Slashdot Mirror


Accounting Systems on Linux?

cuebei asks: "OK, Slashdotters - let's talk accounting systems for small-mid sized businesses. With the popularity of Linux servers running various e-business services such as web, directory, mail, commerce, etc, it only makes sense for Linux to become a more mainstream platform in the business world. One of the areas where I can foresee Linux being used extensively is in the area of accounting. Linux is both reliable and scalable, two key requirements for any accounting package. So who uses Linux for HR/Accounting? What options are out there? Open-source or commercial? If you were starting your own business and standardized on Linux as a platform, what accounting package would you use and why?"

16 of 399 comments (clear)

  1. SQL Ledger by _ivan · · Score: 5, Informative

    GPL'd, web-based, double entry accounting system
    for businesses. Full internationalization support
    for several languages, currencies and chart of
    accounts, written in Perl. Good stuff.
    Webpage here

    GNUCash is *not* a business accounting system.
    It is a *personal* accounting system.

    1. Re:SQL Ledger by Nate+Fox · · Score: 5, Informative

      Funny, I just had one of my clients want to test this out, so he gave me one of his servers to set this up on. He wanted me to install both SQL-Ledger and NOLA. Preliminary results as far as a sysadmin is concerned:

      SQL-Ledger: Rocks. VERY easy to set up, documentation is complete, and from what my client tells me, theres more modules available than most of the commercial stuff he's looked at. Its running on a Debian Potato system, and almost everything is stock (read: stable). All I added was a source install of pgsql, and added the couple of Perl modules via the CPAN perl shell. I think I had the entire thing runnin in less than an hour, from poppin in the 2.2r4 cd to firing up Moz on my other box.

      NOLA: An absolute bitch to set up. Not only does all the documentation end in .doc (with .pdf's on the web...no text/html that I could find), but its EXTREMELY incomplete. It doesnt say what needs to be compiled with PHP (thats my biggest complaint - took me about 6 recompiles to figure out wtf it wanted in PHP). It dynamically generates most of its buttons via libgd, and they dont even look that good. Its got a lot of wizbang stuff, but they haven't worked on the actual use of it much. Not to mention it suggests using the absolute latest libs for things. I'd rather a production system not rely on the bleeding edge. I suggest staying away from it for a while till it matures.

      Welp, there's my $0.02. Like I said..I'm the admin who's settin it all up...I haven't really used either of them, but a lot of times you can tell how good of a project it is by how easy it is to set up (ie: how good the documentation is).

    2. Re:SQL Ledger by larsu · · Score: 5, Informative

      Disclaimer: I work for Noguska, the main company behind NOLA.

      Installing solely from the source tarball is currently much more difficult than need be. We do however provide an iso image file in our downloads section with a complete installer for Apache/PHP/MySQL for both Windows and Linux/Unix servers.

      Also, our UI is currently undergoing extensive changes, and things are changing nightly.

      Thanks for checking it out!

  2. Accounting and HR on Linux? Yikes. by muonzoo · · Score: 5, Informative

    It might just be me, but in my former experience being a SysAdmin for several junior oil companies, one thing really stood out in the IT and infrastructure areas: These people were extra conservative.

    Whereas the exploration group was running on really nice (for the time) new SGI machines, the production group was being more reserved with Sparc/SUN solutions and the accounting department was positively in the dark ages with an old AS/400 mainframe. It was considered quite radical when they migrated to a bunch of AIX boxes and they were terrified to do it.

    Don't misunderstand me, I'd love to see the adoption of linux and open-source solutions in this arena, but I feel that this is likely an area that will meet with substantial resistance.

  3. BillMax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Our company uses BillMax, but my personal view is that the system was cobbled together without much thought on scalability and is missing a lot of features. We are currently porting the system over to an in-house PHP application.

    I suggest staying away from BillMax unless you really want to adapt your company to it instead of the other way around (as it should be)

    Anonymous for a reason.

  4. Go all the way with ERP by swizkid · · Score: 5, Informative

    An "accounting" package is not enough these days. Lets face it, developing relationships with customers is what it's all about. Which means that getting information in and out of your systems in the quickest possible manner is what will win in the face of competition. Enterprise Resource Planning systems from the likes of SAP and Oracle are what give big business the edge. Sure you don't have $250K to spend on solutions from these guys but Appgen, Compiere, and GNU Enterprise are bringing these kind of systems to the masses. The most promising at the moment seems to be Compiere but it does require some up-front costs - (nothing a small business could'nt handle if they were planning on a Windows deployment anyway). Check them out!

    --
    He who knows not what his nose knows......
  5. What about SAP ? by Afrob · · Score: 5, Informative

    mySAP has been running on
    Linux for quite some time now.
    But perhaps that's nothing for small businesses ;-).

