Digital Sound Editing Under Unix?

Jed1Mnd asks: "I have recently set out to find some decent audio manipulation software for Linux, with out that much luck. I have a friend who is currently using CoolEdit on Windows 98SE is running into issue with performance. We are looking at Linux because of the better IO, memory management and support for file systems like xfs. However like I said I am having trouble find a decent replacement for CoolEdit. I was hoping that the Slashdot crowd would know of a product (commercial or non-commercial) that would fit this situation."

Comments

Snd?

[Ridge2001]

http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/linux/2001/10/05/s nd_partone.html
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/linux/2001/10/18/s nd_parttwo.html

Doesn't anybody do /. article searches?

[Quay42]

I think we get this question about once a month or so. I'd imagine searching through the Ask Slashdot history should turn up something.

Cheers,
jw

linuxsound.at

[Sam Lowry]

Try http://www.linuxsound.at/

and... tell yoru friend that such a serious move requires not only the software to change but her habits, methods and skillset to change also...

Audacity

[ratatosk]

As always, SourceForge is your friend ;-)

You might want to try Audacity - it gives the win32-only packages a real run for their money:

Audacity

(and it's available for linux, freebsd, macos and windoze)

/wulff

Re:Audacity

[ConceptJunkie]

I've done quite a bit with Audacity the 0.9.6 and 0.9.7 beta versions under Windows 2000. Aside of a few interface quirks, I am extremely pleased with the results. I can slice-n-dice several hundred megabyte WAV files with impunity and then save it all to a completed file. I've been digitizing old audio tapes and Audacity has made it really easy to edit out dead spots, remove clicks and pops, adjust sound levels, etc.

And it's GPL! Much recommended.

The only thing keeping Win2k on my machine...

[flamingweasel]

...is CoolEdit. About a month ago, I tried every Linux sound editor I could find, and nothing that comes close to CoolEdit's functionality exists. The real killer is CoolEdit's really nice multitracking; Audacity comes close, but crashes far too often and lacks sound grouping. Broadcast 2000 looked promising, but is buggy and no longer being developed. Unfortunately, I think it might take another year or so of development before any Free replacement for CoolEdit (or SoundForge or whatever) is ready.

Wavelab is the best program!

[inburito]

I haven't found anything that can touch wavelab, but it runs on windows, though.

The real killer is the audio montage section where you can arrange clips(non destructively) in unlimited tracks and adjust things like volume and effects on track or clip basis. Crossfading, etc. is a snap. Ton of effects that can be run real-time or not.. the montage section is a lot like broadcast2000..

Can do speed changes with constant pitch and vice versa, connects to your favourite sampler and does mp3 decoding/encoding too..

Also an added plus is an integrated cd burning software. Which means that you can do a montage of clips, set cd-markers(track changes) and burn a cd without gaps between tracks..

Check it out at steinberg.net

Change to the CORRECT operating system.

[Xenex]

I can't see the logic in a move from Windows to Linux here. The application you require only runs on a win32 platform.

Insted of moving from Windows 98 to Linux, why don't you look into moving to Windows 2000. The issues you list (IO, memory mangement, filesystem) are all far better in Windows 2000 compared to Win9x.

Linux is great, and the freedom attached to it is also great. But if what you need to do needs Windows, then perhaps the best solution is to move to a better version of Windows...

Re:UNIX is a broad scope.

[nbvb]

I concur. If you mean just a generic Unix, because you need that Unix-y goodness, then why not a Mac?

You get the best of both worlds --- all the graphics & sound tools that the Macs are famous for, and a real, live, true-blue Unix!

Whoa. Brain overload. :-)

--NBVB