Slashdot Mirror


Google Expands Usenet Archive to 20 Years

Paul Boutin writes "The Ghost of Usenet Postings Past has returned to haunt many more of us: Google just announced the expansion of their Usenet archive back to May 3, 1981."Check out the past on Groups.google.com

30 of 499 comments (clear)

  1. Oh dear by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ahh, to be young and brash again... oh, wait. Noooooooo!! Glad I've changed my email address since those long-(best)forgotten days. It wasn't me, I swear!

    --
    "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
  2. Nostalgia by Lunastorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's nice to browse through the archives and read my various posts over the years. How I've grown. :)

    It should be noted that not all groups are archived. I recently checked out one of my favorites and after the name of it, it said (This group is no longer archived). That's a shame, because I would love to read the older stories of alt.sex.stories.

    I wish that one can access the Google Groups through a news reader such as Pan, because I really don't like the interface Google provides, and one reallly can't change any of their account settings for posting. I was hoping these things would be fixed in beta, but I guess it's OK as it is.

    --
    You die too easily.
  3. Kinda cool by bryan1945 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Younger folks probably won't find this too interesting as it will be more like history to them rather than us old farts re-living younger days...

    I went to the Google link where they have a list of firsts:

    First mention of Microsoft; not even the oldest post!
    IBM PC.
    CDs, in 1982! Shit, now I realize how old I am!
    C64, Lisa and Mac, AIDS (a purely homosexual disease?!?!- really weird 'cause I just found an old copy of Discover magazine that had a first mention of AIDS; blew me away due to difference in info we know now)

    I love the "WorldWideWeb - Executive Summary" link under the Google link:

    A bit of the text-
    "
    Making a web is as simple as writing a few SGML files which point to your existing data. Making it public involves running the FTP or HTTP daemon, and making at least one link into your web from another. In fact, any file available by anonymous FTP can be immediately linked into a web. The very small start-up effort is designed to allow small contributions. At the other end of the scale, large information providers may provide an HTTP server with full text or keyword indexing.

    The WWW model gets over the frustrating incompatibilities of data format between suppliers and reader by allowing negotiation of format between a smart browser and a smart server. This should provide a basis for extension into
    multimedia, and allow those who share application standards to make full use of them across the web.

    This summary does not describe the many exciting possibilities opened up by the WWW project, such as efficient document caching. the reduction of redundant out-of-date copies, and the use of knowledge daemons. There is more information in the online project documentation, including some background on hypertext and many technical notes.

    Try it
    "

    SGML! Does anyone remember this! "Try it" indeed! Wow, when I thought Usenet was the shit... hehehe!

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  4. Milestones on the page by twilight30 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Anyone notice the milestones listed on the page? I was quite charmed by the 'Stallman announces GNU' post -- mostly by the fact that like Torvalds on Linux, his tone is very modest (well, unlike what morphed later-- speaking in comparative terms only).

    Anyway.

    --
    ========================================
    Death will come, and will have your eyes
    -- Pavese
    1. Re:Milestones on the page by __past__ · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Anyone notice the milestones listed on the page? I was quite charmed by the 'Stallman announces GNU' post

      Reading this post, I was more impressed by another point:

      To begin with, GNU will be a kernel plus... [Stallman, 1983]

      Then, in Linus' announcement (eight years later):

      I can (well, almost) hear you asking yourselves "why?". Hurd will be out in a year (or two, or next month, who knows) [Torvalds, 1991]

      Some things will never change. When do they play to release the Hurd again?

  5. Re:Wow by Sivax256 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This comes within half a month of covering my whole life. That I think is very cool now I can go back when I am 90 years old and see what went on 15 days after i was born.

  6. Lesseee Here! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Every post from alt.pave.the.earth
    and
    alt.culture.electric-midget

    This is the stuff that really bears the test of time! Not to metion the great AOL flood of 1995, and the annual rites of September.

    What else? 20 years of tjames and kibo.

    1.1 Why pave the earth?

    There are several advantages of a paved Earth over a non-paved Earth, the only really important one is the ease of driving though. Today roads are narrow, you have to turn, and most governments frown at ground travel over Mach1. With endless blacktop in every direction, there will be no restriction to your movement, and rocket powered hypercars will whiz in all directions. We will be able to amuse ourselves with endless driving at incredible speeds while drinking beer and eating wonderfully juicy burgers.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  7. Can Google be declared historic landmark? by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Now that Google has a historian's wet-dream of actual writings by actual humans as they experienced historic events, such as the falling of the Berlin wall, what are the odds that someone at some point moves to ensure that this information is preserved? I think Google may be thinking very smart here. Their product could become so important that people might actively try to preserve the company, too.

  8. massive copyright violation by vscjoe · · Score: 0, Interesting
    I find this very offensive and intrusive. Those postings were made in the expectation that they were part of an informal, temporary discussion group, not a permanent archive searchable by anybody and everybody in perpetuity.

    And legally, those postings are not in the public domain and Google has no right to republish them beyond the purpose that their authors originally implicitly gave permission for: temporary distribution on USENET.

    1. Re:massive copyright violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      just because you expected it never to happen doesnt mean it shouldnt or wont happen. how do you know that in 5 years time all our posts on /. wont be archived somewhere? this is the very stuff that *should* be saved, because it gives people in the future a look at how things were by the general popular and not generalized or watered down

    2. Re:massive copyright violation by Lee+Bottemiller · · Score: 1, Interesting
      I find this very offensive and intrusive. Those postings were made in the expectation that they were part of an informal, temporary discussion group, not a permanent archive searchable by anybody and everybody in perpetuity.
      And legally, those postings are not in the public domain and Google has no right to republish them beyond the purpose that their authors originally implicitly gave permission for: temporary distribution on USENET.



      Point #1) You have just blabbed away your right to gripe when the RIAA and MPAA attempt to time-limit your use of "their" copyrighted material.

      Point #2) This very question of the copyright status of public postings has been tried and precedent has been set: Your Usenet posts aren't really copyrighted.

      How do I know? When I wanted my Usenet tracks covered and DejaNews wouldn't comply, the EFF referred me to an attorney who had tried the actual precedent-setting case.

      Suggestion #1) Adjust your expectations of privacy downward.

      Suggestion #2) Adjust them downward once again.

      Suggestion #3) Schedule monthly privacy-expectation adjustment sessions.

      Psycho babble: Your posts are just as much a part of you as the events in your life. Embrace them as part of your humanity. I love you. No USENET post will ever change that.

  9. MIME, PR0N, the good old days. by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    base64 is part of MIME from the start of the 90'ties, and wasn't really used on Usenet before mid 90'ties. Before that we used uuencode, however there was very little pr0n back then, and low quality. ASCII art comapred favorable to it. You couldn't upload much with 2400 baud modem.

    We loved it, though!

  10. some thoughts about it in comparison to ./ by dario_moreno · · Score: 4, Interesting

    like almost everyone else, I typed my "real name"...and found 293 articles dating back
    to april 1992. Excepted for my most private
    and personal life, you could guess almost
    exactly who I am, what is my career, hobbies
    and so on... On ./, anonymity and disguise
    seem to be more prevalent than on Usenet.

    Amazing also to see that before 1994 or so,
    there were only educated, polite, informative
    people on the face of the earth (and I looked
    like a bad-taught puppy in comparison to them).
    At this point, with AOLers and non-academics
    appearing, something definitely changed.

    --
    Google passes Turing test : see my journal
    1. Re:some thoughts about it in comparison to ./ by lahi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are almost right, although you are one year off. Before 1993, Usenet tended to get a mass of idiot postings in September. However, September 1993 was the September that never ended. Try searching for "September 1993" AND Usenet.

      Actually, I believe it was bad even earlier than that. In April 1993, Gene Spafford posted this:
      http://groups.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=1rpq88 IN Njlk%40ector.cs.purdue.edu&hl=en

      This is IMO one of the best - if also depressing - posts I've seen on Usenet, which I have been using since about 1991. That message for me marks the end of the "good old" Usenet. I'm glad I had the chance to see it live before it vanished.

      -Lasse

  11. Re:ok, so how do we delete our posts? by Peter+Dyck · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You don't.

    What is it with you people? An marvellous and unique archive like this will become completely useless if people like you want to start censoring it.

    Take the responsibility for your posts!

  12. !mcvax!moskvax!kremvax!chernenko by wirefarm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm surprised that nobody mentioned this one yet.
    Still a favorite of mine:

    USSR on Usenet


    Of course, now nobody thinks twice when they see a Russian address, but back then it was a big deal.
    (To the younger readers: They were the bad guys back then, the "Evil Empire"...)

    And now, let's open a flask of Vodka and have a drink on our entry on
    this network. So:

    NA ZDAROVJE!

    Cheers,
    Jim in Tokyo

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  13. Re:That darn Google... by aussersterne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    *sucks in air*

    No doubt. I just went and had a read at a whole bunch of posts from 10-15 years ago in which I was often a real prick [and strangely enough, in which I seem to have more technical/coding prowess than I have now!?!]. There's nothing like humble pie and complete red-eared embarrassment at three in the morning -- embarrassment first at how one was acting, and second at no longer being able to fully understand technical discussions from one's own teenagehood!

    I'm in my late twenties now. I'm an author. My name is out there and is unique. Now, when people type my name into Google, they're going to pull up stuff I posted via free BBSs and tech bars when I was a prick of a teenaged punk-rocker in the '80s who [it would seem] really had a problem or two.

    *cringe*

    I'm going to go hide my head in the sand for a while, then quickly ink-jet myself a "live and learn" t-shirt.

    [Then, as soon as the sun comes up, I'm heading downtown to change my name.]

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  14. Re:Hmmmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Is it only me who has a hard time imagining people born in the 80's being able to walk and talk? Imagine that there are people using computers today who weren't even around when the C-64 was introduced! Heck, a person born at the same time as the Amiga was born would be 17 years old today!! Damn, I feel old.

  15. My past osama's by deathcow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Advanced google groups search yields Osama from Feb/19/1994

    Text: In The Statement Sent To Several Saudi Newspapers, The Bin
    Laden Family Members Said They Want To Disassociate Themselves
    From Osama Bin Laden.

    Osama Bin Laden Is Believed To Be Living In Sudan And Is Said To
    Have Been A Main Financial Backer Of The So-Called Afghan Arabs.
    They Are Muslim Arabs Who Fought Alongside The Afghan Mujahedin
    Against Soviet Forces In Afghanistan.

    The Bin Laden Statement Was Signed By Bakr Mohamed Bin Laden,
    Osama Bin Laden'S Brother. In Their Statement The Family Said
    All Family Members -- Whose Number Exceeds 50 -- Would Like To
    Express Their Regret, Denunciation, And Condemnation For All Acts
    That Osama Bin Laden May Have Committed, Which, In Their Words,
    We Do Not Condone And Which We Reject.

    Osama Bin Laden Has Been Specially Mentioned In Connection With A
    Group That Has Committed Several Acts Of Violence In Yemen. The
    Bin Laden Family Comes Originally From The Southern Part Of
    Yemen. Some Family Members Emigrated To Saudi Arabia Decades
    Ago. (Signed)

  16. Re:Good thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Their list is great to browse through, but there are some real gems off the beaten path as well...

    For instance, google points you to: "October, 1991 Linus Torvalds's Linux announcement"

    But you can also find a quite interesting, more preliminary announcement from him a few months earlier: "What would you like to see most in minix?"

    You can also read about Rob Malda's "Weird Problem while booting...", which is also the first time he calls himself 'Commander Taco' on Usenet. (October 1995)

    Post your interesting finds!

  17. Re:ok, so how do we delete our posts? by khuber · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I don't think deleting your own posts qualifies as censorship.

    P.S. I deleted all that stuff I said about your wife when I was real drunk.

    -Kevin

  18. Prior Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Here's where you should dig for prior art references.. it would be nice to tailor your query like "Where date[some patent date]"

    www.bigattichouse.com

  19. Re:That darn Google... by eXtro · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Being able to remove your own articles from a public forum beyond the "Oh shit! I hope I can cancel that before it propogates" devalues the archive and makes me lose a lot of respect for the people behind google.com. I've posted things I wish I wouldn't have on usenet before. Big deal. There was a bit of embarassment when my dad discovered how to search for my name on groups.google.com, but there were a lot more things that he was proud of. He didn't necessarily understand them, but he could see that they were well received.


    If you do things in public then you shouldn't be able to excise them from the publics memory, even if the thing you did was make a spectacular ass of yourself.

  20. Political offices and past postings by AgTiger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Given that this archive now stretches back to 1981, I'm left wondering how this will affect some of the younger politicians with aspirations of getting elected to grander seats of power. Politicians who follow in Clinton's footsteps, for instance, might have much more difficulty convincing people that they didn't inhale, if they have a long posting history to rec.drugs.cannabis.

  21. First mention of slashdot by jonearth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First mention of slashdot

    http://groups.google.com/groups?q=slashdot&hl=en &s coring=d&as_drrb=b&as_mind=17&as_minm=1&as_miny=19 97&as_maxd=11&as_maxm=8&as_maxy=1997&rnum=5&selm=5 cr9je%24j2i%40mirrors.cellnet.com

    :P

  22. First (and only?) post by Bill Gates by toast- · · Score: 4, Interesting

    First post (and not even under his own account) can be found here.

    Maybe other celebrities can be found in the archive..

    Find the article
    here

  23. Linus Torvald's first post on USENET! by Andreas(R) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    His first post. It was posted in 1991.

    I think this is kind of scary (if it's abused like what I am doing here)

  24. Where did they dig the data up from??? by silentbozo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Where in the world did they dig this data up from? Were these tapes that Deja had somehow acquired, but never read in, or did Google actually root around and restore backups from way back when, and if so, from who did they get the tapes from???

    I figure that Google has to be getting these posts from trusted sources, or else you could inject false data into the historical archives. Anyone know for sure?

    I gotta say, it's weird seeing how much I used to post. Of course, it was back when USENET was actually useful, and not clogged with spam and idiots... The funny thing is, that AOL used to be the same way (back when that was one of the few ways outside of academia to get something like an e-mail address, remember bitnet?) but that was even farther in the past...

  25. Fascinating -- check it out! by drix · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This is really fascinating, almost like a time capsule! Can you even imagine a time when everyone in the entire online world didn't know what an emoticon was?! Witness this extraordinary paragraph:
    Recently, Scott Fahlman at CMU devised a scheme for annotating one's messages to overcome this problem. If you turn your head sideways to look at the three characters :-) they look sort of like a smiling face. Thus, if someone sends you a message that says "Have you stopped beating your wife?:-)" you know they are joking. If they say "I need to talk to you :-(", be prepared for trouble.
    You read these phrases like, "A company called Microsoft," or "A new virus called AIDS"; what a throwback. Very cool!
    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
  26. Two interesting posts by arnex · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Q: Who posted this question back in May 1995?

    A: The same guy who posted this request a few days earlier.

    And look where we are now.