Linuxwatch Budget System of 2001
A reader writes "Linuxwatch.org has posted their Budget System of 2001 in response to LinuxHardware's 2001 System of the year. Boasting their system is 13% of the price and plenty of power for "normal users". Running at 1.4Ghz with 256MB RAM, it doesn't seem to bad for "normal users"(whatever that means)IMHO."
Oops, I thought they meant a watch running Linux at 1.4Ghz with 256MB RAM.
Booya! I'll take one of those.
"Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
on such a system, because that would explain why it's /.'d all to heck. ;)
No chance of a mirror, eh? How about a Google cache?
My sigs always suck.
Ah, the hidden cost of the Athlon: you need a $300 power supply. Or did you mean 300 W.. ;)
Speak truth to power.
Value not only refers to cost of the machine but the quality within.
That's why I buy Apple gear. But try explaining the concept of a price premium for value to a bunch of 1337 h@x0rs living in mom's basement, running a system cobbled together from CompUSA free-with-rebate parts, an untested bleeding edge kernel grafted onto the TurboLinux install from the CD they found in the dumpster behind Barnes and Noble's.
Yeah, I know, Flamebait. I've been at the cap too fucking long anyway.
--saint
Exactly. That's why I ditched my full tower case for this three-foot cube (the black and blue version which is a spank ass queen in person). It cost $200, but I'm the only one on my block that has one. And when I bring women home with me and they cry out "Good God, what is that jet-engine sounding ottoman-sized monolith sitting next to your desk!?!," it's worth every penny.
--All your stolen base are belong to Rickey Henderson