Slashdot Mirror


The Internet Shifts East

Logic Bomb writes: "The San Francisco Chronicle has an article discussing the World Intellectual Property Organization's prediction that in less than 10 years, Chinese will be the most widely-used language on the web. Assuming the Internet becomes a truly global entity, this is an obvious (and mathematically correct) conclusion. On the other hand, the implementation of the Internet in places without certain civil liberties provides an interesting challenge to typical Western (idealist) notions about what the Internet does for society. Would you even consider the average wealthy Chinese citizen with online access truly 'on the Internet'? And how is the Internet supposed to draw people together when the same old language barrier still exists?"

28 of 447 comments (clear)

  1. "East" ? by mirko · · Score: 3, Funny

    Isn't China west from San Francisco ?

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:"East" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is it me or did the title illusively (subliminally) read "Internet Shit Feast" ???

  2. Slight mistake in the article by J.D.+Hogg · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Western news sites including CNN, the BBC and Reuters are routinely blocked"

    Since when CNN is a news site ? I see similarities between Chinese people who read the People's Daily and westerners who watch CNN.

    1. Re:Slight mistake in the article by Phroggy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Since when CNN is a news site ?

      When comparing it to Slashdot.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    2. Re:Slight mistake in the article by mizhi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "There are plenty of countries where that's not an option. You WILL get your news from politically-acceptable sources. You WILL view only acceptable web sites. And if you don't, then you can be dragged off to die in a slave labor camp or shot with your spouse billed for the ammunition. And China is exactly that kind of fascist rathole."

      Hmmm... you know, when I was in China... I had absolutely no problems reading /., going to the drudgereport, or accessing my mail. That's not to say that censorship does not exist in China, and their TV news shows most definitely present a slanted view of the world; especially the US... BUT, I think that the Western world gets its own healthy dose of propaganda and whenever I hear stuff about China that is of the ilk "China is a big, nasty evil country.", I question it now. Ofcourse, my ex-gf's father would tell her that certain topics could not be discussed safely over the phone, but then he would send it to her over mediaring... :-/ Perhaps I didn't stay there long enough, but my short stay there made a couple impressions on me... (1) We have alot of propoganda about China that is misleading or downright false (2) Chinese are some of the most capitalistic sobs I've ever met.

      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
  3. What about programming languages? by ssheth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While the content produced will increasingly come in many different languages as we move forward over the next few years, I still see little movement on the actual programming front.
    Today, 99% of all programming is still done in English which ends up giving a definite bias towards English as the language of the web.

    If someone comes out with some programming language that can be programmed in local languages and which gets popular, that is when I see a real shift happening in the base of the web. Otherwise, the content producer still ends up embedding their original language content inside English HTML .. which ends up meaning that he/she also must understand English, thereby limiting the scope of the Web to those who at least have a passing knowledge of English.

    1. Re:What about programming languages? by wangi · · Score: 3, Informative

      It makes absolutely no difference at all to the vast majority (say 99% at least) what their software is coded in, or what markup language looks like.

      They're interested in content for some strange reason...

      Are you really trying to say that if HTML is English-based then ALL Chinese have to have minimal English experience? I don't thik so...

    2. Re:What about programming languages? by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Recognizable keywords in your native lanugage aren't necessary at all. Ever use assembly language?

      XDR 0, 3
      PME 9, AX
      LLA AX, AH
      WNV BX, AX
      BCO 0, AX

      Think about Unix: How long did it take you to learn that "cat" means "display some text"? About a second? Yeah, that's about as long as it would take someone who spoke only German.

  4. Billion citizens != Billion Internet Users by -tji · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The latest UN statistics show China's per-capita income at $798 USD.

    Does that sort of income enable the purchase of a computer, or the recurring costs of a phone line and ISP?

    If it does, then what are the Internet applications driving this incredible influx of mandarin/cantonese users? Without the huge economic/retail motive that drove American adoption, it's hard to see the huge growth in users and services. And, obviously, there is absolutely no way this will happen by 2007, as it says in the article.

