The LDP and Debian
Guylhem writes: "The former LDP license was the first license used for our documentation. While we are now recommending the GNU FDL and the OPL 1 without options A or B, many documents are still licensed under the LDPL. David Merril, our Collection Coordinator, noticed that the LDPL is "not free" according to the Debian Free Software Guidelines.
We have to get in touch with the authors as soon as possible or 2/3 of the LDP document collection will be removed from the base Debian distribution because the code freeze is happening in 2 days. Maybe some of the LDP unreachable authors are reading slashdot and could take 1 minute to submit an updated document licensed under the FDL or OPL v1 -A -B ? Another solution is to find volunteers to rewrite from scratch the concerned documents."
first fag
What are you going to eat for supper?
I do. Some of the licenses for proprietary software are laughworthy. The MS Word license used to, and maybe still does, contain a line that went something like "This software is not to be used for operation of nuclear power plants".
Best Slashdot Co
For further information please check out this.
Sorry, don't know the exact reference.
Owner of a Mensa membership card.
By the way, it will be someone's birthday there. I don't know who. There will be 1,000 people there, at least. Someone must be celebrating a birthday.
Ludacris came to me in a dream, and he asked me why I was all up in his biz-NIS
The Fucking Taliban have fucking given up that last fucking shanty village crap KHANDAR or whatever fucking it is fucking called this is so fucking cool
I really have nothing else to day. The moderators are smoking crack lately.