    --
    -- www.linux-laser.org - Open Source Laser Show Software for Linux
  6. Hansa by Howie · · Score: 3, Informative

    You may want to take a look at Hansa Financials, which is now available on Linux. We were looking at it a few years ago as a back-end to integrate with an e-commerc product (never happened).

    The nice parts are that the system has a documented client/server protocol (which they call "Open TCP/IP" for no good reason). Can run on Windows, Mac and Linux. Fairly sensible licensing, from memory. Nice people.

    From my limited experience (I'm no accountant), it did what you'd expect, but you saw a lot more of the database directly than you do with Sage Line 50 (the other package I know a bit about).

    --
    "don't fall into the fallacy of believing that Perl can solve social problems. Maybe Perl 6 can, but that's a ways off"
  7. WyattERP by Kismet · · Score: 3, Informative

    Check out the WyattERP project. It is an Open Source ERP for Linux. There is already at least one medium-sized company that runs nothing but WyattERP for all its needs - from the receptionist to invoicing to HR.

  8. use what you are now - AccPac on Linux by Nailer · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't live in the US, and I never will. But from what I have heard, AccPac performs the same role (ubiquitous SME accounting software) that MYOB does in my own beautiful country, Australia.

    AccPac have a Linux port.
    * It seems to be software you can get competant accountant with many years experience using, minimising training costs and staff overtime while necessary to move to a new system
    * It has a fairly good reputation and large amounts of existing systems
    * it can import data in a wide variety of formats from its competitors.

    It's not Open Source, but it might be the best tool for the job, which should be any competant technical persons criteria for selecting software.

  9. SQL-Ledger vs NOLA & DB backends by chiguy · · Score: 3, Informative
    Ah, another PostgreSQL vs. MySQL product comparison.

    From the posts, SQL-Ledger uses a pgsql backend and NOLA uses a MySQL backend.

    I'm not sure what others think, but I for one would be very scared about using MySQL as a mission-critical backend.

    Several articles comparing the two (a good one here) have come up with the same basic complaints, MySQL might be fast in overall, but it fails 3 out of 4 of the basic ACID tests (Consistency, Isolation, and Durability). So it's extremely fault intolerent.

    PostgreSQL is fully ACID compliant and is thus a more reliable backend.

    Yes, there are plug-in table managers for MySQL that are ACID compliant, but it's nicer to know that the core product already meets these basic requirements for a robust database.

    So be sure you take a look at technology behind the systems before committing your critical systems to them.

    --
    passetspike!
  10. SQL Ledger and Security. by autrijus · · Score: 5, Informative
    I've been using and localizing sql-ledger for a while now, and it's definitely a very extensible and easy-to-use package.

    However, please Do Not use it as a remote administration / accounting tool that serves over the internet. Its place is inside the firewall.

    The reasons is that it doesn't have a session control-related audits. Any user that types in http://hostname/sql-ledger/ir.pl?login=admin&path= bin/mozilla could get into the syste under the name 'admin', given the attacker knows the username "admin" (not hard), and regardless of that account's permission. indeed the same scheme is workable on any other .pl program.

    You can apply This patch to fix it, if you don't worry about shared proxies.

    And yes, this patch has been sent to the author. His comment was more along the line of accountants are not script kiddies, so we don't need to worry too much. That is probably reasonable, too.

  11. Accounting's only part of it - you need middleware by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Informative

    As others have pointed out, SQL ledger is really quite nice but you need to be able to "plug it in" to the other business applications that are being used.

    So you either write SQL ledger modules for *everything* or you use some sort of middleware. I have a short document which describes why you need middleware:
    http://www.yelm.freeserve.co.uk/middleware/

    There's lots of very expensive and proprietary middleware systems from such companies as IBM and WebMethods. Something open would be handy.

    --
    Deleted
  12. Compiere is what you want by danpbrowning · · Score: 3, Informative

    I agree with one other poster who mentioned Compiere. It is a very complete, robust, and *awesome* ERP/CRM system. http://www.compiere.org

    --
    Daniel
  13. Re:Finally, a Slashdot topic I know too much about by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 3, Informative

    My wife uses Quickbooks for her hot gourmet web store Sam McGees. I find the following issues with Quickbooks:

    1. Frequent database corruption and no way to repair the database. Since whole shebang is one db file this is scary. We backup twice daily.

    2. Scalability. If you have a small customer database then it maybe fast enough, but we have several thousand customers it bogs down and becomes sloooooow. Current single file db is around 50 Mbytes.

    3. And foremost the database is inaccessible with no published API. I tried a while back with Quickbooks 2000 to import orders (transactions) from a flat file. Forget it. After hours of work I was able to get customers to import, but the documentation was incomplete and I had to find trick from the usenet to make it work.

  14. FreeMoney by chris_sawtell · · Score: 3, Informative
    You might like to try out Free Money

    It has been designed by people who really do know what they are doing and quite a lot of effort has gone into it recently.