Slashdot Mirror


ZeoSync Makes Claim of Compression Breakthrough

dsb42 writes: "Reuters is reporting that ZeoSync has announced a breakthrough in data compression that allows for 100:1 lossless compression of random data. If this is true, our bandwidth problems just got a lot smaller (or our streaming video just became a lot clearer)..." This story has been submitted many times due to the astounding claims - Zeosync explicitly claims that they've superseded Claude Shannon's work. The "technical description" from their website is less than impressive. I think the odds of this being true are slim to none, but here you go, math majors and EE's - something to liven up your drab dull existence today. Update: 01/08 13:18 GMT by M : I should include a link to their press release.

1 of 989 comments (clear)

  1. Re:how can this be? by sprag · · Score: 2, Troll

    >With truly random data [random.org] there's no pattern to find, assuming you're looking at a large enough sample

    How big is a 'large enough sample'? Seems the larger the sample, the more likelyhood of getting longer matches.

    However, given 10 bytes from random.org: 39, 233, 196, 127, 220, 228, 10, 146, 60, 68.
    Strung together as binary they come out as:

    00100111 11101001 11000100 01111111 11011100 11100100 00001010 10010010 00111100 01000100

    Lots of little patterns in there, providing you cross byte boundaries. 4 1's in a row happens 4 times. 3 zeroes in a row come up 7 times.'10' comes up 17 times. '100' comes up 12 times. '0100' comes up 8 times.

    Can this be encoded in a way that takes less than 10 bytes? Don't know. Don't care really, but there are patterns in there.