Slashdot Mirror
You May Not Link This Web Site
Ganon34 sent us a funny story about a company requiring permission to link their website. The company in question is KPMG, a financial and legal advisory company, and the article itself is an entertaining read about the aftermath of them sending demands that someone remove a link to their public web site. It's a pretty funny piece -- especially the part about KPMG's theme song. Also references the old ticketmaster vs ticet.com case that held up deep linking. It's all funny 'cuz its true.
Their page could also use some testing since it doesn't render in my browser.
Wouldn't this be like hindering freedom of the press or something? That's like saying, "If you use our name in daily conversation, we'll sue you." Its almost as bad as companies trying to sue people because they give their products a bad review.
Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
*shrug* I've tried every browser under the (Windows) sun on their site over the past couple of months, and even with the "required" plugins, still can't get the bedamned thing to load properly. Since they're in our industry, they are on my boss's to-watch list--and every time I send her a report it says "broken site." Can't get past the intro screen, which usually causes my computer to yak.
...
Once upon a time, the site did work
even google breaks the rules! google's simple search brings up many different links to kpmg
The anti-salmon
I have a friend who used to work for the same company as myself. He had links to their web-site and to the sites of clients for whom he had done stellar design work as part of his online resume. The company demanded that he remove these links.
Why? Ostensibly because "too many hits are coming from your page, buddy!" But perhaps it's really because his personal page advocates veganism, or perhaps because he's a photographer who had done some same-sex weddings. Who knows?
The point is, telling people not to link to your site is just plain stupid and unreasonable, and frankly borders on unethical. May they drown in their stupid-karma!
-- thinkyhead software and media
My question is search engines. Does KPMG expect every search engine to "execute an agreement" in order to include: results in their database and subsequently provide the results to their users?
It seems that if, is actually intent on enforcing this policy, then they should require a userid and password to access every page, and then only provide the passwords to websites that have "executed" agreements. Personally, it looks to me like () is doing a good job of executing themeselves.
BTW, if you would like to know more about
Work for Change & GET PAID!
Don't want people linking to your site? Fine. Then don't let them. When the webserver gets an HTTP GET request, check the referrer address. If its not coming from a "proper" link, then simply refuse to serve the page. No need to fuss about improper links. They simply won't work. And you'll be MORE than capable of keeping all those potential customers OFF your website. Who really wants customers anyways? All they do is provide you with more work to do. :)
-Restil
Play with my webcams and lights here
As the articles points out, KPMG has only gotten themselves into this embarrassing situation because they were unhappy about people making fun of another embarrassing situation: The KPMG Theme Song! It explains their power, strength, and global strategy (which must include really bad music).
(heres the akamai link to the mp3)
___
The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
I am sure they have studies that prove a higher GPA = better candidate, I would agree for the most part but its probably a marketing ploy. Maybe this is something they use as a tool to fool their non-technical based customers, "We only higher with a GPA of x.xx", like "We only higher A+, MCSE, CNE, etc.. qualified technicians". Doesnt matter that they have worked at Joe's Pizza Shack for the past 10 years and just finished the exam yesterday. It attempts to clear the FUD of highering just anybody.
Theory to practice applies to more then IT.
I went through the Navy Nuclear Power training pipeline a few years ago. It is three seperate schools, each about 7 months long. The first one is electronics (50% failure rate), second is nuclear power theory (25% failure rate) and last is an actual operating power plant (less then 10% failure rate). In this pipeline with me were two very bright guys that practically walked through the first two schools, while I busted my ass 90+ hours a week just to get by ("2.5 to stay alive" was the quote I believe). Both of these guys bombed out at the end of the operational part of the training. Turned out they had no ability to apply what they had learned and could not actually control a nuclear power plant.
Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
It's quite possible that they were the submittors, the submittor doesn't even exist on slashdot.
Hey, whats the Slashdot theme song?
Jeez. That's a lot of contracts...
"I don't trust goats," --To Catch a Spy
I'd like to know what legal ground you would stand on if you claimed you didn't have a javascript-capable browser, or had disabled scripting (this isn't a rare thing - 12% of users according to thecounter), and therefore could not read their disclaimer page. A lot of websites use scripted popups to open such legal things (and more important ones too than this garbage).
Does this issue pertain to all the websites out there that are "not link free". I did a google search for "not link free", and came up with 465 hits. Maybe it's just my imagination, but a large number of those seem to be Japanese sites. Any idea why?
THink about it. It you want massive hits to your website, can you think of any better way than to get slashdot to say you forbid links--with the inevitable "defiant" link? . . .
hawk
In a somewhat comical incident, the same thing happened in Finland when the police forces sent a cease-and-desist letter to an association for linking to their main page (and with probably as much foundation in law as in this case).
lynx -useragent='Mozilla/4.0 (lynx; faked; hahahaha)' http://www.kpmg.com/
After accepting or rejecting the five cookies they offer (one for the initial connection, one for having seen the flash, one for a session id, and some others for who knows what), the page appears, and looks like it was written especially for Lynx! All the images have alt tags, the text formats nicely, it's easy to read..
So now what was all that
Edith Keeler Must Die
How kpmg.com renders in Mozilla
All of the major consulting companies, Bain, McKinsey, PWC, et al, they won't even interview you if your SAT scores, GPA, and College aren't "top notch."
:) My SATs were decent, but still, not elite scores there either. Oh! You mean what they require to interview a new college grad!? Maybe so, I don't know -- I had ~12 years of experience before interviewing for the job. They never even asked about SAT, college, GPA.
Bullshit. I work for one of the companies mentioned above and both my GPA and college were decidely NOT top notch.
Now all I need is a business and finances.
If KPMG can enforce their policy easily enough by simply not delivering content when the HTTP request comes in asking for their site. They say they are "e-business savvy", so they should have no trouble setting this up in just a few minutes.
The web is about linking. That's why they call it "The Web". If KPMG doesn't want to join in, then they should just stay out. And there are many ways to do that, including still having a site served by HTTP to send content to whoever types their name in manually, or links from sites they approve of. They should just do it and prove their competence in running their site their way.
But why the hell would I want to link to their site anyway. It sucks! The whole damn thing is a morass of lame Javascript. They can't even put plain HTML in and have to have Javascript generate it. It's clear to me that they don't know how to do things on the server side.
now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
Silly company.
--Ben
Suppose I send a plain ol' text message, in which I mention http://www.kpmg.com in plain text, but the recipient's email client renders the url as a link. Who needs to get a link agreement - me, the recipient, or the company that wrote the email client?
Frankly, if KPMG doesn't want to be linked to, they should not be on the web.
Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid