Slashdot Mirror


Review Of The Sharp Zaurus 5000D

Tim_F writes: "Palmstation has a nice review of the recently available development release of the Sharp Zaurus 5000D. This device looks sweet, with QT Embedded, and Lineo Embeddix. It also features a full JVM based on JDK 1.1.8." Any readers out there who have managed to try one of these out as well?

44 of 142 comments (clear)

  1. Sweet little machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's a sweet little machine. I have spent all of 5 minutes playing with it as the day job is insane these days.

    I love the keyboard, and I love the size of the thing. A few things stick out as sore thumbs. One is that it needs some sort of carrying case. I guess I'll see if I can find one from a CE or Palm that it would fit nicely in.

    Another is that while it attempts to do hand writing recognition, it's brain dead at it. Sure the keyboard is there, but I find it quicker to write on the screen being used to my Newton 2100. Would be nice if it had Graffitti (not sure it doesn't) or the ability to write text on the screen.

    When you do HWR, you have to switch modes (a UI design no-no) and it splits your screen into two areas, one into which you write. Once it recognizes your handwriting - and it never does, it pastes the text into the currently open application. In other words, it's brain dead.

    This would be a great area for improvement.

    I totally love the color screen. The size and clarity of the display would be perfect for reading text, playing games (porting MAME would be awesome), and with the camera attachment - taking pix.

    It would be really sweet if I could attach a small hard drive to this, like one of those IBM microdriver in some sort of backpack/cradle - then I could use it to see short mpegs, have some real mp3 storage, etc. :)

    That it has an mp3 player is awesome, but CF and the secure flash lots limit how much you can store, so I won't be using this as my mp3.

    Another annoyance is I find is that it doesn't fit very well into the cradle. You have to wiggle it a bit, and I'm afraid of breaking the connector...

    It looks very promising though.

    1. Re:Sweet little machine by firewort · · Score: 2

      The IBM Microdrive is a CF II card form factor. The 340mb ones are available pretty cheaply. Buy one and let us know if it works. The 1gb ones are more expensive.

      --

  2. It's nice by 1010011010 · · Score: 5, Informative
    I have three of them for a project at work. We plan to used them, or a device like them, to aid in scoring oral exams -- pace the exam, prompt the questions, collect the scores for each section, etc.

    It has a number of nice features for this application:
    • Screen cover (unlike the iPaq)
    • $399 price includes two expansion slots ($499 iPaq has no slots)
    • Light (50% lighter than iPaq with $150 add-on expansion sleeve)
    • comes with linux on it (I don't have to reprogram 150 or so of these things)
    • works with inexpensive CF 802.11b cards, like the Linksys model.
    • can be powered/charged from AC without being in the cradle
    • although we don't plan to use it for the exams, the keyboard is nice
    • full networking support, including dhcp and multicast.
    • removable/replaceable battery. I have an iPaq that will no longer hold a charge, and I cannot replace the battery.


    Adding a single PCMCIA slot and wireless card to an iPaq increases the cost to $850/unit and yields a device with no free slots, but 802.11b networking.

    Adding a wireless card to this Zaurus yields a device with networking and one free slot (an SD slot) for $500. Plus, its noticeable smaller and lighter, and much easier to hold for a long time. Only problem so far: the 802.11b card blocks the stylus slot.

    Now we just need apps! apps! apps! so that Sharp will ship this thing retail and sell them at best buy. It includes all the usual stuff - address book, calendar, todo list, email (pop/smtp), etc. Also includes games, like asteroids (everyone in my office found the asteroids game almost immediately). It just needs "fit and finish."

    Sync over 802.11b would be a nice trick. Currently it uses Intellisync over USB, using 192.168.1.200 and 192.168.1.201 as the unit and host addresses for its private network. It would seem that a major corporate nice-thing would be to have a sync server for the Zaurus, so that employees could just walk near an access point and get things synced.

    Anyway, it's easily the nicest PDA I've seen, and held.
    --
    Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    1. Re:It's nice by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

      Correction: iPaq cost is $750. The iPaq setup is abotu 150% of the price and mass of the Zaurus.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    2. Re:It's nice by Telek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can get brand new iPAQs 3670s on eBay for $350USD-$400.

      I've also seen them in stores for $550USD-$600.

      The iPAQs are more expensive, yes, almost certainly in part to the WinCE lincense, however in many cases YGWYPF (you get what you pay for). I can't really comment because I haven't used one of these Sharp units yet, but I can't wait to try one.

      Also, we have no idea WHAT the sale price of the Sharp unit will be, as it's not in stores yet. It could turn out to be $450, and by that time new iPAQs could have dropped to the same (in stores), so it's unfair to make a price comparison yet.

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    3. Re:It's nice by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

      it's unfair to make a price comparison yet

      I was comparing what I actually paid for both kits, a couple of weeks ago. :)

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  3. Re:I own one of these little puppies by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

    How long does the battery work?

    I don't have a definitive answer, but I do have an anecdotal one: I charged a unit right out the box for about 10-15 minutes and then went around the office for an hour showing it to people -- so I'd say the battery life is pretty good. It dims the display very quickly, to save battery power.

    --
    Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  4. Re:PDA's not what they're cracked up to be... by BlacKat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Uhhh... you may want to go look a the article and/or the pics on the Sharp website.

    This PDA has a nice little tuck-away QWERTY keyboard... built in... so no "5 minutes using graffiti" required. ;)

  5. Re:JDK 1.1.8? by Yokaze · · Score: 4, Informative
    Just a guess.
    The download size of the file

    jre-1_1_8_008-win.exe = 2,764,736 bytes.

    j2re-1_4_0-beta3-win.exe = 9,156,008 bytes.

    j2re-1_4_0-beta3-linux-i386.bin = 21,550,344 bytes.

    This could be of some concern for a PDA.

    Of course, all those numbers apply only for x86 CPUs an were not optimised for size.

    Lastly, the VM is based on JDK 1.1.8, which is a (industry) standard, and not necessarily a JRE.
    In other words, the VM may be quite new.

    Now the question, why did they use a full fledged Java-enviroment instead of the Java 2, Micro Edition? Probably, because the device can handle it.

    --
    "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
  6. No digital rights protection by darkov · · Score: 2

    It's interesting to note that the specifications state that there is no 'copyright protection' on the SD slot. I never really understood why manufacturers ever included the 'feature' since it would have to be turning off lots of customers, including those not into copying but forseeing hassles just doing what the have a right to.

    Hopefully this and other copy protection features will be weeded out by natrual selection.

  7. Apps? by fm6 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Now we just need apps! apps! apps!
    Well, there will certainly be apps, given the established community of Java programmers and the rising community of Qt programmers. But Java 1.1.8? Java 2 has been out for nearly 2 years, and Sun plans to end-of-life the 1.1 stream next year. I suspect that Sharp considers Java to be a stopgap technology, to be used only until the Qt software base reaches critical mass.

    Certain folks in Cupertino can't be happy about this. Java doesn't seem to be winning much acceptance in hand-held application development. Given the failure of Java in other markets, the technology seems to be limited to writing business logic for app servers and hacking out specialized XML editors and filters.

    1. Re:Apps? by GeorgieBoy · · Score: 3, Informative
      Well, there will certainly be apps, given the established community of Java programmers and the rising community of Qt programmers. But Java 1.1.8? Java 2 has been out for nearly 2 years, and Sun plans to end-of-life the 1.1 stream next year. I suspect that Sharp considers Java to be a stopgap technology, to be used only until the Qt software base reaches critical mass


      Unfortunately, part of the reason that Java 1.1.8 is the highest supported version is b/c of the legal battle between M$ and Sun over M$ about violating their license. The M$ VM for IE is stuck at this versionr - so developers remain stuck on Java 1.1.8 for applets, b/c they are more or less "guaranteed to work" if they are written with this spec. This is a sad reality. Even so, Is there really existing Java software that would be suitable on this device? I have two of these units in my office, and they did not ship with any Java apps, only a dumb gfx demo and an animated applet from the web.
    2. Re:Apps? by Dg93 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ummm - no. The Personal Java spec is aimed at lightweight machines, and was at jdk 1.1.8 because it doesn't have a lot of the (enterprise app driven) overhead of the Java2 platform. It has nothing to do with supporting applets.

      Java is much more than applets.

      --Dg, a java developer who hasn't written an applet in 4 years

      --
      --Dg
  8. Re:What it needs by 1010011010 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Iv'e not found anything particularly nice about WinCE or its included apps. I find Windows more difficult to program for than Linux, using GTK. I've not started programming with QT, but it looks as easy, maybe easier. I'll avoid the JVM.

    I agree with your "quirks" assessment. As I mentioned earlier, it still needs some "fit and finish." For instance, a way to edit /etc/pcmcia/* without a text editor. For instance, this would be nice:

    1) insert Linksys 802.11b card
    2) Zaurus sees if it is already listed in config files
    3) if no, start a configuration app that asks what kind of device it is, etc.
    4) zaurus modifies config files

    ... the same app could be used to view/configure already configured devices, or configure a device in advance of plugging it in. Or read an installer file from an SD or CF card that contains drivers for a new device. OR read installer packages on the device that came over from IntelliSync. Maybe they'll do things like this in the retail model. This is the developer model, the "D" on the model number is there for a reason. You have a pre-release device. They even cut the RAM in half (to 32MB) to encourage developers to write smaller apps. It absolutely rocks for a pre-release developer model. I can't wait to see the final version.

    Also, as far as the remote-desktop thing goes, I can use VNC on the Zaurus to do the same thing, and it works with windows, macs and unix, unlike "Terminal Services."

    --
    Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  9. yes, the apps... by vscjoe · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Now we just need apps! apps! apps! so that Sharp will ship this thing retail and sell them at best buy.

    As an open source developer, why would I want to develop for an embedded toolkit that almost nobody uses? A toolkit that's put out in this form as an advertising gimmick by a software company? A toolkit that takes over the screen and excludes all other open source GUI software?

    And as a commercial developer, why would I want to develop for a toolkit that's more expensive than an MSDN subscription and is used on almost no platforms?

    Sharp shot themselves in the foot when they picked Lineo and Qt/Embedded--there is no way this is going to attract a large developer following. They should have gone with X11/FLTK on Familiar or something combo like that. It's too bad, too, because the hardware is really nice.

    1. Re:yes, the apps... by 1010011010 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A toolkit that's put out in this form as an advertising gimmick by a software company?

      Actually, my spy network tells me that Sharp paid TrollTech to develop QPE.

      toolkit that's more expensive than an MSDN

      They will apparently be lowering the price.

      They should have gone with X11/FLTK

      Mmm... ugly, non-portable, AND obscure. A winning combo. QT can at least be used on Windows, Mac, Linux, Solaris, etc. :)

      I do wonder if they (or someone else) will ship Wince for this thing at some point. Not that I want Wince.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    2. Re:yes, the apps... by vscjoe · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "They should have gone with X11/FLTK"

      Mmm... ugly, non-portable, AND obscure. A winning combo. QT can at least be used on Windows, Mac, Linux, Solaris, etc. :)

      I'm not sure what you mean. FLTK runs on Windows, UNIX, Linux, and MacOS, with several other ports in the work. It's tiny, and you'd be hard pressed telling an FLTK application from ones written in other toolkits. And it's the de-facto standard for handheld Linux and lots of applications have been written in it.

      But with X11, you aren't limited to one toolkit, you can still run Qt apps if you like. Qt/Embedded pretty much forces everybody to buy into Qt, a great business move for Troll Tech, but no good for everybody else.

      Actually, my spy network tells me that Sharp paid TrollTech to develop QPE.

      So? Qt is still being released under the GPL to generate business for Qt from commercial customers. You may think that arrangement is pretty swell, I think it will ultimately kill Linux on handhelds if any commercial developer has to pay thousands of dollars before being able to create GUI software for something like the Sharp.

  10. VAMPIRES! by tempest303 · · Score: 3, Funny
    Oh my GOD!! Check out the claws in this pic!

    The dead have risen, and they're reviewing handhelds! AAAHHHHHHH!!!!

  11. I have one of these... by bc90021 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    And I've been using it for half a week now. Some things to note:

    • The handwriting recognition isn't that bad. It requires you to train the device for certain characters if you want your own handwriting to work, but that doesn't take much time.
    • IBM MicroDrives work with no problem. I have a 340MB version, and several other Zaurus owners have reported the 1GB version working. (Though they drain the battery quickly.)
    • There are already tons of programs that have been ported. SSH, Telnet, Seminole Web Server, Jikes, Python, BitchX, Konqueror, NMap, and Perl to name just a few.
    • The keyboard is really easy (and actually kinda fun) to use!
    • The synching for Windows could use a little work, but it is a developer's model. Someone has already patched the 2.4.x kernels to allow USB networking over Linux in order to connect it to a Linux box, so it is now Linux friendly. :)
    • The "Word Game" that comes with it (like Scrabble) has been very addicting!
    • It is easily 80% of the size of a typical WinCE handheld, and includes two expansion slots (one CF and one SD) by default.

    Overall, it's a very neat little device. Since it is only a developer's version, it still has its few kinks to work out. But I won't be buying another PDA for a good long time.
  12. My review, as submitted to slashdot weeks ago by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's my review of the Sharp Zaurus. Maybe it sucks, and that's why it wasn't published as a Slashdot story? Anyway, you can read it for yourself.
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    1. Re:My review, as submitted to slashdot weeks ago by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

      You *sure* it says that???
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  13. RAD IDE Tools Available Today by KarmaBlackballed · · Score: 2


    programming for WinCE/Windows using any of the nice RAD tools that you can get, and I don't see so much in the way of linux


    Since the Zaurus runs Java, you can use any number of Java RAD IDEs today to write your code. Forte and Visual Age are two free ones that come to mind.

    --

    --- -- - -
    Give me LIBERTY, or give me a check.
    1. Re:RAD IDE Tools Available Today by Telek · · Score: 2

      Visual Age is a POS really, I tried it and it's horrbile.

      And I have an inherant dislike of Java because it's designed to be inefficient and slow. It's a beast. I have been programming in it fulltime now for a year however, and I can appreciate that it comes with libraries that make things easy, however I dislike the language itself. It's like the "oohhh, no you're not smart enough to play with pointers!" type of thing. I know that in many cases programmers don't want to care about memory allocation and pointers, but what if I like optimization and efficiency? There should at least be some way to give me that functionality.

      Having said that, C# looks rather interesting.

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
  14. Re:PDA's not what they're cracked up to be... by fwr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Depending on where you are located it's possible you shouldn't be using your cell phone in the car anyway, let alone working on some DPA. Perhaps it would be beneficial to use the scheduling features of PDA's so that you are not pressed into making appointments and holding meetings while driving a car. If you're that important, then hire a driver so that you can really do your job while travelling.

  15. Re:JDK 1.1.8? by mlanett · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually there is no significant difference between JDK118 and J2ME. Minor security classes.

    The major addition to J2SE was Swing, which nobody in their right mind would use on a PDA. Unfortunately most RADs only emit Swing code. However for PDA you're talking hand-written small code (AWT).

  16. Zauru by mduckworth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hey, My roomate has the japanese equivalent, the Zaurus MI-E1 which has been out in japan for over a year now. He was over there last winter. He has all sorts of attachments for it including the Compact flash digital camera. This device is pretty amazing, the japanese one has an SH processor and runs ZaurusOS but it's very very sweet. Full screen mpeg4 video is not a problem for it. It's very fast, and this american one should be faster and a lot more amazing. These things put Ipaq's to shame, trust me ;)

  17. hmmmm by Capt.+Beyond · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I got mine on Monday. It's now sunday, and I can now upload emacs to it.

    geeky little thing. this device was meant to be wireless.

    Alot has been said about the headphone jack vs. speaker. I can't really understand this. Did a walkman have a speaker? The Zaurus can output 44.1/16 bit audio, and your never going to get that from a little tiny pda speaker. I applaud their decision to do that.

    It has a speaker for beeps, congks and groans, anyway.

    The keyboard is a nice feature. Not at all difficult to peck out messages and letters fairly fast.

    and handwriting terminal commands is really bizaar!!! well worth the price paid!!

    --
    -- "Perceptions create reality. By changing your perceptions you change your reality."
  18. Re:Embedded QT by vscjoe · · Score: 2

    If it ran X11, it wouldn't just have Qt applications ported over, it would also have all the AgendaVR and Familiar programs ported over, plus the handwriting recognition and input software.

  19. Questions... by vscjoe · · Score: 2

    The device runs Lineo and Qt/Embedded. Is Lineo completely open source or are there proprietary components? Can I recompile every binary on it from scratch? Is the screen buffer driver code in its version of Qt/Embedded open source (so that one can port X11 to it)?

    1. Re:Questions... by vscjoe · · Score: 2
      The Qt/E on the Zaurus afaik is a licensed version from TrollTech, though a non commercial version running under the GPL can be acquired from TrollTech.

      So that would suggest that the actual display code running on the the Sharp is, in fact, not open source (this is one of the reasons why dual licenses are so annoying). What about other parts of Lineo?

