Slashdot Mirror


No Solaris 9 for x86

Jon writes: "Unsurprisingly, LinuxWorld is reporting that Sun is not going to support Solaris 9 on PCs. The article cites a marketing suit who claims that the prevailing economic conditions account for this."

5 of 272 comments (clear)

  1. Heh by mESSDan · · Score: 2, Funny
    Sun gave developers their first peak...

    Now, is this just a typing error, or is Sun *that* good? ;)

    Me, I must've peaked early.

    --

    -- Dan
  2. Users not pleased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    What I gathered, especially from the register article, is that at least some of the vast numver users of x86 Solaris were not pleased at all. Appearently one had even put up a protest web site. I wonder if the other two also objected.

  3. Re:No proprietary unices left on x86 by jsse · · Score: 5, Funny

    Time to celebrate that opensource has finally conquered x86. Where are the free beers we always talk about?

  4. Re:No proprietary unices left on x86 by envelope · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just because win2K == NT5.0 doesn't mean that Win2K isn't more mature than NT4.

    Because it is "just a version update" doesn't mean that it hasn't matured, i.e., is more stable and has more features.

    However, this is off topic.

    I do think that it is a shame that solaris will no longer be available, as I was hoping to download it for one of my old machines. Now I'll have to convince my wife we need a Sparc...

    --

    appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars
  5. It's on you! by Da+VinMan · · Score: 3, Funny

    You said it first, so you buy the first round.

    Now, how many folks read /.?

    Rough luck being you. ;+)

    --
    Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!