California Takes Issue With Microsoft Settlement Idea
Deepfoo writes: "Note from CNet on the California challenge to Microsoft's attempt to settle the 100 civil cases on file against it by donating equipment. The dissenters will argue that those harmed in the lawsuit aren't getting compensated directly in this way, and that the ploy of donating equipment to schools is a transparent effort to further extend its monopoly. The dissenting California lawyers estimate the actual damages due to Californians alone could be on the order of 3 to 9 billion (wide range, but that's what they've said). Is Microsoft a do-gooder, or up to no good?"
Don't forget the "H" in http . . . http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-7978672.htmlt ag=mn_hd
Why even ask the /. crowd this question? Is there any doubt in anyone's mind on how it will be answered?
Enigma
That sounds exactly like a convicted arsonist who proposes to make up for his deeds by distributing matches in the schoolyard, then sets up an extinguisher manufacture. As much as I hate M$, I have to say I admire them and their attorneys for having the guts to even think about proposing a deal like that, that's classic Microsoft. If the DOJ goes for that, it sure won't be their finest hour ...
"A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
Smooth logic slick. Let's give 'em a pass.
I need to update my MCSE because they changed the pictures around.
Employee Of the Month - Cyberdyne Systems Corporation - September 1997