      Running Qtopia under X11 is currently tried by several people and there is an interesting project running a VNC server on top of X11 so the built-in VNC client can display it under Qtopia.

      Running X11 applications under VNC popped up through a VNC server under Qtopia is not an acceptable solution for any software you want to use regularly or give to other people: the window management doesn't integrate and you can't cut and paste. Furthermore, some of the most important X11 utilities aren't useful in that mode: input methods, screen dump, session record/playback, shortcuts, etc.

      Running Qtopia under X11 is currently tried by several people

      That will be nice for users of the iPaq and other X11-based handhelds, who will then get the same handheld apps that run on the Sharp without the limitations of its "embedded" display engine.

  20. Very nice! by ddmckay · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just got back from the LISA '01 conference and there was a guy (can't remember his name...) that had a SHARP there. He had received it on Thursday before the conference and was showing it off at the Linux on Handhelds BOF.

    I got a chance to use it and it was quite nifty. The thumb keyboard is very usable. I opened a terminal window and was able to type in a few stock UNIX commands, no problems. The keyboard's main problem was a lack of control keys and the escape key. They may be there with some funny mapping, but I couldn't find them in the few minutes I had to play with the device.

    The other impression I got was how well built the device is. It's much stronger than it looks and the slide that hides the keyboard has a nice solid feel to it.

    I'm planning on ordering one in the next few days...

  21. Depends on what you're doing... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    A PDA can hold books, documentation, specialized application software, personal notes, appointments, and play calculator- all of which will take up vastly less space than the notebook, daily organizer, and calculator. If you can afford one, it's NOT pointless. If not, well, you CAN fall back to what you suggest.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  22. Guess you don't know a lot about FLTK do you? by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    "Mmm... ugly, non-portable, AND obscure. A winning combo. QT can at least be used on Windows, Mac, Linux, Solaris, etc. :)"

    FLTK can be used on Windows, MacOS, Linux (and anything running X11...). As for "ugly"- that'd be the default UI look and feel. You can produce NICE looking UI code with FLTK (Witness "Post Office", a mail program using FLTK as the GUI lib (http://www.tarball.net/postoffice)- it looks as polished as many commercial products.) and the default UI look and feel is about to get an update with the 2.0 release that is currently in development.

    Don't get me wrong, Qt is nice. Qt, however, is much, much larger (even with Qt Embedded) than FLTK (2 or so Mb versus 200-400k for FLTK!) and requires special pre-processors to make the code go.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Guess you don't know a lot about FLTK do you? by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

      Guess you don't know a lot about FLTK do you?

      Apparently not. The tarball screenshots looked pretty nice. :)

      I wonder why the Agenda went with the Ugly theme for FLTK...

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  23. Personal Java by fm6 · · Score: 2
    Ah, good point. So my inference that Sharp wasn't serious about Java is obviously bogus. Oh well.

    But I find Sun's strategy in this area to be a little confused. On the one hand, they're EOLing Java 1.1.x. On the other hand they're still using it as a basis for PersonalJava with "possible inclusion" of Java 2 features. My guess (by percentages, I'll get one right eventually) is that they'd like all the handheld developers to migrate to J2ME, but are having trouble convincing people.

  24. finger nails from hell by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

    WOW, someone has to tell our reviewer to trim his hist finger nails... weird.

  25. Zaurus is awesome by Bill+Kendrick · · Score: 3, Informative
    Now, I have an entire To-do list filled with bugs, oddities, and ideas about the thing, but for only just coming out as even a developers' edition, this machine is quite mature. The community is great (although too many people ask "how do I make a pipe ('|') character?" on the lists... hint: It's Shift+Space!), and Sharp is going ALL OUT with this puppy.

    I was one of the lucky few invited to the Symposium they held the day before the Internet World Wireless West conference in San Jose last week (many, was that place desserted! - and, not too surprisingly, Sharp's booth was by far the kick-ass-est). (Not doubt because of all of the random Linux development I've done, including stuff for the Agenda (another Linux-based PDA).

    As for the hardware, it's quite sturdy (compared to my poor, beat up dev. edition of the Agenda), and the keyboard is a godsend. (I knew I'd love it, because I have a pager with a similar keyboard, and love it.) Now - the onscreen keyboard, pickboard, unicode and handwriting aren't to sneeze at, though. They're quite useful!

