Cringely's 2002 Predictions
An anonymous reader submitted Cringley's
2002 predictions. Nothing totally
unexpected: XML will explode (hasn't it already?) and Microsoft will
keep their mits in every big deal in the tech industry. Other stuff
too, like the return of VCs and IPO frenzies (yawn), and that Rich
Media won't quite make it yet in 2002.
2001's predictions
he might be 70% right on the obvious stuff, but his stock predictions are 0% right, so I won't take any notice of the new ones
Mmmmmmm
All of our inter-application communications and middleware uses XML. It makes it much easier to code new applications without knowing the people who coded the old ones. :-)
I'm not implying that there's no problems with raw sockets, any time that you give users a higher-gauge shotgun (in the form an OS) aimed at their foot, you're causing more problems.
However, the solution is not to remove raw sockets, it's to (a) forcibly educate the users, such as making them run through a tutorial on first-boot from a PC, or (b) lock down the system, instead of leaving it open, like MS typically does.
I'm definitely sure there will be WinXP DDoS attacks, I know enough about network security and the like to think there won't be, but it'll be nowhere near the catastrophic levels predicted by Gibon, Cringley, and groupies.
Gawyn
Freedom of Speech?
Not really -- Covad filed what is known as a prepackaged bankruptcy (http://www.latimes.com/business/la-000064425aug08 .story) , where the debt holders have already agreed to trade some or all of their debt for equity and some cash, reducing the amount of debt service the company had to support. From where I'm sitting, there was no question that Covad would reemerge from bankruptcy.
It's Linux, damnit! Pay no attention to renaming attempts by self-aggrandizing blowhards.
Just about every ISP worth the money you pay per month does this. I'm not sure how many ISPs do filter, but it's a very simple, one line addition to the Cisco routers, to check to see if the source IP is within it's IP pool. If not, then you can either discard and ignore the packets, or discard and flag them, based on repeat offenders, and from there, track down which user is sending them and inform them of this.
Gawyn
Freedom of Speech?
A DDoS attack is damaging, either spoofed or non-spoofed, but Gibson's main premise is that, with the inclusion of raw sockets into WinXP, spoofed DDoS attacks will conquer the internet, be untraceable and unblockable, and generally bring around the end of the world as we know it.
For more info on paranoia, read here. Then, before the marketing spin catches a hold of your soul, read here.
Gawyn
Freedom of Speech?