  5. Same old language barrier? by ddent · · Score: 3

    Well duh... sorry, that sounds rather america-centric. Do you really expect everyone else to learn english so you don't have to learn anything else?

    1. Re:Same old language barrier? by sql*kitten · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well duh... sorry, that sounds rather america-centric. Do you really expect everyone else to learn english so you don't have to learn anything else?

      Actually, yes I do. English speakers, whether or not that was the mother tongue of all the individuals involved, after all, developed practically all the technology involved. English is the lingua franca of international commerce. Air traffic control and hotel concierges all over the world speak English. Engineers in many disciplines use English terminology, even if the rest of their communication is in their native language, and international academic journals are published in English. Esperanto was a nice idea (I even learnt basic conversation in it once) but English, with maybe French (which I speak, altho' not fluently) or Spanish for backup, is the de facto common tongue, and will enable you to travel or to business almost anywhere in the world. Remember that English is not a static language, it freely adopts words and phrases from other languages as required. It can be both precise and expressive, as required.

      Maybe (relatively) few Chinese speak English, but relatively few Chinese even speak to non-Chinese at all. That country is not a cultural and linguistic "melting pot" like the US or UK, it is remarkably homogenous for such a large country. The question really is, will the Chinese become like us, or will they choose an isolationist policy? And don't forget, Chinese characters are available on computers at all because Western corporations decided that they should be - we are being as accomodating as we possibly can! If the Chinese want their own information infrastructure, they are free to create it for themselves - or they can choose to use ours, which we are making available freely. Why is America always the bad guy in cultural discussions?

      Besides, there are purely technical reasons why English is a "better" language than Chinese for computing - look at the numbers of characters in the alphabets, for example. English words are distinct, Chinese ideograms are much more dependent on context and the interpretation of the listener.

    2. Re:Same old language barrier? by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 4, Funny

      English is the lingua franca of international commerce

      I agree with you, but i find it kinda funny that you use a Latin phrase meaning "French language" to illustrate your point that English is top dog.

  6. More cock-yanking from California... by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 5, Insightful



    The idea that Chinese will be the predominant language on the web is absurd.

    China, despite recent moves towards a more open, capitalist society, has a problem that wont go away. Saw an interesting program on PBS a few months ago that discussed how China has changed in the past 50 years. Basically, you have a situation these days where the gap between the upper class and lower class is insanely wide. The wealthier segment of the population can often afford computers, internet access and the like, but this wealthier portion only makes up a tiny, tiny fraction of China's population. Meanwhile, the bulk of China's population are subsistance farmers who aren't allowed to even BE in (let alone conduct business in) China's main citiies. In most of these rural areas, electric power and indoor plumbing are considered high tech luxuries. Infact, China's national telecom infrastructure is considerably less extensive than most states in the U.S.

    China's on the move, yes, but they have a looooooooooooong long way to go before their influence on the Internet becomes anywhere near as large as Europe's or America's influence.

    Cheers,

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  7. Technology to the rescue by inkswamp · · Score: 3, Interesting
    And how is the Internet supposed to draw people together when the same old language barrier still exists?

    Give it time. On a Pink Floyd mailing list I subscribe to, one of the more prominent posters is an intriguing fellow from Japan who doesn't speak English and has published a book in Japan about the band. He posts through a piece of software that provides translations both ways. The software is primitive and far from perfect. Frankly, it can sometimes turn out some pretty puzzling results (I often wonder how my messages to him come out.) Despite that, I--and many others on the list--have gotten to know him and value his contribution. I can see the development of this kind of software becoming more and more worthwhile as the Internet moves east. I look forward to it actually.

    --Rick

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  8. Chinese as a second language? by Malc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There might be more people who can read Chinese as their first language than there are Anglophones... but what about the people who speak English or Chinese as their second language? I would say in that light that the internet would have more Anglophones using it.

    Can somebody clarify this for me: isn't English one of the main second languages in India. And isn't the population of India supposed to surpass that of China within the next 10 or 20 years?

  9. Fairly meaningless by MisterBlister · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Sure, Chinese may very well be the native language of most Internet users in 10 years, due to the giant size of the Chinese population, but any claims that this will cause some great shift in how the world uses the web is pretty silly.

