · Score: 1

      5.1 is 5 channels plus 100Hz right?

      no

      • 5.1 = five channels plus a sub channel
      • 10.2 = twice as good, clearly.
      Tom.
      p.s. I can emit pellets...
    2. Re:10.2 sound?? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      yes AND no - your "sub channel" has a bandwidth of 100Hz (hence ".1"). I ALSO KNOW A CRACKING OWL SANCTUARY.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  37. Join the army? by WowTIP · · Score: 1

    ...enhance the sense of reality, smells including burned charcoal can be pumped into the room.' It almost makes me want to write off college and join the army...

    Yeah, you do that. You'll probably end up as telecom guy or something like that, taken into account that you probably study something computer related. My guess is that you would never set your foot near any of these simulators.

    Also, reading the article you get the impression it's mostly used as a tool in training commanding officers in decision making. Not the "regular" FPS you probably was hoping to play.

    --

    --

    "I'm surfin the dead zone
    In the twilight, unknown"
  38. Re: more stinky please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The difference, hopefully, would be that
    it will NOT be fun to play. If it is
    preparatory it should be very stressful
    require quick shifts from action to
    thinking and back. And it should smell
    like an abattoir to the point of
    nausia and whatever pheromone humans
    produce when terrified. That type of
    sensory onslaught may improve reaction
    times. They might also want to alternate
    the subjects activities before the
    simulation, like karate practice, then
    after reveille next, then after taking
    a written exam and then after coming
    back from leave. Of course I'm saying
    this while sitting in my pajamas, in a nice
    warm house drink delicious steaming
    coffee, so..........maybe thats objectivity?

  39. Nope. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    "Virtual Reality" simply means artifically making something seem, well, real.
    When applied to a combat situation, this can mean making the body smell, see, and hear things that they would encounter in combat, to prepare their senses for the real thing.

    "VR" does not mean "Computer-generated imagery & feelings hacked directly into your brainstem", nor does it have to mean "3d generated graphics with stereoscopic vision and a powerglove".

    Even though said soldier obviously KNOWS it's not real, the assault on his senses goes a long way to preparing him for the real thing. That's the point.

    1. Re:Nope. by wadetemp · · Score: 1

      Where is the line then between a movie and virtual reality? An active imagination can subsitute for the missing things like smell. ("Imagine you're smelling charcoal." "Yes, it feels more realistic already.")

      What's missing from your definition of virtual reality is interaction. An experience may be totally emersive, and it may be an assault on the senses, but so are many things Hollywood puts out. Like you said, the soldier knows it's not real. Because you can touch and change reality. You actually have a reason to give a damn. Otherwise this is just a training film someone forced you to sit through.

      Add interaction, and give the person a reason to care about the situation and the ability to make decisions that affect it's outcome, THEN you have something that approaches reality. Otherwise, it's a glorified movie that has no place as a story on Slashdot. Hell, I've got some charcoal. I should burn some and play video games and submit a story to Slashdot about my home VR system.

    2. Re:Nope. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      Well.. no. Interaction is yet another element that can add to the realism of the situation. It's not required for something to be 'VR'

  40. but is it real by TheStruuus · · Score: 1

    If blood doesnt spray from the screen when your VR buddy gets shot in the neck.. I ain't interested.

  41. Re:God, quake 3 is more realistic. by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

    How is this off topic?

    Did you even read before modding, sheesh!?

    Did you even read my posting? Didja *see* the inclusion of text direct from the fucking article?

    Obviously not. Because someone with an IQ above 50 would have read more than the subject line.

    And, if whoever modded this down, obviously missed this:
    But several online game reviews of "Real War" have criticized it for not being realistic enough, calling the movements jerky and cartoonish.
    Which, if you have a sense of humor at all, will see that the paragraph below has direct linking to the paragraph above.

    And in other news, Mr. Omer's next sim will be called "Real Congress", and get rave reviews for its accurate depiction.


    Oh, well, not to worry. My other account hit the karma cap quite quickly, thank you.

    Proving to me, and anyone else in the /. crowd that intelligent moderation is reflected on intelligent posting and the new game seems to be modding by subjet/name

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  42. Why is military stuff always on slashdot? by mr_don't · · Score: 3, Interesting

    SLASHDOT:

    From the demographics I once saw on the OSDN Website, it looks like the readers of slashdot are the type of people who are well-off, white, and fairly unlikely to ever experience war except through Quake, CNN, or Neal Stevenson Novels. Why are there always military articles posted on Slashdot?

    Nerds and geeks will forever be the whimpering lapdogs that build the technology for killing! Racial military minority representation has risen from 14 percent in 1975 to 26 percent. This is faster than the rate that African Americans and Latinos have attained Internet access! Slashdot readers are smart, when will the poseur editors get over their military wanna-be aspirations?

  43. No Danger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with all these VR machines is that there is no danger involved. The movie screen does not shoot back and nobody can die or get hurt from your reactions. When the soldiers get into real life and the enemy is shooting back at them it will be a whole different game and they will flip out. We need more money spent not on complex computer driven interactive movies but on live fire excerises.