    It's just, when you whip out your PDA, turn it on to show off its color screen, and then pop out the keyboard, THAT's when people's eyes bug out. ;^) Anyway.. I love it. Expect plenty of games for it from me once I get my USB, development environment, etc. set up. (Oh, and learn Qt and that damned C++ language.)

  26. Qt and cost of development by jimfrost · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Qt is still being released under the GPL to generate business for Qt from commercial customers. You may think that arrangement is pretty swell, I think it will ultimately kill Linux on handhelds if any commercial developer has to pay thousands of dollars before being able to create GUI software for something like the Sharp.

    Actually, buying the development unit entitles you to the development software. Even if that weren't the case, though, it's pretty much the same place you're standing if you were developing for PalmOS or WinCE/PPC. Somebody here was saying that QPE was more money than MSDN. Uh, have you received your MSDN bill recently? Sure, if you're getting the docs only subscription it's still relatively cheap, but if you want those compilers you better cough up a lung.

    The best part about MSDN, for me, was sitting there opening my mail and watching the news and hearing that Microsoft had told the judge that they weren't a price-gouging monopoly. I opened my MSDN renewal invoice and in the span of one year the price had jumped 40%. That was the year that the last of the competitive Windows development tools producers gave up....

    As a developer I am not especially turned off by the fact that the whole thing isn't open source. It's more important that it be open information. This tool is the most open of any of the palm devices I've seen; anyone with any Linux or UNIX experience at all is going to be able to make this thing do backflips.

    Lots of people have been wondering where the market will be for this device, since Linux people are such a small market in and of themselves. I don't see that being the issue at all. We're the seed market, but the real market going out the door is going to be integrators and vertical market apps people. Java and superb 802.11b support? Damn, in a couple of weeks I could deploy this thing as a handheld database access tool with a custom application. And this can be done for about $600/unit ($100 less for the preproduction units). You can't touch the extensibility with the Palms and you can't touch the price with the PPCs.

    And that, my friends, is going to sell units -- even if they don't do anything to the unit at all by the time it ships.

    If there's any one thing I'd like to see, though, it would be Qt bindings for the Java interpreter. AWT sucks, and Swing (you /can/ get Swing) is just too much of a pig. Still, you really want the widgets ... and Qt has 'em and they're tight and fast like you wish Swing would be.

    It's a very interesting unit.

    --
    jim frost
    jimf@frostbytes.com
    1. Re:Qt and cost of development by vscjoe · · Score: 2
      Even if that weren't the case, though, it's pretty much the same place you're standing if you were developing for PalmOS or WinCE/PPC.

      If the proposition is "this is no worse than PalmOS or WinCE", that's not a particularly good one. I expect more from Linux, and not just technically.

      This tool is the most open of any of the palm devices I've seen;

      Perhaps you haven't seen much then. The Compaq iPaq runs full Linux with X11 and allows you to use whatever toolkit you like. The AgendaVR runs a full version of Linux and X11 as well. Availability of powerful handhelds running fully open Linux has not been a problem.

      anyone with any Linux or UNIX experience at all is going to be able to make this thing do backflips.

      Well, no. A Java programmer can create Java applications for it, but a Java programmer can also create Java applications for Palm or WinCE. A C programmer can't write any GUI apps for it. And a C++ programmer has to learn a new toolkit and completely change the GUI code of their existing X11 applications.

      It's a very interesting unit.

      It is. It is also too bad that Sharp didn't have the guts to go with completely open and unencumbered software and standards.

    2. Re:Qt and cost of development by jimfrost · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Even if that weren't the case, though, it's pretty much the same place you're standing if you were developing for PalmOS or WinCE/PPC.

      If the proposition is "this is no worse than PalmOS or WinCE", that's not a particularly good one. I expect more from Linux, and not just technically.

      I don't much buy into the theory that Linux ought to be an all-free-or-nothing proposition. If it is the case that I can get a better tool if I pay for it (and, historically, that has been very much the case) then I'm happy to pay for it.

      This tool is the most open of any of the palm devices I've seen;

      Perhaps you haven't seen much then. The Compaq iPaq runs full Linux with X11 and allows you to use whatever toolkit you like. The AgendaVR runs a full version of Linux and X11 as well. Availability of powerful handhelds running fully open Linux has not been a problem.