    Numbers alone aren't significant, if they were Chinese (which, as the article points out, has so many speakers) would be the quasi-official language of multinational business, travel, etc..Right? But it isn't...English is. My point isn't to praise English (which in many ways is a very stupid language, technically), but just point out that the numbers only tell a very small part of the story. I won't even bother to point out that many of these Chinese speakers who get on the net will be in no position to contribute much to the global economy in terms of buying goods for import, etc, due to political and economical roadblocks.

  10. Half-on the internet by HalfFlat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Would you even consider the average wealthy Chinese citizen with online access truly 'on the Internet'?
    Would you consider the average Western individual with dial-up access 'on the Internet'?

    There really are two classes of Internet citizens: those who have a fixed IP and can be information sources; and those who have dynamic IPs or are forbidden to run servers, and are pretty much restricted to being information sinks. Sure it's an oversimplification, but the vast majority of people on the Internet through home-connections, are second-class Internet citizens.

    In Australia for example, it is significantly more expensive to be fully on the net - we're looking at 15 to 23 cents per received megabyte of data, and they're marketting megabytes (10e6 bytes). If one is happy with a proxied web service and a server-free presence, then for $80 a month one can download 3 gigabytes or more over ADSL.

  11. A little history lesson by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, after Mao died the Deng Xiaoping and his cohorts were pretty freaked out by what happened and they began to liberalize (in the British sense of the word... like free markets and the like) both economically (Deng actually had a slogan "It's not bad to get rich") and politically. But the Tiananmen Square massacre scared them shitless, especially when people other then students began to get involved. It was suppressed. And given the background (having experienced china in the 1940s and through Mao's crap... Deng had to endure a couple of struggle sessions himself) It's easy to see why they might have been afraid.

    The problem is that when China looked around them to see what was successful they saw the Authoritarian capitalist states like Singapore, Korea and Taiwan. And they figured that it worked well. Taiwan has become a real democracy now though.

    I think after the shock of Tiananmen wares off and things start to calm down again the restrictions will once again start to come off. Well I hope. Unlike Singapore, it's a pretty big country to hold with an iron fist.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  12. Yeh, well by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Look, you can learn what 'color' and 'font' mean without knowing the rest of it. And almost all localization schemes still allow you to type in the roman space.

    So while yeh, some things will be intuitive for English speakers, particularly things like APIs. while "font" might be easy javax.crypto.EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo (of course, Java does in fact allow Unicode for variable and class names, so you could have like .. as a package name).

    So, for a while I think most actual coding will be done in English, but that doesn't mean most website content will be. You could always have one web guy and one content guy as well. Or, for example you could use off the self software and fill it with localized content, (for example slashdot.jp).

    And lets not forget, Ruby, a programming language quickly gaining popularity was actually crated in Japan, where it's now more popular then Perl.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  13. Mathematically correct? by seebs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is unclear. Many many more Chinese speak English than other people speak Chinese. Just as Latin continued to be the main Church language, even in areas where it was not otherwise widely used, English may dominate on the internet whether or not the majority of current users are native English speakers.

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  14. India by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't forget India. (and Pakistan). Both have large English speaking populations (as a second language for a lot of people, though) India, in fact, uses English in the government. I'm not sure about Pakistan though.

    Of course, unlike the US, England, etc, India has lots of native languages as well.

    Oh, one other thing. All Chinese students need to have minimum competency in English in order to get into collage. More people may speak Chinese well, but English is really starting to become a sort of lingua fracia. Of course, soon enough instant translation will take over and the idea of learning another language will be a quaint little hobby.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  15. Perspective Via Elvis by Effugas · · Score: 5, Funny

    From: gascan@dcst16.pt (Bill Gascoyne)
    Newsgroups: talk.origins
    Subject: The dangers of extrapolation (was Re: Speed of Light

    A cautionary thought on the dangers of extrapolation.

    It is reported that in 1977 there were 37 Elvis impersonators in the world.
    In 1993 there were 48,000. At this rate, by the year 2010 one out of every
    three people in the world will be an Elvis impersonator.

    :-)

  16. According to Accenture, it will... but earlier by DavidpFitz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Accenture -- formerly Andersen Consulting -- reckon this will happen by 2007. It's worth a read... especially the links at the bottom talking about cultural pollution (not necessarily in a negative sense!)

    They're not often wrong.

    The figures reckon that one billion people in China will be connecting to the Web by the year 2007. It sounds a it optomistic to me, and what exactly does "connecting to the web" mean. Someone who owns a PC and is connected... or just someone who uses a CyberCafe? I wonder if in China "people per IP" would be much higher than in Europe or America.

  17. No by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Informative

    The vast majority of computers in china use Qwerty keyboards. Then an intelligent layer between the raw input and the application converts it into Kanji or whatever. They even work on context (at least the Microsoft software I have does). so if you type in "shi" you might get 'is', but if you type in "shi jian" the first "shi" will be the word for 'time'.

    If you have a higher-end Nokia phone you know what that's like. You can type regular English on a 9 key keyboard and you only have to hit each key once. It's a rather weird feeling, but it works.

    Actually 'intelligent layers' are good enough that Trendy teens in Japan can actually type kanji on telephone keypads!

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  18. Chinese as english complexity by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Informative

    If there was an award for talking out of you're ass, you'd probably stand a good chance of winning. As an American studying Chinese, I can say almost certainly that Chinese is a far, far simpler language then English.

    Chinese, as far as I know (and I have had a couple of Chinese collegues), Chinese does not posses any of the advantages: it has a very large character set, a difficult prononciation with variations in how you pronounce a word and no easy to cathegorise grammar.


    Wrong, wrong wrong. I don't know exactly what you mean by 'easy to categories grammar' but Chinese grammar itself is much, much simpler then English grammar. There are regional differences in pronunciation of Chinese, just as there are regional differences in the way English is spoke. There are no changes due to grammar however. Every word has the same sound regardless of it's grammatical frame (unlike English with "drive, drove, driving driven," and worse "is, be, being, was"). Also, when using the Pin-Yin system of Romanization pronunciation is not difficult at all. Certainly not any more difficult that that of a Chinese person or any one else for that matter trying to speak English.

    Finally, Chinese characters are for the most part made from smaller characters and easily recognizable/memorable subcomponents. Writing and remembering characters is like spelling on a grid rather then on a straight line. Writing and memorizing them isn't difficult at all once you get the hang of it.

    Of course, getting them into computers has been a problem in the past, but, modern technology has allowed their use pretty much without problems.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  19. Language Barrier by phillymjs · · Score: 3, Funny

    And how is the Internet supposed to draw people together when the same old language barrier still exists?"

    Because on the Internet, we can communicate through the universal language of pr0n. Well, unless you're in one o' them loser countries that filters it out.

    ~Philly

  20. English in China by alexalexis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Because of the massive movement in China to teach it's children English, there have been a few estimates that say there will be more English speakers in China than there are in North America and Europe combined, by the year 2010.

    After traveling around China, I'm somewhat skeptical ... but I can pretty much guarantee that the majority of people with Internet connections will have basic English skills. Only the priviledged and educated classes have regular access to computers, and that's a pretty miniscule percentage of the Chinese population.

    As a slightly off topic side node, what really surprised me about China was the lack of Communism. Sure, there's a good amount of government subsidising, but it's basically the same as it is in the United States ... only the people doling out the cash seem to band together and spend all the money in one place at a time .. like Bejing, for the upcoming olympics in 2008. It's basicaly a capitalistic, entrepenurial country, and it won't surprise me if the Internet floodgates spring open in the next five years.

  21. Transparent Babelfish, Stupid by Saeger · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Even if Chinese did become the predominate online language in a decade, so what?

    It's a virtual certainty that before 2010 most operating systems -- including the one in your "phone" -- will have a language translation module built-in, enabling anyone to communicate with anyone else in their native spoken and written language (if for no other reason, it's good for business).

    "Universal Translators" are hardly science fiction...

    --

    --
    Power to the Peaceful