  44. Join the army? by Deskpoet · · Score: 1

    It almost makes me want to write off college and join the army...

    So I want to understand this. You prefer to experience life through an interface to a localized digital sub-reality where you kill and destroy like a trained machine instead of breathing and eating here with us in meatspace where the blood, disease, and destruction come complete with a real olifactory track that would turn a decent being's stomach?

    Philip K. Dick must be rolling over in his grave......

    Please think about what you are saying. Even if it is said in jest, this kind of eager-beaver jingoism should be known and despised for what it is: abject worship of a system that actively promotes the death of your fellow human beings, "enemy" or not. If you don't value life, that's fine, but keep your adolescent, cold-blooded thoughts to your self.

    --
    "The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws."--Tacitus, The Histories
  45. The point really is the political element by Galvatron · · Score: 2
    These days we have wars with less than a dozen American casualties, and each of these is widely reported in the media. One of the things this simulator tries to do is force people to make command decisions where they have to balance how it will look in the press against completing their objectives.


    Yes folks, this is the new mode of warfare: spin control.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  46. If they want smarter recruits, then by Tablizer · · Score: 0

    ....perfect the simulated Hookers In Every Port. Geeks are too afraid to touch real girls.

  47. (correction) by Tablizer · · Score: 0

    that should be "hookers at every port", not "hookers in every port". After all, were not talking Tailand here....snicker.

    1. Re:(correction) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds like you're downloading a porn movie asynchronously...

  48. Meals, Ready To Eat; Three Lies in One Sentence by mr_death · · Score: 1

    You have to choke one down to understand ...

    --
    It's Linux, damnit! Pay no attention to renaming attempts by self-aggrandizing blowhards.
  49. Personal Experience with Military Flight Sims by Goldenhawk · · Score: 2

    I have worked on these flight sims for a living, testing them and helping develop them. I've logged around a hundred hours of flight time in A-4J, T-45, AV-8B, and S-3B sims, as well as F-18, F-14, S-3, T-45 and other development or test sims. I can state with absolute certainty that getting paid to play these video games was the coolest part of my job.

    Because I have this experience, I'd like to throw in a few considerations to this discussion.

    The military pays LOTS of money to get these simulators as close to reality as possible. I know - my job was to verify that they fly just like the airplane. We would spend a week or more flying a sim in every conceivable situation, and comparing the results to real airplane data. But in the end, there were usually several significant areas where the sims just don't stack up. You cannot ever get a sim as good as the airplane, for a number of fundamental reasons, not the least of which is the lack of true G-forces.

    In the end, the utility of ANY sim is determined mostly by understanding exactly where it is "mission representative" - where the model is representative of the actual mission the sim must model. Then, you carefully develop a syllabus, or training regime, that sidesteps those areas where the sim is not accurate. In some cases, this means not training certain tasks at all. In other cases, it means not using a sim in certain parts of the operating "envelope" while performing certain tasks.

    Why is this important? Because it points out a key fact of simulation, not just flight simulation. Every simulation has its weaknesses. This does NOT mean the simulation is not useful - it simply means that you MUST understand those areas, and account for them while training. It is possible - and in fact done by the military - to take an individual with no actual experience in a certain type of airplane, spend two weeks training them in the simulator, then give them exactly two flights in the REAL airplane, before certifying them to solo in that airplane, and in fact start performing missions (not combat, of course, but that doesn't take long either).

    Sims are tremendously useful. You can do things you'd never risk in real life, and do them over and over again until the reaction is automatic. You can do boring stuff, and do it many times. You can do things much faster - because you don't have to march, or drive, or fly to the operating area. And best of all, you can do it cheaply.

    Sims are here to stay in the military. The most significant change in military procurement policy we're likely to see, worldwide, is the emphasis on interconnected simulations of all kinds for military-wide war gaming. We'll have better trained troops at all levels, at a lower cost than ever before.

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

    1. Re:Personal Experience with Military Flight Sims by Eil · · Score: 2


      That pretty much matches up with my (admittedly limited) experience with flight sims. The ones we have here are for the C-130 (I forget which model), MH53-J, and the UH-1 Huey. The Huey, although much simpler and lacking hydraulics was incredibly fun and I got the hang of flying it almost right away, despite never having flown a helicopter before.

      I was wondering, though, if you could give any insight as to how a regular geek (or military avionics geek, as I am) would go about eventually securing a job in programming and / or maintaining the program on one of these machines?

  50. Join the army to play video games? You're a moron! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boy are you misguided and stupid, if you'd join the army just to play video games. You're sure going be in for a lot of unpleasant surprises. Take my advice, kiddo: stay at home and continue to live with your parents, if you just want to play video games.

  51. Agreed! Mod this up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Well put.

    What a sickening, foolish thing to say: "It almost makes me want to write off college and join the army..."