Looking Ahead at GNOME 2
Able writes "This is a good article that will teach you how to use the new and improved libraries available with GNOME 2 so that you can write your own Nautilus view, and panel applets. It also provides you with the understanding to compile a few sample GTK+ 2 programs that will give you a good understanding of GTK+ 2's many improvements over GTK+ 1."
While they are working on basic AntiAliasing, you should try out ClearType. It improves font quality up to 800% on LCD screens. The antialiasing level is also adjustable... One caveat: you need WinXP to run it...
GTK widgets are pretty, sure, but i don't see how they've improved the usefulness of the X Window System any. i can't think of any way in which GTK has enriched the X experience beyond Athena or Motif widgets. does X really need 1000 faces?
Can we please finish Gnome 1 before moving on to Gnome 2?
Then rewrite everything again when Mono is ready...
I love Gnome so much...
GNOME team is out of focus. Its development is very very slow. Not much stuff has changed. The differences will be very few.
Like said in a post, it's too little to consider a 10 years work. GNOME is always difficult to install from source. Hundreds of dependencies and packages.
Would be better if they did arrange the packaging in a better way:
gnome2-gui.tar.bz2 (4MB)
gnome2-extra.tar.bz2 (4MB)
gnome2-libs.tar.bz2 (5MB)
gnome2-core.tar.bz2 (9MB)
gnome2-applications.tar.bz2 (9MB)
gnome2-addons.tar.bz2 (3MB)
Hmmm... Looks much more organized. Lots of packages merged into "gui" like gtk+, glib, pango, etc.
In "extra" we have the stuff like esound, audiofile, etc.
And so on... forget the hassle to download all the 60 tarballs. Just download one single tarball, untar/ungzip it and start compiling!
But yet, GNOME as it is, is unorganized for real.
As a developer, I found the article sad. It's like going back at least 5 years, to the days when people used to use C. Somebody ought to tell these guys that the rest of the world has migrated to C++.