      I don't count the iPAQ as an "open" palmtop because, when you pull it out of the package, it's proprietary all the way. Granted you can convert it, but I have a lot of better things to do with my time than doing that kind of thing, and I certainly have no intention of trying to sell palmtop software that's created for an iPAQ running Linux until Compaq sells them that way, hopefully for obvious reasons.

      Even if you do, the iPAQ is a substantially larger and more expensive unit (at least if you want expansion capabilities). Cheap stuff wins.

      anyone with any Linux or UNIX experience at all is going to be able to make this thing do backflips.

      Well, no. A Java programmer can create Java applications for it, but a Java programmer can also create Java applications for Palm or WinCE. A C programmer can't write any GUI apps for it. And a C++ programmer has to learn a new toolkit and completely change the GUI code of their existing X11 applications.

      Well, ok, some UNIX programmers will have to learn some new tricks to make it sing, but they ought to be fairly comfortable doing things with it.

      Regarding rewriting GUI code for X11 applications, I would kind of expect that to do a good job for a palmtop application you're going to have to rework you UI to a significant degree anyway -- different form factor and input considerations usually means different design. The fact that Microsoft didn't want to do that has a lot to do with why WinCE sucked so much.

      YMMV, of course, but this is unit has a lot of potential in my opinion. The fact that there are likely to be a lot of different handhelds running Linux doesn't change that, although it does make this one even more appealing to me as an early-adopter system.

      I suppose how interesting this is, versus something like an iPAQ with Linux, has a lot to do with your goals. I don't want a device for personal hacking, I want a tool that makes it easy for me to build software I can sell.

      --
      jim frost
      jimf@frostbytes.com
  27. Re:What it needs by Telek · · Score: 2

    MFC is very very old.

    I have a circa 1995 program called Optima Power++ that makes it so incredibly easy to develop in C++ for windows... Like Visual Basic made easy for C... very very sweet. I can still use that to design the UI and then write the guts in a newer RAD tool... It's great. Very very easy. I don't think that anything like this exists quite yet for linux, but if I am wrong please tell me where!

    --

    If God gave us curiosity
  28. Re:Delete Microsoft Astroturfing by Telek · · Score: 2

    if anything I was dissing microsoft... I don't know what colour those glasses are that you're looking at the world with... :)

    Yes, and there is a LOT more of the ignorant "micro$oft $uXX" posts running around than there are posts defending or supporting microsoft, so how come you don't complain about those?

    --

    If God gave us curiosity
  29. Re:What it needs by Telek · · Score: 2

    Uh guys, VNC is to Terminal Services like what telnet is to X-windows. VNC is much slower, flaky, and doesn't have full compatibility.

    With Terminal Services you can redirect sound, print jobs and serial port and floppy access, and mount your local drives on your remote machine for easy access. Last I checked VNC can't do that.

    I love it, because I just leave my computer on with my ICQ and email and everything running, come in to work (where we are behind a firewall, but the TS port is open), and just connect back home and it's like I'm sitting there.

    Yes, and I am well aware of x-windows as well, but that doesn't allow you to connect to an already running session. It does have the advantage that it's not transmitting screen captures like VNC is.

    And I have heard about plenty of "quirks" and errors and problems with using linux, so ...

    And tell me, on your blue screen of death, what was the message? I'd bet that it was due to shitty hardware or a driver incompatibility, and last time I checked you cannot hold Microsoft responsible for what 3rd parties write... Thus driver errors are *NOT* microsoft's problem, but hey, I was running Win2K and it BSOD'd so it must be MS's fault, right? Couldn't be that third rate ISA sound card that I just installed...

    So yes, to quote you it is absolutely amazing how ignorant people are about what's out there...

    --

    If God gave us curiosity
  30. Re:JDK 1.1.8? by Yokaze · · Score: 2

    Unless there is some fact in this statement, which is not apparent to my eyes, we still have to guess the actual size of a Java2 API supporting VM.

    The PJAE provides an API equivalent to the Java 1.1.8 API.
    I'd say therefor there is no such fact, which shows us, how large an assumed, because nonexistant, Java 1.3 or even Java 1.4 VM for the Zaurus is. Hence, we have to guess.

    The increase of size for the Intel JREs gives us an idea about the probable increase.
    My _guess_ is that a Java 1.4 API compatible JRE would be roughly 3 times larger.

    The "less than 2MB of ROM, 1MB of RAM..." just gives you a basis to extrapolate the absolute size.

    --
    "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"